Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks

Message boards : Number crunching : Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 . . . 120 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1704428 - Posted: 23 Jul 2015, 22:58:35 UTC - in response to Message 1704426.  

how come nobody complains when their rac shoots upward


It's a useful engineering thing, to complain when something broke
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1704428 · Report as offensive
woohoo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 972
Credit: 165,671,404
RAC: 5
United States
Message 1704430 - Posted: 23 Jul 2015, 23:04:40 UTC

oh i understand the value of feedback, in fact i should probably complain more but most of the time i'm too indifferent to speak up
ID: 1704430 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1704431 - Posted: 23 Jul 2015, 23:11:18 UTC - in response to Message 1704430.  
Last modified: 23 Jul 2015, 23:11:39 UTC

oh i understand the value of feedback, in fact i should probably complain more but most of the time i'm too indifferent to speak up

Well for people like me, consider it a philanthropic effort. Every complaint I get i can try to find a way to make something better.
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1704431 · Report as offensive
woohoo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 972
Credit: 165,671,404
RAC: 5
United States
Message 1704442 - Posted: 23 Jul 2015, 23:29:49 UTC

for every complaint there's probably at least a dozen others who have the same problem but have chosen to stay silent. silence doesn't solve most problems
ID: 1704442 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1704455 - Posted: 23 Jul 2015, 23:51:54 UTC - in response to Message 1704442.  

for every complaint there's probably at least a dozen others who have the same problem but have chosen to stay silent. silence doesn't solve most problems


Give ém the pickle!
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1704455 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1704473 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 1:07:24 UTC - in response to Message 1704426.  

how come nobody complains when their rac shoots upward

When you are shot out of a cannon you don't worry about how high you are going until you start to come back down.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1704473 · Report as offensive
woohoo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 972
Credit: 165,671,404
RAC: 5
United States
Message 1704478 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 1:30:38 UTC

yes, nobody complained about the nexus
ID: 1704478 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1704480 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 1:54:56 UTC - in response to Message 1704478.  

yes, nobody complained about the nexus


My nexus7 and nexus9 both rock for sure. Nothing works on them yet for seti, but I still love them.
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1704480 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 1704547 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 7:16:59 UTC - in response to Message 1704480.  
Last modified: 24 Jul 2015, 7:19:28 UTC

yes, nobody complained about the nexus


My nexus7 and nexus9 both rock for sure. Nothing works on them yet for seti, but I still love them.

My Older 2012 Nexus 7 with the Nvidia Tegra chipset runs Seti fine, just three up through,

My 2012 HTC One S hates running Seti, I think it's something to do with the Qualcomm snapdragon processor/the ondemand scaling governor they share (with the 2013 Nexus 7 I mean),
I get them impression the CPU clocks down on it's own, it only project it could run without problem was albert, but even then it would error tasks occasionally.

Claggy
ID: 1704547 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1704624 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 13:47:20 UTC - in response to Message 1704480.  

yes, nobody complained about the nexus


My nexus7 and nexus9 both rock for sure. Nothing works on them yet for seti, but I still love them.

I could be mistaken, but I think woohoo was referring to the nexus of ones RAC, or perhaps they meant the apex?
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1704624 · Report as offensive
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1704625 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 13:49:52 UTC - in response to Message 1704624.  

yes, nobody complained about the nexus


My nexus7 and nexus9 both rock for sure. Nothing works on them yet for seti, but I still love them.

I could be mistaken, but I think woohoo was referring to the nexus of ones RAC, or perhaps they meant the apex?


Probably... in my own world sometimes ;)
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 1704625 · Report as offensive
woohoo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 972
Credit: 165,671,404
RAC: 5
United States
Message 1704671 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 16:27:18 UTC

Only a Star Trek thing
ID: 1704671 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1704692 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 18:10:43 UTC - in response to Message 1704671.  

Only a Star Trek thing

So option C. It was!
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1704692 · Report as offensive
Profile Cliff Harding
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 99
Posts: 1432
Credit: 110,967,840
RAC: 67
United States
Message 1704743 - Posted: 24 Jul 2015, 22:50:02 UTC - in response to Message 1704145.  

This is the current status As of 22 Jul 2015, 21:10:04 UTC. When I did the original post on this, the "total available channels on disk" was either 503 or 504, I can't remember which one. I may be wrong, but the total available channels on a disk does not change, while splitting files on that disk. If that is indeed the case, then the disk currently being worked is in fact a new disk. If my perspective on this is incorrect, then this senile old man deeply apologies.

total available channels on disk: 420 0
channels in progress: 7 0
channels done: 39 0
channels ended in error: 0 0
total channels to do: 374 0

'On disk' means "in currently accessible storage" - the server disk array where data is stored while being work on.

So, there's no "new disk" involved, just a number of image files stored 'on disk'. When an image file is completely split, the working copy is deleted from local storage, and the total number of channels reduces by 14.


Is there any way to make the "total available channels on disk' static as to when the complete initial loading of the array occurs, that way we see a more accurate accounting of the "channels done" & "total channels to do", also changing the wording from "disk" to maybe "disk array"? Instead of reducing the total available, we increase the number of channels done by x amount, and the channels to do is decreased by 14, which you stated is the amount that is currently being reduced from the total available. This way when one checks the status, we see get a more accurate accounting of what was initially loaded, the total number of channels already split, and the total number of channels remain to split.


I don't buy computers, I build them!!
ID: 1704743 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1704980 - Posted: 25 Jul 2015, 17:24:01 UTC - in response to Message 1704743.  

This is the current status As of 22 Jul 2015, 21:10:04 UTC. When I did the original post on this, the "total available channels on disk" was either 503 or 504, I can't remember which one. I may be wrong, but the total available channels on a disk does not change, while splitting files on that disk. If that is indeed the case, then the disk currently being worked is in fact a new disk. If my perspective on this is incorrect, then this senile old man deeply apologies.

total available channels on disk: 420 0
channels in progress: 7 0
channels done: 39 0
channels ended in error: 0 0
total channels to do: 374 0

'On disk' means "in currently accessible storage" - the server disk array where data is stored while being work on.

So, there's no "new disk" involved, just a number of image files stored 'on disk'. When an image file is completely split, the working copy is deleted from local storage, and the total number of channels reduces by 14.


Is there any way to make the "total available channels on disk' static as to when the complete initial loading of the array occurs, that way we see a more accurate accounting of the "channels done" & "total channels to do", also changing the wording from "disk" to maybe "disk array"? Instead of reducing the total available, we increase the number of channels done by x amount, and the channels to do is decreased by 14, which you stated is the amount that is currently being reduced from the total available. This way when one checks the status, we see get a more accurate accounting of what was initially loaded, the total number of channels already split, and the total number of channels remain to split.

I think what you basically want would be for completed data sets to not be removed automatically once they are finished being split. If you wanted the completed data sets to only be removed once new data was added that wouldn't serve your purpose either. Some data sets can be completed while new ones are still being loaded by the system. It is more of a continuous stream of data & more is added when it starts to get low. In the past data was added more often than once a week or two. I seem to recall that new data was added for 3 or 4 days in a row previously, but that may have been when they had more time on their hands.
They could change the display name, but in computer terms "disk", or sometimes disc, is a generic term to refer to any storage medium. In a RAID array it is common to divide the volume into separate "disks". Depending on the complexity of the RAID controller it may also be also to define which individual drives are assigned to which virtual disk.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1704980 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1705430 - Posted: 27 Jul 2015, 0:22:46 UTC

With "only" 120 channels of MBs left to split we may see fresh APs in the next 24 hrs.
ID: 1705430 · Report as offensive
Profile Cliff Harding
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Aug 99
Posts: 1432
Credit: 110,967,840
RAC: 67
United States
Message 1705560 - Posted: 27 Jul 2015, 11:52:51 UTC

Over the last 3 days I've gotten 14 -- 12 w/ _2 & 2 w/ _3 suffixes, time for a 2nd or 3rd opinion (thus adding my 2 cents on the tasks (sic)). I'll take anything and everything I can get at this point. The first one isn't due until 8/18 and in the mean time I keep sucking up MB tasks like a Hoover vacuum and jumping the queue while the AP tasks sit on the side line again.


I don't buy computers, I build them!!
ID: 1705560 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1705653 - Posted: 27 Jul 2015, 17:02:46 UTC

10 channels of APs are being split hopefully more will come.
ID: 1705653 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1705690 - Posted: 27 Jul 2015, 18:26:32 UTC

Aw shucks....
A new AP run, and I have over half the farm shut down all week due to the heat here.

Meowsigh.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1705690 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1705691 - Posted: 27 Jul 2015, 18:27:48 UTC

Now it is up to 42 channels to split and 6 splitters are running, this is starting to be a nice little run.
ID: 1705691 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 . . . 120 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.