Official ET Disclosure? "NSA Document Admits ET Contact"


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Official ET Disclosure? "NSA Document Admits ET Contact"

Previous · 1 · 2
Author Message
Rick
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 99
Posts: 46
Credit: 271,541
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1128445 - Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 20:36:23 UTC - in response to Message 1124631.

The point is that even from the early days of sci-fi, like Dan Dare and the Treens, we have been conditioned to believe that any Aliens would be basically bipeds, but with very different faces and heads. Mainly of course so that it makes it easier for human actors with masks to play parts in films.


Panspermia explains why aliens resemble humans. Some ETs may be fully human.

As for our conditioning, I'd say that was intentional. Many films labeled as fiction actually happened - there is evidence that the stories behind 2001 (discovering alien artifacts) and Close Encounters are true and accurate.
____________

Rick
Send message
Joined: 7 Sep 99
Posts: 46
Credit: 271,541
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1128462 - Posted: 16 Jul 2011, 21:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 1124719.

Sounds like i'm talking complete rubbish, doesn't it? Well thats the way it worked out. When i do finally crack the code i will publish my results and everyone will know what i'm talking about. Until then, the world will just have to wait.


They were probably decoded long ago.

Disclosure isn't so much about coming clean - it's about people in government and academia covering their @sses and pretending they didn't know. In fact the very people who kept silent will now look like heros and whistle-blowers.

Even your stories are suspect in this manner... Are you sure you're telling us everything? Withholding information is worse than lying sometimes.

I've noticed the SETI astronomers use very cute wording.... "We'll let you know if we detect anything!"

Okay. How about telling us what you know about alien artifacts on Mars, historic UFO landings, and the biblical connections to all of this? Or better yet, state emphatically that you have never been briefed or heard credible rumors of anything like that.

They won't do it. They'll keep changing the subject to radio signals and explaining "how science works" etc. But they make no firm denials of knowing anything more about extraterrestrials.
____________

Profile Donegal_TDI
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 02
Posts: 153
Credit: 26,925,080
RAC: 59
Ireland
Message 1130050 - Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 15:20:00 UTC - in response to Message 1124719.

I think they are just playing out a scenario,
what they might do IF a signal was detected,
how they might go about decoding it.

Donegal_TDI,
I'm currently in the middle of decoding ET signals. I have been at it for over 6 months now. I always thought that if mankind detected a signal from ET, the best scientists in the world would be put to work decoding it with all the resources they need.

But no, in the end it has turned out to be me who receives the signal. And to top that off, i haven't a clue how to decode it. So without any help from anyone, cos nobody would believe me if i told them, i have to go and learn how to decode the information by myself.

Sounds like i'm talking complete rubbish, doesn't it? Well thats the way it worked out. When i do finally crack the code i will publish my results and everyone will know what i'm talking about. Until then, the world will just have to wait.

John.


Would be interested to hear more.
I have a motorised satellite dish,
1.2m, in both vertical & horizontal axis.
Would love to play with a spectrum analyser on one of the feeds,
if I had the time, which I don't :)

____________


*** Those who know, don't speak,
those who speak, don't know ***

Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3092
Credit: 2,559,156
RAC: 2,250
Ireland
Message 1130060 - Posted: 20 Jul 2011, 15:42:56 UTC - in response to Message 1130050.
Last modified: 20 Jul 2011, 15:48:01 UTC

Would be interested to hear more.
I have a motorised satellite dish,
1.2m, in both vertical & horizontal axis.
Would love to play with a spectrum analyser on one of the feeds,
if I had the time, which I don't :)

What frequency range can you pick up on that thing Ger? Anywhere near the 1420MHz range?

The thing is, i have a set of transmission/receiving frequencies. And i have rough coordinates in the sky. But for reasons i can't mention here in public, your 1.2 meter dish would be too small. If your serious Ger, we should chat about this through email - john37309 AT hotmail dot com
I have a physicist working on this with me. He's a guy who understands this stuff in detail.

John.
____________

Larry Monske
Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 266
Credit: 529,203
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1140697 - Posted: 15 Aug 2011, 4:48:12 UTC

I find this fascinating but skeptical. Ok so these messages were recieved on shortwave on the sputnik series of satillites. It doesnt say which and 190 plus in that series. Shortwave radio has been around a long time. Many strange signals are heard on shortwave many sourses unknown and contribute to noise. These were only recieved on shortwave and durning this time peroid shortwave radio was the norm. It wasnt picked up by sputnik 1 in 1957 I listened to that one on my dads shortwave radio in germany. Funny no one else has shared this finding. Maybe SETI is looking in the wrong frequency. I dont belive so. I dont have any idea how shortwave radation would be out maybe 50 lightyears and years ago shortwave could have alot of power to transmit with. There have been detectible planets out to 450 light years out.

C Olival
Send message
Joined: 6 Sep 10
Posts: 209
Credit: 10,675
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1140854 - Posted: 15 Aug 2011, 18:50:45 UTC - in response to Message 1140697.

It could be possible, maybe non-natural signals can be picked on shortwave, any validity on this for any experts outthere?

Profile Michael John Hind
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 07
Posts: 1300
Credit: 2,972,056
RAC: 2,840
United Kingdom
Message 1140857 - Posted: 15 Aug 2011, 19:13:35 UTC - in response to Message 1124719.

I'm currently in the middle of decoding ET signals. I have been at it for over 6 months now. I always thought that if mankind detected a signal from ET, the best scientists in the world would be put to work decoding it with all the resources they need.



John, what are you using to decode these signals with. Do you have
a recording available in .wav file format?

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2570
Credit: 1,179,205
RAC: 137
United States
Message 1141035 - Posted: 16 Aug 2011, 2:01:28 UTC - in response to Message 1140857.

First do an autocorrelation to see if anything jumps up out of the noise and whether the strength of the signal displays a gaussian curve in which case it will be a random signal.

C Olival
Send message
Joined: 6 Sep 10
Posts: 209
Credit: 10,675
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1141491 - Posted: 17 Aug 2011, 3:56:01 UTC - in response to Message 1141035.

For the experts outhere? Any recent SETI signals of interest?

Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Official ET Disclosure? "NSA Document Admits ET Contact"

Copyright © 2014 University of California