Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 238 · 239 · 240 · 241 · 242 · 243 · 244 . . . 334 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097530 - Posted: 10 Apr 2022, 18:46:34 UTC
Last modified: 10 Apr 2022, 19:10:16 UTC

Another one for that of a little more terse.

You know I became temporarily moved for having a couple of problems in my flat, and next waiting for having it fixed.

But here keying in Tor Browser for that of Google Search, and getting an error message here, even when for an anonymous tab.

That of course when trying to download after keying in the search term, for only a link being given.

Error here becomes that of accepting cookies for that of needed, when still only a regular browser instead.

The stupid thing is that for only my connection by means of Wi-Fi, I am logged in by means of a local username and password,
and my preferences for that of Google on my own laptop is being superseded or overrided for only that.

This becomes a parent setup not being able to access or change myself, for only the local administrator at the institution or hospital,
so here a sense of personal freedom lost for only such a thing being allowed.

Here I think it is wrong to allow Google such control of users for only given connection, because if having a SIM-card and own modem,
this would not have been any possible at all.

Any suggestions welcome, because I do not have that browser here.
ID: 2097530 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097532 - Posted: 10 Apr 2022, 20:11:46 UTC
Last modified: 10 Apr 2022, 20:15:55 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burl_Ives

Something different, for just another thing I mentioned earlier, for that of folklore.

Here no point walking at the bushes quite yet, but even such people for also naturalists, had their experiences at times.

So here only the Big Dipper for now and I could be doing the same for only wondering about nature for my own personal feeling,
and take notice about patterns in the sky, for also the painting inside a cave.

Here stone age man did so for a couple of symbols depicting that of hunting, where skin could be peeled, and next meat eaten.

But also that he painted for given pleasure as well, in that Intelligence was already a thing offered him by nature for such.

So here still cold for that of freezing, and needing a fire for getting warm, but thoughts for that of Mind could be still present.

But here still only a product of nature for that of giving, for not asking about anymore about possibilities being available instead.

We think we could be good or clever at times for also stupid, for not any other measure we could make instead.

But here only nature superior to our own capabilities, for still Imagination possible, when we could be dreaming of other places, far away.
ID: 2097532 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097560 - Posted: 11 Apr 2022, 8:31:09 UTC
Last modified: 11 Apr 2022, 8:45:11 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melancholia

Any depression, and I could bury my sorrow into both vine and beer for only the bottle, for not any stronger.

So for only a smile on your lips, you more could be enjoying yourself for that of a smile instead.

Here should tell that it is not absolutely true, for only what you could make it, because here still not any smile for only watching the skies.

Became a restart here for that of the whole Norton Password Manager now for also Microsoft Edge, but lost the Vault.

Here most of it known already, but a couple of nice pages with the browser, for also knowing my way for just clicking it through.

As mentioned, I could be losing my track of intended security when just meant, for that of Internet access by means of a local connection.

So when throwing a ball for that of entering, it could come back at you, for still not any stay for just only a bit of waiting.

Still that mental illness goes for that of a disease for only a reason to stay, and the wish for only returning back home, is only a continuous wait.

Here a public service with the name of Commfides.com could be offering me a certificate, but here not with the local bank.

Here insisting it now should be done for that of separate, when still or once more only a Monday for that of weekday.

But here only a decision made for only the better word, and for that of a route, here going to the bank first, and next my own flat,
except still insisting for that of both.

First of all, I could get a cup of coffee and biscuits when just up from bed and in front of the television in my room.

But next still the wait for only the thing it should be, when only wishing to return back at my own flat for only a commitment being made.

Here inventory and furniture goes by means of private insurance with the flat, for also building with the housing association,
so still only a throwing ball for that of commitment for only the current stay.

So asking to get out of here, it becomes only the guard making the night shift here, and it does not any way for not any listening.

But here the local commission or committee with the hospital decided I should be staying a little longer, for needing someone else.

The only thing just heard, is that I could get a new visit here tomorrow, for perhaps deciding more about my flat instead.

You may be able to see the threefold if not any more here for only the bank, flat, and password management for only my current stay.

Paying software by means of the web needs a code device for also code, and here a new one for that of both is needed, for still only bank.

Release, release, and I now could perhaps be allowed to go to the bank for a visit when still with someone, for getting the cards in order.

So if not any external help, for only a guardian instead, and it could be the one in charge here, for only making it so for both bank and flat.

The key for my flat is still in the pocket for that of main entrance, but the complete set is still kept in the separate room.

So here not any willingness for only the housing association for that of providing some assistance, for only leaving my flat up for sale.

Anyway, I messed out with the flat for only leaving purchased food on the floor, and the fridge also got defect.

This should be no responsibility for that of the hospital for not any liking either, but only a personal guardian helping me out.

So tomorrow will perhaps be the day it could be happening, for that of a release being promised, for that of returning back home.

The problem is the commitment for only the reason of staying here, for not any release, when still only the flat being the reason.

For that only a promised wait which should not last forever either, except still a transfer for only being released back at my flat.

So forget to be smart, when only offering solutions instead for the answer it should be, when only such a thing for nature.

Here still only garbled mess for only communication or a transmission, but rather making it nature for its presence for also giving.

Here still not any endless road for just only a travel, but only an intended Cosmos when just only meant for still only Chaos.

So everlasting, for only just happening, and a couple of things could still only take place for that of happening, when still only disorder.

Wish I could better for only finding my way for that of getting through, and next to the end for only an ultimate road instead.

Here I never was able to escape the mess for only things just happening for that of a lasting Event for only a stay, for not any final end it could become.

Any spinning loop for only inside, and it becomes the same story happening for only regular, but here still a wish for only continuing.

Because of that, not being able to see any given whole for just only part, for only a couple of things happening at regular times.

So for only a straight line for that of an interval, not any cyclic repeat for only a period either, but only an exit door for that of terminating.

But if perhaps only so, I next fell out the door for only the drain, and the cyclic period for only an interval became the larger number instead.

So for only the little room for that of staying, it became still only a wait, but next became released into that of unknown, for only a better world.

And wait a second for only a little click, and next also quantizing for the same, and not any given whole for making it an exit door here instead.

Only that the final click for that of ultimate moment becomes the exit door for that of given termination, for next the open door to the other.

So, my life is having a final length here for only that of duration, and it still means that I am supposed to die for only being terminated.

Here life almost spoiled for that of an Event lasting an indeterminate period for only a wait, except still the moment of death for only happening.

So, is time still only a notion, or could it be life happening in cycles for only the Event it could be, for not any decided outcome here instead?

Wait until death for only happening, and it could be life for just lived instead, except still only a continuous loop for that of a cycle here.

So what if life was only linear for only happening once, for not any spinning or cyclical loop just happening, and the Event still only repeated?

Take it away, for that of living life, and I became old of age for not any stolen, and I became relieved for only an excuse being meant.

Here the savior is supposed to coming my way for only such relief for only escaping, when still only life for not any sins committed.

So here it still could happen, for only my soul being cleansed, and for that it becomes the Purgatory here, after the soul could have left.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purgatory

Could you be asking for making it any infinite for only the indeterminate it could be, when still only death for your soul leaving the body?

Which Concept for meaning when only making it part of living for just only your life, for not any holistic view or overall consideration instead?

Could nature be still offering for only promises, or death happening for just only part became such a thing for only given meaning just meant?

For just only death happening, I could be stepping the stone for that of threshold or barrier when only limit being concerned, except beyond.

Just complete for that of death happening, and it also becomes a thing for that of presumed, for still only absolute for that of meaning.

Only that you assume a given whole for that of meaning for only such happening, for not any Butterfly effect instead, for still only small.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

You know that we could still quantize for only making it small for that of size and time, and not any grandness for a given promise.

Here God is great for that of entity, for also promise being made and meant, and next we could be allowed to knock on the door.

But still it becomes Comprehension just for meaning when only that of nature, for not any consummation instead, when that of Religion.

Only inconceivable or incomprehensible here for not the perceived it should be either, could still only leaving us speculate here instead.

Any value for just Religion, for still only the valueless it should be, next also difficult to comprehend for the same, for still the answer it could be.

So here your holy, for that of Almighty, only becomes such a thing when still not any quantized or valued it could be for meaning.

Here we are left still with only that of valueless for also unquantifiable for a thing, and next make it absolute for only Religion instead.

Any description for just only lacking, and it becomes still only undescribable for ony the same, for only past a given Comprehension for meaning.

Should I next bow my head for only that of reverence here for only believing in such a thing, for still not any quantifiable it could be here?

Becoming finished, for still only unfinished, and I became still on my way for that of an endless travel, for still not any gate here instead.

Entering the portal, for only slipping away, and any suffering for that of life would only vanish for just being saved here instead.

Here salvation is meant for that of God's hand for only respect, and therefore not meant to be quantized at all.

And for still only making it Religion for that of meaning, we could still quantize for just only trying, for not any science here instead.

So for Religion still not any provable for also quantifiable, we could be trying out for meaning that of Mysteries, Magic, and Miracles instead.

Here dismissal for Religion leaves us only with no answer at all, except for also the Atheist or Agnostic you could be.

Because here I would like to see a similar Proof for only a Mystery instead, and not any Religion for only the unprovable it could be.

We know that the scientist makes it an excuse for only making it stars and galaxies in the sky for also respective Laws,
for not any unquantifiable for that of Religion, for only being a Skeptic.

Any Certainty for that of death instead, and we think it could be happening for real, for not any notion it should be here either.

So lacking completeness, for just only adding, and you add that of immaterial to the material, for only making it complete.

Could I be left out with a different answer, for not any certain Proof for that of meaning, and it becomes only speculation instead.

Within a given framework of science, for only such a thing, it could become still only a Perception or view of reality just here.

But only that infinity goes for that of a scientific context here, and not asking for any more for still only that of immaterial.

Does it next seem for perhaps looking here, that these two could be different contexts, regardless of contents?

Here we question any Religion for only being invalid or immaterial, for not any part of science for only the material it could be.

So do you include an absolute nature for only making it by means of only Religion here, or should it be science instead?

What if any infinity became only Religion as a Conclusion only because of getting not any further for only an understanding?

Could you make it any Implication for just only meant, when that of Religion for only offering the "better" answer here?

What if any death became only Completion for just only meant, and that absolute became only total for still only infinity here?

Adding any Religion to only science for only complete just meant, and it becomes total for still only an absolute for meaning.

Forget that of Premise for still only infinity meaning everything, for only Religion being added for that of separate part.

But here God makes it incorporated for that of nature for still only included, and not his soul for that of any promise instead.

Here different things for that of quantizing nature for a meaning, and Religion for another, is perhaps not any same.

Any infallibility for just given nature, and it becomes promises for that of the same, for not any same for that of Religion instead.

Here different points for still only reaching or attaining, for not any different for that of science and Religion respectively,
when only two different stairs for that of ladder, when next only climbing.

Almost like God came climbing down instead, for telling I am here, for not any infinity still needed, for only Comprehension being reached.

So we know here that the purpose of infinity is making it an understanding of God for only the achievement it could be,
and not any different stairs it could be here instead, for still only climbing.

Only that you include Religion as a part for only given understanding, and not any Perception, and next know that it was created for a purpose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception

But suddenly I entered the portal for just coming in, and here past any given infinity for just only comprehended, for only making it another thing instead.

So I realize here that a given understanding of nature for only meaning should also be Religion for just only added, except not any different or else.

Do you next make it infallibility an excuse for only nature here, or should it perhaps be Religion, for only being included?

Any God for just only offering me forgiving for that of a salvation, and it became an excuse for only making it infinity here instead.

So here it perhaps does not become any Creation myth either, for only my own point of view for perhaps the understanding it could be here.
ID: 2097560 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20440
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2097567 - Posted: 11 Apr 2022, 13:34:35 UTC

There is always the light and enlightenment...

Sunshine is good also!

Enjoy!!
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2097567 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097570 - Posted: 11 Apr 2022, 15:47:08 UTC - in response to Message 2097567.  
Last modified: 11 Apr 2022, 15:54:58 UTC

Martin, any fairness with nature is not always enlightenment either, for only that of sunshine, except for good it could be.

I appreciate your kind comments, but also know about you having an interest in Chaos for that of a making.

Getting back at that of natural for only a Principle, except also the thing we should believe, only for a meaning.

So I tried here, for making it a relationship between science and Religion for only different contexts, in that I meant they could be separate.

But here sensing perhaps a notion of Belief for not any, that a Reason for that of being, could be still a Creator for that of Existence.

Here the endless road of making it Religion for only its own, and not any Principle, becomes only infinity for the same.

Just thinking that it could be God for a meaning, only because Religion could be telling such a thing, also we should believe.

Any Premise for life, when also death for just given, and it becomes only nature for set example, when still only trying to explain.

But only different roads for that of climbing when still only the stairs, it became only the endless road for that of such once again.

Here we are making it infinity for only describing science for also nature in the terms it should be, when also context for a meaning.

Deviating from a certain road for making it only Belief, when such a thing should be still the endless road, and you only make it the same.

Just add Religion to that of science for only having it included for that of more, and it becomes only the same inconclusive for that of meaning.

Ask me about any given purpose for only me sitting here for only Laws of nature in Existence, and it becomes determination instead.

Any suggestion for that of believing it should be a Creator, only reason to believe by means of Religion, for only that of Existential instead.

Only "here I am" for just only sitting, and next given purpose for such a thing, when still not any quantifying for Existence instead.

For that, only that of "Existential Principle" being keyed in, could perhaps make me a believer for only reason for life, and not any such above.

So do you make it still only Fundamental Laws here for only explaining a couple of things, or should you rather quantify any Religion instead?

Dismiss any Creator for only valid meaning, and you only make it nature for that of its Existence, for only purpose and meaning for such.

But here Causality for only that of such, could be telling me the difference between good and evil, and also the reason for only such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Heaven and Hell becomes still only Creation myth just here, for not any naturally speaking, for only making it Laws of nature instead.

Step on a foot for only given casuality, and any consummation or extol becomes still only part of Religion for just only believing,
but also note the slight difference for that of word.

Any limit for just only seeing, and we make it only infinity for that of the same, for not being able to add or include Religion for just only better.

We know that our Creator chose to hide himself from the landscape for only becoming obscure or invisible, for only leaving nature behind.

Here the Steady State Model of the Universe by Fred Hoyle is not any liked, for still only questioning a Reason for that of behind.

Ask me about any purposeful nature for only given purpose, and it becomes nature for only given purpose, when still only happening.

We could end up believing in God for only the reason it could be, except only better still, for only the quantification of meaning it could be.

Here only philosophing for that of a dream when only speculating, and valid meaning became not any such, for only unable to conclude.

So here Conclusion for meaning when still only Religion for not any science, and we could be still only speculating for that of Belief.

Is any Quantification we could make, also that of determination for the same, when it could be still only Religion for just only telling?

For only that of such, we could be still only doing such a thing for that of Belief, for only just the better.

So take my words for only granted, for just only what I said, and not make it any other for only speculating instead, for still only better.

Becoming the answer here, and it becomes that for only science, when still only meaning for that of the same.

Never mind for any asking whether any completion became the reason for only God, and not any nature for only Principle.

Here such a thing should be still only on behalf of science for given context, except also being explained for that of the same.

So if God is part of nature for only his Existence, where is he for only taking part in what could be happening?

Make it an Illusion for only just happening, and next we also should believe in it for only a reason, except not making it any God just here.

The point is that we could exclude most of all things for only making it science, when still that of Religion or Belief for only own part.

Here Belief should be still only Religion for just only meaning, so perhaps better making it a single context for only that of Religion,
because here presuming nature for that of its own, in the same way as Religion.

Could you next make it absolutes of each thing for only the road it could go, and next also make it certain meaning for the same?

Better conclude still only for science for also the determination it could be, for not any Religion instead, for only that of inconclusive.

And here I mentioned it already, that science and Religion should be that of different roads for that of separate,
except only concluding by means of infinity.

So think of Religion and science for that of two different Sets, and next try to combine it for the single issue it could be,
and next it becomes proven infinity for only just being together.

So did I make it an answer for only asking a couple of things for that of making it Religion just here, or did I leave it only an answer
meant for science instead?

Perhaps it was never any completed for only staying on the road, but here it became Religion for just that of included for only
the single meaning it could be.

Here we surpassed a given threshold for only making it Religion the better Belief, for not any science instead for still only proving.

Or could I choose, for only vice versa, in only deciding which thing should be for only better, when only doing so for that of science?

So leave it out for only Religion for that of Belief, and it became only science instead for only proving for the answers still lying ahead.
ID: 2097570 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097573 - Posted: 11 Apr 2022, 16:22:46 UTC
Last modified: 11 Apr 2022, 16:26:23 UTC

Perhaps a little hard or difficult getting at, except not any decisive versus purposeful either.

So purpose versus Mind, and I questioned if or whether there could be any Reason for such a thing, or it should be another.

Here we just add that of Religion to science for only making it infinity, and next also conclude, for still only the purpose of meaning it should be.

So here presumed death, for only just death, and I also could presume life for just only likelihood, when still naturally for the same.

Making it any God for only itself by means of meaning or Principle, it becomes a genre, for that of a path we could be following.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre

Here making it different Sets for that of each holding separate Laws for that of meaning, except only science and Religion for only combined.

Could you still add Religion for only to science in order to make it just better for only the Concept it should be, and next infinity for the same?

What if any God just did not bother of any infinity for just meaning, when only presenting himself for the being it could be?

For that of Religion, it becomes that of allegiance here for not any checking, while for science it should be that of Credibility.

But do not forget that we could be making it that of infinity for just both here, except not any Conclusion for only past or beyond.

If God is still only a term, also it should be a Concept, except that we make it still Credibility versus Proof for only science here.

So think that you stepped on the stone for just getting it any further, and here not any inheritance for making it science part of Religion.

Rather that we assume God for still only the completion or infinity it could be, for not any separate part for only definition.

Every road leads to Rome for only that of the same, and next we could be explaining just everything by scientific terms, for not anything more.

Here you once more could be able to read that there should be no point of explaining any Religion at all, for only adding to infinity for only subject.

The point is that I should believe for only just meaning, and not assume any Creation per se for only its Existence for only just defined.

Either I could still presume for meaning when just Religion for that of science for just both, and not any Creator for only own Existence instead.

So take it for granted when still only meaning, and it became that of God for only such for still only Religion for that of meaning, and not any science.

But for still only duties and compliance here, rather that of fulfillment here instead, when that of just for only giving, when he could be the Creator.

Here some people speculate about possible multiverses, while others make it that of Eternity for also Purgatory instead.

Only sacred soul, for that of an Aura past my fingers, and I could still believe in such a thing for only the sacred it could be, except also given purpose.
ID: 2097573 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097635 - Posted: 12 Apr 2022, 20:20:39 UTC
Last modified: 12 Apr 2022, 20:22:14 UTC

And not to be any unfair with you either, but I went back at Google Chrome for a regular tab here.

Should tell that after two days of looking around, I was able to circumvent the Tor Browser download error.

Here needs a little more than an empty computer or laptop, for also the resources of the web, and also a bit of experience.

Also the browser restarted for an update needing a couple more minutes, but here an example showing the power of the web.

It should be quite obvious for that of plain that resources being assigned by a local administrator should be kept in his hands,
but only going to show here that this is not any true.

The meaning here is that you should become stuck for not having that option available from inside a place giving perhaps no such access,
but next unable to tell whether it was an error, for trying out with both Google and Yahoo! for that of search.

The connection here is Wi-Fi for that of access, and for only getting used to this using a wireless modem at home, I got it to work.

So here the only missing thing for that of setup is a VPN connection, and that I have not tried at all, for still getting acquainted.
ID: 2097635 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097639 - Posted: 12 Apr 2022, 20:56:02 UTC
Last modified: 12 Apr 2022, 20:57:23 UTC

And for doing so, I also was inside my Google account for that of settings, and here not any Search feature for only available.

The whole thing for that of structure is much complex here, and the pages for also that of help is only telling how it should be done.

I needed two days on this for only own experience, for next giving a thought of what is needed for only being in charge of a network.

Not that it should be Google here for that of domain, but for only a download manager installed, I was able to download the software.

My guess is that here it was not meant to be available for that of permitted, but only that the web itself is taking a precedence here.

Perhaps this was also my sense for making it kind of a misnomer here, in that I felt that such a thing could actually be possible.

My guess is that if you absolutely have to download countless indecent pictures, for also that of fraud, such a thing should be illegal,
except not any discussion for only that of technical possibilities.

I have not tried any onion yet for that of dark web, because of a sense for only that of better, except a couple of things for that of privacy.

Circumventing any features only built in as a possibility should not be any crime, for rather leaving it to the user for his knowledge.
ID: 2097639 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20440
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2097650 - Posted: 12 Apr 2022, 23:04:09 UTC

We used to use garlic to keep blood thirsty vampires away...

Now we need onions to keep away the money thirsty prying eyes of Marketing!

Can we evolve to something a little less greedy?

Can Religions teach us all to be more humble and to cooperate for the better good of everyone?

Perhaps a lot more education and better education is needed for all!


Keep searchin'!
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2097650 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30719
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2097657 - Posted: 13 Apr 2022, 1:14:04 UTC - in response to Message 2097650.  

Can Religions teach us all to be more humble and to cooperate for the better good of everyone?
They teach all of the deadly sins.
ID: 2097657 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2097670 - Posted: 13 Apr 2022, 9:17:57 UTC
Last modified: 13 Apr 2022, 9:23:06 UTC

Gary, with respect to nature, I could be still making it Religion, for still the other thing I perhaps said.

My notion here is that Religion is the way we are supposed to believe in God, for not making it any consideration of nature instead.

Here I know that you are an atheist, and therefore not any such thing, except proving any elementary particles, are still not the same as proving any alien.

I have never heard any testimony telling about whether any possible witnesses could be believable or even truthful regarding possible claims,
except military pilots now locking on possible objects as targets.

Enfing up just a spoofer, or blowing in the air for just nothing, we could be still validating for science, except only guessing for that of speculating.

Many people could be just telling about their given experiences for only purpose, except still only carry on for doing science of the whole thing.

So one thing is making a UFO report valid here instead for being seen and observed for such a thing, except still validness coming along.

But if rather Credibilty instead, you also assume such a thing be true for that of meaning for still only the Truth it could become.

So making an assumption now that we are not any alone in the Universe, is the best Premise we could make, for only a presumption for the same.

In fact, such a thing as both Premise and presumption beats any guess or surmise we could be making here, for only assuming it to be still true.

So if I could be ticking a label on a form stating that such a thing could be true, here a declaration of such a thing should be available.

But also a Consensus for science should be needed, and here so for that of sitting down together, and just agree on such a Principle.

So with regards to science, also with respect to nature for what it could be meant, for still making it the Kardashev scale for the types it could be.

Now I will be out for the shop for a little while and will have to wait for the bank and my housing association until next week, for that of Easter.
ID: 2097670 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098058 - Posted: 19 Apr 2022, 15:43:59 UTC
Last modified: 19 Apr 2022, 16:10:53 UTC

Back with the session for a better start, for also a nice breakfast, and the browser kept all my windows and tabs.

The only thing I miss now are the separate windows for the factorization tasks, so here maybe a development problem of sorts.

But for in between two different rooms for carrying, the laptop kept the single running session for only a battery installed.

Here only clicking the button at the top for a quick shut off, which means only a powered off screen, and not any logoff.

This means problem being mostly fixed, except the missing thing for connecting either between two separate mobile phones,
or both at the same time or simulteously, towards the laptop.

Here the previous phone got frozen in the display for that of lacking a PIN-code, and also unable to shut it off, because I probably
inserted a SIM card directly in the slot, without using the cardholder.

Also that I bought the wrong earphones for the new or most recent one, and struggling below the carpet for getting rid of the Bixby routine,
in order to turn it ofAnother thing is that of wear and tear for the laptop, where the separate keyboard now has become just worn for that of used.

This menu selection I found quite a bit down in the menus, and should be having a better placement for that of simplicity of use.

Here I know it could be a separate airplane mode not only for the click of the button, but also a separate restart when fiddling the knobs.

Also a safe mode, and noticing the text "Setup" briefly right now, but here having to enter the PIN-code, which I do have for the new one,
except turning off the display for not being any connected.

The problem here is the display automatically turning down because of short inactivity, and each time the PIN-code is needed.

Using this code for logging in, I next click the airplane mode in order to turn it off once more.

One thing being noticed, is that my wireless connection to the web goes through a Wi-Fi interface belonging to the institution.

Here I mentioned that the Tor browser could be used for both the laptop and mobile phone, but here perhaps a problem with the phone.

Also a username and password lasting only a week each time, for having to be altered using a separate phone in the adjacent room.

More that of a small office for that of guarding purposes, where I am having both a living room, sleeping room, and also bathroom.

But for once again a weekday, here a physical therapist with me shortly for that of weekly schedule, according to a paper plan.

And should tell that I was not even smiling here, for just another story meant to be for that of that of carrying out science.

Here one thing is that of research, for not any investigative detective at all, for also some eyecolor and fingerprints needed at times.

Lacking a possible ID, and you could be relying on that of such, except a pass or passport needed for being requested separately.

So here still both smiling and laughing alternatively besides each other for just together, for not any laughter and ridicule at all.

Remember that our sun is still a main sequence G2V star for only part of the Universe, and also Alpha Centauri A for the same.

Here the Drake equation is making it a zero or nil possibility for not any civilizations at all, because we could be added for just one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

But here it makes me think that Probability is still one thing, for not making it any Implication for just happening as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

So tell me that I am not any true for only a liar instead, and next it became only a Logical consequence for telling I am part of the Universe.

Next tell about the possible invention which became that of nature, for only the physical properties and parts it should be about.

For one thing we could be still asking and thinking for only guessing about making it any Religion instead, for not any better meaning.

Just explain instead, for having it sorted out, and we as humans for also a civilizations, could be unique for only its own context.

So does it matter for only making it science here, for being the quantitative part we could only value for that of its significance, and not any more?

We already know that the subject of Religion becomes the quite different here, for not any material it could be, for still only being immaterial.

But still that of I.Q or Intelligence Quotient here for that of Mind, when also an investigative detective at times, for not any research purposes either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient

Here suggesting is still better than proposing, and for not being any Skeptical either, I could be relying on my brilliant Mind for only intellect.

Next clicking the second link, and here is the stuff I was looking for most all the time, but so sad for only making it Psychology here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology

Here the sweeper of chimneys still have a metal bar to be standing on, except only a floor and not any roof for only starting.

But next he could be climbing the ladder for only entering the roof, and in such a way he met up or encountered a different condition (presence)
for that of being brought from one place to another.

So think I could be still intelligent for only having a brilliant Mind, for not any taking or carrying away, for ending up at a different place.

Am I supposed to be valuing science for only a meaning, except only different belongings for that of meanings it could represent?

So who becomes the take away, for not any carried out instead, when still brought from one place to another, for only a different location?

Except that I could still die just for a meaning, for only making it valueless still, for only the meaning it could be.

With my current stay for that of living condition, I could also be so for the place I could be living, for not asking for any more or else.

Make perhaps an offering instead for that of a sacrifice, and you could end up worshipping instead, for still only the sacred it could be.

Any believability, for just part of or property of nature it could be, and we make it still Belief for not any trusted instead,
and next we quantify for still only significance, for having it valued.

But in some respect, we could be using a form for that of a scheme, and in such a way "conceptualize" for the meaning or certainty it could be.

So except not any realizing given Fact for only reality, it also could be lost dreams for that of sleep, for not any Reincarnation instead.

Could any lost dreams be the Reincarnation we could be making, for not any valuing of science it could become still?

All those birds, and next any hierarchical branches for that of a tree, and next still wandering for among the trees, for that of dark shadows.

Any Paradise here instead, and it could be the thing wished for or desired, but here wondering if any Certainty could be quantized for a meaning.

Many people could here be wondering, for still not any wandering, if or whether we could quantize any immaterial for only such a thing.

So in respect of, for also respect with nature for only a given thing, still part of nature for only what it could be or represent.

Take any Logic for only first part or stance, and we could be making it still Elementary particles versus Creation myth here,
except also knowing that the first part could be having a changed name.

So here only lost my senses for just given part or happening, and became not any lost at sea for only death happening instead.

But also a possible time travel here, for that of such a thing between space and time, for making a journey to a distant place.

So thinking I could be still wishing for a possible journey happening, also that I could quantize such a thing for a meaning, for still only its value.

I made it a call here for just a note earlier or previously, that I could be making it Belief still part of science for only its respect,
but also that of making it God for being a Creator for only a single context of that of meaning.

Here "In the beginning" for just the thing it became, and all those Coincidences and Contradictions, for also that of arbitrariness and random,
came into being for just a blink of a moment for only a second just defined.

Not a mention of any Planck constant or Planck time just either, for still only parts of nature for only defined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

Not sure about the words here, but translates into exalted or sublime for the possible betterment we could be making it still.

Any Religion here for just only believing, only becomes the science per se for not any quantifying or valuing we could make.

So take it for granted for still only the science it could be, and next also recognition of Fact for just only meant, for that of the same.

Make a pause or stop for that of reflecting on possible betterment, for only the notions of nature we could be still having.

The other angle of approach for still only making or becoming, is the hierarchical structure for that of branch, when still only climbing.

Only small versus large, and it becomes Quarks at one end, for also galaxies and clusters of galaxies, for still not any Belief for only sensing.

So does it matter for only belongs, when still lying down for just to die, for also a grave or burial needed, and also a process?

If any death is still a Concept of nature for just only making, it also is a part of it for just belonging, and also representing.

There should be no reason of speculating, for only philosophering about a certain death for only happening, when still only immaterial.

Question(ing) about nature for only the reasoning it could be, you also quantize for the same meaning, for only that of material,
and it becomes such a thing for that of "Cause", when still only reasoning for a given Fact.

So be sure to exclude a given Fact for only real or reality for only what it is or belongs to, because it should be impossible to add such a thing for
only meaning for still only the immaterial it could be.

Of course it could be still validless, for not any Certainty, but next not any clue for only being Logic instead.

We could be making it still completion of nature for what it could all encompass for the meaning it could be, except not any same valuing.

Here it comes to me that given senses, for only the different it could be, also that we could quantize for a different meaning, when still only Perspective.

An embrace should still not encompass any reality for only understanding, but also Comprehension for a better word.

But again only conceptualizing for the different reality it could be, when still only immaterial, for not any quantized instead.

Here we are only asking for that of speaking, for making it a better word for that of sense or meaning, for the understanding we still could make.

Just fill up the bathtub for that of overflow, and water will still end up on the floor, for not asking about possible betterment for only science.

Again, that it could be Paradigms and Paradoxes for that of explaing possible nature, for still the Certainty it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox

Again that I should make it a line in between, for not any three links instead, for only separating a little.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift

What if I rather shifted here instead, for making it two different branches of a tree for becoming Elementary particles versus Creation myth again?

Again I could be asking for a better word for that of becoming a single context for the first one, because here also Fundamental Laws of physics.

The problem here is that you once again could dismiss any valueless or clueless for only the meaningless it still could be for the latter.

Any definition of Fundamental Laws for only the meaningful or sensible, still does not take into consideration that of death for just happening.

Any Probablility for just only likelihood, is not making any same for only Religion being the other issue, when still only Belief for such a thing,
but also that I made it "reasonable" here earlier on.

So press the button for still only being decisive, and such a thing only reflects on Laws of physics for only the making it could be.

But here left with such a thing for that of an understanding, when only assuming the Universe could be having certain properties for only being unique.

As I said or mentioned, could you still exclude any immaterial for only certain meaning, for still being part of the Universe for only just given?

Is it next possible to prove with any Certainty for just only Proof, that of any immaterial, for only the separate, different or another it could be?

My guess is that here we are trying to quantize for still only completion just meant, for not any immaterial it could be instead,
because you only add such a thing for being incomplete.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

So little priest, for what you could be saying for only preaching, it should be still only worshipping here for next only the God you could make.

Any better perhaps, and I could be speculating for just only an Idea, when philosophering for the same, and next also conclude for a meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea

Did just God for not any nature for only better, come up with such things for that of different, when still not any quantizing just either?

Again that quantizing only becomes matter here, for also the materialization it could be, and that of Idea is perhaps not any relevant,
for only superfluous.

But for only such a thing, it also makes me think here of an Event here as well, for only the thunder and lightning it could be for that of spectacle.

Here such a thing is being explained by means of Laws of nature for such a thing for only the Fundamental it could be,
and / for not leaving me any speculating for just the other Idea of just immaterial or unquantifiable instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

See footnote 118 down here for that of References, and it becomes " . . . probability and of reasoning" for just added.

So here it became using the word "transition" when such a thing for that of a phase versus another for only trespassing.

Next wondering if there should be any "taking hands from mouth", for what God just said, except it became the dawn of time.

Think you could follow the notion of way back in time for not any Internet or web Archive either, because here still large versus small,
and we could make it the Universe as it is, for not any distant past instead.

So here both Adam and Eve for their separate parts for only branches they represent, except not any given whole for science versus Religion.

Only that I could compare an ant or spider versus elephant in size, for still not any firefly or chinese dragon, for just believing.

Any infinite for only just parts, should be still only sizes for that of magnitude, and not any such for a heathen or pagan, versus God.

Therefore I was still only raising my head a little for praising God, except only living in the Heavens, for not any infinite nature instead.

Leave it to the scientist for only dismissing a certain thing, there should be no such thing of valuing a divine entity for that of its magnitude.

Therefore you also set a preference for just only making, in that sizes determines proportions and shapes of objects, but not any angels.

Either the Concept of infinity is indeterminate on its own, or you add to it that of immaterial or unquantifiable for just making it God.

Teavel in different directions, and you could always end up somewhere, except only the notion of God as being an endpoint, when still only infinity.

The scientist or whoever believes that God is the Reason for making it nature, could perhaps be a believer, except still only a preference.

Here Creation myth states that "In the beginning, God created the Earth and the Heavens, and saw it was working".

Never mind, but such a thing does not speak about any Universe for only its properties, because it once was created through the Big Bang.

Here the completion we could make of all things, are those which exists, and only take for granted for such Existence.

All we know is that nature is still only infinite for that of proportions here, and next unable to proceed, for just not any credo available.

So any point, for also pointless, and needless to say for still only the Empty set, which could be assuming a certain value, for not any meaningless.

Only still past infinity, for only continuing, and we could be assuming God as a reason for still only endpoint, except no such thing for nature.

Is God next any full-fledged or complete for that of its own thing for still what it could be or represent, or do you make it a preference for still only nature?

Could edit above for the better, but still Almighty for that of divine or divine entity, for not making it any property or noname just either.

Here Creation became the thing it was meant for nature, but we could still be left to speculate about other things for just an Idea.

Any lifted eyebrows, and also raised for the same, because here still not any stairways to Heaven, for just only a ladder to climb.

Still unable to quantize any Religion for any meaning, but next only knowing that it should be God at one end of the rope.

But also that we could make it infallibility for a couple of things, and next that this should be about only size, for not any Reason instead.

Quantizing for that of Matter is a thing we could still do, for that of Uranium being the heaviest element, for also clusters of galaxies,
so therefore still a tunnel for not any rope, and I could be climbing to the summit for just a mountain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

So time is a notion, for also part of the Universe being created, and here no such a thing as any before for only given past.

Remember what I said about Creation myth before, in that "In the beginning God" created the Universe, and next I should know.

So, is God still only infallible for only undefined for that of Concept, or could you make it a figure or character here instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divinity

Here I know that nature is complete for only the reason I could make it, for still not any other Reason for making it God instead.
ID: 2098058 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20440
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2098065 - Posted: 19 Apr 2022, 16:40:40 UTC
Last modified: 19 Apr 2022, 16:42:58 UTC

"God" is a human concept. Does that require including human fallibility?...

After all, we 'make' God to be 'something' in our own 'image'...


Meanwhile, Science is a never ending search to forever expand our understanding to better understand everything more that there is yet to find to understand.

Enjoy the search for a better understanding!


Keep searchin'!
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2098065 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098263 - Posted: 22 Apr 2022, 19:03:45 UTC
Last modified: 22 Apr 2022, 19:04:11 UTC

I am having some good news for you right now.

Here I got the message that the Wi-Fi with the institution could be misconfigured, and also I told them so.

For some reason, still working on the recently purchased laptop, but here also a software with name of DeX.

Still not working, I sat here for a number of days trying to figure it around.

With my mobile phone, I came across RDP, or Remote Desktop Protocol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Protocol

So here detaching from the previous Wi-Fi, and only using DeX, by opening up a connection by means of USB towards the phone.

Also the same software installed on the laptop, for making it possible to access the phone directly through the cable.

Here a little cumbersome having to turn on the display each time for that of connecting, because I had to unplug for checking.

So please have me excused for only small fingers, because all the other contents are still lying in the buffer.

Here it does not tell me about speed, or whether I could be safe for not any compromised, because it should be more a private
rather than public netword for that of connection.

Getting back at that in due time, because watching a YouTube video here without not any delay or hang at all.

Anyone else having knowledge or experience about this, because here not the regular or typical thing from best guess.

So here putting the Samsung S22 Ultra away, and it lies besides me in the sofa with the display turned off, and only the cable.

The limit becomes the laptop with only Windows 10 Home installed, but I got quite much available here, for also a stuck OneDrive.

Now I could get back at that of running again, and also keep a tab of both news and email which could arrive.

Very nice here and saves my day quite much for only that of comfort.
ID: 2098263 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098289 - Posted: 23 Apr 2022, 10:01:16 UTC
Last modified: 23 Apr 2022, 10:10:39 UTC

So 09:35 AM, and back with a new session, for trying to make it a little better, and it became past noon.

I forgot buying the biscuits when at the shop yesterday, so it becomes doughnuts instead, for also donuts for the same.

So leave it not to any laughter and ridicule for only deciding, but more that of dependency for making a thing trusted, and not any closed.

That became the validness we could be still seeking, for just wanting or having, when an experienced pilot for becoming trusted on his words.

So did it perhaps become a saying, or should we make it those Pentagon videos for making a cheerio by just locking on a target for being unknown?

Either it becomes just unqualified science for not having any meaning, or you could be still asking questions about possible whereabouts.

We know that it could be still a claim for also assertion when only such a thing being of interest, for also the Proof or Conclusion it could be.

Dismissing a possible claim for not being any valid for just validless, and it becomes not any science at all, when still only investigating.

So sad it could become for still only a couple of claims for also statements, when that of probability should be telling about possible likelihood..

Could you make it still validness for only being trusted, except not any likelihood at all, when making it the Universe for only its size?

In which prospect or Concept does it become when assuming possible aliens for that of likelihood, for not any ourselves for that of unique?

My guess is that the church could be still dismissing a couple of things, except Giordano Bruno being burned, and Galilei only sentenced.

Here becoming readily acceptance for only the thing we should still believe in, except also asking questions about how it became.

Namely that it became that of infinity for still only subject, when not making it any unique for only ourselves as a civilization.

Trying versus failing, and we know that both things could be possible, except only a fallback versus victory instead.

Neither religious preaching for only a couple of claims does not help at all, for also dismissing relevent Facts at times.

Only that validness goes for the Proof you could make when still only a Conclusion for the same, and you could be assuming for reality.

So who is the ufologist who could be making such a claim for that of validness today, except perhaps Nick Pope for only doing this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Pope_(journalist)

Here now are many pictures showing UFOs by means of cylinders or dishes, except also making it craft for the same.

My postulate for still only determining, is that we could be making it the Kardashev scale, for only such a thing of meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_creatures_in_Harry_Potter

So here I was looking for the green animal who could be decapitating its victims, but here unable to locate the article, for only give me a laugh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aphid

Just natural, for only becoming science about the Earth, for not any laughter or ridicule when only invalidating versus fantasy instead.

So you are welcome, for still only dismissing the WOW signal for that of whereabouts for also signal characteristics, for unable to determine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien

Anyway, you did watch the first movie here, for the crew being lost in space, and chose to visit a moon for only picking a sample of interest.

Here it became the sixth or seventh passenger instead for just not any welcome, and also a frantic search for only a hunt inside the freight ship.

Maybe still the cat for only a passenger, except also Mother for that of computer, when still being asked a couple of questions.

So lost in space for only sympathies, and we are still back at the same validness for only concluding, for still not any fake story.

Here you choose to be the scientist dismissing any claims for only witness or testimony, for also the picture of a craft it could be.

Any betterment for just not being any alone in space, and you could be assuming others for just the same, for still only given likelihood.

But only "Truth is a virtue" for the right question you could be asking, for also correct answer, and it becomes nature for only purpose and meaning.

Honestly, but rather I could dismiss such a thing for only Tinnitus, when only such a thing in my head, for not any visitor in bed at night.

Only assuming for still being relevant, and it becomes still only unspecific for the questions which could be still left to be answered.

Here the inconclusive result is not giving any definite answer to the question we seek or wish to conclude, for only its specific meaning.

But here it comes to me that such a thing as Belief could be thought of or viewed as Probability or likelihood for just the same.

Only that it becomes a stubborn meaning for just steadfast when keeping to a couple of Principles for only rejecting once again.

But here that you could be looking for extraterrestrial life once again, for only the valid meaning it could be, for not any instruments.

Here still only precious and unique for only what you could quantify or signify for a meaning, for also the valid it could become.

Shoould we dismiss any fantasy for not being any relevant at all, and next we could be doing so for only an alien creature inside a ship.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_(film)

For one thing it becomes only pure entertainment for still only fiction, for not any thing we should believe in for only trusted.

If you choose to make it still "Truth is a virtue", also that such a thing is Logic for only what it could become, for still only relevant answer or Fact.

Getting a little tired of this for only a sense that I should keep trying, for not any dismissing here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Just tell me for not being any Logic here either, and I could be still biased, for not any prejudiced either.

Always that we could make it believability for a couple of things when still not any Religion, for only left with a definitive Proof to conclude.

More that a Concept of nature becomes a giving for that of such, in that Probability should be making it a given chance for only likelihood.

To be or not to be, or could it be, and we could be readily assuming ourselves for just only Fact, for not any similar for only Existence.

Here the celestial sky is supposed to be having 100-200 billion stars for only the Milky Way, for also 200 billion other galaxies all over.

But only that the limit of the speed of light makes it impossible for any space travel, when at least a couple dozen light years separating.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eta_Cassiopeiae

Here one of my favorites for only such likelihood, when still a couple of light years for only separating for that of distance.

Here favorable conditions makes for also ideal conditions for that of living, and you are only assuming Probability for similar likelihood.

Any given welcome for only bowing your hat for not any head, and it becomes such a thing for assuming likelihood for still only probable.

There should be no such thing only assuming ourselves in a divine Concept for only Perspective, when thinking that God created the Universe.

For still only a unique place for that of living for just the Earth, not any sacred for just only the divine, when still only believing here.

Any unique, for also marvelous or fantastic, and it becomes only a description here of such things, for not any likelihood for only relevant.

This means that any Perspective for only the Universe as a single whole, only becomes the description we could be making for the same.

Leave it only to decide for still nature for only a meaning, and it becomes those Probabilities for only likelihood we are able to assume.

Here any such thing should stilll not go for any Religion for only deciding, in that there should exist no Proof for just only the same.

So here I am, for still only a presence, and I could be living for just only the thing I could be, except also such for that of any likelihood.

Only that we just know that, and happened to be making it completion here instead, for only the nature we could be asking about.

So here only given choose for only deciding, and it became such a thing for that of a Creator, when only believing in such a thing for a Reason.

The problem here is that you are not supposed to prove versus disprove any nature for any reality, but only Religion here instead.

But only that Logic makes us able to conclude for a couple of things, when still being uncertain for just the same.

Here the Existence we could be making of ourselves for just only presence, should be only the relevant Fact we could make.

Leaving any Universe alone for not any existing, and you do just the same for only a couple of aliens, for still the Probability it could be.

Here the validness it could become when still only asking, does not leave us with the Fact that the Universe could be still only existing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Tell me a lie for just not any Universe for only existing, and it should not be such a thing for still the relevant Fact it could be.

The second link above makes it event, process, state, or object here at first, but next it tilts towards the possible intended meaning it could be.

Is that the past or beyond we could make it for still not any answer, for only that of infinity becoming the Concept we could make?

So, leaving only Doubt for an answer when still only a liar, and you could dismiss any aliens for only such, and not any indefinite nature instead.

Any experimental for just only philosophering for not any Skeptical, and you only presume nature for a reason, and still not any Doubt.

My guess is that I could still only believe for not any Skeptical, when making it any past or beyond for only given borders here still.

So asking whether there should be any Method for only Philosophy versus science, and it becomes only the answer we could not make.

Here infinity is only the single Concept by science we could make, for still only the thing left unanswered for being only indefinite.

So here border is just a bad word only, for that of separating two political or geographical areas for example, except not any limits for space.

We know that such a thing, or infinity, is still for that of all for just everything included, when also possible for the same.

Asking for God being only a Reason, also that he could be generous for only mild, except he also leaves us with no choices at times.

Here both dead end for only Cul-de-sac when a dead end street, for also the grave for only a burial, when still not any free-floating.

Here it became suggested such things as Reincarnation for also Purgatory when still that of Eternity, for only such things part of Religion.

But only that for both a given Creation for also a demise for that of an oblivion, both could be left undecided for only making it infinity here.

Again that the possible completion you could make, should be assuming Religion as being a possibility, for only the included it could be.

So never mind for making it any science for only the complete it could be, when still only undefined for being incomplete.

But here that it only relates to a given thing for being valid or relevant, for still not any proper instead.

So think I excluded any Religion for not being any relevant, for only the proper answer of making it science here instead.

Does the answer still go by means of Religion for only what we could make or philosophize, or could you only be proving by science instead?

Even worse, for only speculating about Religion for not any valid, and the question you could make, should be still the relevant answer.

Here the Existence I could make for just only natural, are also those things I could be assuming, for still only being relevant.

So ask me about any waiver or dismissal for just falling back a little, and it becomes still only the Universe for a complete meaning.

Here the completion we could make, should be still all and everything for just included, except also asking for still more.

Is Religion any undefined for not any proven, or should we rather include it for only Concept of meaning, for only the single whole it could become?

We know that nature is still undefined for only meaning, but also such a thing for Religion, when still not any proven for the same.

Any relates to God for only the single Concept it could be, also that it relates to science for such a thing, and not making it any Religion instead.

Just thinking of a Creator per se for only a Reason, and you also could be assuming the Universe for only the reality it could be.

So here no questions asked for still making the Universe only infinite in nature, for not any added context for just believing here instead.

If the Universe became just empty, for that of zero, nil, nada, or the Empty set, it would become nothing of presence, and I would not be sitting here.

But only so lucky, when making it that of infallibility here instead, except not knowing whether this should be for neither science or Religion.

Any words for only chosen, and you leave it in the hands of God for only spoken, because here he created nature for only own Conscience,
in the way it just became, only for a meaning.

Is it so that we could readily assume God for only the spoken word it could be, or should we still assume infallibility for still only meant?

In which purpose could you readily assume nature for still only speculating, except not making it any Creator by means of Religion?

Only the Fact that you make it nature a set Preference for only just given, for not any spoken words of God it could be instead.

If I could be just building a pyramid out of a couple of stones, I still need the bricks for only fulfilling, except that it still should be complete.

But if I rather thought I could be making it such a pyramid from only an empty Set, also the incomplete it could be, for also impractical.

This way of reasoning, for only speculating or just thinking, and it becomes the presumption I could make for only God as a Reason.

Invalidating science for only being possible, it could be still true, when still not into that part for just only thing it could be.
ID: 2098289 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098869 - Posted: 3 May 2022, 18:40:26 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2022, 19:13:17 UTC

Anyway, should tell that I got a working session for both the laptop and mobile phone since yesterday, for only cramming it together.

This makes it possible to sit in the sofa here and watch YouTube for only the laptop on my knees, for only lacking the other word.

Here built-in Wi-Fi into the laptop, when the network could be borking or malfunctioning, but got it to work eventually.

One thing is that they serve me hot water for the cup of coffee after dinner, but having a metallic taste, for also not any cooked.

So here the keyboard became really worn, but the unit itself is having much of what I need, for only containing or rooming.

But only for being served the hot water still, I had to shout for only insist, when still about the flat I wish to return back at.

So here deaf ears for only getting in and out again, for not any listened to for only the seriousness it could be still, and it becomes awkward.

Really it does not help becoming stuck here, because I was home twice in the meantime, for collecting at least a couple of things.

Having fixed most of the practical details now, the next thing becomes getting in the bank, for also a repair of the equipment brought.

When still at home, I put a lot of papers in a backpack for conserving space, and it also became two Internet modems as well.

The only thing is that it is nice to get to learn Wi-Fi, for only inside a local network or intranet, because at home it is stil a WAN,
except for not any dial-up, it becomes broadband instead, for also activated SIM-cards needed.

So when at home last time, I brought with me the Huawei wireless router with the power cable, but still lacking the cards necessary.

But here the unit is having a Wi-Fi for that of its own, when also a USB connector, for also both a LAN and WAN Ethernet interface,
except not any such cable brought with me.

Really the same interface here, but listed as LAN1 at the top, for LAN2/WAN at the bottom or below.

Again struggling with the same cables, for also one intermediate almost torn off, but here now Internet by means of both laptop and phone.

So here the Belkin USB interface for that of four standard or regular connectors, but here my suggestion for a 90 degree angled mount between
cable and connector, it has to be soldered or attached well for only working.

But to my surprise, for still only a worn keyboard, both picture and sound is quite satisfactory for only a laptop working,
and here both listening and watching a YouTube video while I type.

So here I am not forgetting about any Fact for only a description either, when still the thing we could be looking for, but still not any answer.

Always I could be trying for only struggling, when striving for the same, for still the result for that of meaning, by only proving.

I just thought here that a given measure should be only for a comparison we could make, except not any such thing to compare with.

Any resultless should be still only futile, when not any listened to or heard for only being a witness, except that nature could always be telling.

But only that Truth is still a virtue, for only being Logic, for not any Set instead for determining quantities or amounts instead.

Only that nature made it a choice for only deciding, and left me sitting here for only a given Probability for such, telling about possible Existence.

So to be or not to be for only such a thing, and it became only emptiness instead (or Empty set), making for not any likelihood at all.

Here the Drake equation is making it such likelihood for only own or ourselves as a civilization, except also unique for the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set

So make a decision for only that of randomness and given chance, and it became still only a likelihood for only myself existing, for still not any unique.

Here it makes me think that nature is still written Laws for only such a thing, except that they perhaps became written for only a meaning.

It always is a possibility of making a comparison with someone else for only just better, except still nature for only its own properties.

So only a best hope for that of best wish, and we always could wish there could be others for only just existing, except only a given likelihood.

Just 0 and 1 for only a difference, and it makes no sense for only myself sitting here, and the Empty set telling about not any such possibility at all.

Of course, but the Drake equation could be still telling about such likelihood for only Probability, except lacking such for overall Existence.

If nature was left deciding on its own for only given Probability, it still became perhaps a chance of ourselves for just existing, like also others.

So do not forget about any uniqueness for still only properties, because it was included for still only meant, except also left deciding for the same.

But for only disorder, randomness and Chaos, nature is still not any same for only the different factors it could be, leaving it with different choices.

So, discerning any white for only black when that of colors, I was still only color blind for not noticing any difference, for only the ocean it could be.

Always the different floors for only a building when that of stairs, but here a beehive is still not any submerged for only different cultures.

So here different rules for only a beehive and undersea or aquatic cultures for that of life, and not any levels for given Existence instead,
for also Comprehension needed for only a given understanding.

Here we sometimes think that a leveled Comprehension could be about or related to that of Religion, when still only a couple of stairs.

So put a label on myself for still only unique, for not any nature here instead, for only the same which could be defined.

If for some reason I could use the elevator for not any stairs, I could be getting to the floor just above, and next both thinking and noticing
that rules could be changed for only a different environment, for also not any comparison I could make.

So use your eyes for only watching the skies for only noticing, and it became the same Laws for only noticing, except rather Existence here instead.

Any rules for only set forward, and it became only such a thing for that of Existence for only being the Universe, and not any else to compare with.

One thought here is making it still multiverses, which I am not any fond of, for also the notion of infinity, making for only unlimited possibilities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Just thinking that it became science versus Religion for only a difference, and I was still living on one floor, for not being able to get upstairs.

Read the contents of the links above, and next make it both Concept and Construct here for that of meaning, when still not any Set,
Rules or Laws, deciding for only the same.

Just thinking that infinity becomes the indeterminate Concept for that of defined, next all and everything included for only the same,
because here I was not falling down the chimney for only entering the basement, for only a lower level of Existence.

Is nature still only infinite for only defined, and next we could be assuming possible other things only because of that,
and here my level of Comprehension for still only Existence, became the Universe I was part of.

The other discussion for becoming that of Religion instead, could be related to the notion of death for only happening, except also a travel
through space and time, when still not any Reincarnation here.

But for only different reasons, also different levels for only the same, when that of a given Comprehension for only an existing Universe,
when still not any fond of possible multiverses.

We here know that any completeness is still only incomplete, for only the way of understanding it could be, and next also how it could relate.

Except for that, I could be still sitting with only the laptop on my leap, for also the cup of coffee standing besides me.
ID: 2098869 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098870 - Posted: 3 May 2022, 19:45:31 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2022, 19:47:40 UTC

But also that of a given measure, for that of measurability versus immeasurability, and it becomes still not the thing which we could compare,
for only relating with for that of any else.

Any label for only a stick, and perhaps only a joke, but here I was still sitting on the floor for only that of my own presence, or Existence here instead.

So who framed Roger Rabbit, for not any Jack in the box, and we could be making it still objects versus Sets, for only the containers it could be.

But here only lack of Belief, for not any believing, and rather I was left believing in thunder and lightning instead, for only being a property of nature,
for not any such for that of possible others, for only the Existence it could be.

Again that nature could be making its own Laws for only that of Existence, for also those things contained herein or inside, for just being included.

Here any life for only possibilities defined, for also rules for the same, makes for limits of Existence for only such a thing, for still only a Universe defined.

Only that we know that a given thing for only that of undersea life could be still unique for only that of preciousness, except also measurable for the same.

Really that it becomes that unique becomes measurable for only quantized, except also asking for any better for only the possible it could be.

Also I should wish that we could be setting a limit for only that of borders or thresholds, except still only limitless for that of being undefined.

So here only that of one level for a given Universe for the same when still only undefined, when still making it other universes instead.

Trust me, for not any wait and see, because here one Creator for just one meaning when becoming a single Universe, for not any multiverses instead.

So different Beliefs, for that of different Comprehensions, and we perhaps make it such a thing for only the different Religions it could be.

This because I never was left with any answer for only asking, when still only such a thing for that of possible multiverses.

Any quantitative answer, for only left deciding, and it became such a thing for only making it a single Creator instead, being responsible for everything.

The only thing is that we make it still completeness versus only undefined, for still that of infinity making for such a thing only possible.

But only trust me still, for that of a given measure, and I could be making it still only E.T. for that of being meaningful (or quantized).

The other discussion becomes still that of material versus immaterial here for only a couple of dreams, except not any life between the stars.

For that, only that of Religion becoming in charge again for not any thing we could prove, for still not any materialized or quantized.
ID: 2098870 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20440
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2098879 - Posted: 3 May 2022, 21:34:39 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2022, 21:39:33 UTC

... materialized or quantized.

Einstein formulated his ideas around how:

  • mass is a manifestation of energy;
  • a concentration of mass (energy) distorts the shape we experience for the space and time around us;
  • time is experienced as motion.


Space-time around us, the very vacuum of space itself, and our very existence, are a manifestation of energy...


Separately and independently, we also have a Quantum description of the effects of discrete (small) packets of energy, that when added up in various ways, describes what we observe at the atomic scale and smaller.

"E=mc^2" and "Quantum" are two very different views of the 'mechanisms' for our existence!

Curiously, digital information (digital simulation) theory also neatly describes some of what we see in our universe...


Keep searchin'!
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2098879 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098885 - Posted: 3 May 2022, 22:46:15 UTC
Last modified: 3 May 2022, 23:43:28 UTC

Any given nature for only telling, and it became that of sacred instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hysteria

Should not be any resemblance here for only the Wall Street crack of 1929, for also a radio show hosted by Orson Welles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Welles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_War_of_the_Worlds

Maybe bourse or stock exchange here for the same word, but needing the toilet here first.

Only for that of panic ensues, and next I am going to bed, for here being told so.

Here not any lights in the bedroom, but could be turning it on, for having it standing besides me, so back shortly.
ID: 2098885 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7045
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2098923 - Posted: 4 May 2022, 17:19:50 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2022, 18:13:25 UTC

Oh me, I could be having a couple of other tabs open here for that of posting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

So funny again, for only having everything available in front of me, for next only "hah-ha" again.

Just keep up shouting for not any keep shouting, because here I am not disagreeing with those who think that abortion should be legal,
but rather that the debate should be kept in in a calm or serious manner, for not any revolt here instead.

So here for that of becoming late, and it became a mentioning of Hysteria and Orson Welles for still only a show, when it rather should be abortion.

Just two differences for that of meaning, and still one part for only calm and serious, except perhaps both making a point of meaning.

Read what I said above, because if perhaps a disagreement, it could be about extremes, where one part could be saying something wrong.

If I happened to be against abortion, for only the loss of a child it could be, also I could be a judge or Conservative for the same, when still only wrong.

But rather that those which could still favor abortion for only the better, could still be screaming, when becoming the opposite decision.

Case closed, but here it became still related to two different parts for their opposite meanings.
ID: 2098923 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 238 · 239 · 240 · 241 · 242 · 243 · 244 . . . 334 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.