can someone please look at my numbers...

Message boards : Number crunching : can someone please look at my numbers...
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Gerry

Send message
Joined: 29 May 15
Posts: 84
Credit: 4,956,983
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 1766865 - Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 10:10:51 UTC

2 PC's .. 1 with 2 280x's and 1 with 2 290x's ..all running 1 WU each for now and latest vulkan beta drivers on both. no cpu crunching at all


when i look at my tasks the 280x is getting WU's of 120,000gflop and finishing in 10mins or so.. 290x is getting 20,000gflop WU's and finishing in 6-8mins. if i look in the individual tasks it shows peak speed 10,500gflops on 280x and 3,500gflops on my 290x's ....something is wrong here is it not?? i dont really understand this stuff..just doesn't look right to me
ID: 1766865 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34258
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1766871 - Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 11:10:53 UTC

Looks normal to me.
Dont worry about those GFlops values.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1766871 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1766889 - Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 15:14:52 UTC

Your 290x MB times look very similar to my 390x times. Also the only tuning parameters I'm using are: -hp -cpu_lock
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1766889 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34258
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1766895 - Posted: 22 Feb 2016, 16:04:04 UTC - in response to Message 1766889.  
Last modified: 22 Feb 2016, 16:05:19 UTC

Your 290x MB times look very similar to my 390x times. Also the only tuning parameters I'm using are: -hp -cpu_lock


Your 390 has 80 MHZ higher core speed.
Of course its faster in particular.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1766895 · Report as offensive
Gerry

Send message
Joined: 29 May 15
Posts: 84
Credit: 4,956,983
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 1767138 - Posted: 23 Feb 2016, 16:30:46 UTC - in response to Message 1766895.  

both 290x are also overclocked to 1150/1400
both 280x's are overclocked to 1130/1600
ID: 1767138 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1767158 - Posted: 23 Feb 2016, 22:39:05 UTC - in response to Message 1767138.  

both 290x are also overclocked to 1150/1400
both 280x's are overclocked to 1130/1600

My 390x is running at its factory clock. 1080MHz / 1500MHz
My i5-4760K is overclocked from 3.4GHz to 4.0GHz

I'm running 0 tasks on CPU & 1 task per GPU. Also I'm using Cat 15.7.1.

I did test overclocking my 390x to 1134MHz / 1575MHz (5%) but I didn't see any gain in doing so compared to the increase in power.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1767158 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : can someone please look at my numbers...


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.