Panic Mode On (93) Server Problems?

Author	Message
Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 1617487 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 19:01:30 UTC - in response to Message 1617479. OK, this is crap: 12/22/2014 1:49:07 PM \| SETI@home \| Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 12/22/2014 1:49:07 PM \| SETI@home \| Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks sent 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for SETI@home Enhanced 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for AstroPulse v6 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for AstroPulse v7 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress On this machine, with 2 GTX 780s (merrily doing Einstein with share 0 at the moment), my limit is 200, but I have ZERO SETI WUs for the GPU, and I get the above. Being out of work is one thing. But this message? WTF????. Run a smaller cache, so you don't try to cache 200 CPU tasks at once. ID: 1617487 ·

WezH Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95	Message 1617495 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 19:18:20 UTC Now SSP shows that marvin is up again. And lando is doing it's job splitting MB units. Now we have to wait to AP splitters to run again. "Please keep Your signature under four lines so Internet traffic doesn't go up too much" - In 1992 when I had my first e-mail address - ID: 1617495 ·

Jimbocous Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1853 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349	Message 1617518 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 20:01:37 UTC - in response to Message 1617516. Last modified: 22 Dec 2014, 20:05:45 UTC Three AP splitters running.... Expect work any year now. Up to 7 now ... ID: 1617518 ·

TBar Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768	Message 1617528 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 20:19:26 UTC - in response to Message 1617519. Three AP splitters running.... Expect work any year now. Up to 7 now ... That was a bold move. Let's hope marvin can cope with it... You should be more positive. Here's a little something to help you out, Don't Worry Be Happy. ID: 1617528 ·

betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66	Message 1617538 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 20:34:07 UTC - in response to Message 1617518. Three AP splitters running.... Expect work any year now. Up to 7 now ... Let the feast begin. ID: 1617538 ·

Dena Wiltsie Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Apr 01 Posts: 1628 Credit: 24,230,968 RAC: 26	Message 1617574 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 21:57:58 UTC - in response to Message 1617563. Those 4 splitters that are doing unspeakable things to each other on the same AP file (03se14ad, really hampers the production of AP work. I wish they would get themselves a hotel room instead :-) Edit: Oops, Marvin is disabled again.... AP splitters RED. We're in code RED again. Computers have no shame!!! ID: 1617574 ·

betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66	Message 1617592 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 22:31:00 UTC Well they be splitting APs but I've not got any yet. ID: 1617592 ·

Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13	Message 1617616 - Posted: 22 Dec 2014, 23:44:32 UTC Have we been able to determine if the AP creation rate that shows on the SSP is actually the real value, or is that still a left-over for v6? I know some of the values got updated to v7 after the DB rebuild, but I don't recall if ALL of the values eventually got switched-over. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) ID: 1617616 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 1617629 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 0:13:46 UTC - in response to Message 1617616. Have we been able to determine if the AP creation rate that shows on the SSP is actually the real value, or is that still a left-over for v6? I know some of the values got updated to v7 after the DB rebuild, but I don't recall if ALL of the values eventually got switched-over. I believe we've got the complete set showing v7 now. ID: 1617629 ·

TBar Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768	Message 1617660 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 3:27:53 UTC Ain't got no AstroPulse, MultiBeam is hard to get, Don't Worry...Be Happy. ID: 1617660 ·

David S Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12	Message 1617664 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 3:45:23 UTC - in response to Message 1617533. Three AP splitters running.... Expect work any year now. Up to 7 now ... That was a bold move. Let's hope marvin can cope with it... You should be more positive. Here's a little something to help you out, Don't Worry Be Happy. I am extremely positive thank you very much. When I am negative, you will notice the difference :-) Being positive: I just got my first AP, after marvin's crash: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1656823185 Sten gets very mellow when there's someone else to be annoyed for him. Meanwhile, I have a WU at Beta that's having a merry time of it. http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/workunit.php?wuid=6779328 My tablet is the inconclusive. There are four various errors, and two invalids that have the same signal counts as my tablet. I suppose I should post about it at Beta, but I feel like I'm more likely to get a response here. David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. ID: 1617664 ·

TBar Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768	Message 1617669 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 4:04:41 UTC - in response to Message 1617663. Ain't got no AstroPulse, MultiBeam is hard to get, Don't Worry...Be Happy. ...Still, it could be worse, we could be living in North Korea. Or you could be living in a country where you download a document from your Government, open it in Photoshop, and notice someone forget to flatten the document. Then you have to contemplate why someone would need to change such a document and the consequences of it being altered. Have you noticed the AP file with 3 splitters, and the file below it, hasn't made any progress since they started... ID: 1617669 ·

Grant (SSSF) Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304	Message 1617709 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 5:28:40 UTC - in response to Message 1617479. OK, this is crap: 12/22/2014 1:49:07 PM \| SETI@home \| Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 12/22/2014 1:49:07 PM \| SETI@home \| Requesting new tasks for CPU and NVIDIA 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks sent 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for SETI@home Enhanced 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for AstroPulse v6 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| No tasks are available for AstroPulse v7 12/22/2014 1:49:09 PM \| SETI@home \| This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress On this machine, with 2 GTX 780s (merrily doing Einstein with share 0 at the moment), my limit is 200, but I have ZERO SETI WUs for the GPU, and I get the above. Being out of work is one thing. But this message? WTF????. Reached the limit on tasks in progress is also the response you get when when requesting GPU work, but only VLARs are available. Grant Darwin NT ID: 1617709 ·

Grant (SSSF) Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304	Message 1617710 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 5:31:26 UTC - in response to Message 1617663. Ain't got no AstroPulse, MultiBeam is hard to get, Don't Worry...Be Happy. MB starting to flow in here now. AP not at all. Still, it could be worse, we could be living in North Korea. MB has increased in output, but it is still way down on what it should be. It should be 35+/s until the ready-to-send buffer is full. Apart from a couple of spikes over 30/s, it's struggling to reach 25/s. Grant Darwin NT ID: 1617710 ·

Josef W. Segur Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0	Message 1617719 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 6:16:17 UTC - in response to Message 1617664. ... Meanwhile, I have a WU at Beta that's having a merry time of it. http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/workunit.php?wuid=6779328 My tablet is the inconclusive. There are four various errors, and two invalids that have the same signal counts as my tablet. I suppose I should post about it at Beta, but I feel like I'm more likely to get a response here. That's one of the WUs with the unusual Autocorr parameters, and my host 10490 produced one of the results marked invalid. That was because the SaH v7 validation code immediately invalidates results which run to 100% completion without having a "best autocorr" in the result file. Joe ID: 1617719 ·

X-Files 27 Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 104 Credit: 111,191,433 RAC: 0	Message 1617748 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 8:15:56 UTC 12/23/2014 1:14:05 AM \| SETI@home \| Started download of 24oc14ad.26705.122814.438086664207.12.178 12/23/2014 1:14:05 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] URL: http://boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/download_fanout/18d/24oc14ad.26705.122814.438086664207.12.178 12/23/2014 1:14:05 AM \| SETI@home \| Started download of 24oc14ad.17827.143673.438086664206.12.80 12/23/2014 1:14:05 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] URL: http://boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/download_fanout/2b6/24oc14ad.17827.143673.438086664206.12.80 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] http op done; retval -107 (connect() failed) 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] http op done; retval -107 (connect() failed) 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] file transfer status -107 (connect() failed) 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| Temporarily failed download of 24oc14ad.26705.122814.438086664207.12.178: connect() failed 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| Backing off 00:55:44 on download of 24oc14ad.26705.122814.438086664207.12.178 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| [file_xfer] file transfer status -107 (connect() failed) 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| Temporarily failed download of 24oc14ad.17827.143673.438086664206.12.80: connect() failed 12/23/2014 1:14:49 AM \| SETI@home \| Backing off 01:44:33 on download of 24oc14ad.17827.143673.438086664206.12.80 12/23/2014 1:14:50 AM \| \| Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 12/23/2014 1:14:51 AM \| \| Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. ID: 1617748 ·

KWSN Ekky Ekky Ekky Send message Joined: 25 May 99 Posts: 944 Credit: 52,956,491 RAC: 67	Message 1617754 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 8:58:35 UTC Cricket collapse. N.Korea fighting back? ID: 1617754 ·

WezH Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95	Message 1617755 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 9:00:44 UTC Last modified: 23 Dec 2014, 9:32:40 UTC And SSP hasn't been updated since 7:40:04 UTC No downloads from here or Beta "Please keep Your signature under four lines so Internet traffic doesn't go up too much" - In 1992 when I had my first e-mail address - ID: 1617755 ·

Grant (SSSF) Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304	Message 1617763 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 9:54:11 UTC - in response to Message 1617755. Scheduler requests result in "No tasks available" message, and I've got several downloads queued up, but they won't even start to download. Something (or several somethings) have crashed. Grant Darwin NT ID: 1617763 ·

Aurora Borealis Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 14 Jan 01 Posts: 3075 Credit: 5,631,463 RAC: 0	Message 1617888 - Posted: 23 Dec 2014, 16:10:48 UTC One more hour should place Eric and Matt in the Colo. I'll be crossing my fingers that they find the right spot to tickle the servers to get them running properly again. ID: 1617888 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.