The Cause and Reason are still unfolding for new developments?

We have a lot of Space to develop into yet!


Keep searchin',
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

So if anyone beating or kicking you in your head, becomes a lyre box, for not any cashier instead.

Not meant for Martin here either, because of the Reply To, but also I had my other accounts here shortly on my mind.

Should tell that I was out yesterday and bought an expensive Samsung S22, where it became the most expensive of three models.

But except a couple of earhphones, a charger, and a USB cable, also one or two micro SIM cards did not come along, for not having a valid card.

Here having a possible small or short plug against the mobile phone, where it connects at first, and next a cable going to standard USB,
but here the laptop is a Microsoft computer, and the cable did not fit.

Should be a data cable here and not any power, because here AC converted to DC through an adapter, for that of 5V or 12V instead.

Here a little certain where it is an ampere fuse or condensator inside, but could be high voltage for not any opened meant.

Together with one of the personnel, I also went down history for looking up RJ-45 for that of telephone jack or ISDN,
where it now is 10 or more 100Base-T for that of shielded, or 1000Base-T gigabit here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_over_twisted_pair

My flat got bonkers, and therefore sitting here right now, lacking both cards for that of personal identification, for also valid cards.

Need the cards in order to purchase, so here the bank for this, which I am unable to contact for the same reason.

The new telephone makes it to the web or Internet otherwise, but unable to make or receive calls because of the lacking SIM cards.

So the problem is now the defect flat, together with the missing or lacking cards for identification, for also the one being in charge of me.

My property vendor for that of housing association, is the one I am paying the bills, through its creditor for this.

Here I am being charged automatically right now, but it should be more correct having my signature for that of ownership,
so here kind of a renewal for having it sorted out.

But if not for the lyre box or cashier, it could be the Pirouette, and here a little down for that little thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turn_(dance_and_gymnastics)#Pirouette

So except for still being silly or stupid, I otherwise became the genius for not any witness, proving for a given purpose or Cause.

But for not any sake just either, I translated it wrong here, and becoming a testimony instead.

For not any value except valid or validness, also it becomes value basis here as well, and next I was proving an immaterial hypothesis.

First of all, given Theory supports Evidence for that of other civilzations in space or the Universe from only observations or witnesses,
except still not making any Gods for rather gods or angels here.

But also that the other word here is still that of Premise, for only such a thing being meant, because promise is still another thing.

So follow the leader and only assuming possible extraterrestrial life for that of Intelligence, only because it was observed or witnessed,
and next or therefore becomes a testimony for such a thing.

Here old Theory for only that of speculation or perhaps Idea, makes it still a Postulate, where that of Axiom is a better word.

Only that of definite Proof instead, and next also Truth for the same for not any recognition, and here not any Logic for the same either.

Just think that the Millky Way could still consist of or comprise some 100-200 billion stars, and next the invalid issue for only proving.

But eventually we chose to wake up and sort out our problems for that of such a thing, only making for a better world for that of living.

Therefore it eventually became such a thing for only better, in that it could be a still a wish for that of dreaming, for also results being wanted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes

You perhaps know the phrase here, for "Elementary Dear Watson", for only having the correct answered delivered for a given purpose.

But still that any Logic is not any "Yes" or "No" for only just word or a phrase either, in that we could be still dismissing, for not any proving.

Better prove instead, for only a given better, and here still both results collected and obtained, for also the possible witness to an Event.

I think here it is a shame just bypassing any Logic for only the "nature" or naturally it is, for not any Laws of physics or Equations instead.

Think you just saw it for that of an Event, and next the answer became "No" for any same thing, only because it was not possible.

So put ourselves in a booth instead, for that of level of Intelligence or Conscience, for also our natural environment or place of living,
and it could be another star instead, with its own planets, for harboring its own civilization.

Any dream for just having, and not any valued either, but perhaps for meaning instead, in that we wish it to be proven here only.

Is that or could it be the same answer for that of "Yes" or "No" for answering a couple of answer in the Court for that of an interrogation,
or could I rather be pleased for making an experience for only observing or witnessing by my own eyes?

Again, love could be a pleasure for not any eyes or even sing a song either, but still the Proof desired or expected from such an Event instead.

So here the word "judgment" or "judgement" is passing me for not any police interrogation either, for only standing and watching instead.

Here time to celebrate, because a wish became a wish became fulfilled, and it became an encounter for that of a handshake just here.

But only poor translation for only that of word, and we left it to Laws and Equations in order to speculate, and next proving nature.

Could we still having the debate of such a thing for only that of Uncertain or relative, where we do not know any standing point?

Is any Proof definitive for only a standard, or could we trust the world for that of its reality, and here the Universe?

Anyone telling that the Universe could be flawed by means of its Inception or Conception, and here both Einstein and Heisenberg for this.

Being uncertain in the answer for just telling, is not the same as any Uncertainty Principle or Theory of relativity as only given.

Any definite answer is still Proof for that or upon meaning, for only meant to be, except that we could be still uncertain about the whole thing.

So given properties of nature, it only becomes so for still only defined, in that every "Certain" only becomes uncertain, for not any proven.

Only quicksand becomes still only quagmire for that of standing in, so either sink to the bottom, for not any saved instead.

So here only "I had no dream" for not any such thing either, and the little sorrow of death, became the thing not any proven.

First of all, I was still only standing in the air for only floating, and not having any reference point for any access to.

Here Einstein made it everything relative, for also Heisenberg only uncertain, and next we were relating nature to a given Concept.

Always the exact for only precise for only pinpointing, but rather we left it nature with its own Cause for only being indeterminate.

But again that of infinite for just the same word, and we thought numbers only could be explaining, for not any dimensions instead.

So what happens when you die, except your whole life flashing for only a couple of seconds, and next being left in someone elses hand.

Being taken away from your own charge or responsibilities, and you became incapacitated for that of personality and soul.

Therefore ending up becoming lost for only that of disenfranchised for the same, and the soul left you for that of the Purgatory,

Next you entered the stairs for only the ladder, and found the chair sitting besides God for only being saved.

Is it not strange for only an infinite Concept of nature, that Creation myth could be telling about the "finite" of God instead?

So if God created nature for only his presence, also that he should be taking a precedence for only him at first, and still in charge.

Otherwise, we could still leave it to nature for that of its brutality, for not any feather across skin for a little more smooth.

But only that infinity becomes those values we care for and protect, and also could be wishing for, except still not any possible.

Proving God could be still possible, for not any sake of nature instead for only the determined or predetermined it could be.

Still the Big Bang for only that of its first moment or Instantiation, except proving the little alien for another given possibility.

So here a divine being showing its face for only being both God and the Devil, and given Creation was only meant by its face or countenance.

It should be still impossible to quantize any God by means of Religion for only speculate, except only doing so by means of unquantified instead.

So here a guess for only answering or knowing, it becomes still only undefined or unknown here, except quantifying for that of infinite instead.

Only do or carry out a thing for that of a misdemeanor, and it come back at you for only regretting it, and if so, not any God here.

So where is the pschyciatrist located for not any proving or Proof theory it should be either, except Sigmund Freud?

Leave it in someones hands for only someone else, it could still be that of such giving the answer, and also concluding for a purpose,
and here just experiencing that of same thing for my current stay.

Here a medical examination should also be a mental evaluation, except a ward for the same, where I also ended up staying.

Read my earlier or previous stuff for that of a guess or assumption for that of possible intelligent life in space, and you may understand.

So here intelligent life for only that of Intelligence, is also Conscience, when only that of human Mind being concerned, for also other animals.

Next so sad making it the spider the programmed for not any ant instead, because here only thinking it made it just a little better.

But here only questioning what betterment could still represent, except still the Universe, when also that of life for its part.

Only a philosophical quest for that of dreaming, adds to an understanding we could make, for that of completeness instead, rather than given part.

So when only departing the road for that of science and ending up wrong, it becomes such a thing for that of the immaterial instead.

Here that of Proof is still for an intended purpose when also scientific, for still not any dreams we could prove instead.

Only left excused for not the other when still only quantifying, for the material and not immaterial, it also becomes the answer we could get.

Guess what for not making it dreams any Religion either, except still speculating for a given purpose, and prove in the same way.

Here God is still infinite only for that of Concept, except rather making it unquantifiable or immaterial for only what it could be.

Rather that it became the fine word of meaning for only slipping me here, for not any Concept it should be here either.

But is it not so that we try to include such a thing for that of Creation myth for only the part it is, for not any infinite instead?

So make or set any preference on that of infinity, for not any Concept of God instead, and it should not be any reality just either.

Only that God could be represented by means of just thinking, in that we always could be climbing the ladder for only stairs.

But is it still that we should still believe in God for only its sight, or should we rather make it naturally here instead?

For only that of conceived, when also that of sight and countenance, we always could make it that of precedence for only infinity first.

So here I only ended up climbing that of infinity for only the stairs and ladder it should be, and next became still seated with God.

Here fulfillment by means of reality becomes still that of God, for only nature being a Concept instead.

Questioning nature for its purposes, you also question that of infinity, for not having Religion any included, for just own part.

Having a picture for only nature created in the name of God, and you make him still that of a Creator, for only nature its part.

So with respect, for not any respect, and I already said it for only that of precedence, in that it became the Gods hands for only that of nature.

So weigh any material for only immaterial for that of its value, except you an Atheist or Agnostic, and you could "qualify" God for just more given.

Does it become still only nature for that of its Laws and Equations, or should we believe in "more" for just letting it happen?

Only reasoning for that of questioning when making it the Laws of nature for the same, except not the same Reason for making it God.

Here our picture for also interpreting nature is that of bad versus good for only its own Principle, except only making it God versus Devil instead.

Kind of a governing, for that of governance, and you could be able to see or make it that of God as a reason, for only nature for an initial purpose.

But here not any given whole for only that of infinity instead, because here God is that of immaterial or unquantifiable, for still a given nature which
could be undefined or undetermined for that of its own purpose, so here walking in parallell.

Any symbol or ("/\") for making it the smallest versus largest for both that of science and Creation myth, it could end up with God for only the
top level it should be, where the hierarchical branches could meet.

So making it an interpretation of infinity for only a symbol or "~" next to nature, for not any God defined in a similar way, it becomes only a
name for that of the latter, for also what we could believe.

Anyway, trust the credible witness for still only being believed, for not any trusted or trustworthy he could be instead.

If a given whole was left to decide, rather than a couple of details, it could be still running in parallell, for only meant to be.

Here it became that of adjacent or juxtaposed, where two things of that of dissimilar, ended up side by side instead.

So here only ending up proving for science, and believing for that of Religion for only the material it could be for one thing,
and immaterial for the other, and not any single Concept where it could be included.

Trying to explain or make it God as the single endpoint where that of nature and Religion ends by means of Belief, it becomes only words
for that of Concept, which could describe such a thing.

So for just anything or whatelse you could say for that of only given, it becomes that of words for only such thing for that of explaining,
when any God is still past any recognition or Comprehension for that of an understanding.

Could that of infinity, for a single Belief for that of nature, be put in a same context for that of believing in God for only the purpose of Religion?

Should it be any better Belief for not any worse for only believing more in God than any less, only because of purpose being meant?

Here so fortunate I could be for only quantifying science for that of meaning, for not any such given for such for Religion instead.

Just prove God for a reason, and next also answer meant for only the Truth it should be, except that you still make it only nature for a reason.

In such a way, it becomes that of prejudice here, for not any biased, because this word should be more that of Religion itself.

But next not any clever just here either, because I did not see or make it any Laws or Equations just here either, for only my own sake.

So here "purpose sanctifies the means", for not any "hallowed be thy name", because here only an angel at my side for not any god,
and I could still believe the thing for only what it is.

Forget any wisdom instead, for still only the skilled or clever it could be, when it also could be attributed for only a purpose,
and not any "Census" or regulation instead, because I made it an inscription just before, for only having it counted.

Here just better of it for making it the Laws of nature and Equations once again, because here not any other set of Laws
for just telling how it just came for that before.

So here only a keeper of hands, for not any dishwash just either, and here made it nature from only a dish, only by means of his presence,
and here first hand, only because he came before what once came into being, for that of nature.

Bow your head for that of unique and precious, and you know it could be nature for that of such a way, except a couple of dirt at times,
and you know that God did not make it any such Laws for only his own countenance.

Again, to be more correct, that it should be that of physical Laws here once again, for only what we could be knowing.

I know that a precise description of God could be difficult or impossible to make, except still that of infinity for only nature.

Here I sense that infinity is only a thing of nature thrown in our eyes to only speculate, for not any Laws for God itself.

Becoming only void for that of matter, it still becomes space, except the dimensions of space and time it also could represent.

But rather than quantifying infinity for that of a value, we also could be making it infallibility instead, for just another word.

Here you may be able to see I am making it a distinction between nature and God, for only such a thing it still could be.

Here we value nature by means of science for only the material it could be, when also trying to make a similar value for that of immaterial.

But only just attributed, for only the "believed" it should be, not any trusted either, for only the proven it should be instead.

It did not became quite well for that of correct in the previous, but if supposedly trying to prove God for not any nature,
I could be still making it Laws only for such.

Only that I know that infinity could be for that of undefined or indeterminate for that of context, and next also question that of nature for
the same, for not any indifference it should be either.

Any regret, for still also remission of sins, it becomes still only a making for that of words, for also a description of nature we could make,
except also sight and countenance with respect to God itself.

Here proving God for that of its infallibility should not be any possible either, except that nature could be still proven for only itself.

So with respect to nature for not any God, I could be still climbing the ladder for only stars, only just believing that God could be "better".

Making it any separate for only different, and you could still make an excuse for only own opinion, except not any Laws for the same.

If I happened to be passing the vine for only just a drink, I next could believe that God became an excuse for that of nature for only such a thing.

Prove that of infinity for just only happening, and you make it still a symbol for that of the same, for not any Laws and Equations instead.

But if I rather could imply that God was just for a meaning, also the purpose it could be for that of just happening, and being a real Consequence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

So tell me that Logic could be making me believing for only the Cause it could be, when still only true and false for that of an answer.

What if I set or make it a Premise for that of God for only a prerequisite, in the same way as also order or direction should be?

Should I assume nature for only such a thing, or should I rather make it God by means of an Implication, only because I could be believing?

Here I trusted nature for that of a reason, and not any God for such a thing either, only because it should be another reason instead.

So if not any direction here either, I lost the other word for that of my thoughts, except also that of presumption.

But still that a prescription should be an order of pills for only being made, so here stuck upon word for that of "regulation" instead.

If more that of fortunate instead, I could be having a cup of coffee and also chocolate cake here together with the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCt1ED0wltM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAKy_08klrg

What is the signal curve here for that of digital conversion?

Should it be any signal to noise ratio here perhaps, except converting the audio output for the signal into digital instead?

What about perhaps being able to download some interesting candidates from the fans, in order for me to have a look at?

Any upload could just be discarded, or I could be trying to run this project (or client) standalone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel

This for only listening to an audio sound, for only that of being detected, and next a signal curve for that of the conversion being needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function

And here being able to finally locate the scoring function for that of related algorithm for this.

Could I have the large edit window here as well, for not any going to bed?

Oh, indifference, for not any naivety just either, and I could try shying away here instead.

Really so sad for having the WOW! signal dismissed, for not any "fire in the hall" it should be, or "call an ambulance" instead.

Here it was not the Arecibo Telescope, but rather the Ohio State University for the Wow! signal.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_State_University_Radio_Observatory

Any sentimental of me, and only a look back in history for where things once was happening just here, except also the name.

Should tell that he once told me in writing that this signal was not any gaussian, so here only a transmission in binary format.

Rather that it was detected in only audio and needs to be formatted for such a conversion, except perhaps not any FFT only.

Here the client meant to be used, was having such a Gaussian function for only being able to convert, and next a signal curve for output.

So here it was rather in the little message of "Searching for gaussians", when only the client for doing so, and going for a best score.

But rather you try to reduce by means of a cutoff, for that of detecting a possible voice behind, and here visible in the YouTube videos.

Here another word for this as well, but once again slipping away, because the original software being able to do such a thing.

So read my lips instead, for not being able to make any symbol of just a word being spoken either, except I could be whispering.

Only raised hand for that of arms and elbows, and it became still the man and woman standing besides each other, for that of the Arecibo message.

So here only a voice for that of broadcast into space, and it became audio for that of this, for not any convertible it should be either.

Translate for a meaning, and next translate for a word, for not any picture or depiction it could be instead for also a symbol.

Figuratively, for only a speaking, and we know it could be circles and squares for only given purpose, when also rectangles,
but if rather a "star" here instead, it could be a filled curve here instead, for that of color inside.

More perhaps I could wish to see Mona Lisa depicted instead, only for that of being an alien sender for that of such a message.

Blame it perhaps on intended nature instead, for not any Intelligence, and those signals being picked up in radio, only becomes noise.

So here no such thing for making it a Paradox for any human civilization, only because it could be rare or unusual in space.

Making the Drake equation not any zero possibility for only that of ourselves, because we could be viewing Earth as exceptional instead.

There should be no reason assuming that life could be commonplace elsewhere, for not making it any strange here instead.

Just think it could be likely for still only common, here no such thing as any Philosophy either, but only that a dragon could be still only rare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation

Could this be used for only assuming possibility of intelligent life in space for not the other equation here instead, and need to be looking in detail.

Here another example for only telling about such likelihood by science, and not making it any Religion here instead.

Or maybe looked at here instead, because here I was in the shower and next given a warm meal.

Here getting fixed and ready to go, but will perhaps have to wait until next Tuesday for more of getting home with a guardian.

Problem here is they are thinking I could be insane for also a commitment for the same, in that it should be a written paper instead.

So still not any tax and duties for another Principle here either, but rather could be an obligation here instead.

Here the reason why the parents of Jesus once left Nazareth for that of Bethlehem, was that of registering for a Census,
and here on behalf of the Roman empire, for that of conquerors.

So therefore that of decree here at first, for not the other word just either, which happens to be unavailable for only present.

Therefore not any resolution either, when I made it a promise for the thing perhaps still only meant to be.

Anyway, here still only a couple of words for only being mentioned, and not any Laws or Equations instead.

Pretend it to be nature for only a given sake, and you next also assume the similar thing for only a given understanding.

Here both Einstein and Heisenberg knew or understood science for only its Concepts, for also that of Mathematics and Physics needed.

So, fire in the hole for not any promise, and it became only promised land, or it still ended up in another posting thread.

But if both of them knew which tools to use, not any understated either, but only used for both value and meaning it should be.

Here both Kepler and Newton made it so by means of the Laws of motion and gravity, and next the others continued or kept following,
for only making it uncertain.

So here not any absolute for only a final Concepts either, because we know that nature could be infinite or indeterminate for only such,
except also making it both Fallacies of Religion and Fallacies of science in the same way.

But next infinite possibilities for not any proven either, and we only speculate about such limits for next only an Idea.

Keep looking for that of searching, and next only the better Idea still, when any Proof seems impossible in a similar way.

Here it still looks to me that only the betterment of such a thing could be able to explain possible limits for also given
Conceptions for the same thing, when we could be still only looking for that of asking.

So here I climbed the stairs for not any surface of the Moon for only an achievement and thought such a thing was a great thing to do.

Say that of "Yes" or "No" and next let Logic decide for that of Truth it should be instead, for also validness for the same.

Here nature for its sight and countenance is still a thing we could value for only being counted, except also material versus immaterial.

Sights and sounds instead for that of both visual and audible, and it could be a thing being welcome for only that of given pleasure.

But also that splendor and glory only add to what could be counted for that of visual, and next being still only visible.

Any dead end for that of death instead, and only a notion of Eternity or afterlife when also that of possible dreams happening.

For that only a separation between apparent or true life for that of living, for not any other possible by means of Reincarnation or the like.

Ask me to dismiss for only a Probability when it comes to that of aliens, and we rather could dismiss a project instead, for only a giving.

Of course we could still validate a given report for not any dismissing, except knowing that such a thing could be still only rejected.

But only that we could recognize a given thing for that of an acknowledgment here instead, for not making it any Plausibility either.

Only that firm still means steadfast here as well, for still only the Conclusion we could make for also tangible Evidence or Proof.

But next only a pity for that of the Andromeda galaxy being far and way for only the old age it could be, for here also elliptical companions.

Rather it becomes a travel through dust and gas for another civilization in the Milky Way, for not any signal they could broadcast instead.

So with regard to this project, there never was such a thing for that of a saying, when a fine man with the name of Jerry R. Ehman
took notice of the WOW! signal for only the strength of the signal against the background (30 times).

For one thing it becomes detection for that of capabilities, and next we have to prove it for that of possible authenticy.

So here you also took notice of me for mentioning that I could be making it Signal to noise here, for only the ratio it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio

Anyway, for just the garble or mess it could be, also that of filtering could be needed, and next have to check the other details.

What did I just say for not any filter just here, but if so the true meaning for that of real, should be the message heard, for also broadcast.

Again that it becomes a transmission for a similar broadcast here for not any television or video, so here only another word.

Should our detection Methods for that of capabilities still be the finest we could have, or should you only believe the witness?

Is not still any Truth just better than just only believing for that of possible Proof for the same, or we had that discussion in the past.

Only making it a given measure for that of ourselves in a bigger context, and it becomes 0.84 for that of civilization or type.

So just readily known for that of an assumption, and I could still believe in myself for that of value, except not any others for what they could be.

Quantizing for given numbers, also the same for any value for not any meaning of Religion it should be, for only immaterial instead.

Except also unquantifiable here as well, that of Proof should still go for meaning for only that of material here, for only given values.

So what does it mean for only making it quantifiable by means of Proof, when we should not be any believing here just either?

Could it still be a face or countenance for that of meaning here instead for only immaterial, when still only left to guess instead?

Ask me to transform rather than translate for a given meaning, it becomes not any conversion here just either, but only for
making it Belief into Proof for only the needed it should be.

So here only a converted value of sorts for that of meaning when still only Jesus for not any Saint, and we next only believed for just better,
when making it science here for the thing we rather should prove.

Here it becomes immaterial sciences for only a couple of ghosts, and we seek to prove for only the relevant thing it could be.

So here do not forget any dreams either for only the sight or countenance it still could be, when only immaterial for that of value.

Any nature for that of its fullest, and it becomes still fulfilled for the same, except only that of natural purposes we could still prove.

Make it the shining diamond here for only its sparkles or rays, and it could become still excellent for that of its value,
except we rather try to prove that of immaterial or unquantifiable here instead.

So how much do you make out of or for an object being just ill-defined, except still visual or apparent for only its presence?

Do you still claim that of immaterial to be any true for only meaning for not any false, except proving for the same for only the thing it could be?

What if a positive identification for that of an ID was only a true face for that of a human being, and next it became only falsified for that of value?

Do you still make a representation of nature for only the qualified it could be, for not any unqualified instead, when also meaningless versus meaningful?

Any negative for that of false, and it becomes still positive for that of true, when still not any resemblance between numbers and any Logic.

If perhaps more that of attributed instead, you could be making such a thing for that of representing, except not any true or false at all.

So here only a Janus face, for that of its two faces, and next we think both to be true for not any false, because it could be only an inversion.

Quantifying for just total instead, and it becomes all factors for also possibilities available, when you could be making it numbers for such a thing.

If the question became still one for that of the other for only given choose, you could be selecting that of true for only being the better.

Any description for making it nature here instead, would have to be that of both contexts for just included, for only the total it should be.

Here we could be attributing that of both for just only given, for only what it could represent or be for still only meaning.

So better make it that of true for only the Truth it should be, and next we also believed in such a thing for still only being better.

Anyway, here I was just entering the train for not leaving any bus, and I made it better for still only climbing the stairs, for not any falling.

So dismiss only nature for only the negative or false it could be, when not any positive identification for rather a Falsification instead,
because here I was only on dry for only sitting, and not any boat for that of rowing.

Quite remarkably here for still only quantizing for only given value for just only meant, because any Falsification should still mean I could be falling.

So dry up the dirt for only waste, for only forgetting the sparkling diamond for that of its value, because here still able to quantize only for meaning.

Only that we know that given Proof still means that of Certainty we could make for still also Truth, except not any limit for only Logic instead.

So if not any Logic here instead, for only that of Truth, how much is needed for still only making it Proof for that of meaning here?

If not saying any so just either, it became so that I still could believe in given "orders" of value for only the meaning it could be,
except still only that of valid Proof here instead.

For only quantizing for that of given value instead, it becomes each thing for that of respectively, for still only being for that of representing,
because here still that of grand value for only representing total, and we could still believe only one thing.

So if I could determine that any given Truth became that of meaning for only quantizing, it should not be any Logic for just only telling better either.

Next think it became a nature for only believed for that of seeing, and we could be still making it Proof here instead, for also that of Truth.

So please, for that of welcome, and I was offered the dish for only shining diamond, and next quantized for only given value again.

Any thing of being not of any value at all, next becomes that of illogical for just only meaning it could be, when still only Logic just here.

Just immense for that of value, and we could be making it also tremendous, for not any Falsification of given value, for only immaterial instead.

So here still only believing just for meaning, and not making it any true or false either, for still only the true meaning it could be, and not any false.

Diminished results, for not any accomplished instead, and we only added for not any reduce, for only just making it better.

Any laughter and ridicule here instead, and you only blame such a thing for a couple of words happening, for not making it any countenance instead.

Therefore I could be still valuing the idiot for just only meaning it could be when still only stupid, except that he only told a Lie.

So tell me that it could be false Logic here, for not any true or false instead, and I could still believe for only the "quantified" meaning it could be.

Rather that we made it completion here for just having it added for still only the total it could be, and next it continued into infinity just here.

So for still not any inclusion versus exclusion for only the valued it could be, I could be making it grand here for only the included it could be.

And for still only a given purpose here for that of meaning here, I could still only believe for just only better, except also prove for the same.

So if perhaps still infinity only here, do you make it any such thing for what it could be for still only meaning, except not any Religion?

Make it still legitimate here for not any illegitimate, and you could be still believing in both Principles for that of meaning, except not any true.

Here that of real still goes for reality for only the same, except also quantizing for only the meaning it should be, and therefore you
do not make it any immaterial for that of any unreal just either, when it could be only ghosts.

And to be clear, for still only specific, and I still only quantized nature for only the meaning it could be, and not any immaterial for only being false.

Just readily plainly visible for only eyes, and the object was still visible in front of me for only my eyes, for not any specific here instead.

But only that I just believed for that of meaning here instead, for only the immaterial or unquantifiable it could be, for still not any proving.

Does nature set or make it a precedence for that of believing for just only true, when that of Falsification could be laughter and ridicule instead?

Be specific again, for only quantizing for meaning, because here still only that of infinity, for only the unspecific it could be.

So here trying, for making it absolutes, for only representing just everything for that of meaning, for still only the grand total it could be.

Any fullest or deepest for also honest, I could still make a bow for not any sigh, except only proving for a given purpose, and not any Almighty here instead.

But still only ugly, for that of ghostly, it became respectively for not any needed, for only the corresponding it should be instead.

Alternatively I came to a different Conclusion for only just better, for also given terms of meaning it could be.

So do not forget the devoted here for that of skill, for also the interested he could be for not any rent instead, because here only a loser.

But related for not any relative, it became still only in a closed door for being locked, and next I was in the closet.

Just beautiful instead, and it became a Revelation here instead, when still only a spirit for that of meaning, and not any bottle.

Any marvelous or stupendous here instead, and you only quantize given nature for only being for only the better it could be, except still superb.

To the fullest or deepest for still only meaning, for not any superior instead, and I only offered my deepest condolences for that of a sad death.

Therefore not any invaluable diamond for only being quantized, because here you could be still making it specific value for only its worth.

So fortunate both we and others could be for only being specific instead, for making it E=mc2 for only a value it could represent.

Only that we assume any readily for not any relative, and make it a readily assumption for that of an acknowledgment here instead.

Sincerely yours for still only meaning, and I should not any oppose for only different meaning here instead, when only you could be having.

But if my deepest condolences was still for only being sad, next not any need of believing in any ghosts for only the Falsification it could be.

Only that nature could be still deep for that of holes when still only a sinkhole or quagmire, and next we could be falling into one such.

Rather that I could be able to acknowledge nature for that of its real value here instead, for still only representing, except also immaterial.

Here it becomes still meaningless just doing so for only that of false or invalid, for only the meaningless it could be, and not any valuable.

So why not offer a gift here instead for only that of recognition meant, because here it became only a ghost for that of visible,
and next we only could believe.

Should we still believe in the invaluable for only being invalid, or should I rather quantify for not any speculate instead,
for only the possible Idea it could be?

Only groundless for that of answer, and it becomes unspecific for the same, when still not being able to quantize, for only the invalid it could be.

But here still only valueless for not having a clue, and I became only uncertain for just only meaning, when still being able to prove.

Any reasoning here, for not any Court of Justice here, and I could be making it Religion here instead, for still not any Proof for such.

So here I stepped my foot on a needle for just the thaw it could be, and only confused that of Religion for only infinity, for just the better it could be.

Here I was only surpassing my abilities for that of preference or liking for just only the good it could be, for not speculating for any infinity either.

Any loophole for just only a short-circuit, not any shortcut either for only making it to the end of space and time for only dimensions.

Here only that of completion meant for a given nature for only what we could understand, and not surpassing any Ideas just either.

But for only such an Idea, it became still only Comprehension for that of such a thing for only making it a given whole here instead.

So for not any comprehended, for just uncomprehended, it becomes that of comprehensible for still only incomprehensible
for the Idea we still could not understand or grasp for only a meaning.

The other thing could become that of a quack here instead, when still only a garbled mess for only a meaning.

Shout in my mouth for just only harsh, and it could be still only a telling for that of meaning, for not any eventful here instead.

Make it only eventless here instead, and I was spinning down to Earth for only the Event Horizon it could be, for not any recognition of else.

The Universe could be still Event driven for only that of its horizons, but still we have to quantize for not any believe for its meaning.

Here view is still that of Perception for also purpose versus meaning, and next I was granted a place for only that of staying.

So here still only infallible for only the incalculable for only the unknown context it could be for not any having, when still only quantizing.

Just regard, for not any disregard, and I could still only believe for not any unjust here instead, when only attributing science for a meaning.

Given context, for just only added, and I forgot the other word for still only meaning for not any single or singular it should be instead.

But only a Conclusion for that of given name, and it became word for that of wording for only the same.

Events are to be enjoyed even if we may not be fully aware of how they might connect!

Is the new mass discovered for the W Boson 'particle' a new connection to explore?

On the scale of the universe, a difference in mass and energy of a mere 0.1% adds up to a lot of fun new Science...


Keep searchin'!
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=83172&postid=1965899

@Wiggo, escape velocity from Earth is 11.2 km/s (40,000 km/h), so why 9.8 meters per sec per sec here?

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=83172&postid=1965899

@Wiggo, escape velocity from Earth is 11.2 km/s (40,000 km/h), so why 9.8 meters per sec per sec here?

Good question!

I'm not Wiggo but I hope my answering is ok?...


Escape velocity to escape from Earth's gravity is:
The speed needed to give a mass (object) enough kinetic energy to equal the change in potential energy needed to escape from Earth.

The kinetic energy (reduces) is exchanged into potential energy (increases) as the object increases in height/altitude above the Earth.

11.2 km/s straight up gives a mass just enough kinetic energy to escape Earth's gravity.

That is changing altitude and hence changing the potential energy.


Differently, when standing still on the Earth, there is no change in altitude and so there is no change in potential energy.

Also:

weight (force felt due to gravity) = mass * acceleration due to gravity

Note: Force = mass * acceleration.

We call the force that we feel due to our mass and Earth's gravity as "Weight".

And on Earth, the force of gravity that we feel gives an acceleration of 9.8 metres per second per second.


Hence, if your bathroom weighing scales show that you are "100 kg", the scales are actually measuring a force of 980 Newtons to hold you off the floor.

( 980 Newtons force = 100 kg * 9.8 gravity )


Keep searchin'!
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

Martin, sorry for letting you slip through here while having the dinner.

Please read what I meant for only posting here, for not making it any science here for only its terms.

Next it becomes only an apology for the other thing, for not making it any light sable for only a classic movie.

So where I get the 9.8 m/s² for perhaps only you, I really do not know just either, except perhaps a thing heard before.

Here the escape velocity should be related to the Earth for only its mass, like other planets for also stars, when motion could be still another thing.

Only that for a Black hole, the speed of light becomes the limit here for that of constraint, when still only massless photons for such.

Accepting that light could be still having only one property for not any gravity for the same, it becomes still only the Universe for given purpose.

Here any Kepler for still only wrong he became, rather it became Einstein here instead, for only his own Theory instead, when still only light.

But here time becomes warped for only distorted when that of a Black hole, for that of becoming a space time continuum instead.

Here only living for not any speculating, for still only the magnificent spectacle it could be, for only that of wonders of space.

So here not any inclined for just only making it better, for still only knowing about such a thing for only the infinite it could be,
except not any marvelous it should be either.

Here part Law for that of physical, when also not any such Law for that of infinite, here only part of a given thing for one context versus the other.

Only better for that of determine, when only precise or exact for such a thing, still only nature just here, for not any infinity for just undefined.

So here only God's words for that of meaning for still only symbol it could be, and next we could be interpreting it for an absolute meaning.

Any nature for only that of its incomplete and still only nature for the same, for not anymore for just the included or total it could be.

But here we do not see any God for only the completeness it could be, when still only given nature for such a thing instead.

Surpass any Idea for just only more and it becomes only past any Comprehension for such a thing, when still only nature for a given,
and not anymore for just God instead.

Here infinity is not making any limits or borders for only a making, but still only a guess for that of an Idea, when just a word.

Rather that we could be implying God for just the better, when not having any else for only the excuse it could be.

But next a God for just given behalf of nature for only the better we could make it for such a thing, for still only past or beyond.

Only that you make it uncertain when only believing, when still not any quantifying for only Certainty instead.

Anyway, I was just watching a movie here using the mobile phone, and was forgetting time when still waiting for the coffee.

Stupid question, but how do I adjust Resource Share manually for having more than one project?

Log into your project on their website. Then look in the project preferences.

The default share 'value' is 100. Increase/decrease for that project for a proportionate share alongside your other projects.


Keep searchin',
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

Thanks, I already adjusted for setting it to 5.

For example for s@h:

Log into the s@h site.

Then go to "Your account" https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/home.php

The resource share for the s@h project is on "Preferences for this project SETI@home preferences" https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/prefs.php?subset=project

The magic number to adjust is "Resource share 100"...

Select the "Edit preferences" https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/prefs_edit.php?subset=project

... And away you go.

(Note: Will be a different https address for other projects!)


Hope that helps,

Keep searchin',
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

Very good!

Enjoy!!


Keep searchin',
Martin

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)