China / Spratly Islands

Message boards : Politics : China / Spratly Islands
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30651
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1772315 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 3:15:04 UTC

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2016/0317/Argentina-sinks-Chinese-fishing-vessel-after-chase-on-high-seas
Tension has risen between Argentina and China this week after the Argentinian coast guard sank a Chinese trawler fishing illegally in the Latin American country's waters.

The coast guard warned operators on board the Lu Yan Yuan Yu 010 trawler before firing warning shots and engaging in a high seas chase into international waters. The altercation took place off the coast of Puerto Madryn, about 907 miles south of Buenos Aires.

ID: 1772315 · Report as offensive
Profile James Sotherden
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 May 99
Posts: 10436
Credit: 110,373,059
RAC: 54
United States
Message 1772346 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 5:23:27 UTC

As I am not versed in maritime law. I would think it was legal to Pursue said vessel into international waters.
I somehow think China would have done the same to any vessel doing something underhanded in their waters.
China is starting to flex it muscles.
[/quote]

Old James
ID: 1772346 · Report as offensive
JLDun
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 06
Posts: 573
Credit: 196,101
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1772499 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 21:50:02 UTC - in response to Message 1772346.  

What I didn't notice in the article was where the chase started... just that the bulk of the action seemed to take place at the mentioned 907 miles..

(And I was going to say more on that, but I decided to check Wikipedia first. Their International Waters page didn't post a definite limit for 'waters outside of national control', but did state that any nation can pursue 'universal justice' on the open seas. Oh well.)
ID: 1772499 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30651
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1772506 - Posted: 18 Mar 2016, 22:26:31 UTC - in response to Message 1772499.  

What I didn't notice in the article was where the chase started... just that the bulk of the action seemed to take place at the mentioned 907 miles..

(And I was going to say more on that, but I decided to check Wikipedia first. Their International Waters page didn't post a definite limit for 'waters outside of national control', but did state that any nation can pursue 'universal justice' on the open seas. Oh well.)

Google is your friend
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/15/americas/argentina-chinese-fishing-vessel?sr=nl_5things_argentinachinesefishing%20vessel
The incident began Monday near Puerto Madryn, Argentina, the coast guard said, within the 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone off the country's coast.

ID: 1772506 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Politics : China / Spratly Islands


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.