CPU vs GPU

Message boards : Number crunching : CPU vs GPU
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
doug
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 202
Credit: 10,828,067
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1185410 - Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 6:01:55 UTC - in response to Message 1185402.  

I meant to say 3 CPU and 2 GPU wu at a time. Works out quite well. The CPUs are pegged at 100% and the GPU runs at >90% most of the time. I have to slow it down if I want to watch a video without it being jerky. Most of the time I put up with it in the interest of science. Hey! I don't have a computer to watch TV right?
ID: 1185410 · Report as offensive
doug
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 10 Jul 09
Posts: 202
Credit: 10,828,067
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1185412 - Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 6:12:17 UTC - in response to Message 1185408.  

Yes you have to experiment a bit to find out what works best. I tried i GPU task, 2 and then 3. Add to that the mixture of shorties, VLARs and AP wu. I finally gave up on tuning. As for the laptop, I didn't purchase it, I just happened upon it. Had I had my druthers I'd probably gone desktop and NVIDIA.

By the by, I haven't heard the term apu used and things change all the time. Is that like a gpGPU? This rig is 1 year old, state of the art then and nearly ancient now.
ID: 1185412 · Report as offensive
Profile AllenIN
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 58,297,005
RAC: 311
United States
Message 1185542 - Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 20:00:41 UTC - in response to Message 1185412.  

Yes you have to experiment a bit to find out what works best. I tried i GPU task, 2 and then 3. Add to that the mixture of shorties, VLARs and AP wu. I finally gave up on tuning. As for the laptop, I didn't purchase it, I just happened upon it. Had I had my druthers I'd probably gone desktop and NVIDIA.

By the by, I haven't heard the term apu used and things change all the time. Is that like a gpGPU? This rig is 1 year old, state of the art then and nearly ancient now.


The APU is the new integrated CPU/GPU from AMD. It has a Radeon HD Graphics 6550D built right into the CPU. So basically it's all the processing power in one chip. Pretty nice. And, you can also add another discrete GPU card to your PCI Express x16 slot that will work with it for a dual setup.


ID: 1185542 · Report as offensive
Treasurer

Send message
Joined: 13 Dec 05
Posts: 109
Credit: 1,569,762
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 1185564 - Posted: 15 Jan 2012, 21:54:54 UTC - in response to Message 1185542.  

The APU is the new integrated CPU/GPU from AMD. It has a Radeon HD Graphics 6550D built right into the CPU


...and the northbridge, all 3 on one chip to be easily cooled by one heatsink. I think Intel did this already with the i7 but AMDs integrated GPU is a bit better.
ID: 1185564 · Report as offensive
Profile AllenIN
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 00
Posts: 292
Credit: 58,297,005
RAC: 311
United States
Message 1185603 - Posted: 16 Jan 2012, 1:58:06 UTC - in response to Message 1185564.  

The APU is the new integrated CPU/GPU from AMD. It has a Radeon HD Graphics 6550D built right into the CPU


...and the northbridge, all 3 on one chip to be easily cooled by one heatsink. I think Intel did this already with the i7 but AMDs integrated GPU is a bit better.


Whoops....correct, all three on one chip. Intel is having trouble with the GPU meld efficiency. Still without the Radeon or the Nvidia GPU, I doubt they will ever out do AMD on an all in one chip.


ID: 1185603 · Report as offensive
ahj

Send message
Joined: 24 Sep 02
Posts: 11
Credit: 110,418
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1185628 - Posted: 16 Jan 2012, 7:46:18 UTC

On a slightly unrelated note, I've now got a dedicated Core i5 2400 system crunching on SETI WUs. A relative supercomputer compared to the Athlon XP system I used to crunch SETI on.

Feels great to be back :D
ID: 1185628 · Report as offensive
Granite T. Rock

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 1,248,634
RAC: 1
Canada
Message 1186492 - Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 15:28:15 UTC - in response to Message 1184789.  

There's productivity... then there's efficiency. I've noticed my run time is alot greater than my CPU use time. I'm not using the computer so I wonder why that would be.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2269856210
ID: 1186492 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1186504 - Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 16:27:46 UTC - in response to Message 1186492.  

There's productivity... then there's efficiency. I've noticed my run time is alot greater than my CPU use time. I'm not using the computer so I wonder why that would be.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=2269856210

Because most of the heavy lifting was done on your GTX 560.

While the GPU was doing the work (run time), your CPU was free to get on with something else.
ID: 1186504 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : CPU vs GPU


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.