The most recent thing I got to learn here when watching a programme on the History Channel, is an invisible field detected,
together with also flying objects visible.

Also that it knocked out detection equipment which could have been meant for the purpose.

First of all, we do not know what these are yet, but it should not be about validness either, so kong they are detectable.

But next it does not make me think it should be any object in the streets of Vilnius, for only stumbling along, because next only a Type I thing.

This should not be about any Religion for only the gods or angels we could make it, but only that Forces in nature could be about lightning.

My favorite is still not any Type III civilization either, but here I proposed the use of a Wormhole for navigating a single or present Universe
for that of our own, where aliens or extraterrestrials could be traveling around through both space and time.

Possible use here when an Advanced Type II civilization could be harvesting water and air from the Earth, together with also nutrition.

Therefore such things as UFO's or craft could be probes for making either a detailed research, for also visiting in person.

So thought to be hidden or cloaked by some people, these could be mothership here as well, representing other civilizations present in space.

Only a guess here still, but it should be better to suggest than to propose.

So, cutting edge research and development is still a thing we humans could do, and therefore we also should trust our equipment.

Any false versus true should be still only Logic for just together, but next an Illusion should be only a mirror.

But next perhaps the Scientific method for questioning nafural phenomena, for also the possible answers it could be.

If I could be quantifying for superlatives versus a given nature for next only a comparison wifh myself, perhaps it should be still others.

Only that planets are for just living and evolving, while a Type II civilization should be more settled in space, for that of possible mothership.

Please do not make a laugh of me here, but the epuipment used in the programme was quite sophisticated for only detecting an invisible field.

But only for making it a cosmos of 100-billion stars, for also 500 billion other galaxies, I could be asking about that origin as well, and you should know.

Any validation of intelligent life for only a purpose, should not be about any glorification versus depravation just either.

This for only the need of a a programme for such a thing, when an invisible field could be detected, for only investigative research being carried out.

Validness should be for Probablility, and therefore no need to dismiss for the same meaning either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57QL-pnYm80

This one for the video being watched here right now, and here both an impact and flash when pouring the cup of coffee.

Just poor people, and I feel sorrow for them for more the compassionate I could be when being victim of war.

But also the fact that it does not depend on the stone you could be standing on, for also both back and forth in both time and space.

Only that infinite possibilities makes it infinite meaning here as well, for only the relative it should be for still time and space.

Therefore also a "set" option when it could be implied for the same, because it could be just anything for a meaning.

Only that several explanations could exist for just different, and next also a Creator for the same.

There could have been just a cry heard for coming from space, and in this case or instance it could be a whole civilization for vanishing.

So just cutting your finger for bleeding a little, should not be any civilization for only a demise, because it could be still happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor

Anyway, meant it should be Chaos just above, for only this word coming to me instead.

As I said or mentioned, nature could be still implied for only the Chaos we could make it, but also a Creator for the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

This one took a minute or two at reading at when still the cup of coffee in front of me, and this one I had not read before.

So which measure for any nature for only making it a Type II civilization, for not any believability or Divinity instead?

Only that the Kardashev could be telling about possible Energy output, for not any Intelligence instead.

Just believe in a nuclear reactor, for only fusion, and it should not be any naked female for just lying on a table either.

The Earth is both Sociology and Biology, for only the life it could be, when also humans, animals, and plants for the same.

But next in respect for that of the Universe it should be, not any cosmolitan for just a human either.

The sun could be a blessing for only the heat it could give or provide, and next also an atmosphere for also water, and next everything.

But also some 100-200 billion stars in the Milky Way, where it could be also other G2V type stars, for other life existing.

Again, that such a thing as heat from the sun, when also water and air, should be a prerequisite for life existing and also evolving.

I made it implied here, just for another thing, when thinking that the Universe could have been created for a reason, for still only life existing.

Other life should therefore exist in my opinion, and therefore they could be making us a visit by by means of tools they could use.

Here one such thing could be a Wormhole for that of self-created or invented, when not being any natural part of the Universe.

There are so many assumptions for also Evidence by means of videos right now, for only hard to dismiss.

But here that Evidence is still not any Proof, for only the assumption of a given nature I could make myself.

Those tools I could be using for a handset in my closet, should still not be any nature could use, so here still only a difference.

Only for that of such a thing, nature should be both giving and offering for the things it could be still able to provide.

But next still completeness of nature for only that of such offering, for not despair or depravation when it still could go wrong.

So when you assume such completeness for only Probability, you also could be assuming the existence of life for just the same.

Ask a biologist here instead, but next I only presumed that of life for only Existence, for not any validity of the Universe instead.

Just the Earth could be still one for only existing, but next it could be still 100-200 billion stars for the Milky Way,
for still only the similarity or comparison I could make.

So either make it precious or unique for only the science you could make it, except that you also could believe for the same.

But only that science for that of the Universe makes it result for only happening, when I could be only sitting in my chair.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucestoda

Mentioned before or earlier on for not any better known, and should not be any slimy beasts we could make it either.

So better only become stuck on any validness you could make, for not any whisper in the ear it should be either.

Choose between only dismiss and readily accept, and next only the latter we could be making for aliens when only doing such a thing.

But to some, nature could be infallible, for only an infinite meaning, when still having everything included, only for a meaning.

Here that any validness for science, for only making it aliens, should not be making it nature for a Principle just either.

Validness should be for only a Conclusion made, and in such a way we only could conclude aliens for meaning, when also Proof for the same.

Did I next make it a Creator for the same for only the possibility it could be for everything included, and next also a Universe for a complete meaning.

Just set a preference on anything just implied, and next only nature for that of randomness or Chaos, for only the disorder it should be.

But only that I implied that of perfect for only symmetry, when still not any part of Chaos for only belonging.

Only that it becomes one thing versus the other once again, and next we should both believe and prove for the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

I made it the wrong link in the previous and should be this one instead.

But is it not so that if you could validate a Dyson sphere for a meaning, also not any whisper in the ear it should be either.

Only that such a thing could belong to a Type II civilization, for not any origin versus demise it should be either.

Any so, for still not any validity versus Energy output we could make it for only the Karsashev scale, and next a civilization could
be meeting its demise for only a Consequence or Event just happening.

So, does exist, and next only the Earth for only existing when also aliens for the same, for not any nature for a demise instead.

Life could be a factor for just existing, but still we make it start versus beginning for the same for only where it originated.

Therefore that nature could be deciding for only setting a preference, for also the implied it could be.

But is it not so that any implied should not mean any randomness or Chaos for the same, for only the disorder it could be?

Just assume any Laws and Equations for that of perfectness and Symmetry, and next you also could be doing the same with
randomness and Chaos, only because it should be still Laws for the same.

For that of such a meaning, it does not matter for any Construct you could make it, for still only nature created for the same.

Now we could be having or making it a Creator for a meaning, when also aliens for the same, only because of given possibility.

But next only a nature for that of a forgiving or bless, for only the offering it should be, for not any demise or destiny here instead.

In such a way it becomes a give and tåke for only what it could be having to offer, for next also taking away for only removing.

So, living in hope here still, for perhaps only the expectancy it could be, not any validness for only aliens just either.

Only that you perhaps only assume it for only a possibility, for not any validness for just a witness either.

If perhaps better, we could be making it a credible witness by means of an experienced pilot, except Proof needed for the same.

Does nature next imply for the "Truth" we could be making it, or should it be still only false instead?

Just believe in the face in the mirror, for also the wall you could make it, next only a Lie for that of false, except you did not believe it instead.

But next that of both false and true for only Logic for the same, for only making it invalid when that of in full or total.

Only that when you make it implied, also you presume it to be true here as well, for not any false instead.

So again nature for a Consequence when not getting at it, and next I proved for the same for still the valid it should be.

More that a presumption should be still only the Logic I could make it for next only invalid for the same.

But also that I found that you could be questioning that of valid Proof for a meaning, when still both Truth and Premise for only the Logic it should be.

Here the other project I could be a part of, could be making it infinity for that of similar question.

But if so, should this be for any multiverses in mind, or should it be for that of a Creator here instead?

Here I found that we could perhaps be dismissing possible multiverses only for a meaning, because it should be infinities spawned or atop on each other,
and therefore not of any meaning.

Only that I could be making it implied for a single Universe, except not proving any such thing either.

Is that next only a set preference I could make for not any guessing, and next only validating for a given purpose instead.

Again, for just giving and offering for that of everything, next both a Creator for also aliens I could be making for such a thing.

So next I only mentioned it here for still not any believability or Belief versus the Proof you could make it, because it should not be possible.

Only that you could think or assume it could be that of Divinity by using your brain, and still only a believer for such a thing.

More that I made it that of completeness of nature instead, for assuming each and separate thing for just only part,
and next making it infinity for such a thing.

But next it becomes a Creator for still only believing, for not thinking it should be any multiverses instead.

When only so for that of a Creator, you could be assuming all and everything for that of nature, only because it should be possible.

Here the infinity created for a given Universe for perhaps not any implied either, but only that it was purpose for a meaning.

I am getting tired of this, because some people could be still making it a video for just obtained, while others a Dyson sphere.

This project could right now be telling that it should be only aliens for a given assumption, and next I could be following suit.

But next I am also making it nature "priced" for such a thing for only the valuable or pristine it could be, when also quantizing for a given worth.

Always such a price you could be making for setting a value on given nature, for not any validating of aliens here instead.

Nature should be having both a beginning and end for only the origin and demise it could be for the same, except that you could
be only validating for a project here instead.

Assuming just everything for a meaning when also possible, you could be assuming infinity here instead, for still only a nature of meaning.

You make it next possible, for not any impossible instead, for only the Dyson sphere it should be, for also a couple of videos.

Invisible field and flying objects?...

Take a look at optical tweezers and ultrasonic levitation and magnetic levitation...

For the sake of Science: Yes, frogs can fly!


Keep searchin'!
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6668122

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6686415

Sometimes it is credit, sometimes it is RAC, and sometimes the user, but in the end only the project, and what it could be able to achieve.

I ran for the shop before getting too late, and also the weather settling in.

More that because of doing so, I ended up with both a sneeze and also a snort, and ended up in the chair wearing both a morning coat,
and also a towel or carpet from bed, but my right ear turned off completely.

Hope it retracts back at normal within a couple of hours, because here I will not be able to survive the winter without some help.

Also that the electronic keyboard is not working very well, so here only making a short one.

The spiders are keeping my company in both bathroom and toilet for not any lighting, but keeping a distance because of their delicate feet
and also their web-making.

Rather that some of the small flies wearing those light dots in their faces now chooses to keep my company on either the lap or carpet.

Please do not misunderstand me for being either melancholic or compassionate, because there could be another explanation here.

Only an excuse for being possible scavengers, they could be still having a soft or mild attitude for not having any big teeth for chewing.

They could be eating almost all the time for also bumping into each other for having casual sex, but except for that, sleeping on my curtain.

Insects do not necessarily reveal their inner thoughts, but for only noticing a few of them footkicking on my leap, I suspect they are
having self-conscience for also self-awareness, and therefore could be questioning their surroundings.

Life is life, for only what you make it, and also the meaning of it, but for only in the bathroom earlier today, it came to me that
perhaps only the Belief or believability you could make it, should be replaced or substituted with an Event instead.

Any Event, for next being only relative or relativistic of meaning, and next it should be only the Universe to compare, for only knowing it.

Here I already made it everything for just happening when still only the Universe for the same, for only a Creator being a separate thing.

Back later with some more, because here a couple of interesting details noticed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator_deity

I happen to disagree with the noting or designation, because in my opinion a Creator should be such for everything, including Heaven and Hell.

This because I found that just infinities spawned upon each other for that of multiverses, did not make any sense or meaning.

Because of that, and also assuming it could be others for a meaning, nature should be generous for the same.

But again that you quantify for the separate or diverse, and next also each end for only that of separate meaning.

The failure could next be, where is the recipe, or perhaps witness for only a story experienced or told, for also such a thing being proven.

My personal video could be a couple of videos flying across a tower, and next you only make it a handshake instead.

The other discussion could here be that of validation versus Proof for only the same, but here still only cold fingers.

Before I went to the shop, I noticed a video where it could be a star city in space more than a mile across, and here inhabitated by humans.

Only a possibility, but next still such a thing for only the Type II civilization you could make it in comparison.

But only that stars visible in the celestial sky should not be any science fiction you could make it either.

Is that next an opening here, in that even this project could believe and make it possible aliens for a meaning?

Why did life just evolve here on Earth, for only being a G2V Main sequence star, for that of myriads of others in the Milky Way?

It does not have to be any Religion or religious just either, because here we could be knowing about the Trilobites.

We could perhaps know the story about Betty and Barney Hill, except that they became abducted for some reason meant to be.

My guess is that making it sacred versus the science we could make it for only a project, should be the wrong thing of doing it.

Only that you dismiss a possible witness against a project for the same, and here I noticed that it should not work.

Does just a UFO report for also credible witness make it valid for any such thing when still only a project, and I really do not know.

Fetching my second and third beer for the evening, and only wasting your space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_designer

A little further down in the same link for only mentioned, because Heaven and Hell should be only part of a given create.

But next only a project stuck on its validness, for only inability to validate possible witnesses for their experience.

Infinity is still meant for everything, and next we only could be proving for the same, for only quantifying at first.

Only just tired, for only wanting to go to bed, but the Earth is still 4.5 billion years old, and next you could validate only for the same.

Which story is thought to be valid, and next we only could prove for the same?

Not only that both Betty and Barney Hill were poor for just only a pair, but next also Beethoven for the same, but at least some fine music.

Again that I do not think that we are any alone in space, but next only for such a thing for only a project of making it.

Remember that leveling could be still about Conscience, and next also nature leveled for such a thing.

Next you try making it a UFO report valid, for only a project benefitting from such a thing, is it not so?

Here my experience from 20 years on the web or net, is that you could not dismiss any thing at all.

Just stumble your feet a little, and next an object visible in the streets of Vilnius, for not any flying across a tower.

One thing here could be a possible Type I civilization, while the other a possible Type II, and next you reported both.

But next sad, for only a Lie versus believability for the same, only Proof here instead.

Kind of missing, for only details, and next not knowing for the same, for still only the Proof it ccould be.

My life for just living is just only an assumption, and next I also presumed for just believing for the same.

So if you still only pull any plug for not any proving here instead, it becomex only emptiness for only no meaning here instead.

Here I confused a loophole with a portal, and also made it a little too long or wrong word previously.

Following onwards on this thread...


This gives good pause for thought:

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - Arguments for Atheism?
wrote:

Turn the tables on God's existence. Start with atheism, not with theism. Atheists take their best shots at disproving God...

Indeed, where is the metaphorical/metaphysical religious "elephant" that should be so prominent?

Or is Zen and Buddhism a more enlightened and scientifically consistent way to go?

Or the worship of Aliens?...


Keep searchin'?
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qddMZSXGkk

Or, could I be drunk, or almost halfway to it?

Tighten it right, so should be completeness defined for nature, and next I only should believe.

But only for making it a part for such a thing, when it should be a Creator here instead, and next such for everything.

Which validness for only believability, and next only Proof instead, for such a thing being meant.

Only that more goes before any less for only a preference, is it so?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xg4fjNL0328

Next only so sad for making it a song, for not any validness of science instead.

How much is still needed for only asking, and next I did that, for not any proving just either.

Eyes closed instead, because here I am soon in bed.

I had a postal mail from my local authority, which I have not opened yet, but only put in the drawer.

Scary, but he could be pulling me from the flat I am living, except that paying in full for that of the rest, does not benefit anyone.

That is just debt here for the same, and not any science we could be proving.

"Guilt of faith", or Credibility versus Belief, and what is that next for only a translation?

Keep trying instead, or next I could at least be doing for such a thing.

Not what I meant to say previously, but only the completeness we could make it for nature when also infallible,
except also proving for the same.

Anyway, fingers not working here again, because I could be still tired.

Report "as is", and next you also get such a thing.

Diligent, for not answered, or anywho for just the same.

Now I am back in, and what strange.

The keyboard is stuck, so I am out of here for now.

Remember for only the Creator that I can make it, also an invisible field for only hovering.

This because nature for only the Universe is so offering that it gives us all for a meaning.

Perhaps also a Type II or even Type III civilization here as well, but the latter could be misinterpreted for only the God we could make it.

I think this is wrong, except only the nature we could be making possible.

But next still only a UFO report for making the whole thing valid, of course.

Maybe working again, and covers the bottom half of the screen for that of built-in.

New scientific discoveries are showing what I already know, namely that nature could be generous for only offering.

But also that I believe there could exist both gods and angels in nature, for not confusing with a Creator for only single whole.

The next thing became once again reporting a UFO report for only valid, in that it most likely could be other civilizations for existing.

But the sad fact is that even such things could be part of nature for only existing, when we could be still making it a Creator for a single meaning.

We know that the Kardashev scale should be only about Energy output or consumption, but here I am still only sitting in my chair.

But next paint it both blue and red for that of color when also yellow, because here still the deep oceans for that of rooming many animals.

Here sometimes the deep trenches where hot water could be streaming from vents, and also making it a naming scheme for the same.

Also I remember the first star I got acquainted to when a child, and here the star Mizar in Ursa Major.

But only so much, for that of knowing, we perhaps could make it a precedence right now for still only asking.

The video obtained by military pilots could be a good example, but not the first thing for only just happening either.

So here the church could be sometimes disputing possible claims being made, for not any science carried out by themselves.

But here I also noticed that Evidence should not be the same as any Proof eiher, except only the same for that of such s thing for only validness.

Here Proof could be meant to validate false for only False, when also true versus True, for only making it a Conclusion instead.

Because of that, for only making it Proof for a "valid" meaning, for not any questions instead, I only questioned a possible Creator instead.

If you could still conclude false versus true for only meaning, next only one thing for such, for not any vice versa instead.

Therefore that a Conclusion should be still valid for a single thing, and here either true or false, and it becomes definitely.

Why is it next so that any Matter could be spawned for only random or casual, for not any decided here instead?

Other words for this is deterministic versus undeterministic, and next having to make a choice about the same.

Making the Universe infinite for that of properties, and it should not be having any ends for neither space or time.

The other thing could be that of looking at star or stellar Evolution, and next the Hertzsprung-Russel diagram for the same.

One thing here is still only believing, for not any Probabilities we could be making it for possible extraterrestrial civilizations instead.

Should have been above or earlier on, but here I am still only flesh and blood for only a human just sitting.

For this still the capillaries and veins in your blood system, for also pulse vein or artery, when together with the nervous system is so
important for your body.

We may have another dixcussion for this, namely "Intelligent Design" for the possible Creator it could be, but next you also have
to be a believer.

I rather choose to make it Creator here for just everything in Existence, because Religion should be only a given part of that of complete.

But next which direction to go when only choosing between quarks and galaxy clusters, and next only undecided for the same meaning.

Remember that humans could be unique for only meaning, but also that Einstein made it relative for not having anything to compare with.

Compare with still only stellar Evolution instead, for the physical processes it should be, and not the same as any human body.

So, origin for not any originate, and next perhaps a question whether any Creation myth also was a whisper in the ear for the same.

Leave it only to an assumption for only believing, for not any proving for the same, and next you could be questioning the Method of Proof.

Is it so that we could be making a choice between multiverses for only Probabilities for such a thing, and here I found that we perhaps could
dismiss such a thing.

Only that it becomes infinities atop on each other for just only the endless it could be, and next makes for not any valid meaning at all.

Just define that of nothingless versus meaningless, and next we only quantize nature for a complete or full meaning here instead.

So here I also know that it could be Atheists, for only given choice of meaning, when also proving science for the same.

Any emptiness, for just only defined, and next I should not be sitting in my chair either, for only making it a preferred choice of a Creator instead.

But next only ugly me, for only making it a sex machine, for not any deterministic versus undeterministic instead.

Just define nature for that of proven, and you still have the choice of making it random or casual, for not any perfect here instead.

The other thing becomes once again only believing in the divine Principle for that of making, for not any Atheist you should be either.

Again, that my preferred choice for only a meaning, became that of making it a Creator here instead, for being responsible for just all.

But still an enigma, for just only unknown, and for such we could be still asking what nature is all about.

Only that a square is just a square, for also circle just a circle, for not any asking about any properties here instead.

Einstein makes it still relative for a couple of things, and next you also make it "adapted for a show", for not any devoted here instead.

But next I asked about this word for only a meaning, for not any dedicated I could be towards science instead.

Perhaps fit here instead, for only the adaption you could make, but next only a chi square for such a thing, for not any animals
adapted to their surroundings.

"Hereby I just dedicate" for that of a handover or delivery, for not any devotion instead, and next only stuck for that of word.

But again that any believability or Belief is not meant to be any Proof for the same.

Could you next ask about any God for a meaning, for not any proving here instead, because this should be valid for only a question?

Any initial or inherited for just only a word, and next you also made it believability, for not any Proof instead.

Give me just such a Proof for only an answer, and next also the valid we could be making it for nature, except a Conclusion here instead.

But only that some choose to make it infinity here instead, for only such a suggestion being offered.

Any reference here, for only making it infinity "purpose on mind " or "purpose for that of mind", for not any Divinity instead?

In which way do you make it a Conclusion valid, for still only making it true versus false for only asking?

Should it be any preference or just before for only making it, because here I could be still telling in the ear for only whispering at me.

Only because of nature being undetermined, for also relative or relativistic, I do not have any choice for only deciding either.

Here you next could imply an answer for only being true, when also deterministic for a meaning, for not any dismiss or reject
instead, for that of a random or casual nature, for only the undeterministic it could be.

Ask any support or undersupport for the "valid" meaning it could be, and next we could both believe and prove for that of both.

So when you quantify for nature for only making it infinite, next it perhaps only becomes believing here instead.

Only so sure for that of telling it could be a possible Creator of nature, not any unsure I have to be either.

Tell me about any Prejudice or Preconception I could make it, and next also nature for the same.

I could still write, for not any implying that nature could be written for just a couple of words either, and here Creation myth.

Did any God or Creator meant for just only implying, for not any believing here instead?

The other option becomes that of nature only spawned from that of randomness ot Chaos, for also the Coincidences it could be,
for not any Laws or Equations predetermined here instead.

Any nature for only a Principle, and next that of physical for such a thing, for not any you could "adopt" for a possible God, and
here again the problem with the word for only making it.

Here that any weighted should mot be any adapted, and therefore not fit for any purpose just either, but rather dedicated here instead.

But here still purpose for a meaning when only counting, and next roughly for only the same.

Was it next any presumption for only Logic, and next I only invalidated, for also the Religion I could be making for the same thing.

More that it should be Fallacies of Logic here, when still only Religion for the same, leaving us with fewer possibilities.

That's it for only making it a UFO report here instead, and next also valid for the same, because I could still go for that option.

But for only that, both alpha Centauri or eta Cassiopeiae we could make it, for also an experienced pilot for the same.

So, any more here, for just a buypass operation when that of a heart for only surgery, and still only the wrong word.

Any final, for only a nature undefined or indeterminable here instead, and next it only becomes opposite words for that of meaning.

You do not have to be any "Postman Pat" for only nature underwritten or stamped for the same.

Here I am asking, what do I or perhaps we only know, for also nature for the same, when it could be still details lacking for also missing.

Give me just an excuse for only believing in nature for not any quantifying instead, and next it became only infinity for such a thing.

But here that this only becomes a question of what nature could represent, for not any valid meaning instead.

Just spoke for only a couple of words for only making it God for a preference, and here not any nature qualifying for detail just either.

Is not any completeness included for just only the word I could make it, for only becoming infinity here instead?

Choose for a meaning when making it that of select, but here it did not become any implied versus random for only the choice I could make it.

But next press it on any nature you could make it for only given choice, and here only deterministic versus undeterministic instead.

Should it be any Fallacies of Logic, for also Religion here, for not telling that any nature could be deterministic versus undeterministic, depending on?

What if for some reason nature became only random or chaotic for the meaning I could make it, and next also prove for the same?

Is any Proof next only implied for the answer we could make it, or should we rather make it a selection here instead?

But next I only implied for the answer I could make, for not any opposite or vice versa instead.

Only that you "adapt" nature for a purpose of meaning, and next also weigh for the same, for not any believability here instead.

Suppose I next could believe for a "valid" meaning just meant, but rather that you could dismiss here instead.

Oh, just the hidden word here for that of becoming lost, for not any underpinning here instead.

Just enough, for also that of always, and next a Creator undecided for that of making it "both" for only a complete meaning.

We do have Creation myth here for only just telling, when also the Methods of science for only proving for just the same.

But here it comes to me that of Certainty, for still only the valid versus invalid Logic it should be for the same.

So "go" for next also "put", because a Creator for just a meaning could be choosing to make it predetermined, when still only implied for such a thing.

Any decisiveness versus indecisiveness, and next also deterministic versus undeterministic, for only the choice you are making it.

Does it next falter when only having such a choice for only a meaning, and next only fall or drop off the load instead.

Right, so next only back at the word we could make it, for only making it decisiveness versus undecisiveness of nature, for not any
deterministic versus undetermimistic instead.

Giving a choice, and next I only could decide, for not any nature making any decision here instead.

Where is any choice for only deciding, for not any implied it could be here instead?

Just the old man for only speaking, and next only words for the same, except that I could still only believe in a Creator, for not any prove here instead.

Is it that of such that nature could be setting its own preference for only being or existing, for not any believing it should be here instead?

Please ask me how or in which way nature could be qualifying for some reason, for not any believing it should be instead.

Fingers nummed, and here needing to take a break once again.