Astropulse result

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Astropulse result

To post messages, you must log in.

Profile SamuelProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Nov 07
Posts: 40
Credit: 465,702
RAC: 102
Message 1317030 - Posted: 19 Dec 2012, 8:19:47 UTC

Hello, sorry i don't know where to post my question. and so i decided to make a new thread :-) Sorry about that.

What does that mean? ap_12no12aa_B4_P1_00052_20121218_25767.wu_0

RFI? or simply a compute error?

Found 30 single pulses and 30 repeating pulses, exiting.
percent blanked: 0.00

ID: 1317030 · Report as offensive
Profile Chris SCrowdfunding Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 39079
Credit: 26,352,860
RAC: 51,817
United Kingdom
Message 1317098 - Posted: 19 Dec 2012, 13:17:24 UTC

I would think more likely RFI, but others will know better than me.

ID: 1317098 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1317186 - Posted: 19 Dec 2012, 17:15:42 UTC

Those limits are certainly there to keep too many false signals caused by RFI out of the database. Computation error is very unlikely to cause the overflow, though possible. Another possibility is strong signals from a Pulsar, and we wouldn't be here if we didn't hope for signals from e.t....
ID: 1317186 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Astropulse result

©2017 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.