Well that went smooothly, can report a "percent blanked: 74.54" done in under 28 mins on a 670.
and a "percent blanked: 70.98" in ~32 min

edit} how was the high blanked outliers detected in version 6, because I have a Ver7 validated but not showing up in Application Details, "Number of tasks completed"

The Validator reads the amount of blanking which the application writes into the uploaded result file. That's in fraction blanked form. 0.1 or over is still considered a runtime outlier, because CPU applications now run considerably faster on tasks with significant blanking than on tasks with no blanking.

                                                                   Joe

It's been very strange that no official announcement has been made. *ponders?*

Cheers.

For those that might be interested (my first Nvidia v7 AP WU):

Task
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=3776536957


@Wiggo, not really. They have a tendency not to communicate very well with the volunteers.

cheers[/url]

---

Lionel, are you using commandlines? Just curious....

I actually had one validate on my DDR3 7750, Workunit 1612617361

You gotta love that 'score'. I saw a few of those in testing. It should 'normalize' after 11 completions...

Yes, there seem to be a few more being sent out at the moment. r2713/2721 seem to be running very well, no issues so far. Thank you to everyone involved in the development and testing.

Does anyone has available the links for the stock Linux APv7 applications, please? I understand Windows builds are the focus for the moment as the majority use that one, but I've never been able to successfully build my own Linux AstroPulse binaries.

---

Soli Deo Gloria

Lionel, are you using commandlines? Just curious....

yes, I am using an ap_cmdline_win..... file

and I have now added v7 AP to my app_info files for 3 of my puters (1 left to go) (only doing GPU application at the moment)

cheers

---

I have a question to add to all of this talk of new apps..

When we moved over to AP_v6, we were asked to run stock apps for a while so that the server-side estimates and credit balancing could get a proper baseline before going to anonymous platform.

Is that going to be the same case with v7?

As it turned out credit wasn't ever "balanced" so no really deep sence to continue that practice. Number of active stock hosts is high enough to not force few on anonymous (few regarding number of stock hosts) platform to force go to stock...

I've received a couple of AstroPulse v7 v7.03 (sse), and AstroPulse v7 v7.05 (opencl_nvidia_100) tasks, But no AstroPulse v7 7.04 (opencl_ati_100) tasks (yet) which is strange. Edit: a little later one is sent.

All AstroPulse v7 tasks for computer 5427475

Claggy

Glad to see you involved again!

The time estimate says 11:37:30 which is rather long ...

Mine is 12 days :)
But I know it will finish in ~2 h if run alone or ~3:30 if run along AstroPulse v6 (APv6 0.48 + APv7 0.51)

From BoincTasks:
7.04 astropulse_v7 (opencl_ati_100) ap_01au10ad_B1_P0_00088_20141009_18779.wu_2 - (-) 0.00 0.000    12d,03:42:56    03-11-2014 23:48 0.04C + 0.51ATI   Ready to start

Unfortunately, smooth estimations transition wasn't developed on beta and from beta to main. Each version update we will face same ridiculous estimations even if minor version number updates...

Looks like MACs with ATI HD4000 are having an issue with AP v7.
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1612643637
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1612659323

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6837987
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=6837987&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=20

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7327237
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7327237&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=20

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=5214945
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=5214945&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=20

Thanks for observation.
There are some non-fitments in what Apple's OpenCL runtime reports for HD4xxx device capabilities and how AMD treats such devices under other OSes.
Here I tried to explain what could be wrong:
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/forum_thread.php?id=2182&postid=52760

--

mike
I have just been to your site to see what you have put up and i'm not shore which one to download , ! I need the AP v7 but for AMD which ones or one do i download . I have Luna version 0.42 all ready installed
I also noticed that the cuda app is 42 and not 50 is there one for cuda 50 as i do have a Kepler chip .
Thank's

---

Astropulse V7 packages are now available on my website.

Please read included readme text carefully.

Link

Any CPU SSE or SSE2 available? If I'm not mistaken, only SSE3 is up there for CPU work right now? My apologies if I missed it.

@Zeus,

No, I just switched to ap7_win_x86_sse2_opencl_nv_r2721
Here is portion of app_info:

Just a heads-up that in your example, the second app_version plan_class is the same as the first one. Should be open_cl_nvidia_100 rather than cuda_open_cl_100, if I'm reading Mike's aistub correctly? As it reads right now, I think it's just a dupe ... Regards, Jim ..

---

Astropulse V7 packages are now available on my website.

Please read included readme text carefully.

Link

Any CPU SSE or SSE2 available? If I'm not mistaken, only SSE3 is up there for CPU work right now? My apologies if I missed it.

Here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/eb39ijd2czm32ev/AP7_win_x86_SSE_CPU_r2703.7z?dl=0

should be little faster than rev distributed as SSE x86 stock for Windows.
Regarding SSE2 - current build not faster than "stock" SSE2 x86 windows one so better to use it.

@Arkayn

I have them up on my site now as well.
http://www.arkayn.us/forum/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=cat105

Sorry for the duplicate question, as I don't know who's owning this. Any chance we'll see an SSE2 version of R2692 for those of us who lack SSE3 or AVX? Not sure I'll go back to doing any CPU work, but would be nice to have the option. Regards, Jim ...

Well that went smooothly, can report a "percent blanked: 74.54" done in under 28 mins on a 670.
and a "percent blanked: 70.98" in ~32 min

edit} how was the high blanked outliers detected in version 6, because I have a Ver7 validated but not showing up in Application Details, "Number of tasks completed"

The Validator reads the amount of blanking which the application writes into the uploaded result file. That's in fraction blanked form. 0.1 or over is still considered a runtime outlier, because CPU applications now run considerably faster on tasks with significant blanking than on tasks with no blanking.

                                                                   Joe

Thanks Joe,
But have to report that I am not seeing that. The high percentage blanking tasks are taking approx the same time as tasks with only a few percent blanking.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7006214&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=20

resultid=3776428437, percent blanked: 7.88, Run time 29 min 40 sec
resultid=3776428962, percent blanked: 83.09, Run time 28 min 45 sec

Well that went smooothly, can report a "percent blanked: 74.54" done in under 28 mins on a 670.
and a "percent blanked: 70.98" in ~32 min

edit} how was the high blanked outliers detected in version 6, because I have a Ver7 validated but not showing up in Application Details, "Number of tasks completed"

The Validator reads the amount of blanking which the application writes into the uploaded result file. That's in fraction blanked form. 0.1 or over is still considered a runtime outlier, because CPU applications now run considerably faster on tasks with significant blanking than on tasks with no blanking.

                                                                   Joe

Thanks Joe,
But have to report that I am not seeing that. The high percentage blanking tasks are taking approx the same time as tasks with only a few percent blanking.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7006214&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=20

resultid=3776428437, percent blanked: 7.88, Run time 29 min 40 sec
resultid=3776428962, percent blanked: 83.09, Run time 28 min 45 sec

Joe said about CPU app. You cite result for GPU app.

Any CPU SSE or SSE2 available? If I'm not mistaken, only SSE3 is up there for CPU work right now? My apologies if I missed it.

Here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/eb39ijd2czm32ev/AP7_win_x86_SSE_CPU_r2703.7z?dl=0

Wow, was that ever quick. Many thanks!!!
@Mike, @Arkayn, disregard.