Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
SETI Brainstorm
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
AndrewSiemion Send message Joined: 20 Dec 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
For over a decade, the SETI@home experiment has engaged millions of people in the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence by harnessing the spare CPU cycles of project participants to process data collected at the Arecibo radio telescope. The immensely powerful supercomputer formed by SETI@home is enabling the most sensitive and thorough sky survey for extraterrestrial technological radio emission ever performed. Today we are launching a new public participation SETI project to complement SETI@home – SETI Brainstorm. In addition to offering the opportunity to passively process SETI data, we are now making some of the raw data from our observations available to the world and asking YOU to take a look with your own eyes, ears and algorithms. Our experiments generate massive amounts of data, often many gigabits per second, so for now we will only distribute observations of a single target. If response to this project is strong, we will find ways to make even more of our observations accessible. The initially released data are observations of the binary star system 55 Cancri collected during the commissioning phase of our Kepler Field SETI experiment at the Green Bank Telescope (GBT). 55 Cancri A (the larger of the two stars in the binary system) is known to host at least five extrasolar planets, and there may be more. The 55 Cancri system is about 40 ly away from our own Solar System in the constellation Cancer. 55 Cancri was the target of a directed interstellar communication signal in 2003, scheduled to arrive in 2044. These data are now available for BitTorrent download using the links at SETI Brainstorm. If you have questions, please post here first. SETI@home and Kepler SETI scientists will be checking in regularly to help. Good luck, and good hunting! |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
Yes, but what are we supposed to do with these data? Tullio |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
It occurred to me that we are processing raw data in SETI-AT-Home. Couldn't there be a quick post-antenna process to throw out the bulk of this data that does not correlate above the noise. We then might have more time to investigate, checkout and "Clutter Map" other signals that are more interesting. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20291 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
It occurred to me that we are processing raw data in SETI-AT-Home. Couldn't there be a quick post-antenna process to throw out the bulk of this data that does not correlate above the noise. Isn't that already being done by Berkeley with a big lump of hardware working in real-time across a much broader band of frequencies? The s@h search is doing a more limited search but for far greater sensitivity to look for weaker signals that will be missed by the broader/faster real-time hardware search. Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
AndrewSiemion Send message Joined: 20 Dec 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hi tullio, Our hope is that interested participants will search these data using their own ideas and algorithms, create software tools for visualizations and perhaps audio realizations of the data and share their results back with the community. Signal detection in time series data is a challenge in many branches of science and engineering, and we know that there are techniques in use in other fields that could be useful for SETI. Moreover, we are frequently asked by both astronomers and the public if raw data is available, and in the past it has been difficult to provide because we didn't have easy to use code to extract and explain our data. This project is also designed to simply make our data more accessible to a wider group of people. Cheers, Andrew |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
Thanks Andrew, Will be mulling over a few ideas for this. Jason "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
tullio Send message Joined: 9 Apr 04 Posts: 8797 Credit: 2,930,782 RAC: 1 |
Andrew, it is sometimes difficult for me, who live in Italy, to understand why there are different SETI projects related to the Berkeley campus of the University of California. I am a SETI cruncher but also an Einstein cruncher, a QMC cruncher, a CPDN cruncher, a Beta tester of LHC@home 2.0 using VirtualBox. Your project seems to me a carbon copy of SetiQuest which I tried to understand at www,setiquest.org. I have downloaded the Open SonATA source code and tried to compile it on my SuSE Linux 11.1. I did not succeed because it requires a SuSE Linux 11.3 which I have but do not want to install, at least now. So I think what you are asking me is beyond my skills. I can compile a program like mplayer and mplayerplug-in but most of the programs I use are executable written and compiled by others. On my BOINC_VM virtual machine I am running CERN programs written in FORTRAN in a Scientific Linux environment.That is all I can do. Cheers. Tullio |
Johnney Guinness Send message Joined: 11 Sep 06 Posts: 3093 Credit: 2,652,287 RAC: 0 |
Andrew, Interesting idea. But i can't see this taking off. People, volunteers, might be useful at seeing something unusual in a visual image displaying a signal on a graph. But offering dot py files to the public and asking them to spot sequences in the numbers will get you nowhere. To be honest, it sounds like you would be better off writing to the editor of one of the astronomy journals or science magazines and asking them to publish a short article asking for participation from the science community to help process the data using new methods. This will flop if your asking the public to manually scan pages of numbers and unprocessed data. Take example from the success they have had with Galaxy Zoo. Galaxy Zoo is successful because its an interesting human task to look a pictures. Good luck with your new project. John. |
AndrewSiemion Send message Joined: 20 Dec 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hi John, Thanks for your thoughts. Our intent is not for the general public to rotely scan pages of numbers. Hopefully the smaller fraction of people with some experience in signal processing and electrical engineering will be able to put together tools to translate the data into a form where the less technically inclined majority can participate. We are working on ways to do this within our group, but we would love to have your help. Galaxy Zoo is a fantastic project, but we are still experimenting with depictions of our data that would be effective at engaging the public's minds as well as their machines. Again, one of the goals of this project is to 'brainstorm' ways of looking at and thinking about our data. If you have some specific ideas, please share them! Cheers, Andrew |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20291 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
It occurred to me that we are processing raw data in SETI-AT-Home. Couldn't there be a quick post-antenna process to throw out the bulk of this data that does not correlate above the noise. See: SERENDIP Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
mariod505 Send message Joined: 6 Sep 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 940,405 RAC: 0 |
This is a fantastic initiative and exactly the type of openness in science we need. There are literally millions of IT professionals globally. Many participate (like actually write software) in a wide variety of open source projects - think Linux, Firefox, OpenOffice, BOINC - we are talking millions of lines of code donated by qualified developers. Almost all of whom grew up on star trek, run Seti@home, and keep up with news on Kepler. Some, such as myself, even have a statistical programming background, and run multi-million dollar IT projects. You have plenty of potential talent. What you need is better marketing. The only reason I heard about this effort is because I randomly happened upon the forums. You need to get the word out to the right crowd. You also need to find a few key people who can form a "backbone" group that can answer questions about development environments, useful libraries, kick around algo ideas, database structures, etc... The only downside is that you're going to initially get a huge amount of skepticism around a project like this. Most scientists or software developers don't think the "public" can seriously contribute to science and typically exist in a culture where your data, your technology, and your methods must be strictly guarded (maybe the reason you were only able to release one small piece of data). What if someone publishes before us?! These folks won't understand crowd sourcing project. I strongly encourage you to keep this idea alive despite the nay-sayers. |
mariod505 Send message Joined: 6 Sep 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 940,405 RAC: 0 |
....I said small amount of data, and as I torrent it I see there's about 100GB of data here. What's the time duration of this data sample? |
Chironex Send message Joined: 2 Aug 99 Posts: 1 Credit: 18,128,852 RAC: 0 |
I don't post here at all but I would simply like to know if Seti@home is still down? I did a search for this question but found no recent information within the last 7 days. |
mariod505 Send message Joined: 6 Sep 03 Posts: 7 Credit: 940,405 RAC: 0 |
Several years ago I happened to crunch workunits with Seti@home v3.08 and returned 486 classic workunits back to the server. It's a good point. We should probably have a few different data samples. Some have signals (maybe pulsars, satellites, or terrestrial interference), so we can test any algorithms we develop. ...Although part of the point is for us to come up with altogether new methods of data analysis that would vet the data in a new way. Maybe we could develop a distance adjusted power threshold (i.e. the further the signal, the lower the threshold power could trigger interest)? |
AndrewSiemion Send message Joined: 20 Dec 09 Posts: 19 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hi Mariod, This is a fantastic idea. We'll post some pulsar data later this week. - Andrew |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
....I said small amount of data, and as I torrent it I see there's about 100GB of data here. What's the time duration of this data sample? Something like 450 seconds is IIRC what they planned for the targeted observations, given a sample rate of 800 MHz. that seems to approximately match the amount of data. Joe |
Anders Feder Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 11 Credit: 601,684 RAC: 0 |
Two things: 1. What license will the data be released under? It's imperative that a good licensing model is selected from the outset. 2. I have a good book on digital signal processing, generously donated by an ace programmer at SETI Institute. I would like to write a series of articles on this topic to get others started. Is there any chance that someone at SETI@home could please set up a wiki for the project where I could post this information? |
Slavac Send message Joined: 27 Apr 11 Posts: 1932 Credit: 17,952,639 RAC: 0 |
|
Anders Feder Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 11 Credit: 601,684 RAC: 0 |
Your project seems to me a carbon copy of SetiQuest which I tried to understand at www,setiquest.org. I see a couple of differences. On the upside, this initiative is publicly funded. setiQuest is privately funded and SETI Institute, which runs it, is intimately reliant on being able to tell a story to their private donors. Their greatest asset is star power - you've probably heard all the stories about Carl Sagan's tales of the cosmos, Frank Drakes' equations and seminal SETI experiments and not least Jill Tarter as supposedly depicted by Jodie Foster in Contact. These are all parts of SETI Institute's brand, and because this is their main source of revenue, when faced with a decision between star power and science, unfortunately, the former often wins out. One must hope that UC Berkeley, as a public research institution, is able to prioritize differently. Also, SETI@home already has an extensive infrastructure for continously provisioning millions of computers on the internet with SETI data. Perhaps, at some point in the future, this initiative will be allowed to piggyback on that infrastructure, so the standard SETI@home data can be routinely processed by complex pipelines of any sophisticated new algorithms we come up with here. On the downside, UC Berkeley has no capability for real-time follow-up on candidate signals. This means that even if we do find something, unless the signal is very persistent, we have no way of investigating it beyond the initial data record. Perhaps in the future, however, data from multiple beams will be made available (who knows?). That would make it easier to rule out a lot of RFI from the results. |
popandbob Send message Joined: 19 Mar 05 Posts: 551 Credit: 4,673,015 RAC: 0 |
I think that someone creative could turn this idea into something special... What I'm thinking of is something along the lines of fold.it Basically you make a program to visualize the data in 3D (in much smaller chunks of course!) and have users scan through it using a few built in tools but have the option available for users to write scripts to do what ever they want with the data (without being able to edit it) It could be turned into a fun game I think... highest scoring signal wins! Bob |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.