Next, perhaps define the Universe itself and its possible or intended meaning when it comes to giving answers to a couple of questions.

The article about Cosmology in the Wikipedia could appear somewhat unclear, but is not the same thing quite clear or evident when it comes to a couple of other things?

I mentioned it earlier on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_string

No more here right now, but will give it a thought.

Really, it is supposed to be about microcosmos, including the Planck constant.

Finishing off for today, think of the scientist as being the possible stupid idiot.

Or possibly ambassador of sorts.

If I am not wrong, there could be some people around questioning the role or affairs of Dr. Oppenheimer when it comes to the development of the Atomic or nuclear Bomb during the Second World War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Robert_Oppenheimer

Oops, his name is Jason Robards (adding in his name here).

The first name above is about possible historical facts.

The second is about a given or imaginary event of facts which could be more related to that of fiction, rather than that of facts.

You probably know it already.

Using YouTube, next key in "Nuclear Holocaust".

Think of a pilot wearing a helmet and next he could be a possible hero.

At least one such picture from the cockpit of an F16 fighter plane, or the similar being available, or in front of me.

Why not start with such a thing like Electromagnetism if that of the Weak Nuclear Force could not be able to tell everything.

A ship going down in rough seas is no different from that of a plane going down in a similar way.

What next makes the possible difference between the "Commander of the Ship", or perhaps the pilot and the passenger which could be aboard and next enjoying the flight?

Could such a thing be said about the possible "Upper deck"?

Make it science if you will and next being able to unite or merge three of the major Forces of nature into a single Theory.

What an accomplishment and this time by scientists.

Speaking about UFO's, you next could be back at the subject of gravity for the lack of anything else.

Back tomorrow.

Mature audiences only.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nuclear+holocaust

Either it becomes angels in the sky and the possible belief in either God or the Devil, or it could be that above.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRWzNIaVyBs

Edit: Show me the Devil, will you.

If possible, the subject of science could in fact be able to do such a thing, even when excluding the possible notion of Religion and Faith.

Next, when possibly doing the same when it comes to the possible notion of God, why not the same when it comes to the Devil himself?

No personalities, by the way.

No science here, of course, only a personal meaning, or perhaps opinion of sorts and in fact I did not create this video.

Radiation syndrome . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=milbW4RDIco

No God, or even the Devil here, but what the heck else?

Edit: Watching the video, are you able to see either God or the Devil in all of this?

Earlier on I said "speaking of God", but should tell that I am watching the video right now and not yesterday.

Is the subject of possible Statistics that of possible accidents being part of life, or perhaps that of radiation which could be a similar part of nature, or that of a given transformation of matter into energy?

Speaking of possible fusion.

Some 7:40 and following in the mentioned YouTube clip or video.

Again, the mentioned "upper deck" makes no reference to anything else, so here I am still in the dark.

More to come.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjCA3zEbN-A

Is this supposed to be about possible Nuclear Holocaust?

Bah!

Here it should go.

Looking around.

Edit: Nuclear alert.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcJCLf-Uv74

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRWzNIaVyBs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=milbW4RDIco

I better have the rest of the day off.

Edit: The silly thing is that an escalation of possible events eventually leads to "The Day After".

Nothing else.

I will get back at it, because we should not forget that we also are sitting ducks in space.

Bad wording perhaps, but possibly true fact.

Back later.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRWzNIaVyBs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=milbW4RDIco

I better have the rest of the day off.

Edit: The silly thing is that an escalation of possible events eventually leads to "The Day After".

Nothing else.

I will get back at it, because we should not forget that we also are sitting ducks in space.

Bad wording perhaps, but possibly true fact.

Or perhaps I rather should have a look at War Games instead?

The fact is that except for ourselves, including the possible fate of our civilization if such a thing should ever happen, we are probably left with either the political, military, or possible science aspect when it comes to this.

Place a certain value on a thing of your possession and you most likely will not like if such a thing should break.

Ask a Politician about certain things and their eventual consequence and he or she would probably be able to tell you the reason for such a thing happening.

Next, ask a military man about the possible events which might next unfold and he probably will be able to tell you a given answer as well.

But a scientist could also be able to know that the Earth is a planet located in space and that our physical world makes such things possible.

Like an arm or a leg of your body, a precious inventory or furniture could be back of your property,

If such a thing breaks, you could be suffering a personal loss when it happens.

The question is that if it ever should happen, would it be the final solution or end when it comes to given things?

Look back at such things as natural ageing, as well as the remnants of neutron stars and Black Holes for possible answers to this question.

In fact, Jesus is being shown or portrayed as being our savior.

Next we could perhaps believe that God and the Devil should not be the same.

I mentioned salvation versus the purgatory earlier on.

Here a possible difference of opinion could be apparent or visible.

Getting back at it.

More later.

Needs the white background for better readability.

Please note that the following is based on a general knowledge about certain things as I happen to know it.

During my usual day, I do not usually fold my hands and pray.

Anyway, life is supposed to be life, what happens before or after is supposed to be either heaven or hell.

For those of us who have been taught religion through school or had to be attending church, there is some knowledge currently available.

This knowledge is related to the subject of religion and possible belief. It is not supposed to be of any specific scientific value if you happen to be either an agnostic or an atheist.

Here on Earth you may be asked to receive an absolution for your sins by a priest when it is supposed that you have been making any such sins. At least when it comes to the Catholic church.

There are faint stories from people experiencing near death experiences that they passed or went through a long, possibly dark tunnel before ending up seeing a very strong light which kind of blindfolded their ability to observe things as they supposedly were happening.

Ultimately when still alive here on Earth, you are getting old or possibly become the victim of an illness or an accident.

There are also stories being told that when you pass away, someone is picking you up and is following you on your way to heaven.

This could very well be an angel.

During this process, you may be able to re-live the life you had on Earth and recapitulate or sum up your wrongdoings as well as better-doings in everything that you were able to accomplish during your short lifespan.

In order to be able to get to heaven, there is an ultimate process of soul cleaning or ordeal needed which is called "purgatory".

As you certainly may know, the last name of Jesus was either Jesus Christ or possibly Jesus Christ from Nazareth.

By means of his name, he was supposed to be our "Saviour" or "Redeemer" in the name of God.

It was his sacrifice by means of crucifixion which ultimately created the posthumous reputation of spiritual reputation which is supposed to be the foundation or framework for our current way of belief.

A belief which is supposed to be all about God.

Here is the main point.

I could be both a scientist, but also kind of religious, or possibly a believer as well.

The native version is speaking about a possible resurrection and not necessarily only a purgatory.

Here I tend to disagree, because we should know that even though or while Jesus was not one of the disciples, he was in fact the son of God.

Make of such a thing as you will, if you like, but the process of Death among people could possibly include that of the purgatory.

Only this subject alone could be a possible heated discussion.

But next I do not believe in a similar resurrection among ordinary people, because this is not what it is all about.

Make Jesus what you think he could have been, but our destiny by means of becoming victims of a nuclear war or Holocaust is not the same as dying stars, including that of neutron stars and Black Holes in space.

A possible change of the levels of intelligence could be explained by means of either Laws of Nature, or perhaps those those which could give an explanation for evolution.

Both intelligence and conscience could be real facts, but such a thing like the Big Bang is only telling us about either Matter Creation, or possibly Creation Myth.

If such a thing like Genesis could be explained in the same context as Creation Myth, a similar thing could likely also be made for such a thing as Armageddon, or possible demise, but the fact is that if or when such a thing happens, we become both victims as well as observers ourselves and most likely forget about our place in nature.

Back tomorrow.

In the beginning...

I should have started up here, but you probably already know.

Should next tell that I am familiar with, or at least heard the name Erik Dammann.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Dammann

1987 Behind time and space

Should note that it could be more to it here.

Not hyperlinked and here it for the moment stops when it comes to my current knowledge.

This is a little bit sad, because I think there is something more here.

I possibly mentioned an old book having the title "Then it became light".

This book is a classic and is written by someone who knows quite much about astronomy.

But here I do not have the author and also the book is probably not with my parents anymore.

But is it not the fact that such a thing as Birth could be synonymous with possible Genesis and that of possible death could be or mean a similar Armageddon or demise?

Look at the Drake equation as being a Probability function or Equation when it comes to the possibility of intelligent life in nature?

If such a thing could be possible, what would Probability itself next be a part, subroutine, or function by means of belonging to?

A Coincidence could possibly be a better alternative here, but next such a thing as Casuality is being referenced.

Or possibly a given Paradox instead and still we supposedly are discussing phenomena related to nature.

Not forgetting the important subject of Statistics either.

Again, Behind Time and Space, as previously mentioned, but I do not have neither the author or the title available, or in front of me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUU-lf0zL9o

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superforce

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUU-lf0zL9o

You know, fractals, including the Mandelbrot set, versus the stupid story of the Bible.

If you for some reason could have a digital painting in front of you, it would still be a painting.

Watch the YouTube video.

Where is the direct relationship between the DNA in our blood or cells, including that of the nerve cells which supposedly makes up the nerve cells and the technology we supposedly are able to create at least with our hands and
possibly our creative mind as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection

The fact is that Biblical references are not supposed to be making any references to such things as Arithmetics and Logic,

While not forgetting the sometimes strange properties of water, we should not forget about the Fibonacci sequence either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_angle

The link just above became a wrong one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

The Golden ratio here and not the Golden Angle.

Ask me about the "Upper Deck" instead and perhaps someone else should be consulted instead.

Still, or despite such a fact, this is all supposed to be science and next you probably you could be questioning the possible mind rather than a given or similar knowledge for such a thing.

Speaking of God.

Is he perhaps stumbling on the words at times when becoming or getting eager?

In which way are scientists able to tell about the processes related to that of Birth and Death when not doing so in the context or notion of possible Religion and Faith?

Take an example from reality.

Apparently newly elect President Donald Trump apparently is thinking of throwing the money away in order to become a Politician, or perhaps leader of a Nation.

If so, possibly a good thing and also a brave choice, but what next?

When I previously wrote or mentioned the Drake equation, I quite likely ended up at referencing such an equation in the similar context as that of Probability.

This because the subject of Probability is next supposed to be a similar equation for such a thing.

This next implies that you both need to know what Probability means and also what is being meant with an Equation.

If I am not wrong, Probability could also be about the subject of Logic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUU-lf0zL9o

Did Albert Einstein ever mentioned the Mandelbrot set as such?

Slip the video by means of pausing, next rewinding and playing back once more.

For the small details, you really need to watch carefully here in order to possibly understand.

Next, look at the small details, including that of the fractals and the Mandelbrot set and you next could be able to understand the notion or principle of infinity as well.

If for some reason the Superforce was the possible divine separating with the forces of nature at the initial moment of the creation of the Universe by means of the Big Bang, not only is such a thing as Matter creation important or
essential to understand, but also that of Creation Myth, which could be about the possible Creator behind the Universe.

Does such a thing as Religion tell about the possible creation of the Universe?

Next, what is the possible difference between a Creator and that of creation itself.

Is it perhaps about the man behind the pencil, or that of holding the pencil in his hand and the pencil itself?

Which one of these things are next about the notion of Religion and Faith, or possibly that of Science?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4EaWPIlNYY

Lack of sound here.

Possibly intentionally.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6VZnmohw8E

Should note that I have not watched it yet, but my first thought is that

Getting my thoughts and ideas from listening at contents and unfortunately not able to catch it all.

You should know that I had the insects visiting my flat and also a nice lamp going down the drain because of eager parents.

One of the apostles of the Bible was Peter.

Also we are having the Revelation of John in a same or similar context.

If you are able to make or note the fact that water could become ice at times, or perhaps believe in such a thing as Cold Fusion, make it science if you will, but not necessarily the Bible for a similar thing.

Both the processes of fission and fusion could be part of nature, but neither tell about about a possible Armageddon, or a similar demise.

What is the word at some 7:10 in the clip?

Repir... ?

Needs checking, because right now I do not have it, only making a guess.

In the Military, we are supposed to be having the Chain of Command.

The clip is among other things mentioning such a thing as "Redemtion".

Meaning that we could be back at such things as "absolutes".

Look at the word or definition "The first Three Minutes".

Any reference here when it comes to possible Genesis?

Or is it perhaps that of Matter creation?

Listening in, forget the Bible, forget possible nonsense, we are still left with possible nonsense versus that of true or actual facts.

We do have the atomic clock as a possible reference.

Does such a clock give a possible reference to the Planck constant or the similar for a possible reference?

The answer could be no here, but needs possible checking.

Always a difference, isn't it or is it not?

Therefore it should also be a difference of words when being chosen, whether or not these could be about or related to that of science, or possibly that of Religion and Faith.

In my opinion such a thing as Religion and Faith is not a direct substitution or replacement of that of science, or possibly technology.

Like the Special Theory of Relativity, which is dealing with the subject of time, our future, or at least the notion of such future most likely can not be explained or predicted by science.

One of the reasons for this is that we could be mostly concerned about the subject of technology and development and not necessarily that of a given change for the purpose of a good or bad thing.

Such a thing is about randomness and chance at best and our future should be determined by facts which have already happened, or known to exist.

Still, we are having such a thing as coincidence, which tells us that a given thing could happen or occur almost by chance and nothing less and because of that, such a thing as chance is once again about Logic and the Method of Proof.

Also Axioms for such a thing.

The fact is that creation at times could be viewed as a sperm from a male merging with an egg from a female.

Compare such a thing with that of of a nuclear Armageddon, or a possible Holocaust and you have the possible difference.

If I am not wrong, such a thing as "Judgment Day" could be having a given explanation by means of science.

Again, back to the purgatory or possible redemption for such a thing.

Both are quite strong words and better need a scientific explanation rather than something else.

This because we do not readily see such things in those of birth or the like, because we could be taking both Birth and Creation more or less granted.

But when it next becomes the question about Armageddon, or possible demise, the story could be something else.

In the same way as both Birth and Death could possibly be explained by means of Creation itself, including that of Matter creation, our destiny or ultimate faith is possibly more or better explained, either by means of the notion of the Devil, or any similar processes which could be attributed with such facts.

This is still supposed to be all about nature and because of that, we should not forget about the First Three Minutes, which is all about Matter creation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle

Again, the clip should better be listened at.

Bump.

Lost that one.

Should tell that I wrote a better one and for some reason it went away.

Buh!

In the meantime

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flN3E7u3sHs

Yes, it was a better one here, therefore the missing comma.

Guess we all become older in the meantime, but is that all about our poor eyesight?

Apparently not that bad right now, but where is the salesman?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j0R_yUZFDo

Bump! (at least when listening in).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j0R_yUZFDo

Good old one.

2:08 or 2:09.

Catch this one?

This is kind of a scream, in my opinion.

Not necessarily part of your daily life, really.

Do we perhaps take microcosmos or macrocosmos (meaning space) for granted when things are not usual.

Or usual or common?

Heck, try me if you will.

Sorry about that.

But it is still hurting when it comes to my body.

I will get back at new tasks later on, but I finished quite many .vlar tasks during the past week.

One thing being on my mind while catching the most recent things, at least some of it, is the fact that although not having seen the clip in recent times, you probably know about the old one in black and white showing Dwight D. Eisenhower who went from being a military man to that of President of the United States.

Looking up in the Wikipedia, he was also the 34'th President of the United States, but for now I rather recognize his appearance in the clip as that of being a military man.

You possibly know that he was the man who warned us about the military technological concept and its possible consequences.

Such a thing could at times be readily visible, both when you look at human society as a whole and a similar technological development also happening.

Also we know that society also is about many other factors as well, including that of being part of a nature which at times could be hiding its secrets.

One of the results of possible events happening when it comes to the human existence is the result of the arms race between the superpowers, which could include a nuclear such race as well,
next having its own designation, is that of satellites orbiting the Earth.

Also we are having a manned space station in orbit around Earth as well.

Because these things are man made, we should keep a track of them, whether or not this is possible garbage, or perhaps a spy satellite for monitoring the Earth.

You probably know that I am the one who at times could be asking a couple of questions about things.

Not everything are being easily explained and for some of these there are no readily answer given as well.

I happened to look up Energy in the Wikipedia.

Once again this subject is possibly a source of either confusion, or possibly something else, because this article is both semi-protected, but also not complete.

If you happen to look up the article about the Standard Model, what could previously have been about the relationship between matter and energy by means of matter as that of the mass of the
elementary particles and next energy being only about radiation, it now calls this relationship an interaction.

If an elementary particle is traveling at high speed, it definitely becomes radiation.

But when looking at the Standard Model as a whole, we are able to see a reference to that of "Forces of Nature".

Definitely neither electricity or Electromagnetism as one such Force of nature and next possibly a fundamental such Force, we are still assumed to believe that this is about the subject of
matter rather than that of energy.

You probably know that there are three separate Laws when it comes to gravity itself, at least as defined by Newton.

At least one of these Laws are in fact quite complex on its own, reminding us that he was an eminent scientist.

Einstein was only able to prove that these Laws were not exact, or were not always valid under all conditions.

A given Equation is supposed to be telling about a property of nature, like the famous one of E=mc2.

When I have tried giving these things a look, I always have had the sense that there could be something missing and possibly it is as well.

If you happen to make a similar look at the three Forces of Nature, except for gravity, should we then be concerned or dealing with these Forces by means of what they could tell us about possible matter, or should we rather be looking for the corresponding energy instead, because this is still about elementary particles?

Remember the previous debate of Cold Fusion which is not in my thoughts right now.

But next compare with that of igniting a match and next setting a fire, at least when it comes to the oven in order to make things comfortable.

Or perhaps even the heat coming from your body after consuming a large dinner.

Such heat is the result of chemical processes and if I am not wrong, chemists and physicists may not always be willling to listen at each other.

Because you could be such a physicist, there could be possible difference between the drop of water falling from the sky and those things which you at times could believe could be
flying around or present as well.

Both stories being told by the man on the street and next the fact that such a thing as the Disclosure Project could now make us able to think that a couple of things could in fact be real
and not only a product of imagination by the brain.

Not totally sure, but I possibly mentioned Trinity earlier on as the name for the first nuclear test being carried out.

Also the fact that a couple of natural elements belonging to the Table of Elements which are not that well known is also being mentioned.

The fact is that we are supposed to believe that fusion is the most effective way of energy creation in nature.

Controlled fusion could be possible, but probably still not yet and except for that we know that ordinary stars are creating energy by means of some two different fusion processes.

Finally we should not forget that there could be still other possibilities, including that of a supernova explosion creating new elements of matter by means of energy production, or really fusion.

Another thing possible left unexplained is the possible fact that energy could also be associated with that of the living versus the dead and also we could believe in matters related to the paranormal as well
when it comes to such energy, meaning possible spirits and the like.

Finally the previously mentioned subject about whether such a thing as the Uncertainty Principle and the models relating to that of Chaos Theory could be part of Electromagnetism,
since it is not readily found when looking up the Weak Nuclear Force in the Wikipedia.

Definitely the Special Theory of Relativity is about the notion of time, while the General Theory of Relativity is still about the subject of gravity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_gravity

Right now I have yet to be looking up the subject of Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Theory, but feel slightly disappointed that a couple of these subjects are lacking a better explanation.

The third link above which at least should go to the correct place is having quite many equations being visible and definitely this is nothing new.

Notice the main equation being given in both of the first two links.

The fourth link above is perhaps a bit technical for some readers.

If you happen to know about the subject of mathematics and physics, you could be able to understand these equations, but could you still be able to see the smile in the face of "Mona Lisa"?

The fact is that being a scientist makes you able to understand nature and such a thing is not always for a philosopher or even a theologist in order to be able to do the same.

Still, more or less all of these should be able to provide valuable insights and ideas and next contribute towards a given understanding.

The fact is that such a thing as evolution most likely could be explained by means of both physics, as well as couple of other subjects, but not necessarily those of the mentioned philosophy or religion.

If a new equation could be given a look each day, the same could perhaps be done for a painting, but when doing so, which one is perhaps the better way of understanding a given nature for which the complete
answer might only be given by carrying out science on the subject?

Is it not the fact that we already could be having a given answer to a couple of questions, because such scientists as Michio Kaku and particularly Stephen Hawking could be able to do such a thing?

Are we next ready to dismiss both philosophy and religion because we know that science could be giving the better answer to these questions?

More later on.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=80541

Hi, Sparrow45.

You posted here, or above as well.

I guess it is back at the old question, namely that of perhaps water coming before that of intelligent life.

Water alone is not sufficient to create life, only maintain, uphold, or sustain such life.

In plants and trees a process is converting CO2 into breathable oxygen, or in fact O2, if I am not wrong, in a constantly occurring process.

You even do not need such a thing as lightning here.

Unlike the element iron which is at the core of the human hemoglobin molecule, being found in red blood cells of the body, the plants rather are having the element magnesium for this, giving the reason for the green color being visible.

Look at a similar mentioning about the Trinity experiment given in my thread in the Cafe and next the similar mentioning at other elements in the Periodic Table, of which not all are not that well known.

When we next think about such things as the white blood cells of the body, including the macrofags, we next only are able to think about the red blood cells as able to carry oxygen through the body.

The subject of biology is about a given knowledge about life as we know it.

Such things as DNA, RNA and enzymes makes at least human life possible, but still we could be left with the processes of thinking, as well as that of a given conscience.

"We built the city", is the common phrase often being used and this is because of the food you were able to eat.

The fact is that when you next start questioning the possible subject of mathematics when it comes to a given purpose of nature, including that of possible alien or extraterrestrial life,
some of this probably is destined for the drain.

Take the Mandelbrot set as a typical example when it comes to the subject of Chaos Theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set

Note that this set also is dealing with a possible notion of infinity as well.

Are we next supposed to ask, or perhaps answer the question whether or not this Set did came into existence at the moment of Big Bang, which supposedly was the moment of Creation when it comes to the Universe?

Did perhaps water become present at the same time as well, or did rather such things as DNA, RNA and enzymes, at least making such things as bacteria and viruses a possibility?

Did I perhaps mention such things as the Uncertainty Principle, as well as a couple of similar related subjects?

For now I choose to skip the remaining ones here, because except for those sciences which could be dealing with possible Fundamental Laws, there are probably still a couple of exceptions to this
rule and for now we are unable to place these things into the same context.

One important subject of Mathematics is that of Algebra.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra

Using a local search on my disc and next stumbling upon problems when it comes to both local as well as web page access, I think I know a bit of what I said in the past.

Many people here are either atheists or agnostics.

Should we perhaps therefore bother or care more about such a thing as mathematics, because unlike such things as intelligence or conscience, mathematics itself could be explained from a given
perspective of nature itself and next you are supposed to believe that also the subject of evolution could be the same?

Such a thing as prime numbers and the subject of factoring might not be your interest, but starting up today, the google.com homepage is making a reference to a 340 year anniversary of the discovery of the speed of light by the Danish astronomer Ole Roemer.

Always those things that either become missing, or perhaps forgotten and next part of the whole story.

If the Universe is having a possible Creator, such things as water, air and even electricity could make such a thing as life possible, in the same way as organical substances could also do the same.

In order to create such life, the possible Creator would need to create the Universe first and for this such things as both physical laws, as well as equations are needed.

We could be speaking of something not being True and next being False, or vice versa, because this would be about the subject of Logic.

If possibly doing a similar thing when it comes to the subject of Religion and Faith, we do not have any similar Logic, only the fact that some people are unable to make up their mind for a given reason.

If you next remember that the subject of Philosophy should be about the subject of possible existence, you probably have more or less the remaining part of the story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemoglobin

Perhaps could be moved at the end, but the previous did not become finished because of the running of tasks.

Human civilization and possibly other civilizations as well could most likely be thought of as likely because of organic substances being found in nature.

But next it is still either biology and possibly chemistry and is only dealing with the Earth itself.

Except for the Earth and next Mars, possibly Pluto could be the best candidate in the solar system for the possibility of life.

But only a very thin atmosphere and both Nitrogen and possible CO2 would be frozen rather than liquid.

The little sad thing is that the Russians were able to land on the surface of Venus, but next any probes visiting Mercury were only able to make pictures of the surface from above.

Also a possible dream not becoming reality is that of a mission to one of the four large moons of Jupiter.

Even an unmanned probe would be having a spectacular vision of the planet above in the sky and if it happened to be the moon Io, it next could be digging in the volcanic ash for signs of biological activity.

Evolution on Earth is based on a probabilistic equation, but as we probably know, most scientists are making a difference between possible intelligence, or concience and those elements which are thought of as being part of nature itself.

Is technology only possible because of the fact that life does exist on Earth, or could such technology be found in nature itself, whether or not this could be part of or belong to a given intelligence?

Again, compare with such a thing as aggression and instinct found in such animals as alligators and the like and next assume a possible conscience with that of a high or higher level of intelligence.

Those "Little Green Men" could definitely be using such things like a UFO in order to fly around, but what next when perhaps speaking about their possible brain capabilities?

Or is it rather the fact that we could relate a given technology with ourselves and in such a way make a distinction between ourselves and possible other levels of intelligence, or conscience, which might be found?

The final answer could be that we are as usual making a separation between a couple of things and next assume that the possible divine could be more than one given thing as well.

By means of a given practice, there could be a difference between a good and a bad doctor, but next are you supposed to be asking whether a given level of intelligence could be for the same thing or purpose?

The fact is that we could be left with only two suggestions or options all the time and for each one being able to view both from opposite or different angles.

Sorry about that.

Became a posting during the day yesterday while doing a couple of other things.

You probably know that there is one thing of interest currently on my mind which goes a bit more into detail.

Getting late in the afternoon here, I perhaps should go for the weekend shopping today, in order to be able to have the evening off tomorrow and still keep a tab on things.

Back later.