https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GEebx72-qs

Sorry about that, but thinking about doing the weekend shopping once again.

You should know that the possible relationship between that of Mathematics and that of Astronomy as a pure scientific study is still on my mind,
because after the finish of the mentioned video, the window is having a clip for that of "The Largest Black Holes in the Universe" as one of its options.

Definitely such a thing as numbers are for both "Numbermaniacs" and also nerds to solve, while that of Black Holes are the place for the astronomers (lost the better word),
where the astronomers are usually finding common ground in order for a possible explanation.

So while the HP-10C pocket calculator for now lies unused on the shelf and is from a respected manufacturer, also the manual, or leaflet coming along,
is having that mentioned flaw which is related to that of Statistics, in one of its chapters.

Add to it the big color speck damaging a whole page of an excellent book from a national publisher to the rest and you have most of the story.

The natural logarithm, e, as you probably know, is based on the number 2,7182818284590452353602874713527 .

Next, even such a number does not necessarily tell about any Statistics either.

What if rather than a computer nerd, or at least a "Numbermaniac" or "Numberphile", I was rather a UFO nerd?

Should tell that listening in at Robert "Bob" Lazar giving one of his interviews telling about his security clearance, it really gets too much, even for me.

If we should believe in possible extraterrestrial life, or that of intelligent civilizations in space, we probably should not forget the technological issue which could be involved.

Other people could perhaps end up having a different opinion and except for perhaps painting a picture for that of living, or only daydreaming, could end up being more
philosophical about the whole issue and perhaps make a couple of wishes which most likely never would materialize.

So what is perhaps a "googol", except for not being related to "Google" in any way?

Think of a sunny beach in the late afternoon and next perhaps having a swim in the ocean.

The beach is supposedly made up of countless numbers of individual grains of sand.

Pick up one fist of sand and you next could start counting the individual grains in your hand.

If you are able to do so, you probably will get a sense of how many individual grains of sand are on the beach.

While such a thing as both Mathematics and except for that of Physics, also that of Statistics, could perhaps give a sense of reality, at least a Physicist could describe the
conditions on an atomic, or even subatomic level and the properties making this possible.

People who could be either ufologists, or even UFO nerds could be living with the belief that such a thing as UFO's really do exist and that they also could belong to alien civilizations.

Having first such a belief, it probably is a hard thing making them change their mind for the possible opposite.

From both a Sociological perspective, as well as other ways of approach, such a thing as "I want to believe" could be not only a thing being wished for, but something that
also could be a thing for real, next meeting given expectations.

A nuclear phycisist, or even a general level physicist, could be doing experiments as part of his regular work.

"Order out of chaos" is perhaps the general rule of thumb, but perhaps not so when you look at their desks, or sometimes laboratories.

If I am not wrong, scientists are often there to make "Laws" out of nature based on such things as Equations and not something else, like Algebra, or Linear Regression.

The famous equation E=mc2 is one such example, where an equation supposedly could be for one thing, but perhaps not relate to the rest of the subject, which could be that of gravity.

If for some reason a scientist forgot mentioning his work, is that because he had a close contact or experience with an alien being, or extraterrestrial making a visit?

The Scientific Method is not always about that of numbers either and in fact I was able to realize that.

But if a scientist, or ufologist, with the name of Budd Hopkins, could be able to come to the conclusion that we are being visited from space, because foreign tissue at times
could be pulled from peoples arms or legs, are we next supposed to believe that such work could be either inconclusive or futile, because of possible results being obtained?

In my opinion, possible results should also mean possible or similar answers as well.

A classical example here on Earth is that of ghosts.

Such a thing as ghosts could be a natural phenomenon, but next, not all people do believe in such a thing as ghosts.

Is the Scientific Method the given tool which should be used in order to either explain such a phenomenon, or rather explain it away, or dismiss the whole fact?

So, except for possible nerds, you could still be having "Angels in the Sky" at times and for this perhaps a reminder of Erich von Däniken.

Perhaps not the big clown in my opinion anymore after listening in at his videos, but rather a scientist who are both willing and able to do some serious work.

When I look at both the finished dinner being put away in my kitchen, as well as the chocolate still remaining on my desk, I should be thankful for such a think as gifts which
could sometimes be coming from God.

Next also a reminder that not everything in life is not good either and rather becomes a possible sacrifice when such a thing is happening.

In the world of numbers, computing such numbers could be that of Arithmetic, meaning Calculus.

From my own work on numbers, I also happen to rather view them as sets instead and next it becomes a possible programming issue or subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

I have earlier mentioned such a thing as both "Determinism" and also that of "Causality".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_horizon

If you rather key in the word "Event" in the Wikipedia, you get an ambiguation page back in return and next no specific mention about such a thing as an "Event Horizon",
but still mentioned a bit down the page.

Yes, in fact I could be either Bruce Macabbe, or Budd Hopkins and at least believe in such a thing as an Event Horizon making up the properties of a Black Hole in space,
but next start questioning such a thing as foreign tissue being found in peoples legs and arms and we are probably back at the Scientific Method.

Same story all over again, I guess.

Am I still supposed to "believe", or should I rather be an atheist, agnostic, or even debunker, because nature could be telling me such a thing?

If not a "googol" for that of possible numbers, you even could be having that of "googolplex" as well and again you probably could be questioning such a thing as numbers
and not necessarily that of the Scientific Method.

Back later.

Next I also did the weekend shopping during the day, because as you may already notice, I am busy.

Also some good news when checking, namely that the new computer being ordered during the last couple of weeks is now ready for shipment.

Using the web, I have agreed with the carrier for that of express delivery on my entrance door and this will happen tomorrow evening (Friday, local time).

So, except a couple of problems related to both that of cleaning and also a couple of health problems (a possible broken toe, among other things),
I will have to put everything below the shelf until problems are being fixed.

This is not a one-man task and therefore I have sought help here for the assembling of this new computer.

For now, no precise timetable has been set, but I could be hoping for the next two or three weeks, or so.

Despite being a quite powerful system, it probably will have a quite slow start, with only the essential parts of software at the beginning.

Thinking of perhaps a bit of ClimatePrediction here for this computer, although I do not like the project that much when it comes to appearance.

One thing perhaps of either concern, or interest here, is that of whether human interference could be responsible for such a thing as global warming.

My guess is that even President Trump could be an advocate for either one thing or the other, depending on such things as economy and profit, or the like.

The only thing noticeable is that such a thing as ice ages could be possible without any human intervention, so perhaps rather a reason to understand high temperatures.
except for that of global warming of the climate, which could be as a result of cars running.

As you probably know, I am a bit more concerned, or busy about such things as "events" which could be happening.

The fact is that even such a thing as 9/11 from a national, or at least local perspective, rather became the three o'clock, or perhaps even the evening news here,
at least when it comes to myself.

Take a game of chess instead, rather than a game of poker and both could be based on such things as rules in order to actually work, or be working.

In a military context, a situation on the ground could end up in a stalemate at times, except for that of chess.

Of course a difference around, but who are supposed to be questioning that of Armageddon, or the like, except for that of birth of a living being, which to at least some
should be having a possible religious meaning?

Or perhaps the endless, or repetitive cycle happening all over, because it could benefit or favor those people who are scientists?

Honestly, but such a thing as "The End" is not supposed to be part of our civilization, or society either.

For now the possible asteroid impact which could bring a chapter to the end, or if not so, someone pushing the red button, in order to carry us into a war,
which could possibly end in a nuclear Holocaust.

A very old game (like Monopoly) being played with a couple of friends in early years, was that of "Shipping" and here I do not recall the details.

Perhaps I once again should be looking up that of "Gaussian distribution" once again, because such a thing could be a reminder of possible life.

Or rather that it could be about Probability instead and therefore add to to a given perception about possible intelligent being found and existing among the stars in the Milky Way.

In the end, even such a thing as Probability does not necessarily tell about such a thing as neither a heavy hand. or even such a thing as Creation, which could make that of life possible.

Before I finish off, perhaps a report, or at least some local news about a security guard being killed, or stabbed to death while doing his regular duties.

For now I have not been looking at the details here, including the article, but should tell that I happen to know about peoples faces.

Always those people around which could be both lean and mean, but in fact, I am not able to see such a thing here.

So therefore feeling a bit sad about this and therefore offering my condolences.

Back tomorrow.

Oh, is she perhaps at home right now?

At least she is not answering me, or the call, by means of Skype and a pair of headphones on my ears does not get through.

Also testing with my own mobile phone for this and it next rang in my living room.

Here is the telephone number I have (for the mother, Kristin Nelson Tinker).

+ 00 1 310 454 2210 (It is a Los Angeles, Pacific Palisades, CA, number, by the way).

You are welcome to give it a try, but also that a couple of things could be discussed in private here, like that of the Racoon Lovers Message board or thread.

Getting a bit tired right now, but still not upset, so please have me excused.

"Eine kleine Nachtmusic".

Or perhaps you did not know, but in fact YouTube is being part of Google as a given service.

So what if I perhaps used such words as "pretty face" there when next perhaps linking it to Bonnie Tyler or the similar and next do not find or recognize the face?

Or in fact, or actually that when once again coming across Enya as a popular music star, the melody of perhaps interest is some 12. or 13. in the list.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5S-5GpKUdj8

Ricky Nelson link for this in here and dang it is slow because of the line or connection.

Don't make me have to bite you, because I could if I wished.

Make up your own mind here because of the overlay, but should be either 12. or 13. in the list before going back checking.

Adding a little more, perhaps.

So why not the "Screen Actors Guild" for this and next as usual and next a couple of stupid people around.

http://www.sagaftra.org/

Oh, pretty girl, by the way, but perhaps another story for this.

Oh, those space stations"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttMt9SHRwsM

Or perhaps, Mary Lou, because at least I found it and next makes you an idiot as well.
sadly to say, or possibly tell.

Should next also tell that in the past the response there (or they) were quite hostile already from the beginning.

In my opinion the web or net is now more or less "peer-to-peer" when it comes to its buildup, or making, so except for perhaps a couple of bad or nasty people around, perhaps a thing not to forget either.

Edit: 34:10 plus or minus a little and you have a little more of Enya for perhaps your entertainment, because here it again becomes that of "Sail away".

Again, I do not like her that much, but the melody here is quite good. except for the constant system hang being experienced.

The thing being noticed here, except for the possible "slant" is that the time ticker could be the only reference for the mentioned playback above, because the rest of it is more or less fixed.

Enjoy the music!

Perhaps getting it right in the middle of the night, even with a couple of beers, possibly cluttering my sight.

But the melody being played back was next also that one being noticed as well and for now I do not have it.

Getting back at it when possible, but it was nice here.

For now I do not have it, but needs a possible rewind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1TcDHrkQYg&list=PLCqukCFvcNBKN4okn9OFCQZvkFdbki2vH&index=2

Another one here, but for now in another tab.

Except for that, possible music could be about a given theme and not a given "idiocy".

Never mind. except for perhaps running Seti@home.

Or perhaps the fact that sex still sells, except for possible (nobody's) fools. which actually could end up being women?

Same old story again. except for perhaps the stupid fool, of course and next no pun intended.

Also unpacking two boxes in my door earlier today before finishing off the beer in the night.

The power supply in one box and the rest of it, except for the systems box, which I already have, in the other one.

Quite good service being experienced, except for the power supply not in the store and had to be ordered separately.

Also the usual language problem as well, because the van with the goods became parked next to the entrance at the other end of the building.

Receiving both a telephone call on my mobile phone and also a SMS, I did not make of it that he was already there.

Signing with my name, it became a garble of it when using the electronic pen against the small screen and he next chose to key in my first name using a
keypad that was on the screen itself and probably a quite new feature when it comes to handheld devices.

Being stacked in the box, the memory modules of course flipped over when pulling the larger parts.

Also the box with the processor is coming with a hole on one side which makes it possible to place a finger directly on it and I do not like that thing.

Further unpacking and assembly will be made together with a family friend after necessarily cleaning of the flat later on, but in all, these are quite good parts, or components,
making up a computer.

Back later.

Or perhaps "first I did not make of it that he was already there.

The power supply was a bit late here, but except for a couple of small things, having it delivered on my door, makes it for a big thanks back in return.

You perhaps know that I also have a "box" of my own at Mersenneforum.org, where I next could edit my posts.

"Do as you are being told" and it supposedly is a possible Commandment, but next perhaps not from the Bible.

My current thought about things is that is perhaps is not science all the time, but perhaps it could be numbers.

From perhaps not an ideological perspective, but rather a religious such, it should be known that Giordano Bruno once was burned alive,
because of his "faith" in that of science.

Should next that I actually was being told to do such science in lack of anything else and next once again perhaps blame the stupid idiot.

I have mentioned such a thing as both infallabilities and also infallacies both here and also at BOINC and next think that it is not only about words.

Our Universe is for one thing that of possible diversity, but next also that of "make and break" because of possible Laws being given.

Next that possible Laws or Equations should not be the same as any Commandments either.

Like perhaps the notion of time, which later became Special Theory of Relativity, I have always wondered what that of Relativity alone actually means.

Yes, Einstein could be perhaps "wicked" because he next was a genius and also able to come up with possible discoveries.

"Make or break", perhaps, or rather make a laugh of it everything, because in fact I happen to look at the Universe, together with its diversity and also that perhaps something could still be lacking.

For a reason not still explained, or perhaps being told, one of the Ten Commandments is that "You shall not have any Gods than me".

Again, I choose to make it proper language here, rather than spoken words, or perhaps a dialect.

One religion currently being practiced, is that of Baptism and before checking, I do not have any problems with that.

Again, perhaps a big laugh, but also that we have discussed that of Multiverses in the past, or earlier on.

A nuclear physicist could perhaps be concerned about, or how that of fission could perhaps be one thing and that of fusion next yet another thing.

So, working versus perhaps not working and it could be about possible factoring, or factorization of numbers.

Yes, "Go to hell", at least literally and it could also be a state of mind.

I have mentioned that of the Purgatory in the past and at least by means of the Church, that of absolution, which next could translate into "forgiveness of sins"
could be one such example.

I happen to be using sky-map.org at times and being quite familiar with both the Milky Way and also the celestial objects of the sky, I know that looking at the Milky Way
also means looking at our own galaxy, more or less in detail.

But again, I happen to zoom in on a remote area in the sky far away from the bulge of the Milky Way and guess what I found?

I perhaps mentioned it before, but next I am thinking about the Mandelbrot set, which at least from a Mathematical point of view, could be a recursive feature.

One possible recursive feature, at least when it comes to that of programming, could be that of Hilbert curves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reika

The word being mentioned here locally, in an e-mail conversation, is that of "Reika", because right now the word came back.

Make up your own mind on the subject, perhaps, but except for that perhaps rather that of a given practise.

You probably never know.

I am a little more concerned about that of history perhaps not being disputed, or disputable.

If President Donald Trump perhaps stands for the greedy among the American people, I am perhaps right.

In my opinion, wearing a knife for that of self defense should be a possible option.

For some reason, a dagger being worn, or in ones hand, could next make you a killer and next you

The musical group Supertramp, which by the way is not my personal favorite, is having the melody "Dreamer".

For now I make a difference here between that of "Killer", by Michael Jackson (or "step on your feet", if you will).

In my opinion, perhaps believing in that of Special Theory as a subject, but next that of any rocket science, could perhaps make for such a thing as possible misuse.

In the world of computing, that of "hacking" is a common misnomer, or use of words.

If perhaps the "Scientific Method" alone should next mean everything, or perhaps nothing, we should not forget the man in the street either.

So perhaps rather a funeral instead.

A bit concerned, or perhaps dealing with that of numbers at times, the end, or perhaps

Dangit, but a possible translation always welcome.

Looking back a bit in in time, my grandmother, or the mother of my mother, like the father of my mother (grandfather),
both were given or designated a coffein for that of burial purposes and next a ceremony, or process for such, being carried out by means of the Church.

When next doing so, I also happen to look back at times.

I mentioned the security guard in the past and that he could perhaps be an idiot.

Take it or leave it perhaps, but a movie featuring Arnold Schwarzenegger as either the Predator, or perhaps the Terminator, if you will,
is making a possible given thing that of a "bad idea".

Really, you do not necessarily need to have or come up with a bad idea all the time either.

To my knowledge, or perhaps the point, a reminder of both the Challenger space shuttle disaster and also the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

Take it or leave it perhaps, but if I happen to look at such a thing as birth, it could be in a hospital, or nursery.

Next that such a thing as hypernovae in space is probably poorly defined.

In the programming language of Pascal we are having the definition, or term "Options Base" and next a bit uncertain here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooker

If for some reason I had a big purchase in my door, it next becomes not such a "hooker" in any way.

What is the possible definition here?

The sad fact is that sex perhaps could sell, but not necessarily in the name of science.

So why not perhaps make you a female rather than a male here and next think that it actually sells when it comes to such a thing?

Yes, sucks, except for possible science, of course.

I got the message earlier on that my family friend wishes to start with new things out of the box.

So for now I made the choice of using the scissor in order to cut the plastic tape.

But when doing this on both sides of the box containing the motherboard, because here it needs opening at both ends,
when raisied on its edge, the contents started bumping the inner wall towards me, which still had the tape, or sealing across in the middle.

Here a slight mistake and for now the box lies flat on the floor in the living room, taking up a bit more space.

Should tell that I really admire those responsible for such technological development, because the distance between success and failure could be a short one.

If not mentioned, the box having the processor next came with a plastic cover for protection, so when putting my finger inside, I touched the cover.

Making things ready for the assembly, a couple of things became visible, among them a short wave radio antennae with a pull-out cable from a roundish box,
which could be connected to an outlet almost like that on the front of the computer, but rather meant for the stereo.

Possibly a smaller plug could be attached in between, but will have to look at that later on.

Next, one thing of notice for all of you running a personal computer at home.

With a couple of disks in my possession, I placed a couple of these on top of a commode, or dresser in my bedroom.

Later I found a pair of small scissors being placed on top of one of the disks, apparently by my aunt.

Being metal blades of steel, I quickly got the sense that there was no magnetism in the blades this time.

I am still going to mention that thing, because later on, in the living room, the pen being used for writing on the laptop computer,
got attached with the combined power and data plug for the Samsung mobile phone, which is a small USB unit.

Here the small plug got attached at one end of the pen and this time it was because of magnetism.

Really an ugly thing and one more reason to protect your disks when possible.

Or perhaps the closing ceremony of the Los Angeles Olympic Games, back in 1984.

Next it becomes a couple of other YouTube videos with some interesting contents.

Becomes kind of a ladder with several or many steps, where one could be about those magnificent things of nature at times,
or even the possibility that we are being visited by other civilizations.

If not so, I would very much love to know what is the reason for that of deceit, or perhaps rather counterfeiting, because the first word could be used in a more political context.

If rather make it that of red, white and blue and next shining as well, it could well be about such magnificent things which could be found in nature,
but for which science either has no explanation for, or rather seek to explain away, for several reasons.

Again the same word two times above, but I think I found the better one to use here.

Also perhaps a reminder of the old question which could be "where we are coming from and next going".

For such a thing it could perhaps be "Wonderous stories" at times, except for the accident which could happen and next break your arm.

Therefore perhaps not only about where we are coming and next going, but perhaps also about the meaning of it all.

I will have a couple of links later for those interested.

So perhaps a taste, or prelude of it all right now, except for it perhaps not being any science.

I had a visit from both my mother, as well as aunt and uncle yesterday.

Both the kitchen, entrance hall and also the computer room had become quite a mess because first of all, I bought too much food and also the fridge is not well working.

Despite having a hand which suffers from a break because of an earlier accident, my aunt this time was quite eager at giving me a hand, since she knows thing well here,
both when it comes to my kitchen and also habits, or perhaps rather taste, or preference.

Unfortunately this process takes away a couple of other things and therefore I was not able to speak in detail with my mother.

But also that I gave a note that while I perhaps are having or making my preferences, it should be for a good sake or thing and because of that,
not forgetting the other issues, particularly when such issues becomes main problems.

So, the recent purchase of a new computer came in two boxes, one of which had the power supply only.

In order for support, at least one of the boxes had air-filled plastic tubes in the case.

For some reason, I guess it could be a personality issue, my uncle chose to puncture one of the tubes, which in fact made for a bit of a sting being felt.

I think it was unnecessary, particularly when considering this a heavy purchase coming in at a stiff price.

You could do so with the packs of chocolate where most have been eaten up, or perhaps swallowed dust, but not from a purchased product which makes up a package.

There you have my opinion, but here where I am living, the waste is being divided into three parts, or categories, namely that of food trash for your waste bin, including plastic which is
not clean and next that of such plastic which has not become dirty from food or the like and finally all the cardboard making up the packages which could be your prepared dinner.

Except for that, the box upstairs for toxic waste, or the like, but the last time I used it, I put a large feather from a bird in the box, because the batteries here
now goes in the trash for the wastebin.

With all respect for my aunt, who is so helpful, one thing which still makes up the difference between the sexes, is the way certain things are being valued, or put a price on,
except for it perhaps making its way to the kitchen sink.

I had one lamp ending up in pieces on the floor of the living room, because for some reason, things were in a hurry and the kitchen was perhaps the more important thing.

Only the thick socket remains and is standing upstairs.

Another lamp is standing in my bedroom, but is having a wire much too long and another being found in a closet had its lightbulb not working when turning it on when signing off and having a break.

Also a third one which is still unpacked and standing in my living room becomes a third option, but I am still back with, or perhaps stuck, with that original mishap.

In addition, there now became two floor standing fans for that of heating in my flat, of which one is not working that well.

The one working had been inside the computer room and ended up swallowing both food and chocolate, but still working.

My aunt chose to have a look at it, but could not get inside the metal cover, because it is a fan based heater, but this time not for cooling, but rather the opposite.

Therefore it has some four adjusting knobs, where one pair means single or double cooling (and not heating), while the other means single or double heating.

Of course at least the double knob for heating blows my 10 Ampere fuse, so therefore I am not using both.

But when next plugging it back into mains, all the four knobs had been turned into the ON position and in the same way as putting or placing a pair of metallic scissors atop
my hard disk drives lying on the commode in the living room, I made a point of that of magnetism during a short break while doing the cleaning.

The same should therefore be made about that of electric power as well, because in the living room, the fuse is push-button knobs in the fuse cabinet outside the entrance door.

But in the computer room, it should rather have been a bed instead and therefore still only the 10 Ampere fuse, which is in pairs and needs replacing, mostly one at a time.

Each time when doing so, it flashes like a lightning strike through the fuse towards me and makes for an unpleasant thing when doing.

Therefore, when possibly doing maintenance, one thing is perhaps that of cleaning, but next what such a thing is meant or supposed to be doing.

Earlier on, or previously, I told about the story of the whole charge going from the power supply of an older computer and next into the wooden chair
supporting it on the floor through the attached power cable.

Not being connected to mains, it had drawed, or perhaps pulled everything into its capacitors, making for a high power electric charge.

This was not household current, as far as I am able to tell and if it rather had been my finger, or hand, I probably would not be sitting here today.

So the important thing of making a choice for having a second computer and this time a quite heavy one, comes with a couple of other things as well.

I give both, or perhaps all of these a thought, except for perhaps leaving most of the kitchen for my aunt to deal with, while I have a look at the other things.

The cardboard boxes with the shipment comes with those small flips which makes it possible to open it at one end, or the other.

Of course my father chose to break one such while still alive and I do not want a repeat here.

My family friend, which should be ready at giving a helping hand when it comes to assembly of the new computer, wants to have it from the case, or box, meaning unpacked.

Unflipping the boxes in order to have at least that away, the box containing the motherboard was pulled open by cutting the plastic tape around.

The result became a standing box which next had to be laid flat on the floor, because the contents started bulging outwards, particularly when next also cutting the seal in the middle.

Before they left, I opened the box and pulled the motherboard free.

Still in a plastic cover, I left it there, but the double socket for the processor (remember what I said, or told), became visible.

Also making a point that the two graphics cards still could be used for gaming purposes, but does not come with such a thing as "ROG", or the like.

So, for now it became the tentative agreement for next Wednesday for my family friend to appear, or come by.

For now it became the main cleaning, with still a couple of things remaining, but still almost a week left.

Like the way both the kitchen, bedroom and also the computer room was being cleaned yesterday, the remaining issue becomes a similar thing.

My family friend, who is running a local business of selling computer inventory, is probably better than nothing.

I spent some three hours during the past week, pulling both graphics cards on this computer inside here, because the diods had come off, including that of the front POWER button.

Also I ended up being almost stuck because of the other thing I am doing, namely that of factoring of numbers.

Almost there now, I think and with a second computer soon coming my way, we probably could be having the answer here.

Oh, by the way, please do not ask me about the definition of both a scientist, as well as perhaps that of science itself, because that is perhaps the most important.

The fine word which could be used here, at least when it comes to science, is that of a possible "recognition".

Those things known to be flying around, having all those colors, could perhaps be an imagined thing, except for perhaps not being ghosts.

If perhaps not a painting, it could rather be the story of Jesus Christ, as it is being told, because we should also know about the Shroud of Turin, as previously mentioned.

Therefore the important thing of what we perhaps are supposed to do and also the way things should be interpreted in order to be understood.

If perhaps making a laugh of everything, including that of possible science, there is probably not much we can do, but except for possible numbers, we should also be
aware of, or familiar with the way science is being carried out and also for which purpose in mind.

This is the main reason for why I am bying a second computer and next by means of a given purpose in mind, we could be back at that of "recognition" in order for a possible understanding.

So, except for perhaps the kitchen sink, why not rather make it science instead because here it becomes the starting point.

The old adventure could be telling about the Princess on the peas, (not Cinderella, or even Princess Diana, by the way), or rather meaning that she had some 30 mattresses for that of sleeping,
or perhaps lying on, but still not able to sleep because of the single pea located at the bottom pillow.

If I am not wrong, the official launch of Seti@home is the picture of a man, or scientist, in front of his computer.

Rather than possible understanding, or even "comprehension", for now rather it becomes a possible computing issue, where that of numbers and the like could be possibly involved.

If for some reason you could make it "Little Green Men" in order for such an understanding being possible, one thing is perhaps believing in such a story and next make it science.

It should be no secret that neither such a thing as a changing climate, by means of both a possible ice age, as well as that of global warming, is not the same as that of Theory of Relativity, or the similar,
in the same way as both should not be the same as Quantum mechanics.

The ice man being found in the Alps probably got a name next with him and possibly starting with the letter "T".

I will be looking for that next and here got it almost right.

If it rather was so that Albert Einstein could be able to tell me about such a thing as the climate, because it could be either number crunching, or perhaps even Predictability,
we probably could make it science.

As usual, when dividing science into different branches, or brands, if you will, it could for sure, or certain, be that of using your eyes through the lens of a microscope, in order to detect possible life.

Both such things as bacteria and viruses are commonly found and except some insects being of perhaps more of use, rather than possible irratition, or nuisance,
my guess is that a possible "comprehension" is not being obtained, or gained in such a way.

Make it possible "Wonderous stories" by means of possible music being performed and you also could be having fabulous stories being told as well.

If rather making it a colorful thing flying in the sky, it perhaps could be such a thing, but next it could be of no meaning, or significance, when it comes to that of science.

Many years ago, when attending a course in the subject of Geology at secondary school, I took part in an excursion which ended up being exhaustive one, where we collected samples of a
mineral which is not commonly found.

For this, both a hammer and also a shovel was being needed, but next not a microscope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96tzi

Found the link for this right now, because here it is not about the Sun, or even the climate, but rather the destiny of an individual soul, or person.

It becomes an interesting story being told and also a historical fact, but also that such a thing is not telling about such a thing as "recognition", or possible "comprehension" either.

Guess what, but in fact I was showed away when at least trying to come up with some ideas, but as usual this is supposed to be science and not necessarily anything else.

The funny thing is that right now it becomes a reminder of the old melody "Singing in the rain", which is perhaps not my favorite, but next perhaps remember, or recall the umbrella.

To most people, even such a thing as eating and sleeping, as well as living your life is no such thing as science at all.

Still there could be people around thinking that we are living in a "scientific world", where a couple of things are happening.

Not to make too much of it perhaps, but except for the Force of gravity, or possibly inertia, we could sometimes make it "make or break", because in fact this is what it is, or could be.

When I ended up finishing the day by going from some colorful videos of a couple of things flying in the sky, also what could appear to be live pictures of a real world, but next also a
possible graphic animation, or possible rendering, next made live for that of playback purpose.

Next could add that theoretically, such a thing as computer animation, or rendering, in fact could be made to be looking almost that of the real thing, with almost no difference visible at all.

When such a thing is happening, for one thing it could be that of intuition, or perhaps knowledge, because you are able to tell "heck, that is not true at all" and so on.

If perhaps being rather that of knowledge, because of facts already known, it could be a recognition of facts at times, but not necessarily such a thing as "comprehension".

The fact is that at least both that of Religion and Faith could be one thing and next that both such a thing as an apparition in the sky, or the like could make for such a thing as
comprehension, or a given understanding possible, except for perhaps the Revelation of John, in the last chapter of the Bible.

So, perhaps such a thing as "Mysteries, magic and miracles" for that of possible science, but not necessarily any Religion and Faith either.

Keeping to the book, or at least a given standard, or practice, it supposedly should be science most of the time and not any Religion, so therefore the possible difference between that of
both neutron stars and Black Holes being found in space and next that of possible wormholes or even "white holes" which could make such a thing as time travel possible.

Except for that of infinity, we also have that of "eternity", as a possible different word, or explanation for that of Creation myth.

Honestly you do not need to be a painter either, because at least you should know that a Samsung mobile phone could be coming with a hidden technology.

Like that of St. Peter possibly facing you when at sometimes entering the gate or stairways to Hby means of a possible portal, such a thing should also be there when it comes to that of Hell.

The church itself could be viewed as a possible sanctuary, but if perhaps that of Hell is wearing a chain around your feet and next doing slavery work forever, my understanding of things is that
both such a thing as an absolution by means of the church and next the possible definition of hell itself, is not the same as that of both forgiveness or remorse, versus the total opposite.

If an absolution of sins is because a remorse, or perhaps excuse could be given for such a sin being carried out, it definitely is not the same as "digging a grave" either, because when doing so,
you more likely are supposed to be ending up in Heaven, rather than a given hell and for that the nice word "Purgatory".

For now I have still not mentioned that of Cosmology either, because even such a thing could be the "Janus face", or at least that of possible "Omens", rather than possible Predictions.

Definitely we do not see such a thing as Matter Creation here, but is it then perhaps Creation myth?

Posting here before perhaps continuing.

Or perhaps story rather than adventure, except for the small typo.

So therefore, or perhaps of all of this, another reason to ask about the possible wrong way entering the show.

I am so happy to know that I could be at least walking on the beach in the middle of summer and possibly lying down for that of sunbathing as well,
if not having a swim in the ocean.

The reason for this happening, or being possible, are the heat from the sun, which is because of infrared radiation.

Except for perhaps not the wireless mouse for your computer, it could be that of wireless communication, which could be possible using a mobile phone,
or laptop computer.

Is this possible only because of the proper SIM card which needs to be inserted and currently is an issue being looked at here and for now not completely solved.

I do have a micro wave oven as well for that of cooking of food, but if it rather became that of rain coming down, except for the perfect ice world,
where nothing is happening, I still could be looking at the sun as a source of both creation, or at least generation of energy and also that of the possiblity of life.

I still do have a bike standing in the cellar or basement, but not using it anymore.

In order to use the pedals when out in the dark, a light or lantern (again the poor translation) is needed and for this a dynamo mounted against, or towards the front wheel.

Friction makes for generation of energy and next it becomes that of electricity.

As previously mentioned, such a thing as capacitors inside a power supply could make for such a thing as high electrical power or force being present and this time by means of ampere.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampere

Next could add that I could perhaps pretend to be Isaac Asimov, rather than both Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein and therefore that of electricity making up Electromagnetism as one of the
Fundamental Forces of nature.

For one thing it could perhaps be "Men in Black" for part of your late night show, including possible wide or large eyes, or it could be that of Chuck Yeager using his stick in order to break the
speed of sound.

If it rather became that of "Little Green Men" and possible extraterrestrial visitors, most likely it would end up becoming a different story which not all people would believe in, or perhaps agree.

As an astronomer of sorts, for now sitting in front of a monitor or graphics display and next having a computer standing next to me, I still am supposed to believe in such a thing as both neutron stars and
Black Holes making up that of space.

Is this perhaps because of a given "belief", or perhaps rather a comprehension, because having a given understanding about a couple of things next makes such a thing possible?

In the world of ufology, whether or not it could be any science, or possibly something else, it could be a story about possible orbs, rods, critters and the like.

We could for some reason be left to possibly "believe" in a story being told about that of aliens and extraterrestrials here on Earth, because it could be possible science.

My guess is that for now such a thing as both "debunking" or even that of denial is not the usual or regular thing around, but rather the total or complete opposite.

Perhaps the word "open science" is not the word or phrase which should be used, but at least such a word as Glasnost and Perestroika should be known when it comes to that of Russian politics.

The same thing we probably have as well when it comes to part of science, because a man, or scientist, with the name Steven M. Greer, chose to come up with that of
the "Disclosure Project", in order to tell the public about possible secrets being around.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_M._Greer

Therefore, if you happen to be a debunker or the like and perhaps not a scientist yourself, should you perhaps debunk a given story, because it could be one such being told by a scientist?

Or is it perhaps still the fact that perhaps "believing" is next also that of making possible better science as well?

There are quite good reasons to believe that we are not alone in space, but next we could be looking at both the climate and also the ice man (Ötzi) in order to make such a thing possible.

Except for that, possibly the fact that even that of Electromagnetism still leaves both the Weak and Strong Nuclear force, as well as that of gravity in the dark, or at least remaining.

If for some reason it could rather be a dead body, or corpse, making up an extraterrestrial being (or EBE), lying on a table, we could next believe in such a story as well.

I have previously mentioned that we are supposed to believe in both that of life and death and next also that of birth as being a possible process.

Also that life itself could be cyclic in nature, because of either repeating patterns, or possibly Events happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event

Again the ambiguation page for this word.

Right now noticing the last element in the section "In science, technology, and mathematics", which is about a possible Mental event.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_event

Here it also becomes a reference to possible Artificial Intelligence (AI), which could be about both robots and androids, but here more in the leisure mood for this and rather thinking about
possible conscience.

Because there should be a difference here, perhaps more needs to be added, or at least it should not be that of St. Peter for that of a possible "Purgatory".

Except for perhaps the musical melody "We are the robots", the end sequence of the movie "2001 A Space Odyssey", could be like kind of a Revelation of sorts.

Here it becomes the boring sequence with the old man at the end, which in my opinion leads nowhere.

If perhaps science (and not Religion) could be that of "In the beginning", it could perhaps also be that of both oblivion and possible Armageddon as well.

A recent article at Yahoo! is telling, or perhaps predicting the future of the Universe some 10^33 years ago, where everything has ended up in oblivion and next makes for some disappointment.

Always the notion of time for that of the evolution of the Universe and next not such a thing as possible "Events" happening.

Am I supposed to believe that such a thing as "Mysteries, magic and miracles" could be possible and next also being science?

If so, what about the Revelation of John, which could be anything else than that of both oblivion and at least that of Armageddon?

To some people an asteroid impact wiping out the human civilization, could be "The end of the World", in the same way as an Epidemy, or plague,
but also that some people think that a nuclear war could be having a similar result as a consequence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequence

Here it becomes tempting at making a similarity or resemblance between that of an Event and that of a Consequence, but again only the ambiguation page for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instantiation

From that difficult, or even dreadful word "Instantaneity", which is a bit difficult to spell.

If not such a thing as both an Event and also Consequence, we could be back at the Butterfly effect, because this could be about both Chaos theory and also Quantum Mechanics,
except for perhaps being referenced by means of the Mandelbrot set, or the Lorentz transformation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor

Here it becomes something quite similar and not anything different and next that of Tensors for such a thing, at least when it comes to that of Mathematics.

Back later.

Again, what did I say?

If I happened to be a musician of profession, I could possibly be waking up in the morning with the flute or violin in my hands.

The fact that thinking with one part of your brain and here the left part, most likely makes you use the right hand for that of writing.

Same goes for that of speech as well, because while perhaps being able to both think and also reflect about a couple of things as well,
the ability of speaking, or perhaps speech, is something which differs between people, including possible stuttering and the like.

Except for that of dreams and also possible drug related hallucinations, that of intuition is an important thing which should not be forgotten.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuition

Deserves a link on its own, because here a possible source of confusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clairvoyance

This because as soon as you veer off tracks and rather make it something else, it could be that of Clairvoyance instead and soon it could be different sciences,
or possibly way of thinking.

For now I chose to open the box containing the power supply for the recent purchase in order to check the power and data cables, which was not included with the motherboard.

One thing being noticed is that the fan is apparently on the bottom, while the labeling is on the top, but next the product label, or name, has become upside down on one side
and the correct side on the other, which makes for some confusion.

Here needs a fix, because it better should be top-down on both sides, but except for that, this is a 1500 W power supply coming from Corsair.

Also I took the time looking at system boxes with my vendor, because for now I have chosen to use one already in my possession, but still having the soldered plate in the middle.

Like the refurbishment of my flat, where both the window and balcony ended up in white when it comes to color, it probably still is an advantage of having it in dark, or black.

Except for its weight and the soldered plate, with the new connector system for the SATA cables towards the disks, this is probably still one of the best solutions available.

Anyway, you probably already know that I have mentioned it, but at least for now, a ufologist with the name of Budd Hopkins is probably doing it slightly better than
Dr. Bruce Mcabbee, who I guess was not able to finish up his part of the story.

Therefore I find it somewhat unncessary, or perhaps threading on thin ice, or perhaps walking a similar line, by perhaps thinking, or making one thing against another,
at least when it comes to possible judgement.

If for some reason you could be left to think that we should be believing in such a thing as aliens and extraterrestrials, except for possible numbers, either such a thing as
Consensus is needed, if not perhaps the Scientific Method for the same thing, which also should be about a possible Method of Proof.

If for some reason you start mentioning one thing in a sentence or post and next it diverts into something else, it derails, or perhaps veers off course, or perhaps tracks.

If I could be asking the question "What is the definition of an intelligent signal", what would the answer next be?

One reason for perhaps asking the old question of whether we perhaps are alone in space, is in order for a possible answer be given, or coming back in return.

The fact is rather that I could be having a quite sophisticated product in my hands, but next it could also slip out of my fingers and next be nothing.

Both the book and also the movie is telling that "Diamonds are forever" and therefore we should value such a thing as diamonds even more than gold.

Like possible valuable versus invaluable science, excpept for that of material "goods" which next could be something else, we sometimes could be left asking the question whether or not science
is always about things which are related to the material, in the same way as a computer could also be for both good and bad when it comes to possible use.

Whether or not it could be an Intel Core i7 6950 -X processor, or perhaps a Samsung mobile phone, or perhaps even a laptop or portable computer,
we perhaps think of its processing, or computational capabilities, by means of such a thing as both speed and data transfer rate per second and the like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laptop

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_computer

Make it rather Artificial Intelligence (AI, large caps) and you next have the humanoid or robot for such a thing, as previously mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android

Except for perhaps an operating system, an Android could also be a robot, according to the ambiguation page.

Turning on the Samsung mobile phone in order to check, when next pressing the right key and holding it, I could make a restart of the phone or system.

Next, it reads

SAMSUNG Galaxy S7 Edge

POWERED by android

on five separate lines on the display.

In fact we should also know that while the Samsung is perhaps an Android device of sorts, such a thing could also be a robot, as mentioned, so here possibly some confusion.

Next we should also know what a transistor is, except for perhaps a radio valve.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor

If for some reason a computer should be more than just Arithmetic and also Logic, like the human brain, it could be possible thinking and next perhaps also conscience.

Is the human brain such a huge set or stack of transistors, if perhaps not capacitors?

Possibly not, but at least for the brain we are supposed to be having both intelligence and most likely also conscience.

A movie like Terminator II, could also be known for having the title or designation "Judgement Day", being added in its title.

Always the notion of time, except for perhaps the difference between the good and bad and next that of Judgement also means that of Right versus Wrong.

When perhaps speaking about such a thing as both moral and possible dignity, we probably could be left to choose between at least good versus bad, if not also that of
Right versus Wrong, in a similar way.

If perhaps that of Creation in one given way or another, we could also be looking at a possible "Creator" as the reason for our existence.

Whether or not one given thing for a possible explanation, this time Matter Creation versus Creation myth, the suspicion is that one thing or perhaps way of thinking, could give a
better answer than perhaps another thing.

Is perhaps one main reason for that of the Catholic church that of in order for a possible absolution of sins, or renunciation, if possibly different,
should we next not take that of Evil for possibly granted, while still look for such a thing as both love and compassion?

As I previously mentioned, if God is the possible Creator of the Universe, he could also be heavy handed at times, but still not the same as the Devil.

Are we still left to believe that both love and compassion could be one given thing, while that of remorse, anger, or even hatred, could be yet another thing?

In my opinion, St. Peter could be in front of you when entering the stairways to Heaven, but not necessarily so if it rather should go the other way and you next end up in Hell.

The event, or perhaps story being mentioned in the regular news, is that of events happening on Earth and not necessarily such a thing as both birth and death.

Whether it perhaps is such a thing as CASE analysis, or that of evolution, as being told or explained by Charles Darwin, at least patterns should be part of nature and next also
galaxies like NGC 488 and NGC 4449 could be different examples when it comes to that of both almost perfect, versus not so perfect, at least when it comes to possible symmetries.

We definitely know that life is not perfect, because for one thing we could be having both infinity and also those things which could mean almost nothing, side by side.

I previously gave a note of the possibility of having two processors at the same time on my purchased motherboard, because I did not shop or buy cheap this time.

Next not necessarily intending to mean that a processor should be or mean any conscience either, so here still a difference from that of a human brain.

The same reason when perhaps mentioning the fact that the world is not supposed to be any perfect either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armageddon

In fact when reading, this article makes a quite good summary of the key points being mentioned and next you are left with what perhaps such a thing should be about, in more details.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Hoyle

If the Steady State Model, or Theory of the Universe by Fred Hoyle should still hold in a way or another, we could still be left with a couple of things coming and next going,
as previously mentioned.

If rather "Genesis" is another word for that of Creation myth, it only adds to the confusion, because at least when it comes to Matter Creation, it becomes more or less one subject only.

I will have a little more of this after doing the weekend shopping.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2I4Ko2yW0M

Someone is perhaps reading my mind, or perhaps lips, which next gives rise to a couple of new thoughts.

It became a late night wakeup of sorts after the lull of the whole afternoon and evening after doing the weekend shopping.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abell_1689

Also there was a mentioning of this galactic cluster during the day as well.

Perhaps not a bad idea returning back at both Galileo and Kepler for a couple of things, because gravity makes everything fall to the ground,
at least here on Earth.

But when including the perhaps most extreme example, namely that of radiation coming from Black Holes (Hawking radiation),
I also noticed it being mentioned that photons are escaping fixed objects in space having a given mass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Is this supposed to mean that radiation always, or most often beat even that of gravity as a force?

Next a possible or given assumption that photons could relate, or be part of Quantum mechanics, rather than that of Electromagnetism,
because this particle is radiation coming from a star as a result of possible fusion.

If perhaps so, is it possible to include or incorporate the other two or three Fundamental Forces of nature into that of Quantum mechanics in a similar way?

Perhaps not the original suggestion or idea, but for now just a guess that this is what Einstein was trying to solve and next was unsuccessful.

What is the possible secret, or maybe culprit here?

In fact, the not so much secret right now, is that scientists are attempting at coming up with a GUT (or Grand Unified Theory) in order to explain everything.

Hydrogen, as you probably know, fuses into the noble gas Helium in the core of the sun, which next is not flammable, like that of Hydrogen.

Meaning that Hydrogen is a flammable gas (and not liquid), while Helium is an inert gas.

The question is whether or not this happens to be Chemistry rather than Physics and in the late hours of the night, I am not willing to speculate.

Except for that, I am not forgetting the isotopes here, but also get a sense that perhaps something is missing.

Just by listening, I get the sense that at least Carbon could be liquid, or even boiling at a high temperature and next what about that of Lead?

At least two periodic elements, except for the Lanthanids, are rare, or seldomly found here on Earth.

Next tell me that both Iron, Gold and Uranium, happens to be that of possible liquids in a similar way and the answer is perhaps no.

The planet Mercury, as you probably know, is perhaps the most dense, or heavy planet in the solar system, except for the Earth and also Venus.

When we end up discussing such a thing as life, it could be that of CASE analysis (read Charles Darwin) versus that of a possible belief in God.

I could get back at that, but also we should know that the planet Mars is having two polar caps, like the Earth and here the possible confusion of making it
Carbon Dioxyde, or perhaps rather Carbon Monoxide, for the ice making up the caps.

Yes, sweet dreams and next perhaps Meryl Streep for a couple of tears and the like around.

Guess what, but she was apparently trying to mimic the words of Einstein, which is "God is not playing with dices".

Honestly, when perhaps doing so, I also was thinking about the Butterfly effect, as a possible example.

Rather than the possible wimp versus that of a possible "wit", by means of being possibly "witty", I still could be back on the surface of Mars and next digging in the sand.

My guess is that Charles Darwin knew that he was living on planet Earth, but next that he did not know about such a thing as "Planetary Unfolding", which is a musical album.

Or is it perhaps still the possible conflict between the Chemist and the Physicist, where that of noble, or perhaps inert gases should be a favored subject?

For now, I hope you notice, or recognize the possible discrepancy, because in my opinion, something is either wrong here, or perhaps missing.

Really the fact is that I have mentioned such a thing as a "Falling Angel" in the past and also that the whole meaning next falls on dead words.

For one thing we could be left to assume that Seti@home, as a project, is looking for an intelligent signal coming from space, telling that we are not alone.

Rather than perhaps looking for such a signal, I rather mentioned that of , as that of the ice man, being found buried in the ice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96tzi

If for some reason it was so that the Fundamental Force of Electromagnetism was responsible for that of life on Earth, we probably could be better off,
because then we could next be left explaining the other three Forces and the way they are supposed to interact, or being part of nature.

For this reason, at least that of evolution, as well as a couple of other things, could be included, or being part of that of Electromagnetism, but next the fact that this is not so either.

If perhaps not that of evolution, it could perhaps be that of either Probability and possibly Prediction as well, which are particular or individual subjects on their own.

I previously mentioned the fine word "purgatory" but here perhaps could rather be looking at the singularity and next be able to tell that such a thing is probably kind of a "Dead End",
at least when it comes to that of nature.

Meet and greet and next it could be the king, except for perhaps the Pope.

I previously mentioned that of a possible "sanctuary" and next was not thinking of, or making any reference with that of "Garden of Eden" either.

For now I really do not know what could be the best or worst thing, because as a scientist, you could be left with a possible Armageddon in your hands,
if not that of a nuclear Holocaust.

Theoretically, the Ten Commandments of the Bible could next mean possible "obedience", but next that perhaps this is not so.

Ever heard the question "Science without a meaning" because there could be a possibilty that even scientists are questioning that of God.

Many years ago, I watched a movie about a fire in a high rised building, or skyscraper, featuring one of those silent movie actors from the days of black and white.

Except for perhaps thinking in black and white, which I know some people do, it probably was not Harold Lloyd, Buster Keaton, or even Charles Chaplin, taking part there.

The fact is that except for perhaps "stupid fool", meaning the man in the street and next what he saw, even myself as a user and possibly contributor to this project,
could end up thinking in the same way.

This is the reason why I could be looking at nature for some or most part and next that of a possible explanation, in order for a given understanding.

I guess you probably heard about the Scientific Method.

If this method is next supposed to question that of God, either directly, or perhaps indirectly, next eat my hat, because possibly there is no answer around.

The last or perhaps least thing a scientist will be doing. or perhaps bother about, is taking things for granted.

If for some reason I happen to watch a YouTube video, is this perhaps about the Scientific Method as possibly given or stated, or could the whole thing be a possible lie?

Again, the possible importance of that of Logic, because I was interrupted in the session.

Anyway, you possibly know about a couple of people in the White House, being possible "nerds", or even "jokers", except for perhaps the president himself.

Why so, is it perhaps because I rather could choose to question that of nature, rather than a possible stupid idiot which could be around?

Read my lips and you probably know who I am thinking about.

In fact. whether or not it could be a possible knight, queen, king, ace, joker, or even trump, you are not supposed to question such a thing either,
in regards with that of possible nature, despite or except for having such a thing as Probability at your hand.

Ever heard about the possible "spoken word"?

Is it still supposed to be that of Probability?

It should next be a fact that we are not supposed to be here in order to do any science, because we are possibly "doomed".

If such a thing as being possibly "doomed" could be a fact, or possibly true, we should also look for its reasons, or possible origins for that of a given answer.

My guess is that a possible "tell-tale" story could be about not the past or present, but perhaps rather the future and here I do not have the answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avogadro_constant

In my years at school, I happened to learn about the Avogadro constant, which I next found to be a quite important one.

We definitely know that nature could be both random and even "casual" at times.

Because of that, we could at times be left with the impression that not only science, but also scientsts, could be unfruitful in their work,
because it is either regarded as being valueless, or possibly not a penny worth.

Make it perhaps a couple of shining objects in the sky, or perhaps a couple of such things passing your way and next you could think that we are not alone.

Bah! Humbug.

Rather the fact that the Scientific Method always is about a given "truth" versus another, which next once again makes a possible reference to that of Logic.

Here in fact, I think it perhaps is getting wrong (and next not any Logic here).

If perhaps some kind of Statistics (for the lack of anything else) could be made or created, showing the distribution of possible debunkers or skeptics.
versus that of possible "believers", what would such a chart eventually look like?

Again the possible trap, or trap door that this could be about possible Religion and Faith, but in fact it is not.

In my opinion, the end sequence of the movie "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", could perhaps show us nature as it is, or is supposed to be.

No pun intended, but perhaps you also recall the "quarrel scence" from the same movie, making the rest of it even more realistic, if not possibly "surrealistic"?

Yes, push science on or upon me and next push such a thing as Religion and Faith upon me as well, except for perhaps one thing possibly being the "truth".

Because of that, "Never say never".

And next dangit, because right now I was in the kitchen for some two more beers.

Guess where it eventually ends up, if not in bed.

Life itself could be possible "experiences" and for this we probably still have to choose or select among the good versus bad.

I mentioned the cardboard boxes (some two in all or total), where part of the support for the inventory, goods, or property, except for perhaps not gas,
or gaseous contents (air), came included, or being part of the shipment.

Next, I have one upstairs room, as well as two downstairs room for that of storage, including possible potatoes.

Next that also three plastic bags having or containing drunken beer and this time half litre bottles,
ended up in the cellar or basement.

Next, is this supposed to be any "trash"?

What am I supposed to be doing with the trash, except for perhaps a two week rest, or delay, next making me think that the flies that could be around could be a resaon for
possible questions and next not my trash either.

I have previously mentioned the "battle of the sexes" and that we most likely are looking at things in a different way.

So, therefore, it became a possible mentioning about that of possible "goods", rather than a given inventory, or property, because like that of science,
I also could be questioning that of the possible "valuable", versus that of the possible invaluable (valuable versus invaluable science).

One of my personal, or possible wishes in all of this, is both getting to bed, as well as walking to the shop, in order to next know that my property is safe.

My entrance door for now comes with a single lock only and despite it being third floor here and next no elevators, I do not feel safe.

Becomes one of the main issues, in my opinion and I am going to mention that when the assembly starts next Wednesday.

I had a look at systems boxes with my vendor, as previously mentioned and for now it is left undecided.

The soldered plate becomes the major inconvenience with the box still being kept and also I will have to clean the dust away.

The reason why I am asking for help here and next getting, or receiving it, is the heat issue.

With a total of two user accounts with my vendor, I checked in with the liquid cooling system (I guess water) during the day and found that if possibly internal fans (some two).
these could be lying around, as well as the cooler itself.

Except for that, it becomes the Noctua cooler itself, which should be a nice one when unpacked and also should make for a rather quick assembly. when it eventually.
or finally happens.

So one thing for sure is that the choice or selection among components, probably is an excellent one.

The motherboard itself supports a total of 1 TB memory (or really adressable memory, because here it becam two boxes of 2 * 16 GB RAM memory for now and also being mentioned.
or discussed with my vendor).

Yes, tell me science and perhaps it could be the stupid idiot, but for now appearently not so.

For now I chose to pull the motherboard, because the case was "sagging" when standing and next had to be laid flat down.

Also I opened the box containing the 1500 W power supply, because the power and data cables did not not come with the motherboard.

The motherboard itself is kind of a "wish come through", in my opinion, because I know what it is and is all about.

But as previously mentioned, having a couple of accidents in my home, as well as possible experiences,
next makes for the "nice touch" and should not be overlooked, or forgotten.

I previously mentioned that my aunt was helpful in the kitchen, except for having no knowledge about that of magnetism,
as well as the strong current which sometimes could come my way and next kill off the show.

Always the flop, because I inserted the batteries for the fire protection system and next is having no such in the kitchen.

Yes, bummerme if you will, but I was on a chair during the day and next replacing those "dumb" units, which chose to tell me that something was broke.

Here, the interesting thing, or fact, if not already mentioned, is that I put or placed the writing pen for the Microsoft laptop computer against the USB connector for the
Samsung mobile phone and guess it became connected, this time by magnetism.

Also I mentioned that if it blows in the living room, I need to pull, or insert the pull-down knob for the (electrical) power supply, by means of opening up the gate. leading to the fuse drawer.
located outside my flat, or apartment, for now located some three floors upstairs, without any elevator being present.

Any capacitors in my fuse closet perhaps and right now I do not know.

The only thing possible when in the living room, is pressing the top-most, or top button (among some two) in order to get it working.

If it blows in here, I will need to do it manually and sigh, it became some time since last it happened.

Why not just kill that of science away?

Again remember those "spoken words" and next perhaps think I am silly or st

For now I do not have it in detail, but perhaps mentioned before.

The fact is that I ended up here with my pension, or a salary, being pulled away.

For now, I am left with a cash payment, possibly monthly and except for the food, it became a selection of a new computer.
both from a bit of taste, but also personal experience.

The general rule of thumb is perhasp "nuff, nuff", what did you say.

I previously mentioned that I chose to by a package still in its works, not only because it is expensive,
but also that I know about most of the nuts and bolts as well.

So by looking, guess I bought the more expensive ones, but also the better ones, as far as I am able to tell.

Right now it went into Friday, local time and I next made the agreement, or possibly agreed about next Wednesday.

Again "stupid idiot". because this is perhaps supposed to be science.

If or when happening to meet or enconnunter someone else than both my aunt and uncle.
it could in fact be an "authoritarian", if not perhaps a social "naught"-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianism

Yes, hallelujah, if you will, because here you have the stupid idiot, rather than the possible fool,
except for perhaps the name.

At least something to think about.

Edit: Or perhaps that of "given" rather than that of the possible.

In fact, you probably never know.

Beware of the typos.

I looked up "Toto" in the middle of the night, because I know, or happen to know that they are a professional band.

Next that of "studio music" comes to my attention, or notice and that such music perhaps was given a bit of care.

If perhaps so, supposedly even sex sells.

Who is the producer and next the consumer?

Again that of TOTO and here I am not the expert.

Always the old story around, because we could end up stumbling on words rather than something else.

Believe it or not, but in the world of space, such a thing could be about possible mishaps and next think, or believe that these, or such a thing could happen.

Yes, suckers (remember the intelligent signal which could be around).

Definitely so, because such a thing could come back haunting you, regardless of how good you are.

Next pressing the OK button or the like and the contents for now ends up on the page and anyway, so it goes.

Please excuse my eagerness, except for that of possible rooms.

In fact I was thinking of the perhaps end line here and not necessarily the start.

Yes, "Hold the line" and at least you are having possible music, except for that of "Hydra".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mkmUdUYgH0

If not that, or so, perhaps "Turn back".

Here I am possibly being cut short for now, so please have me excused.

At least makes me think, but except for that, suggestions are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7XhWUDj-Ts

Quite nice here when it comes to that of music, while still looking.
like that of "it next makes for the "nice touch" and should not be overlooked, or forgotten".

So, perhaps the violin, or even the flute here, except for perhaps me repeating myself.

Again, dangit, but next take it for granted if you will, but we are probably not alone in space, for obvious reasons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crgQGdpZR0

Again if you don't mind.

"I have a dream".

Do you remember those words?

For now I have not made the links to those guys out in the field (and not in the lab this time), but at least was able to come up with their name (ThirdphaseofMoon).

Albert Einstein used the strange or peculiar phrase "God is not playing with dices".

I am being reminded that while nature offers a wide range of possibilities, that of Probability is perhaps slightly different.

In the United States, that of Racism is a problem still lurking beneath the surface and while such a thing as crime is also a problem,
there should always be a difference between both people and also the way things are being handled, or dealt with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

Only to note that I went from the first link to the second when keying in the latter and here it could make for a possible comparison.

First of all, the United States is definitely no such Authoritarianism, but is rather a general phenomenon which should be carefully watched.

When I look at the whip or batons being carried by some people, that of right-wing mentality should be quite clear.

In my opinion, most colored people are having a quite good mentality, but there should be no exception when it comes to possible crime.

That of O. J. Simpson is perhaps a good example here, but I did not keep track of events as they happened and the show-business part of the story became the only part visible.

Like the falling man, which like many other things are related to the physical, other things are dealing with the Metaphysical part.

We are left to believe that the "hammer and feather" experiment on the Moon is supposed to prove a given thing, but here I am not totally sure.

Rather that being whipped or lashed, or perhaps breaking every single bone in your body from a fall, is something different than perhaps a whisper in your ear.

Is perhaps trying to give an explanation of a couple of things by means of possible science, an "excuse" for a couple of things?

The little silly or stupid thing is that Martin Luther versus Martin Luther King makes for a possible name confusion, in my opinion.

I have previously asked for a definition of that of science and whether or not such a thing is always that of possible "belief".

Definitely I know that science should be about the Method of Proof and the similar, but when it comes to those things we are supposed to be doing,
while "seeing is perhaps believing", we still are supposed to be doing science as well.

In recent times we have had at least two good observations, or perhaps recordings, of something which probably could be an extraterrestrial craft.

While there always could be that event which could be inconclusive, like the old recording of a flying object low in the sky,
most such things are being dismissed, because of, or in favor of a possible explanation of it being something else.

Rather than perhaps inconclusive, that of ambiguity is also part of a nature we seek to explain or understand.

If two people are able to see the same thing, but still unable to explain, it does not always help when a third person is stepping in.

Because of that, it rather should be better at looking at the problem or phenomenon itself, rather than perhaps believe in stupid people.

If for some reason God is regretting or regrets the creation of the Universe, he could perhaps be back at the drawing board for perhaps another attempt.

That of a product "as is", is also another possible solution or option, because except for some people going up in the sky, we could always believe in the painting above our heads.

My grandfather sometimes called me the "Professor", only because like him, I am wearing glasses and next I do not think that is true.

Rather the fact that both the grass, as well as the lawn is green of color and the clear sky in daylight is blue.

The fact that Albert Einstein started up his career in a patent office and next was dealing with that of watches, next became Special Theory of Relativity,
which next together with General Theory of Relativity, made for an understanding of both gravity and time.

So, I previously mentioned that I perhaps came in here the wrong door, because at least that of electricity is part of Electromagnetism, as one of the Fundamental Forces of nature.

The falling man is perhaps no secret, but rather the plane hitting the bulding which is perhaps not there, could be such a secret.

Rather that photons are coming from the sun as a result of radiation and the reason for such radiation is that of fusion happening in the core.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking

Rather than the scientist himself, I should rather deal with his research and also the results which have been obtained and next I did not listen to his speeches.

We definitely know that both a neutron star and a Black Hole is radiating both visible and invisible light because of fusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accretion_disk

Here it becomes at least two explanations, or part of a whole subject and next I am supposed to believe in it.

In nature we may at times be observing, or come across the eddy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddy_(fluid_dynamics)

Like the Earth itself, which is probably not hollow, a Black Hole should be a single object with no openings.

Gravity is a result of matter and matter next makes for mass being present.

Also we are supposed to believe that matter equals energy by means of the famous equation E=mc2, while still perhaps not making a difference or separation of that of radiation itself.

So when the old book with my parents, like the manual for my pocket calculator gets it all wrong from the start, it is always a reason to wonder.

Whether or not these errors are intentional, or perhaps a big flaw, is perhaps a bit hard to tell.

My guess is that neither Newton or Einstein was thinking of, or concerned of the weather.

Therefore such a thing as both viscocity and thermodynamics were possibly not on his mind.

So while we also know that the explanation for the calculation of a gaussian score is still poorly explained, at least we should believe in that of Probability.

I could get back at that of both Intelligence and Conscience, as well as a that of believing in a couple of things later on, but here I was thinking more about physical objects located in space.

Neither such a thing as neutron stars or Black Holes are probably a subject of, or part of a given Method of Proof, because we readily assume that such things are being found, or present.

The little sad thing is that while we have at least that of Electromagnetism, also that of both the Weak and Strong Nuclear force are in between, before that of gravity, so which way next?

This because while the sun is still shining, we should next believe in both photons making up that of radiation, while also that of fusion processes happening in the core of the sun.

All objects having mass is having a certain escape velocity, depending on the amount of matter present.

For the Earth itself, the escape velocity is some 11.2 km/s, or roughly 40,000 km per hour.

In my opinion we do not see the famous equation here, so rather it becomes the three Laws of gravity, by Newton for this.

Because those things making up the Sun should be different than both a neutron star and a Black Hole, the notion of time is still different than the Laws of gravity.

The deceased author Roald Dahl was writing books about "Tales of the unexpected", which sometimes could be that of "Mysteries, magic and miracles" and here we also should know about
yet another person for more or less the same subject (Patrick Macnee).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roald_Dahl

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Macnee

If for some reason both you and me could believe in that of gravity, also that of Metaphysics could be an important subject.

Therefore UFO research is supposed to be about the Method of Proof, but rather ends up being throwing out those which happen to be believers.

Science is definitely not about numbers all the time, but at least for the latter, we now are making steady progress.

Is a given Method of Proof only for that of an understanding, or perhaps explanation in mind, or could it be anything else, or perhaps more?

I have previously mentioned that I found it quite hard to both tell and also explain, when combining or mixing white colors with black colors in a photograph.

Therefore the same should go or be true when it comes to a live video as well, which could be possibly streamed, or played back.

Perhaps dismissing a certain fact could be easier than actually proving it because of this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception

Because of that we could therefore also be back at that of Perception as well.

My sense of balance is because of my ears and if I either fall, or perhaps end up in a circus for that of a carousel, I am always being told which way is up and also down.

If perhaps that of both the Falling Man and that of perhaps "Living Dead" could be more or less the same thing, we should always know the final result of such an event happening.

Like that of matter itself, the force of gravity makes no difference or separation between that of the living versus the dead, but perhaps that of energy could explain it better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

My guess is that at least this subject could be used as a possible "excuse" in order to tell whether we are alone in space, or not.

If Philosophy could perhaps be one given subject, that of Probability could perhaps explain that of God, by perhaps asking "Does God exist"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism

I have mentioned that of both infallability, or infallacies versus that of possible fallability, or fallacies at BOINC and next that they did not like that stuff.

So, what is perhaps next?

Perhaps it becomes that of a funnel, because when baking a cake, or making a meal for your dinner, such a thing is used to pour from one place into another.

The distilling process, which could sometimes separate flour from water, if not alcohol making it dough, could also make for that of Uranium 235 from Uranium 238, in the same way as Plutonium.

But unlike the distilling process, the Eddy is the place where both water and also matter is being sucked in, apparently as a result of gravity.

Both matter and gravity should therefore be referenced with something else, because while both neutron stars and Black Holes exist in space, also that of complete emptiness as well.

We are supposed to believe that the Universe is some three dimensions, with that of time being added makes it some four in total.

Also that there could be a total of 11 dimensions, but here my knowledge is almost nil.

Are we not sometimes supposed to believe that one thing could be a diversion from something else and that also here, there are both different explanations and also possibilities?

Definitely both Mathematics and Physics are able to explain that of nature, while that of Philosophy could perhaps explain that of God, but we could still be back at the Method of Proof.

If the properties of a neutron star or Black Hole could be explained by means of something else or different than that of both matter and gravity, I would very much like to know.

The core or nucleus of a Black Hole, as you probably know, is the "singularity", where everything ceases to exist and next means nothing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_(mathematics)

That of infinity, "∞", is still not the same as eternity either, because these are still two different things.

We could still be back at the question of the Big Bang as the event which made for the Creation of the Universe.

In my opinion everything was created, or came into existence with that of the Big Bang and therefore no such a thing as a "Probabilistic argument" here.

If Albert Einstein had been living today, he probably would be making an attempt at explaining the singularity, but for now, we probably should rely on Stephen Hawking here.

The important thing, as far as I am able to tell, is that the singularity should not be explained by neither that of gravity, or time.

The Theory of Relativity is still divided in two parts and for the lack of any better, or else, it could perhaps be said or stated that the singularity could be the place where these two meet,
or encounter each other, but next becoming something else, or perhaps nothing.

As long as 100 is larger than 10 and so on, that of infinity is possibly defined, or having a definition, or possible meaning.

But when next adding the notion of time, or possibly that of eternity as well, these two are still two different things.

Therefore the singularity is perhaps something which may not be defined and in my opinion, the Wikipedia is giving such an example here.

For now I make the singularity the result of gravity being present as a force and this time a force by nature.

The subject of Mathematics introduces us to both that of functions and integrals, next making it possible equations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_theory

I missed the above link until now, but when next reading, I do not get any more sense of it.

In my opinion, the singularity is a property of space, because it for now relates to an object in space, namely the Black Hole.

If you finish the life of a person by means of a bullet through the head, it is possibly clean work and not dirty.

In the same way, we are supposed to believe that Creation itself was also clean work in the same way and not some dirty business.

Is perfect symmetry the same as total chaos, because both could be found in nature, in the same way as that of both fallacies and infallacies?

The fact is that we could question the possibility of other Universes (multiverses) only because of a knowledge about our own Universe and next making it that of Philosophy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

Like matter itself, we should also believe in antimatter as well and also that these forces annihilates each other, leaving antimatter not present or found anymore.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser

Also that the laser has become an important tool for both that of science and also industrial purposes.

More later.

I am one having a middle name in my real life user name.

Anyone who knows the purpose or meaning for this being so?

Thanks!