I would say that the most important thing is the number of wus per host per day. As far as I am aware it is widely regarded that HT enabled is the way to run a machine with HT ability. The number of wus per host per day with HT will be 25 - 30% more than with HT disabled. However the time per wu will be longer for the reasons explained further down this thread, L2 cache etc..

Dunc

---

> I would say that the most important thing is the number of wus per host per
> day.....

I totally agree ;-)

---

A loooong time ago: First Credits after SETI@home Restart

Well my experiment results are in. Since I can't switch it off, I did an experiment like I did with Seti Driver. I compared one process versus 2 processes and one unit ran in about 3 hours while 2 ran in 4 to 4:15. So basically, 2 processes run slower per process, however will yield more results per day, just like the old Seti. Either 8 per day or 12 per day.

Running 2 doesn't seem to slow me down much.

---

<img src="http://www.setisynergy.com/images/stats/197876sah.png"></img>