Is neither morally nor ethically challenging.

Was the following: -

May 4th 1970
May 15th 1970

& all the relevant dates since then.

They were murder.

Thank you. Coming from a retired police officer that was quite refreshing.

NOW, would you care to tell us WHY no one was charged & imprisoned for said murders?

Can you tell us where is the difference between the answer to that question & Ping Pong II?

So you arrested fellow officers, good for you as we all know the USA follows the rule of law.

SO why are you now advocating murder?

Is your rule of law for America ONLY?

Ah so you agree that the world should turn a Hollywood Sci-Fi film into reality?

Hmm....

You start down that road, where does it end?

If you start, what is to stop someone taking you out?

You start down that road, where does it end?

If you start, what is to stop someone taking you out?

You are correct. But...

Then we accept the unacceptable threat to murder millions of innocent and their children over speech.

As I have repeatedly posted. All options carry the seeds of disaster.

Not necessarily so. The world suffered that threat for 45 years, Nothing happened. WHAT makes you so sure that Ping Pong II is stupid enough to launch an attack against you?

If so sure, provide proof!

A war of words does not constitute proof.

So the "Cold War" escaped your notice?

The "Cuban Crisis" escaped your notice?

The massive military permanently stationed in West Germany escaped your notice? Wait...
...scrub that, you have already told us that you were stationed there.

Hmm, it seems for some that there are massive gaps in history.

JFK... Any missile launched... Response to an action, not speech.

Trump... Any missile launched or nuclear bombs exploded... Response to an action, not speech.

Kim... Any speech...

Quite correct, but there is a flaw in your post...
..what action has Kim taken asides from words that scare some Americans that his murder is required?

When a person on the street, who has murdered many.

Why is he on the streets? I thought you operated a "3 strikes & you're out" policy?

No it does not.

Let me postulate the following:

When a person on the street, who has previously murdered many.

What action has Kim taken against the USA? Words do not count.

When a person on the street, who has previously murdered many. Is now loading a more powerful gun. And is repeatedly saying he will murder anyone whose speech he does not like.

Who would not accept that he is a real danger to others?

Not a good compassion.

Kim so far has not attacked other countries and killed their citizens, he has stayed at home.

Kim is not "on the street" he is in his own house, he has killed all his family and as you approach he says come one step closer and I will open fire.

So what do you do.

Or he says I will shoot, from inside my house, anyone outside of my house. And the streets are crowded.

But that has been happening in the US for years & the shooter got away with murder.

When people see that, it makes one wonder why those very same shooters are interfering with another nation.

Are the shooters scared that they will end up murdered?

When a person on the street, who has previously murdered many. Is now loading a more powerful gun. And is repeatedly saying he will murder anyone whose speech he does not like.

Who would not accept that he is a real danger to others?

Not a good compassion.

Kim so far has not attacked other countries and killed their citizens, he has stayed at home.

Kim is not "on the street" he is in his own house, he has killed all his family and as you approach he says come one step closer and I will open fire.

So what do you do.

Or he says I will shoot, from inside my house, anyone outside of my house. And the streets are crowded.

Exactly so, you back away and negotiate, as how do you know all the people inside the house are actually dead, you don't, but you don't have a clear shot at him, so you would suggest an RPG to destroy the house?

Sad. Murder simply because someone might murder. Thought police. Disgusting and deplorable!

What happened to a man's home is his castle?

A man is in his own home. Bully cuts his home in half an puts up a dividing wall. Bully sees him in his window and screams to the entire world he is the axis of evil. Man sees bully attack and kill another he called an axis of evil. Bully stages war games just outside his home on how to attack his home. Bully screams he will totally destroy him.
Is the man in the home justified in telling the bully to back off? Is he justified in building weapons to assure MAD?

Sometimes, one just has to laugh at a bully.

I can't stop the best laughing thought I've had for some time.

"America, you've been tangoed"

If one can't get that... use Youtube to find "You've been tangoed"

Again, if we were to follow CLYDE's logic, then violently getting rid of a countries President, because he neglects his job of protecting about 4 million of his citizens, causing them extreme hardship and maybe worse, by pursuing his hobby most w/ends. Might just be a good idea to some, not a policy I might support, but I do see it could solve a lot of problems.

Yep

---

Okay just for you, back on subject: -

WHAT action has Kim taken against the USA that warrants your suggestion that he be killed?

Okay just for you, back on subject: -

WHAT action has Kim taken against the USA that warrants your suggestion that he be killed?

Pledged no first use is all that presently comes to mind.

edit for those unfamiliar with the policy:- wiki

And the worrying thing is this: -
"China has also consistently called on the United States to adopt a no-first-use policy, to reach an NFU agreement bilaterally with China, and to conclude an NFU agreement among the five nuclear weapon states. The United States has repeatedly refused these calls."

China has also publically stated that if North Korea is attacked 1st, they'll interfere, if North Korea attacks the USA 1st, they will remain neutral.

So "Mr Tango" himself is the one doing all the incitement & his fellow Americans like Clyde wants Ping Pong II killed.

During the 70's Britain was the laughing stock of Europe. Since January 20th 2017 & for the next 40 months, America is now the laughing stock of the world.

Therefore, one can't help but feel sorry for Yanks such as Clyde.

Stop laughing Sirius

What would you do to insure he doesn't kill millions of innocents?

Give me a friggin' break. There is no assurance of anything in this one.

If Kim shoots at us or our friends first we will blow him and his off the face of the earth and take what comes after that. Our history shows that. Har

---

...