Oh, keeping it for that of himself, for not any dominant or deterministic here instead, and next going to bed.

So here the month of February arrived, and checking date for the similar equinoxes it should be twice a year, and here also excact time.

This year set for becoming March 20, at 10:37 CET, so together with just 28 days of February, it becomes only seven weeks for that of waiting.

I think it was just cold enough here already, because snow was pouring down, and visibility went down to almost zero, for that of fumbling in the dark.

Here almost clear sky right now, for only the Fact that it becomes much more chilly, and I will have to adjust, for closing the valves, and turning up the oven.

So do not tell me that it is just lovely, for still only chilly, except some people could choose to make for a snow angel by just lying down on the back.

The little sad or ugly thing here is that my father could be coming back for a visit in just a dream, and next not any gentle face for only having.

As you know he passed away in 2017, and I could be standing out with him for just tolerating, except that the dream could not be any smiling at all.

So here also a Janus face for only a given look, and it becomes only an opposite for what we are able to see, except also given look on nature for such a thing.

For some reason it became a completion for what we are able to make or fulfill, except that such a thing should also be what nature could be having to offer.

Here such a thing also became limitless possibilities for only what could be offered, except not any limited grant for only a scheme.

So here that of a rule for only reigning the Earth, when also prevailing, except not any dominant for only the same, because here Google Translate is not with me.

Here not any state of the art just either, but rather it became only a thing for just being offered when still only reigning, for that of only the dominant it could be.

Anyway, close your eyes for only just a moment for that of the starting point, and next becoming the living day of just today, for only opening once again.

Suddenly it became only the life we should know of, for only everything just existing, and also a nature for just only granted, for only the meaning it could be.

Here time could be sliding backwards and forwards for only the three dimensions of space it could be still, when just living only for the same, for that of end sacrifice for just outcome.

But either a moment of birth for not any just for death, still life for only a Consequence or meaning when just happening, for only the Existence it still only could be.

Here time adds to space for not any product just either, but only the living versus death for still only a couple of factors it could be for that of meaning.

So for only just an end moment of life, it becomes still only a sacrifice for that of death, for not any infallible we could be making it for that of a Creation, where it could be still an end.

All those factors, for still only products of meaning for only the Existence it could be, next a start for only a beginning, for the end we could be making for a final destiny.

So here cycles for still only epochs or time periods, for not any time spinning just around either, for only the cycle it could be, when that of reapeating for only an occurrence.

The only thing I know is that here it could be just different things happening, when that of life for its moment and beauty, and next death taking place for just only after.

So here not any wonderful or Mircacle for only just life happening or taking place, for only the infallible Concept of death, where it should be not any pleasant at all.

Either it becomes nature for only a meaning for only the factors it could be consisiting of, for not sliding into the unknown for only the Faith it should be instead.

So choose to make it only nature brutal and hard, for not any Miracle we only should believe in, when only Proof for that of offered by just nature instead.

But here choose to make it Belief in one way or just another, and it becomes only Certainty instead, leaving me still in the dark for only the precise answer it could be.

I guess a certain Concept could be still making it that of Belief for only the Fallacies it could be, when still perhaps not any Proof just offered for only the same.

But if we make it a wondrous nature for just a given thinking it becomes, or perhaps only ourselves, it becomes only such a thing for only what we could be comparing against.

Here true answer only for that of meaning, and next completion for only that of the same for only what we could readily assume for just only the making or being it could be.

But here that some people could choose to believe for still only Religion, for not making it any Miracle just on behalf or context of science instead.

So here only a turnaround, for just only the better, and still only the infinity it could be, when only such a thing for that of a Miracle, for only the better it could be.

Perhaps God versus the Devil is only the Janus face we could make, for not any -infinity versus infinity, through any 0 instead.

So tell me that the pretty woman should be only prettier for that of a look, for not any prettiest, and next the same for only ugly, uglier, ugliest, because it only could be telling about "more".

But if we could assume a Miracle being a reality for only the science it could be, next also the taking for granted it could be for only becoming scientific Proof instead.

So, naturally, and it becomes only a Cause for still only an eventuality it could be, except also taking it for granted for only the real it still only could be.

Here still making it 100-200 billion stars for the Milky Way, for also the same amount of other galaxies throughout space, so therefore still only the infallible for meaning here instead.

Prove Existence for only the certain thing it could be for that of meaning, and still ourselves for only taking for granted, for part of such a thing it could be.

So here only say "yes" for not any "no", when still only versus for the same, when perhaps both could be a product of space for only the certain meaning it could be.

Here "two eyes" perhaps is only supposed to make me a believer for that of an alien just only a face, for not any better medical therapies or products it could be instead.

But only a thing for that of nature set or determined instead, and it becomes infinity for that of a Concept, for which we are not any able to define at all.

So put a label on any unbeknownst here instead, except not any man, and it becomes only Uncertainty of nature instead, for still only the undetermined it could be.

This again becomes only God for what it could represent, and next the pedestal it only could be for that of reigning.

So if I could prove infinity for only the indefinite it could be, for not any else, it perhaps could end up becoming 0 or the Empty set, for not any -infinity here instead.

Here nature gave us such a thing for only that of offered, when still infinity for an undefined Concept, for only a part of reality it could be for that of only the rest.

So here it becomes only a pressing of the button, for only the remaining it should be still, for not any perimeter or border, for just surpassing the limit of any infinity.

Our view or notion for only a general theme or suggestion, could be that of proving the WOW signal for only intelligent or valid meaning, for still only ourselves to believe.

But here not precisely what I want to say, and next thinking that it should be only valid for still only an indeterminate nature we could be making it.

Here that of Truth is not supposed to be only that of meaning, but always could be there for only the answer we could give or make.

So slip my finger for only the infinity it still only could become, for only a nature of that of "whatelse" for only what it could mean or constitute instead.

We are supposed to be proving absolutes for still only meaning, for only infinity being the Concept for only a starting point, except also a Premise as well.

So if only "of course" could be the natural answer we could make, next also proving aliens for only the same, except still only with Certainty here instead.

Any Premise for only making it nature for its validity or even beauty, and it only becomes gone or invalid for only the undefined instead, when we are not able to determine.

So if I was only just lucky, perhaps I could be able to prove aliens for only the meaning it could be, for not any Certain versus Uncertain, for only such a thing for nature instead.

So here perhaps only unable to prove that of both for only certain meaning, when only that of time versus space for only the combined it could be, and also a product.

The thing we could be making it for that of space here, is that of absolutes, except only infinity for that of a Concept, and next I only should believe in aliens, for not any taken for granted.

And here the lost word could be that of prevailing, when also losing the better word for just meaning a little further down.

Here it became just to complex to have it just written down on the spot, except that it could be coming directly from the brain, by just only thinking.

But here still only lovely, for not any "upset", when still only making it a Miracle for only science, and next the thing we could prove for only a scheme.

Anyway, so I just missed that point for only skipping it, when that of science for the whole thing, except not any detail just instead.

"That's the way", for only what it becomes, in that we know when we should be making it science for just not the other thing either, when still only Religion instead.

So here we only choose for that of a making, and it becomes only Proof for that of a result, for not any left in the dark or blue, for only the Uncertain it could be instead.

Tell me, but is just lovely only the Miracle we could be making for nature, or should we also prove such a thing, for only the real, or part of reality it could be?

Any sledgehammer, and it should not be any Curse just either, but only part of nature which we could be making Existence, for still only the infallible it could be.

So "all charging", and next being only so brave to have such a thing as Religion included for still not any science, but only a Concept of nature instead.

But next kind of a meeting, for not any collecting just either, when perhaps death for only a meaning for only the Construct it could be, when still not any infallible Universe instead.

So pull things just together for only the combined context it could be, and next time and space for only the same, except still only that of Existence for not any just written.

If we could think for only making it a starting point for only the Creation it became, next also a final demise or destiny for only becoming an end for just only meaning.

Here we are only able to assume such a thing with respect with each other, for only the opposite it could be, when perhaps time still only unidirectional from a starting through ending point.

But here we know that it could be a singularity for only a Black hole, and next also infinity defined, for still only the Concept or Construct of nature it could be.

Here the things we could include for only just add, could be still separate or respective things, for not any ultimate or complete context instead, for that of describing everything.

But if I next should believe that it could become "master of skills" for not any separate, here not any diverse just either, for only the respective it could be.

My guess is that even a singularity for that of infinity, should not be telling about any final destiny or demise of just nature, for only the total Concept of the Universe instead.

So be my guest for just only asking, because here I should not be any swearing for only the final destiny or outcome it could become instead.

But like kind of a platform, for still only standing, it becomes a starting point for only one end, versus an end point for just the other, except still only infinity for that of just being offered.

So here just a blink of an eye for just only a popup or excuse, and next still only a starting point for just only a beginning, when also an end, except only within the frame of infinity just here.

There should be no point of making it just another thing for only that of preceding or before, for also the next or thereafter it could be, when still only the Concept of infinity.

Any sacred, for also a Miracle, and still only unbelievable, for not any proven Concept of nature instead, where we only could be taking it for granted.

So here not any two different frames or more, for only the eventualities it could be, when still only climbing the horse for that of the saddle, and not any Stairways to Heaven instead.

Only that I know that it became only infinity for that of unproven or unfounded, and next I could believing for only the same Premise, when still not any God offered for only its Truth.

We know that infinity should not be making it any border or perimeter for only a context, but next still only the excuse for that of believing in God just here.

So therefore nature created for only the Concept or Premise it should be, for also that of all-inclusive or encompassing, except also God for its own infallible meaning.

Asking if or whether any God could be just "better" than any nature made or determined for only its own meaning, and it becomes still only its own reign, for that of fulfillment.

Only that nature gave or offered an excuse for still its own meaning for that of presence, when it only just became for only the starting point it should be.

Here that of infallible, of infallibility, is what we think could be for that of meaning for only just meant, in that nature could be still encompassed for only included.

So here it becomes that it should be still only a starting point for just only meaning, when also a final end for that of a demise, when still not any infallible for just the "better" it could be instead.

We know that it could be a pulsating rhythm for just only a heart, for not any alternative Theory of scientifical evolution instead, when it became only the Big Bang at first.

Again that it should be Fred Hoyle here instead, for that of the alternative Theory, except guessing that it could be still a divine Premise for only making it the Big Bang instead.

But next only the shame it could be, for that of invalidating science for just only meaning, when knowing that the Milky Way could be still comprising 100-200 billion stars,
when that of ourselves for just only a part, being only such for that of Existence.

Life is still only precious, for not the other or any way for just determining for only the possible meaning it could be, except perhaps only sub-dividing for that of respective parts.

Only completed for that of a scheme, and it becomes that of nature for only the respective, except still only infinity for that of being undefined.

I should have linked to Fred Hoyle here instead, because here a bit of trouble for only the long sentence it became instead, just at the end of the previous.

But if knowing that life for also Existence could be infallible just only for meaning, also the free offer of goodwill it could be for only offering.

So, rich for only manifold and diversity, and still not any sparse or frugal, when only that of wasteful instead, and next only the lost word here.

At least genrerous only it could be, when still that of offering, except that richness and diversity comes for only the manifold we could make it or becomes.

So to say, but next prove the idiot versus genius for not any science instead, and next it became only Truth for only the witness it still only could be.

Here I could be making it Perception of sorts, for not any jumping through the ring it should be for only that of proving aliens for their Existence, for only the testimony it could be.

Always for science, with respect for only the meaning it could be, and next only it becomes for that of answer instead, for still only the Certainty we could be making for meaning.

Remember that a spider could be still having eight eyes for not any two, and next I could be only sitting here, for not making it any Wormhole of space, for only given Comprehension.

But either a leap just forward, for not any lean, and next nature could be coming in for a visit from just the past, for not any given future here instead.

So here nature becomes that of four-dimensional, for not any empty space it could be instead, for only the voluminous it could be, and next "duck and take cover", for only being afraid.

Should I be looking any up, for not any down, except only a Frame of reference for only sub-dividing into parts, except not any "eventuality" for making it forwards or backwards instead?

Here sliding into a different part for only a sphere, should not be any skating just either, but only a realm of certain meaning for only the inside limit or borders it could be, for only that above.

But here I also know from recall, that it could be the word "transcend", except still not any Shakespeare just either, but only for a nature we still only could comprehend.

So when it slides, it could be that of continuous for only that of droplets in the ocean, for still not any bits and pieces, for only making it split into parts or subelements instead.

Here you know that a perfect circle could be smooth for only that of surface, for still not any vertical wall or stairs being climbed instead.

Rather that we choose to divide for not any continuous, when still not any end to end carpet for only the start through finishing end of time here instead.

So here the point where the ocean meets the horizon for only the surface of the Earth, and next the vertical fall for only a climb just ahead, except only a steep fall.

If you could be making it the Universe for only that of circle, also the limited it could be for that of shape, except still that of everything within, for only what it could encompass.

So tell me that I could limit a circle for only a shape, except only meeting at the other end, for just only grabbing itself in the tail, when still not any endless for only a boundary.

Be my friend, and next I thought it became only a singularity for not any infinity here instead, when still only endless for that of a circle, which could be running itself for a loop.

So, is that such a thing for only meant or determined, namely that it should be an endless circle for only the infinity it could represent, except also going on forever?

Here finite time, for only an absolute Certainty, and next only infinite volume of Matter instead, only because it could be compressed into an infinitesimal volume of space.

Should I believe in a Construct for only an absolute meaning when only such a thing, for not any "this or that" for only that of respective here instead?

If a circle could be still endless, for only that of continuous, I could be still standing above it for not any surface, only because my world of living could be a three-dimensional one.

Therefore I was thinking we always could be proving that of above infinity for only just "more", for only the better it perhaps could be, and not anything else.

But here the strange thing is that if I make it corkscrew instead, for perhaps not any DNA just either, it could be still only a tip for just an end, when that of two for only respective.

So, is an end of such a corkscrew, for only the wine extractor it could be, having any sharp end or tip for not any opposite, and it becomes only an atom, for not any singularity instead.

Perhaps still only infinitesimal small, for only the small or minuscule it could be, except here you do not make it any Frame of reference for only bits or pieces of time just either.

Thefore just thinking that we always could be making it a singularity versus that of the three-dimensional space, for only what it could represent.

So here these different things, for only the separate it could be, only could be that of Constructs for only just meaning, for only the nature it could be part of instead.

Of course, just infinitesimal small, for just only the part of it, and again still only standing in free air, for that of besides an object which could be still only defined.

Here also for that of its properties or characteristics as well, except that it should be still only within a circle for only the Universe defined, for not any outside instead.

The problem here is once again you only meet a wall of problems for that of the limitations it could be, except also a limit of knowledge for only the frame it could be.

So here I could perhaps be climbing a chair for only looking past a vertical wall for only the other side it could be, and next only beyond that of just inifinity instead.

And here still not pulling any circle apart for only making it a corkscrew instead, only because it could be finite, for that of having a tip at each separate end.

But also that you could be making it a voluminous circle for that of a "globe" versus cube, and always be asking which one is the largest, for only the reference you could make it.

So does nature set any limitations for still only possibilities offered and the answer could be no, for not the other alternative here instead, for only becoming that of aliens.

Only so small we are, for not any tip of the iceberg, and next only nature for that of its infallibility, for only the thing we are not any able to comprehend at all.

Just only so fortunate to be alive, and still not any Concept or Construct we could be defining of an infinite world, only because it should be indeterminate for that of meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isis

But also I read Mr. Kevvys post in Message 2035186.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=85267&postid=2035186

I wish to know, we wish to know the answer for only having it, and next we are starting to ask questions, for that of making a quest and so, for that of gaining or obtaining knowledge.

So we are still asking fundamental questions about nature, for only the same answers back in return, except also the thing which could be implied, for also hidden.

And here also in or therein, for just only the implied or meant it could be for just given, in that for only the knowledge it could become, also it shoud be proven.

So with respect to, for not any relative, and you could make it still only a thing for that of being when only a subject for still questions being asked versus the same validity.

Here not any obliged, for only a confession just either, and next you could be making it a template for science for only the way it still could be carried out, for also asking.

Only that it ends up with the same, for that of reason when still only asking for the fundamental questions it only could be.

So evidently we could be making it Proof when still only asking a couple of questions for the meaning it perhaps could be, when only that of the unexplained here instead.

Here also that of enigma in the same way, for also mysteries, when that of Mysteries, Magic, and Miracles, for only the rational explanation for that of meaning here still.

But also that we could be making it a foundation here for just standing on a platform, because with PrimeGrid, I gave a note of that of Premise versus Causality.

Making it that of time for only a notion, it becomes such a thing for that of past and present, when still the future for that of looking ahead.

But next also time and space for that of a combined context, when we could be making it that of reality for only Existence, and next the Universe for its own or certain thing.

So if infinity is only part of a grand design it could be for that of meaning, next that of above for perhaps explaining it a little better than just before.

I made it here that just infinity could be the Principle for that of offering unlimited possibilities, except not any Logic for only telling whether it should be true or false.

My guess is that you could be making it vivid beauty for also infinite for that of such, except not telling about any grave for only the death it could become.

Rather that a singularity should be found inside a Black hole for that of immense density, and next only a candlelight being turned on or lighted besides the grave of someone.

Any different Concepts of nature, and next you only press the button for that of past or beyond, when still not any infinity for only setting a limit for that of possibilities being made.

So perhaps available instead, and we otherwise could be back at the discussion of Religion and science for only the different it could be, except also different Concepts of nature.

Next not any proven, for also the certain it could be, but here that of a Wormhole for still not any Black hole for only a difference, and next I could believe for only the certain meaning it could be.

I always could be falling inside a Black hole for just encountering, except that a Wormhole could be making it somewhere else for that of space and time, for only bringing it so.

So here I am only proving a limit for not any limitless with respect to the Black hole or infinity it could be, for not any Wormhole here instead.

Here it becomes different properties of nature for just only given, when also that of objects or Sets. for only the Abstracts it could be, for also that of meaning.

And next not any same, because you could be attributing certain elements of science for only the properties it could be, and next be ascribing for that of Heavens instead.

So proving for an infinite scheme when that of nature for only a context, and it becomes only infinity still, for not the other thing instead, when we only choose to believe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

So why not make it so for only the different Laws of nature we could be having only still, for also the tenet or doctrine it could be, for that of way for only explaining?

Here we know that Fundamental Laws of physics should be only the elementary particles we could be making it still, for not any Type I, or Type II civilization instead.

So kind of nose for only the "butt" it could be, and next we only choose to believe, for only the certain meaning it could be, when still not any Proof.

But here not any Commandment for just given Census just either, except that in a way nature could be assigned for still only left to be for only a meaning.

So here also adapted for just a show, when still not any Census, for only the word it could be for still only lacking.

But next on given behalf, for just only order, and next being commanded to walk one step forward, when still not any "meant" for just the thing it only became.

My best guess is that the top of a gaussian, for just only the peak it could be, next also could represent a score for just only meaning for the same.

But rather that we kind of a way are trying to quantify nature for only the meaning it could be, when also possible limits for the same, and next that of infallible for only undefined.

So here only sweet music, for not any playing for just the better, for only nature becoming so for that of meaning, when still not making it any Miracles for just only better instead.

Therefore we are quantifying for just only the better it could be, excpept that infinity is still its own scheme for that of undefined meaning.

So here the man we know by name of Jesus, walking around on Earth for that of saving people from illnesses, and we make him a savior only for that of such.

Next on my way for still only walking, and it becomes only a lonely march for still only walking, when that of infinity for only a Premise by means of nature instead.

So here that of sacred for just only past or beyond for that of meaning, and next still only a Miracle for that of such, which perhaps could not be any comprehended,
but also could be past any limits for just an understanding.

We know that both Atheists and most Agnostics are not supposed to believe for any meaning, except only comprehend for the certain Proof it could be instead,
for only a nature being defined by means of Principle.

Therefore it also becomes an infallible nature when still uncomprehended for that of the same, except you also could be making it completion for just only fulfilled.

Here it becomes that of science versus Religion once again, for only the opposite meanings it could be, when that of Belief for just one thing, and Proof for next the other.

But here only infinity defined for that of scheme for just only belong, when being part of nature for only the certain meaning it could be.

Therefore you also could think you could surpass a given limit for only frame or delimiter when that of infinity here still, for not any exaggerating instead.

In the same way, we also could be making it nature still its own context for that of self or itself, when only looking at the details it could represent or be made of.

Just making it infinity for that of both a singularity for just only meant, for also the not any limited we could be making for space, next a Construct for that of death.

Rather that we should be making it so for both that of life when perhaps also the Universe, except that for still only time and space for only a notion, it should be the above links instead.

So if any limitless should be still not the thing we could comprehend, for that of incomprehensible, also it becomes the same limit for not any nature for only set or defined.

Here incomplete becomes still the opposite of any complete just only for meaning, and next also fallible versus infallible here as well, for still only nature for a written context.

Next only so fortunate I could be only still, for that of having it played out for only all details visible, except still only a show for that of being discernible.

When I press the button for not any proving, I make it still a Miracle for only what it becomes, except also a nature for still only the comprehended meaning it could be.

So here any set example for just only given, and it becomes nature for still only a comprhended meaning, for not any infallible here instead, and next becoming almost a description.

Is a Miracle still any proven for just only the "better" it could be, or should I rather be making it nature incomprehensible or infallible here instead?

So, in which way could you perhaps presume for only the better, for still not any past the limit for only the border or threshold it could be, for only that of infinity defined instead?

Just order of a magnitude, for still only the better, and next still only a presumption for that of meaning, for only making it nature better still.

So ask it to be complete here, for still only perfect, and next also a marvelous nature for only being magnificent, for only the glorious or fabulous it could be.

But here I am only reaching the end of the road for just only encountering, for not any limit it should be instead, when both that of Comprehension and Frame of Reference for the same.

Rather that we set a limit for only such a thing, when that of limits for only our understanding, for also the knowledge or Wisdom it could be, for not any "ascertained" here instead.

Only make a choice, for still that of knowing that nature could be limitless for only defined, and next the undefined it could be for still only being infallible for just only the same.

Therefore, still only behalf of, for only the certain meaning it could be, when that of Jesus for still only a savior, for not any God for just other meaning instead,
and next the label we could be making for only a stick, for only the written context of nature it could be.

Here the mentioned links at the top for only the set example of nature for just only defined, except that we should still prove for only the same meaning it could be.

Just the other thing here instead, for that of a Type I or Type II civilization for just only meaning, and next only poking a nose for that of doing only such a thing.

Can we create a Type III civilization?

What would that look like?

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

Martin, why not leave only nature to decide for only the meaning it could be here still?

If so, we are perhaps able to conclude for only the possible meaning it could be, for that of Certainty here as well, and next only a conclusive Proof for only the "defined" meaning it could be.

So here perhaps not any "for the same" just either, but only that I could reach a Conclusion for just only the better, when still that of Proof for only the same meaning it could be.

Any infallible for only written context, and it becomes nature for a presumed meaning, for only the Premise or Causality it could be only here still.

If just asking whether we could add to nature, next for only the better perhaps, except nature still infallible for only a meaning, for also the way it could be included.

Rather that possible makes it still not any possibility for only a scheme, for also that of nature for only the limitless it still could be.

Just on behalf of nature for only the set example or Premise it could be, next that of "assigned" or commanded for just the other word, for also the attributed it could be.

If still only a couple of stars and galaxies for only the chance or likelihood it could be, next what so for just the other question here instead, when we could be asking questions about nature for just only meant?

With respect to nature for only that of our Comprehension for just only behalf, and it becomes nature for that of its own reference, for only its own meaning it could be.

I made it limit here for just only a word, and next that of nature for only the same reference for only the part of meaning it could be, for that of only writing.

See it just for only meaning, and it becomes that of WYSIWYG for the same, except that it becomes both that of perfect and impefect residing side by side, for only that of completion at the other end.

But here that of testimony comes to me for only a word when still not any written, for not any obliged it perhaps could be, and here lost the other word for only the small buffer.

Perhaps it became that of Truth here instead, for only that of Logic, except perhaps still not any defined or complete answer just for meaning, for only nature for its behalf.

So kind of justify everything for only a meaning, and next it becomes that of completion for only a scheme, when still only nature being infallible here instead.

Therefore, once again respect with or for, when that of a certain nature for only meaning or defined here, when also that of set example for just only the same, and it becomes at least attributed
for that of science, when rather Proof here instead.

So here obviously, for still only "of course", and next nature granted for only the meaning it could be, except still complete for only the presumed meaning it could be.

Rather that we make it "all charging" once again, for only catching the train, except also that of everything possible, for only the limit or scheme it could be.

So perhaps border or frontier here for that of past or beyond, when still not any scheme, because here I was still only standing on a platform for that of loose air, and not having any Perspective
for only defined against for only comparing.

And here just think it could be -inifinity through infinity for just only 0 in between, and next the same infallible Concept for just only written, for only the nature it could be.

But again only a description here, for not any depiction, because here we could at least contemplate for the certain meaning it could be, for not any acknowledging here instead.

I better make a new one here for only the small posting buffer in front of me or available.

Can we add to nature?

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art

So maybe art of love, for not any art of noise, for just thinking we could be speaking of two different things here for only Concept, when that of perhaps aliens for only meaning.

Here you make it perhaps a robot in a laboratory for only artificially designed or created, for not any purposeful or will I could be making of nature for only a Premise.

But here Truth is a virtue, for also the Certainty it could be, when still only nature for that of its magnificence and beauty, for only splendor of meaning.

Here always a Concept for just only meaning, for also that of conceptual here as well, for that of possible Intelligence it could be, for that of levels for only such.

But here Intelligence becomes only I.Q. for the meaning it could be, for not any determined here instead, when only nature for that of its part, for only being realistic.

So here you still only relate to a given thing for only certain meaning, when also quantifying just more, for not any less here instead, and it becomes still only a description.

Asking whether it could be any levels for only the respect it could be, next also levels of Intelligence for such a thing, for still only levels of nature for only the same.

But here still only incomprehensible, for that of undefined for just the other thing, when still only nature for that of its beauty, for only the witnessed it could be here still.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_(device)

So here that of sufficiently for just only meant when that of a push or pull, because here I could be still pulling the train for not any lifting.

But next I entered the wrong door for only an entrance, for only choosing to believe for the Truth and Certainty it could be, for not any virtue here instead.

So here trust me by only making it Proof, except still not any set example or determined for only that of meaning instead, for only a nature we could be comprehending.

Only just an absolute, for only the defined meaning it could be, and next we attribute it for that of its context, for only the defined or written it still only could be.

Are nature still for only that of different for just only what it represents, for only different parts of a scheme, for just only belonging for that of a member?

What if I just said that nature could be perfect for only a given look by just noticing for only that of details, when still not any jack for only the lifting of a hammer instead?

Rather that you come up with, for also that of determining, for still only the different scheme, except also attributing for the same thing when still only different parts.

So think that the jack was just perfect or complete for only what it could be able to do, for not any set example or Deterministic for that of nature instead.

Just said it, for also mean it, and nature became still only comprehended for that of its defined parts, for also that of full, for still only a member.

But if you make it infinity that of an absolute Concept here instead, next also what it represents for still only the meaning it could be.

So therefore also a mechanism, when only doing a thing for that of its innerworking, except also a scheme for only doing the same, and you could be making it a fork instead.

Here only Lord for that of being beautiful only for meaning, except also knowing that God could be a savior, for not any Jesus here instead, when still nature for only an infallible.

Could we still make it small versus large for only a context, except also attributing for the same meaning, for still not any arbitrariness of nature instead?

Therefore still a lift for only an elevator, for not any nature for that of its magificence instead, when only that of realistic for only the provable here instead.

So here quantifying for still only meaning, when it becomes only Chaos instead, except that you could be still attributing for only that of glory, for not any ascribing instead.

What if I just know, for only a set example, for not any Deterministic here instead, that I could be pushing the button past any limit for only threshold, and still only becoming infinity?

If so, which realistic part could you make it only for that of scheme, for not any perfect or complete nature it could be here instead?

Is the quantifiable still for only the certain respect it could be for a given thing, for still not any past or beyond for that of threshold instead, when still only infinity defined?

Proving one thing versus the other, and it could be still possible for only a set example, for not any unquantifiable or undefined here instead.

Except that I still know, for not any knew, that it only became that of nature for only being so, except not any such for only a part here instead, and it rather becomes that of respective.

Next I only chose one thing for only the respective meaning it could be, when still not any past or beyond for only the threshold or border it could be instead.

Knowing just both or all for only the certain meaning it could be, and next it becomes just everything for only what you could acknowledge, for still only the meaning it could be.

Rather that I left out one thing for not being any possible, for only the exclusion mechanism it could be, when still not any nature determined, for only the Truth it could be.

The other word here is that of a writeoff for that of the same, for also the missed opportunity it could be, when still missing the train for not any catching it.

And here still not any inconclusive, for only that of conclusive here instead, when also nature for that of being determined, for not any indeterminate instead.

So here you still wrap that of completeness for just around infinity it could be for that of Concept, when still not any Premise or Causality here instead, for only explaining.

Art to dream new ideas...

Engineering to reshape nature...

And physics to understand nature!

---

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature

Ask me not to be any true believer either, because either it does not bother for also warrant, except also suffice.

Here my kitchen becoming a huge cleanup together with the bathroom, so next giving me a bit of heacache, but rather for the back instead.

Therefore also putting a couple of leftover potatoes, together with the sausage pins, or hot dogs, inside the oven, but here one piece was yellow in color.

Next opening a box of tomato dressing as an addition, using hot water under the sink, and will have to wait a little, for that of 200 C in the oven.

So getting cold fingers, and next doing whatever better I can for only making it a readable post just here.

The problem here is that we got a spell of cold outside, for that of -10C, so therefore at least trying when still only writing here, for that of wet fingers.

But here also unable to go to the shop, because the postal bank is not willing to pay out any money, and all my ID-cards for also cards towards the bank got expired.

Next having the dinner eaten in just a moment, and next going to bed, for only getting tired, because we also got quite a bit of snow first.

So here another lost day for that of spent for also wasted, when still not any buttefly for only a dream instead, but could be having it another time instead.

My computer room still needs the same for that of a cleanup, except that it could be just dreadful here for not any glamorous here instead.

But also that it does not rhyme here with "first" above, so rather I should have switched a couple of sentences instead.

So thrash in one ear, for also out the other, because here a couple of problems once again, for not any riding high for just another moment.

Here that all my cards for ID, together with such for that of getting to the post office and having money charged, expired on date, and is invalid.

So here the police issuing pass or passports mostly meant for travel abroad, but the alternative becomes an ID, or national ID issued by my bank, which also is expired.

For my flat of living, there is a telephone cable or wire installed, but has become defect or not in order or functional because of the physical, and also is expensive.

Alternative next becomes that of Skype, using either the main computer or the laptop, and calling the bank for that of charging both money and possible ID.

But next a bit of hesitation or reluctance here, because the keypad for that of use with Skype needs an 11 digit number for that of personal ID, and next is not working any well.

This when perhaps dialing the number for the bank, and being asked to enter this number for that of reference, and could be finishing off with the "#" symbol.

The problem here is that I am late out of bed, so calling the bank after 4 PM, and it will probably be closed for the day.

Here I gave my mother a mentioning of the current problem, and also the head or chairman of the housing association or cooperative where I live, for perhaps not any successful here.

Paying any bills is not any problem here because of using a chosen letter for that of such, and next also money standing on the accounts for that of the bank.

Only alternative becomes picking up every piece of ID just having, and next walking to the post office, for making it perhaps cash for that of money in my hands.

My bank does not respond by means of email, so the only alternative becomes calling here for that of the mentioned charge, as well as difficulty for only using the dialpad.

So except for a not working fridge, I could perhaps be having food left or remaining for a week, except that I could be missing the beer for just the weekend holiday.

Either I just misunderstood for a valid signature, because here I am having some three code devices with my bank, for also one or two single codes, except none of them working.

Here we left the social structure for that of welfare or income altogether, and the alternative becomes standing on the corner for just begging for money.

So, calling all stations for not any asking for help either, and it becomes still only such welfare for only given or offered, except that I still need to charge my bank for possible access.

There should not be any better or alternative solution just mortgaging or redeeming my flat for only a lack of money, because such becomes selling for that of fixed property.

When I rather make it cash instead, it should be notes and coins for just in between my fingers, except that only a dime could also be used for that of change currency.

So here it became a note for that of 100 in my national currency, and I chose to exchange into 10 for that of 10 dimes for each using only a box for that of such.

Let us say or pretend I could be still having a valid card for that of ID, and next asking for just 100 for that of a charge, and next receiving by means of 10 pieces for each 10 dimes.

Next I walk into the store for that of shopping, and picking up just two six-pack of beer, and next paying by means of the 10 pieces of 10 dimes already in my hands.

Here such cash becomes still only valid for that of payment, because it could be still both notes and coins only worth a shilling, but still available for that of just in my pocket.

So here kind of an unfair scheme, when perhaps unjust instead, when the bank is not willing to give or afford any money for just only the cash flow it could be.

Any expiry or expiration for just only cards, and it should be a renewal for that of the same, when either being done automatically, for not any manual instead.

Here I just wonder if I still could be climbing the ladder for only entering the seventh sky for only Heavens, when still not any fall down to Earth, for only just hitting it hard.

Such a thing as Inflation, when only becoming more worth for the amount of money you could afford to spend, and next you become only a rich man just here.

But that Deflation, for also a Deficit, could be making money valueless for still only held between your fingers, except that climbing the ladder could make it still a high rise.

Are you next supposed to spend any money for only Deficit just happening, or could it slide past your fingers for only the valueless it still only could be?

If so, I could perhaps make it a 1,000,000 or 1 million note for that of a stamp when still not any coin, and next think I could be doing the shopping, for still not any selling of my flat.

Maybe just pretend once again, for only the valueless note it became, because here a Deficit making any money just valueless for just only worth for the stamp it became.

Just the Idea that I could be aiming for just only striving, and next I could be standing in just free air for only that of floating, for not having any reference point of making.

Rather that it became a platform for still only standing when that of loose air, and next I could be comparing with any less or more for just above or below, for still only a comparison.

So, did it became just a climb up the ladder for only a rise or ride when still only reaching the summit for that of climbing, and next becoming successful when reaching the top or summit,
or did it just became a fall back to Earth for only an accident, and next hitting the ground just hard?

If I could be claiming success for only reaching the top or summit, I next could also feel a bit of pleasure or satisfaction as well, except that here it should only be that of "+" or "-",
for still not any past any moment of lost accomplishment or success for only the triumph it could be, when that of past any death, for only the perdition or damnation it could be.

Here I lost the point completely, and it went into minus for only the negative, except that my level of comparison for only the numbers it could be, only could be that of infinity just here.

Make it any rich man versus poor man instead, and next only a pledge for that of being poor, for not any successful it could be instead.

Is the world still only brutal or hard for just the meaning it could be, or could I be hitting the Earth hard for just only a fall, and next succumb to death, for only such a thing happening?

Any better than success just made, and next it becomes only a Miracle instead, when still not any perdition or damnation for only the worse it could become instead.

You say it and next also make it, for still only physical Laws for that of meaning, when that of both life and death for only birth for just a moment, becomes that of meaning.

But if infinity is still an undefined Concept of nature, for only a platform just standing on, for that of free air, next still not any comparison, but I could be still left to die.

Guess what, but here poor people could be still only slaves, for not any empowerish instead, when that of glamour could be making still stars shining, for not any final moment instead.

Here that birth itself, for also the notion of death for just happening, makes for life just happening for only the Chaos it could be, except that we could be "redeeming" for only that of the other.

So we think that birth could be still not any sacred, for only coming out of the vomb for only the genes or chromosomes it could be, when also that of death for only a burial.

But here such a thing also needing a gravestone for that of legacy, and next do not ask me if I still was any successful for only living and just taking my part.

Either it becomes only "Divide and Conquer" for only the different it could be, or we could be splitting nature into parts for only the different it could be, when that of death for only another Concept.

Here we could still make or determine life for only its presence for only the Chaos it could be, for not any sacred here instead, for just only the moment preceding, for also the after it could be.

You next ask me about a moment for only bittersweet, when still only living on Earth for just only a member, because here a sacrifice still only made, for that of becoming death.

Any Chaos instead, for only the random order it could be, and next nature for its arbitrariness, for only the different factors (Ambiguities, Contradictions) it could be.

Rather I chose to enter the different horse for just only riding, and next a noble factor for just only sacred, when still only such a thing for that of becoming that of afterwards.

So here only that of flesh and blood, for still not any water, soil and air for only preceding any given birth for just only a moment, when knowing that any afterlife should be still only sacred.

Is such a thing that of a precious moment for justonly happening, or could you make it still an ultimate sacrifice for just death happening, and you could be passing away?

Here different factors makes for still different meanings, and next I could only believe for that of its beauty, for not any validness of making it any sacred instead.

Only that afterlife makes for still that of Eternity for only a given context, and next I was trying to prove science for only the infinite Concept it could be instead.

So here just tried at PrimeGrid for a hidden post, when that of the following links.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_and_error

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error_detection_and_correction

Mind you I also gave a note about a little smile here for just Mona Lisa, for only the unambiguous or undefined it still only could be, except not any painter for only the Reason behind.

Tick-tack, for just the perfect it still only could be when that of complete, except not making it any infallible scheme for nature, for only the infallible it still only could be.

Here noticing that my three or so posts being made there, becomes a little too much for that of any quote, and next could be leaving it out it just here.

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=9531&nowrap=true#148425

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=9531&nowrap=true#148426

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=9531&nowrap=true#148427

No, no, again, for just you unable to read that, but you could be asking moderator Micael Goetz for possible access to contents for just posted.

The problem is that for still only a little smile visible in a face, for not any ambiguous nature, and next only leaving you undecided for still only meaning, for what it could be all about.

So rather representing instead, for also constitute, still only meaning for that of such, which you could only comprehend or fathom, except that such a thing could be in or with respect for that of a Reason,
for only making it Father or God here for that of such, when still only a nature for that of detemined meaning.

Again, that only Fallacies makes me still think about Religion for only meaning, except that we should prove science for only the absolutes it still only could be.

Rather it becomes Terms and Conditions for only the Uncertainty it still only could become, for also that of Ambiguity and Contradictions, leaving you undecided for the answer,
for still only the valid Proof of meaning it could be.

Should it be any tantamount or unequivocal instead, and next also such a thing for only that of decided, when still not any undefined or indeterminate here instead.

Here it becomes still "inherited" for only the meaning of science, for only the evident or readily Proof it could be, except still only unanswered for that of undefined Concept.

So here any infallible becomes only with respect to just only Religion for that of meaning, for not any proving of science instead, for only the indeterminate it perhaps could be.

Next only lost meaning for that of lost words, because it could be even better written here, except only saying it so for that of meaning, and next only proving for still only such a thing.

So know for not any know, and it becomes only do and don't for that of such, when also does not, except still only provable versus unprovable, for only the "determined" it could be.

Wish I could shake hands with someone, for just meeting at the other end, because here still only undefined or indeterminate for only the Concept of science, and next also proving such a thing.

Perhaps science is still only the better thing of explaining for that of meaning, for not any Religion instead, except only that of set for not any unset, when still only that of infallible.

Here you are supposedly proving science for still only meaning, for also the respect to or with it could be, except still only the same nature for that of undefined Concept.

But next only in your eyes for that of seeing, for not any inside, because here science became that of proving absolutes for still only meaning, for only the indefinite it still only could be.

Could you make it any perfect answer by just only asking, or should nature be still only perfect or complete, for only the example or specimen it could be?

Never say never, for only a round or roundish circle when it never could meet for not any middle, because here still only infinity for that of undefined or unlimited Concept instead.

So think it perhaps became the end of the road, for only the circle meeting in the middle, when still only an undefined Concept for that of nature for only defined instead.

Any absolute Proof for only determined, and next also Certainty as well, for only making you able to prove that of nature for only unlimited Concept, for only the indefinite it could be.

So if my reference became still only Proof for that of specified or written, next also nature for the true answer it could be or become, for only an absolute meaning for such.

Could I choose between any relative for not any deterministic or indeterministic meaning instead, and next I could only prove for a specific meaning, for that of decided only for such.

So here it becomes still only "whatever" for just only word, when not quoting any above for just PrimeGrid instead, because here that of an absolute should be only one thing for only choosing.

Next pack my bag for only my shoulders and start walking, and next only forever for only the endless way it could be, when still only nature undefined for only Principle or context.

But suddenly I was only proving Religion for the fallibles it could be, when still not any infallibles for science, for only the undefined or indeterminate it could be.

Either we choose to make it infinity for still only an indefinite Concept, or we could choose to prove God here instead, for only the certain meaning it perhaps could be.

To me or myself, it becomes that of two different Principles or Causes just here, when only proving nature by example, for not any Religion here instead.

If nature could be still proven for only the undefined or unlimited it could be, next fine, for not any same Concept for only proving God for that of its Certainty instead.

Either God does not exist at all, or we could be making it still infallibles with respect to nature, for only the undefined or indeterminate it could be.

So here we make it nature in respect for just only written for perhaps the Truth it could be, for not any other answer or Causality, for proving God here instead.

But here still only undefined or indeterminate for the same limitless Concept it could be for that of nature, and next proving for only its beauty, when perhaps more Certainty instead.

Should you make it nature any groundless or unspecified for not any determined instead, and next it becomes only unequivocal or tantamount for the same thing.

Here I know that synonymous should still mean the same as any tantamount, and for not any opposite instead, you should only interpret it as equivoval perhaps here instead.

So here you are labeling that of nature for still only its unlimited Concept for just only defined, except also stick to it for just the marker it could be.

Press the button for still not any goal or end of the road, and you could be still only on your way for that of undefined Concept, for only such a thing that of infiinity could be.

But here that Proof made it still only an ultimate answer for what I could be asking about, for not making it any unambiguous for any the Ambiguity it perhaps could be.

You next think that God could be only the answer for only representing for that of meaning, when still only nature for that of unlimited Concept instead.

Next I tried with a moniker or Allegory for just only explaining one thing for only the another, when still only science proven for only the undefined Concept it could be.

Either it becomes still only undefined, indeterminate, or unlimited for the same context or meaning, or you could be proving that of absolutes for only meaning instead.

If I next have to choose, I only could prove nature for the answer or meaning it could be, when also an absolute, for only the written context of meaning it could be.

Of course it became only fallibles instead, for not any infallibles, and next proving God for still only the respect it could be, for not any meaning for such instead.

But here FIFO becomes only the choice you could be making first for only nature left to decide for only the order it could be, for not any proving for only ultimate Concept versus God.

Should I have my beer first, for not the one I could not buy, or should it perhaps be even better written here, for only that of letting you comprehend?

Give me a definition of a smile if you will, for not any laughter, and next back at Mona Lisa for just only a painter, and not any Reason behind.

Suppose you could be proving nature for only a certain meaning, and next also absolutes for the same, when still not any indefinite or indeterminate here instead.

Evidently it became only so, for that of back on the horse or in the saddle, because here only nature proven for that of its Certainty, for still not any incomplete here instead.

Again that you could be back for only making it a choice for that of proving for science, for not any respect of any Religion here instead.

Next you think it could be only fallibles versus infallibles for only science just for meaning, and not the other Concept of beliveving just for Religion instead.

So here only stuck in mouth for that of the fallibles it could be, and next also proving for science, for only the certain meaning it could be.

Rather I made it that of pretending, for only pretension for that of such, when it could be that of name calling for just only a nicname or moniker, when still perhaps only representing God.
except still only science for only the determined it could be, when also absolutes of nature.

Should I still prove for completeness for only nature being such a thing, or should it rather be a sight or countenance here instead, only because it could be "better" for that of a Miracle?

Or should it perhaps be valid here instead, for still not any invalid, for only the founded versus unfounded it could be, when still not any proven?

Next you think that Proof should be for only an absolute thing for that of such, when not any Truth here instead, for only the Fallacies of Logic for just only meant.

So here quoting from Message 148427 at PrimeGrid, for only the last five or so lines it could be.

Here you could still only prove by example, for only the "Yes" or "No" it could be, when also false versus true, except that Logic should still be only for the determined answer you could be making for a meaning.

We still could also be making it absolutes for the same, when only proving for a better meaning, except still only nature for that of its Uncertainty, for only the one versus the other thing here only for such.

Really, you could make it still such a thing for only being undecided, except that nature could be coming with just "both", for still only the answer or meaning it could be.

So here only choosing for that of telling for only so, when it became a determined answer for only that of "both" for that of meaning, when that of the above for just included as well.

This makes you still uncertain for only behalf of nature, except that it also could Contradict itself for that of its Ambiguity, leaving us with not any answer we could prove.

Here you may notice that I used the word "determine" for still only such a thing letting it be, when that of a Concept of nature defined for only the meaning it could be.

Proving Existence, and next you could also be proving God for only the same meaning it could be, except that you make it still valid for only sights and sound, for not any countenance instead.

So here I became only late, for not any finished, for only reaching the goal, for only the finite scheme it perhaps could be, when only unlimited, for not any undefined.

Either I wrote it first, for that of specified meaning, or it became added later on, for just only the mentioned or specified it could be.

Here I got the question from our moderator ML1, whether we perhaps could create a type III civlization, except for not any certain Belief for only such a thing,
you rather could be making it tools and products for only at your disposal, for only the things you are able to make or create here instead.

Rather I could see or make it in such a way for only the Comprehension I could be making it of space for only its limit (if any), for also the infallible Concept it also could be.

Therefore also Perspective for such a thing when that of view or notion, except also making it an Aspect for only a grand or total Design just for meaning.

Perhaps it became an Abstraction here instead, but next you are back at the Metaphysical, for not any physical, for explaining properties of objects for that of such.

We could be making it still a needle for only that of fine surgery when also medicines, except also a developing world for only the inherited Chaos it could be, for not any determined instead.

But here only an ultimate Concept defined for that of nature, should be the undefined or limitless for only the unlimited it could be here instead, for still only a Concept for such a thing.

So if perhaps more an Abstract for that of a Concept just here, you could be making it an Abstraction of nature just here, for not any limits, borders, frontiers, or perimeters instead.

And not forgetting any boundaries just either, for only inside the circle for not any outside, when still only meeting itself at the middle for only an enclosed circle.

Remember that a needle should be still sharp at one end for only the tip it could be, when still not any Abstraction for just levels of Philosophy here instead.

So here that orders of nature for only magnitude, becomes the level or threshold for still only what it could represent, except also constitute for that of determined meaning.

If we could prove nature for only the undefined or limitless it could be, next only lift your hat for not any putting it on, for only the validness of meaning for that of Religion,
and here I had the word for this in the preceding post.

Guess it should not work, for only supposed it could be for that of so, when still only valid meaning for that of science, when still not any unfounded or groundless for that of Religion.

Here you make it so for still only the "proven" it could be for that of science for only Aspect for such, when still only undefined or indeterminate for that of possible meaning instead.

Only that infinity became just tantamount or unequivocal for the Principle it could be, when that of such for only a nature set or determined for just the thing it could be.

Never stop, for that of never end, and next blow a flute for not any horn, because here it could be continuing forever, for only the indeterminate or endless it could be.

Either we should "decide" on precise or exact meaning just here, for not any ultimate here instead, when still only an endless road for that of making it incompleteness.

Next, let it only be so for that of proving science for only the ultimate meaning it could be, when still only nature for that of undefined Concept here instead.

But still that I made it also undetermined for that of unlimited here as well, for more that of undefined or indeterminate here instead.

But if nature could be any so for that of determined meaning, perhaps not any so for only the sacrifice we could make, for only that of a "divine" Concept just here.

Here I think that these two could be still only two different things for what they could constitute or mean, for also the context or relationship it could be.

This because you could be proving Fallacies for only a certain meaning for not any nature instead, and next also God for the other meaning it perhaps only could be.

But here this thing for only a God for just a meaning for only the Reason it perhaps could be, for not any nature created for that of its sight or countenance instead.

Rather that you make it still a face for not any sight or countenance instead, and next also believe for only the beauty or marvel it perhaps could be.

This reminds me of the parable of the traveling salesman, for only the "aspiring" he could be, for only climbing the ranks for the selling of products he could be making.

But here supposedly it could be Proof for still only meaning when that of technological crafts for their marvel, for only the instruments of nature it only could be.

Again, ask Michael Goetz for the hidden contents in the three messages for that of mentioned, for only the contents it could be.

Rather it becomes only a sigh for that of slap in the face, when still not any face for only a sight or countenance here instead, for only such a thing we could be proving.

Just standing on a couple of feet for only the determined it could be, and next not any nature for only the different it could be, when that of levels for only a scheme for just written.

Either it becomes nature for only specifically written when that of tantamount only for such, except also proven for the same Principle only for that of meaning.

Any two or more for just the cubit it could be, and next still not any different for only the possible choice you could make, except still only nature specific for that of meaning.

Perhaps we could be making still different choices for that of selecting for only an option, for still not any same for only a nature specifically written for that of determined meaning.

But next it became only a perfect nature for the complete it could be, for not pressing any button for just above or beyond, for only the absolute it could be, and not any fulfilled.

If we could think that it became only God for that of Reason, next that of "both" for still only a scheme, when that of implied for just the completeness it still only could be.

Therefore also a total completeness for only grand, when still only a scheme for that of such, and next thinking that nature could be determined for only a reason.

So, proving science for not any Religion instead, and it becomes only vice versa for that of certain meaning, when still not any Proof here instead.

Eventually I could be still only continuing on my grand journey for only a travel, when still not any God sitting on a pedestal, for only the reign it perhaps could be.

This because, when still not any sovereignty, or kingdom for only an empire, we also could be making it a "planar scale" for only the meaning it perhaps could be.

Rather that a Type III civilization could be just grabbing everything that could be around for only its dominance, except still only unproven for that of Concept.

So here only such a thing for that of "planar" when still only levels for that of such, and it becomes levels of Existence for still only the thinking it could be.

With pleasure, and next only moderation for that of temperate for such a thing, when also that of abstinence for only preventing you a couple of times, for not any apt or inclined instead.

Perhaps a square could be still only a module for that of shape, except not any past or beyond for that of a circle for only Construct or level instead, for also an Abstraction.

Next I only skipped the circle, for that of enclosed for only a meaning, for not any outside for only levels instead, when perhaps only ending up in free air for just only floating.

So here only in my wildest dreams, for still only floating, for not any Comprehension it could be instead, and next we could be making it levels of Intelligence, for only just defined.

Perhaps I could only imagine, for only the dream it still only could be, for not pressing any button for only past or beyond any infinity here instead.

So if I could just imagine, for not any skipping of a couple words just above, could it perhaps be still only a Construct for that of infinity, for not any "more" it could be instead?

Does such a thing only become that of Eternity for only represent for that of meaning, or should it be any "better" for only the past or beyond infinity here instead?

So here do not ask me what God perhaps was thinking when only making it a "Frame of reference" for just only nature of a making, for only the created it perhaps only became.

Rather that you attribute nature for still only the certain meaning it could be, for not any ascribing of God for only an infallible Principle or meaning here instead.

But if God is only nature's representative for the sight or countenance it could be for that of written, still not any such a thing for only the ascribed it could be here instead.

One word for just coming at me here, is that of "vertigo", except only interpreted for that of the other meaning here instead.

Only that it perhaps could be true for only past or beyond for what we are able to describe for only God when still only meaning, except only writtten or ascribed here instead.

Perhaps it could be still an unlimited Concept for only making it an infallble such for that of Religion here instead, but next I was only proving science for that of its completeness.

So here only that of related, when still only ascribed versus God for only the sight or countenance it could be, except that we could be still proving in one way or another.

But here only honestly, for not any afraid, for only the context of meaning you could be making yourself, for only attributing nature for that of science, for not any describing of God instead.

Just leave the show, for only top of your hat, and next you only leave it to decide for yourself for only the certain meaning it could be, for not any Proof of science instead.

But here just thinking about the vessels of your blood for only the magnificence it could be, and still not any splendor of nature for only the sight or countenance it could be here instead.

Ending up proving for only a certain meaning, and next also part for only such, when still not every detail on the table for just only the explaining it could be.

We always could dimiss for not any certain Proof here instead, and next it becomes only nature for that of its meaning, for only the interpreted it could be.

Do I have to mention such a thing when still only aliens for that of their Existence, for not any infallible nature for only a context instead?

Only that of fullest, next also deepest for only the meaning it becomes, except that we still could be proving for only that of the infallible, for not any beautiful here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heliocentric_orbit

Getting tired for only a single beer left in the fridge for also late at night, so back tomorrow.

Anyway, catch you later, for only 04:30 AM in the morning here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWEgPKI3TtI

Just remind me of every single feather for only worn, and next only one for just lifted or raised, and the others lying flat onto the skin.

Therefore not keeping track with any details just either, and for the same reason not any choreographed for just only happening in true time for just everything.

Every second counts, for just not any detail either, and next the three-dimensional view for only Perspective, and not any lens, becomes the everything happening at the same time.

Therefore also small, when still only details, because here I was still not able to remember any single detail for only just happening.

So hurry up and pack your bags for not any packed records, because here it became only an overload for not any surprise, when just all details being pushed into my face.

Ask me next what is going to happen, for not anything just happening before, when still all details available for that of being present, and I could be losing track of the details.

So is the land or reign of confusion still only Chaos for just happening, or could be making it determined here for just a way of progress, when still only things happening for just an Event?

Just matter counts, and next let it rain down from the sky for just forever, when still not any ending for just only the happening or occurrence it could be.

We know that a picture just counts for still only the details, except also remembering for the small details just happening in the same way.

So, if any ever for just only forever could be still only now for just only happening, it could be still taking place for only the Event it could be, when still (not) at the same time.

But if I take a look at a picture for only frozen in time, I could also be looking at the small details being part of the picture, for not being any overcome by surprise.

Just in full, for that of being completed, and next still only simultaneously for only taking place at the same time, for still only an overload, and not overcome.

But here only just over and over again, for that of repeating, and it becomes still only a repeated occurrence for that of happening, except that it also could become an overlay.

Do I next make it a tick of a clock for only running time, or could it rather be a Frame of reference, when time could be still only running in cycles, for that of repeating itself?

Here I also could replicate or copy for that of making it siamese twins, except still not any many or more for only completeness, standing up and visible at the same time.

Just a blink of an eye for only that of a second, and it became only missing time, for not the other way, where it could be a train passing by, having a lot of passengers and wagons.

So, is just everything for only the small details visible, present at the same time for only being available, and next everything for that of its completeness only in a blink of a second?

Give me a smile will you, and next I believed in infinity for only just happening, for not being any rooted by Concept here instead.

Just together for that of being hand in hand for just held, and next not any structure or Topology for that of the Universe, just telling that everything could be happening at once,
for only the true time it could be, and fixing that.

If I stepped on an ant with just my foot, it could be trampled flat, but next not any mountain pressed down on my head, for just becoming flat here instead.

Here it does not work if you could be either lazy for also sleepy, because with a posting at PrimeGrid, I found that any Idiocy should not work against Logic, for only the idiot it could be.

Therefore still not any determined just either, for only the Conclusion it could become.

Crazy, crazy, so here only a cheater or liar for only the faking it could be, and next not finding the original post just here, but the post could be having Determinism for that of link.

But if we make it Probability an issue, for only part of infinity just here, next still only the same posting it became, for that of Trial and error just here, for also mechanism.

So when looking at these things, either just everything part of infinity still, except only being wrong for that of the total Concept, and we have to start anew.

If I once did, you could ask Michael Goetz for the hidden postings, except that I also provided the links for this.

My guess is that if you are out for proving infinity for only an answer, next you are also making it a "substance", for not any Abstract or Abstraction here instead.

Just 1, 2, 3, and I could be proving nature for only the matter or eventuality it could be, when next not any singing a song for only making it aliens instead.

Next here I am, for just only my presence, except only being stuck for that of an announcer or announcement for also manifest, when still not any Recognition of Facts.

So whoever I call, for only the whatever it could be, next only a given call for such, for not any manifest, because you could be making it just anything out of nature for only its presence.

Just floating in free air, for that of a platform for such, and you could be still standing, for not making it any invalid viewpoint or Perspective instead.

For that, science becomes invalid for only a Consequence for only the infinity it could become, when still proving both science and Religion for only the meaning it could be.

But either it becomes still only Aspect here, or Aspect ratio for the thing we perhaps could only prove, for not any believe here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect_ratio

So do not forget the image either, when also becoming old of age for that of mature and fed up, for also saturated, and next also the word for only that of old age.

Here I mentioned it just before perhaps at PrimeGrid, but becoming lost right now, for still not any wrinkles, except also vintage wine.

But again perhaps a reminder of just the factor it became for meaning when only explaing everything for that of details, because such a thing should be still counting.

Just a reminder that a smile could still count for only a face, but next it became only a starship from eta Cassiopeia, which for some reason we perhaps could believe in.

Here it does not matter who you are or could believe in, but only a matter for that of science, which could only be trusted for that of its own detail.

We choose to make it Proof for only that of the better, because next Logic implied for just only an answer, for only the true or false it could be.

But again give me a smile for that of "<==>", and next it became an Implication here instead, for only making it a Truth by means of numbers instead.

Next ask me if I could quantize a Fallacy for only a meaning, and next only believe for that of Certainty, when still not any Proof here instead.

So here only assume me to be correct for only the meaning it perhaps could be, and next I was looking up in the sky for only making it a couple of UFO's visible.

Easy come, easy go, for not any next, because here I could choose to believe, for still not any prove, and next also make it a readily acknowledgment just for the same.

Out of Ideas right now, so going to bed, and see you tomorrow.

Perhaps I should be having the link first in the previous post, but found it better this way.

Next tears coming down in my face, and I could be wiping a little for just only a stroke by my hand.

So here not any sprinter or runner for that of 100 or 110 m free or hedge, when that of besides for only a juxtaposition, when still only a competition.

Any factors besides each other for next only nature, and it becomes only even for that of smooth, when still only a flat surface.

But next only weighted, for also the other word, and it becomes only a bump in the road for still not any flat, and I next could believe in nature for only equality, or similar composition.

So next only thoughts just flying, and you could be guessing what it is all about, for still only me just thinking here.

Either I should be looking up weighted for just another word, or I could be choosing to be an Agnostic, for still only a fall into the ditch, for not any jump back at Earth.

So prove any infinity for not any peculiarity, and you could be left to still only your choice for that of choosing (lost word).

But next it became only an Enigma for not any unexplained, and I could be still stuck in the mud for only the choice of making it Fallacy versus scientifical Proof.

Earlier on, or during the day, I was also reminded about that of counterproof, when still only proving for the details we could make.

But as an Agnostic, I could be left without the choice of believing for also the proving it could be, for only becoming stuck in mud for the other alternative.

So turn a blue face against me, for not any nose, and next it could be filled to capacity for only the horn, when not any torch for just blowing here instead.

If you could get or become mad, also you could become insane, and next I was only making it Laws of science for next also nature, in order to be proving for the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot

But again that Idiocy for only an idiot, could be telling about Logic in the same, for only the "valid" it could be, when still not any true versus false.

Again, check in with PrimeGrid or Michael Goetz for what I posted there, because you have my consent for at least a reading or perusal here.

But if you also read, I made it Consequence earlier on when it perhaps should be Concept instead, for only the meaning it could be.

Just thin ice, and it should not be any pinpoint accuracy for only the tip of the needle, when you could be relying on only a single factor for that of support.

More fact finding instead, for only forgetting the other word, because here perhaps only a single thing for that of factor, explaining everything for only Concept.

Just on my way, I could be making it still E=mc2 for only that of an Equation for such, except that it slipped into infinity for perhaps only making it better.

Either I should believe in aliens for only the idiot I could be, or I could be making it Causality for only explaining the Universe for that of reason and meaning.

But either just groundless or meaningless, I became lost in the middle for just only crowd, when still not any climbing the stairways to the top, for just only the middle.

Here it becomes just little man for only that of Inception and Belief, for not any grand or total Concept describing the Universe for that of its full or entirety.

Next only so sweet, and I fell absolutely in love with you, for only the great personality you could be, when still not any flowers or diamonds for only beautiful.

Any excuse for only the Religion it could become, and next I fell down the stairs for only a mishap, except that I was stuck in mud for only a lack of Belief instead.

So not any bump in the road, for the other post instead dealing with that of Trial and error, and next only the Determinism it became for that of issue.

The thing here is that I was left only proving infinity for only such a thing it could be, for not making it any Fallacies with respect to only Belief instead.

For this, I could make it infinity with respect to only nature for only the Concept it could be, or I could rather believe in God, for only the certain meaning it could be instead.

Getting tired at just 06:40 AM in the morning, so here still only sure that it could be a better way of only explaining, except still an Agnostic.

So paint a picture and have it on the wall for just hanging, when still only becoming "as is" at the other project, and next becoming the explanation I made.

Always there for that of its presence, and we should make it nature so for that of its presence, except also forever for still only its presence, or "ubiquitous".

This also makes for all possibilities and options available for just every (not repeating myself), for still only the limitless Universe it could be for that of Concept for such.

But therefore also old of age for just mature, when still forgetting the word for that of being fed up or saturated, when still only old age, for not any vintage wine.

Again starting anew, for just giving it a new try, if I did not already mentioned that, for only the completeness of the Universe we already are able to see and make up.

So like stepping on the wrong toe, it also became the wrong Concept for just believing, when only making it aliens from eta Cassiopeiae instead, and next we could only believe.

Any nature coming ahead of us for only preceding, when still not any later, and it becomes only better for that of Concept, for only such a thing we could believe.

So like Rationality, I made it still Plausibilty here for that of a factor, and next we only should prove, for not any believe here instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

This is as far as I or we could get, except still not making it any Proof for only the infinity it could be, when also that of Religion for only Faith or Belief here instead.

You could be making it the Aura with respect to Religion for only just believing, but next it should answer for meaning by means of Truth instead, which rather should be that of Proof.

Read my lips correctly here, and something is wrong for only the details it could become.

Here one of our moderators wants to make it the subject of this project a readily Fact, and next I will have to stick with that for just only meaning.

The true Fact is that it could be a small planet for also little me, except also a recognition for that of such a thing for only the deepfounded or profound it could be.

Never say never for only the solution we could make, for next also having an answer for such, which should be only everything meant for its completeness and Truth.

Any switching of subject, and it never becomes the same, except that I could be still repeating myself a little, for only what I could be choosing to say.

Next only a contrast with any Belief here for that of such, and you could be making it infinity for just only the better.

So true meaning for that of all, when still not anything, for only God residing by means of a pedestal, for only infinity being inferior or below for that of meaning.

Therefore it becomes a comparison with just the better it could be, when still not any limit for only that of infinity here instead, when still anything for not any.

Again, I was only premeditated here, for not making it any superb or superior instead, for only that of inferior or below instead.

So here for just see, and next only tools for that of toolbox being jacked up from the box and being available for only such a thing for that of nature for its full Concept.

Always the details, and next also factors, but we could be making it still splendid for that of complete, and next "all and everything" for only its grandiosity.

But only a reminder that it now became 07:15 AM in the morning, and I should be doing what already could be promised.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Earth

These are both prerequisites of life for only necessary, for also the ingredients making up such a thing, for not any Watergate here instead.

Here spiders could be found in my room of living, for only the toilet for the respective, when also plankton being nested balls floating in the sea or ocean.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plankton

But next you question validness of science for only what the world could be having to offer, for still only its magnificence and glory, for also wonders.

The way we perhaps could be making for life, is also the thing we could be making sacred, except that it also could be the credible witness, for only the thing he saw.

So if any infinity becomes only an initial point of reference, still the magnificent world for only living, for also the Conclusion we are able to make.

Here we think that such a thing at least should be in respect with nature for just given or offered, except also such a thing for that of a Creator being the Reason behind.

Here some recent thinking makes it everything just intertwined into each other, like a tangled mesh, except also that of determined, for only the way it came into being.

There should perhaps be no need of making it any Fallacies of Religion, for still only nature for that of its preciousness, except that we also could quantify for only the more or better.

Either I lost my grip or handle for still only the free-floating platform in the air, for not having any reference points for a comparison.

But here infinity is supposed to be only such an indefinite or indeterminate Concept for only grasp or realization, when perhaps more Comprehension here instead.

Telling that it could be any wrong for just only interpreting, and it becomes only lost understanding for the same, where it should not be any lack of just either.

But therefore also an execution for just only the butcher or hangman, for not having any such thing carried out by means of nature instead, for only having it done.

The other word for this is still completion, for not any consummation it could be here instead.

Any respect of or with, for still only the determined or determinate, and it becomes only indeterminate here instead, for only the free-floating platform it could be, for not any reference.

If life could be still found on Earth for that of its diversity and manifold, also we could be making it life between the stars, for still only the 100-200 billion stars of the Milky Way.

So just generous for only an offering, and it becomes still only such a thing for that of Existence for only living, when also the Universe for a given Concept.

But here it becomes that of infallibility for still only such a lack of reference, for also the describing or description it could be.

So here a Proof relates to only the completeness we are able to witness and observe, for not any emptiness or deficiency instead.

Again, that nature is still only a natural Concept for its own meaning, just making or defining the Universe for only the same thing, for still only Existence for that of presence.

Running empty, and I could be out of gas, when still not having any reference point for only making it a difference between the rich and poor, for only the sparse it could be.

Just standing on a chair, and I always could be making it a reference point by just looking up or down, for not any wrong or incomplete it could be here instead.

Again that Translate is not with me here for only that of prodigal, when that of the opposite of any wasteful here instead.

So here "to be or not to be" perhaps, and it becomes only fallible versus infallible for only the opposite Concepts it could be, for also just made up meaning or comprehended.

Wish I know my way for only the answer I could make, except still only nature indeterminate for still only meaning, for also the reference point we could make.

A better choice could be making it that of emptiness versus filled-up for only that of to the edge for only completed, except that Proof becomes still validness, for not any knucklehead.

Therefore a definition of life versus death relates to still only the Universe it could be a part of, for also human Existence only a part of such a thing.

Choose it to be, and next also let it be, for only the validness of a given subject, for also making me believe, for still only the Proof it should be here instead.

Here the Drake equation makes me just able to think that it should be likely for just only a Probability, for still only a space just defined for its reality.

Therefore still one Concept for that of nature for only its meaning, when also that of God for only the given understanding it could be.

So if just space is still only a reality, for not any embodiment here instead, I could perhaps be only blindfolded for the possible meaning or opinion I could make.

Perhaps such a thing as better could be only implied in the cards, for still only trying a couple of times for only making it such a thing or better.

So here proving for that of completeness could be still only a better way of doing it, for not any emptiness instead, where it could be only a lack of comparison.

Sad to say, but glorification is still only the thing you could believe in, for not making it any magnificence or splendor of nature instead, for just only meant.

But if we already make it such a thing for only having it said, next the other thing for still only making it better, for only nature the way it could be conceived.

Always the fog and haze of nature for not any luminous objects instead, when threading inside a circle becomes entering another world instead.

A Black hole could be still gravity compressed into a singularity, and next a Wormhole perhaps an entrance to a different world for only different Laws existing.

Only the way different Objects relates to each other for that of Sets, next also nature constituting for only its respective parts of Existence.

But here still only magnificent for that of being great or grand, and next you do not know how such a thing relates for only that of life versus death instead.

So threading the edge for only the limits of a discussion, and it becomes nature on its edge for only the understanding it could be, when also grasping for a similar context.

Here the universal part of it makes for still only Existence, when still only presence for that of delivered or made here instead.

Only let it be, for having it assumed, and it becomes aliens for that of its reality, except still a Universe for that of glamour and splendor instead.

True answer for meaning when still only given, and next only such a thing for given nature, in the way it could still only constitute or mean, for that of its validness.

You know, but this leaves me with only two choices, namely a God for that of superior, or a nature which came into being for only being quantified.

So all men go, and next only included for not any excluded, for only the lost or bygone it could be, for only a missing detail.

If just already here for that of my presence, also I could be living for just only a citizen of Earth, except also a part of Existence for just only offered.

Therefore you make it a grand design for just only such a thing, when still not having any reference point for only a given location or place.

Again, makes me think of the words by Einstein here, when everything could be relative, for not any comparison being made or possible.

But here it becomes perhaps infallibility once again, for only the more infinity it should be for that of a subject, and next it became only nature for a Concept.

Again, thanks to user composite at PrimeGrid for only starting this discussion, because this was of much help for only just offered.

But here our sun is still only a yellow dwarf star type G2V, and it became life situated on Earth for only the reason it became, except still only life and death for that of sacred.

So here still many small stones for also sand grains or grit, and next we quantify for meaning for only the electrons it could be instead.

Passing the vine for only making it implied for only a certain thing, and next we could be making it still aliens for only that of possibility or likelihood.

But here only making it a Creator when only the other things for just said, for still only the magnificent and splendid it could be.

Rather that splendor comes with still only greatness for that of being grand, and therefore only an "or" for that of separate or separating.

Whatever you perhaps make it, next also a Cause for that of a given meaning, and next you perhaps should only prove, for not any Belief it could be here instead.

So when you see nature for only witnessing or observing, that of its greatness still for only its display, for not any value or worth it should be for only that of precious instead.

But when making it the Kardashev scale for only a comparison or reference, you do not still quantify for only the valuable meaning it could be, for still only magnificent.

Always different Object for that of Sets, and next you only quantify for the different it should be, when also relating with each other.

Catch my meaning for that above if you will, except unable to explain it any further, except still only different purposes for that of meaning.

Any flaw of thinking for just only dismissing, and it does not become the thing we could believe in, for only making it validless instead.

Here Logic makes me still not any able to believe, but rather that such a scale should be only the Comprehension I could be able to fathom, for not any limits instead.

Suppose I could value for that of valuing, but rather estimating instead for only a purpose, and next it becomes only such a scale for that of quantified meaning instead.

Any red nose does perhaps not count, but perhaps rather a face for that of sight or countenance instead, for only the witness you perhaps became.

The open door could be still the pressing of button I could make for only just asking, except also such a thing for that of nature for only whereabouts or intended meaning.

Any implied or implicit thinking for only making it life and death, and it becomes only nature for that of its precious meaning instead, for only what we could value.

Therefore it becomes still only different valuing or valuation for only the quantifying or Quantification it could be, or be able to make, for only the thing I could be able to estimate.

So play a game with me, for still only an estimate, for not making it nature a single whole for only the way we could quantify for such a thing, except only a full scheme.

But if completion is still only the same as a full scheme, next we could also be quantifying nature for a certain meaning, except perhaps not the same.

A Logical Fallacy could be telling about a dream at best, but next I could be making it still only Certainty to have it proven instead, or make it Proof.

Slip my nose for only the same, because here it became still only a threadmill for that of a mesh, when all details of nature could be intertwined for only such a thing.

And here only a Concept for that of a Conceptualization when still only a falling leaf, for only the different Sets or Objects it could be, except that I was only dreaming.

Here you should not be able to conceive for just only a dream, except only making it Objects and Sets of nature, for only the properties it could be.

So here a hard lesson learnt is still not the same as any feather for just only smooth, except that it could be falling back to Earth for only gravity the reason.

But here only nature for its hard and brutal reality, when still not any smooth dream for only the perceived or conceived it could be, for that of a Conceptualization.

Unfortunately still not any feather for only the embodiment it perhaps could be, when still only Realization of Facts for only hard or given reality instead.

Therefore still only proving for the hammer when still not any feather, for only the soft touch it perhaps could be, when a dream should not be making it any better.

But just included, for that of all and everything, and it becomes still only the Universe for only meant, in the way it perhaps could be conceived.

So here my consideration for just only viewpoint becomes infinity for still not any limit it could be, when also not any Universe for a conscious meaning instead.

Here duties and obligations makes for only the things you could still be carrying out, so therefore not any conscientious here either.

Was I left to believe, or should I only believe, and next I should not any trust either, for only the certain Belief it could be instead, except that I only should prove for science.

Any complete here instead, and it becomes only included for the separate or diverse meaning it could be, except still only such a thing for that of a full context.

Therefore the limit it only becomes for not any absolutes, when still only infinity versus the completeness we could make, for not any over the edge here instead.

But just a little smile around the corner for such a thing, and next only a Reason behind, for still only the Construct of nature we could be making for infinity.