Human electrical transmission & detecting aliens |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Human electrical transmission & detecting aliens
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I’m a physicist, I assure you that all EM waves can be viewed as discreet packets with discreet energies. hc/wavelength no matter if it is 60nm or 60km. | |
| ID: 1094364 · | |
|
Michael(sirzerp), Hi Johnney, Michael, my background is in electrical engineering but i have studied several other related discipline's. No, i have not carried out any extensive scientific investigation into the science discussed in this thread. So i must admit, some of the science is speculative. But the theory is solid science. Yes, you are correct that we try to balance the 3 phases, hence this would neutralize some of the EM radiation. But due to electrical inductance and something called "power factor", the balance is never perfect. Another point is that 3 phase a.c. transmission lines are not "screened" like a co-axial cable. They run in free air to cool them. The fact that they are not screened means that even though the 3 phases balance the current flow, there is a massive RF transmission from the lines at 50Hz in Europe and 60Hz in the US. The balancing or power factor correction wont prevent the lines transmitting RF signals 120 degrees apart. So in theory, each of the three lines will act as individual dipole antennas between the Earth and the copper or aluminum wire, if the transformer has been grounded to earth. If the transformer is not grounded, as is the case with some transmission systems, the dipole antenna would be from wire-to-wire, horizontally. or phase-to-phase. Another person made an argument about AM radio being reflected by our atmosphere which is a good argument. Thought I’m not sure it applies. Most of the time AM radio is broadcasted vertically but our power grid is aligned horizontally. Meaning any leakage would be in the normal direction to the atmosphere ‘up’ and I would guess it would escape. In the case of the horizontal power lines, you could think of it like an antenna lying flat on the ground instead of being on a vertical mast. With our power line, half the "lobe" of EM radiation will be absorbed into the ground. The other half will propagate vertically out into space. I'm not sure, but you might be right, maybe some of the EM wave will bounce off the ionosphere. But most of it will propagate into space. Think of a radio telescope dish on the ground. The dish faces up into space of thats where you are transmitting too. So really, our transmission lines are pointed in the best possible direction, they face into space, they just don't have a radio dish underneath them to amplify and direct the signal. The third issue is the size of wavelength itself. It is in the 60,000,000 meter range. I don’t think anyone knows the propagation characteristics of a wavelength this large. It isn’t like anyone has went to space to measure it. We assume it propagates like AM radio but the wavelength is larger than our planet. The wave should propagate just like any other EM wave. I’ll show you an example why we can’t assume things. We know black holes eat photons. That’s simple to understand, but what if the black hole has a 1000 km radius and the photon has a 60000 km wavelength? Can a black hole capture a photon much larger than its light consuming radius? This is the way i see it Michael. The black hole is a bad analogy. The wave will propagate just like any other wave. And it does not matter if the wavelength is larger than the planet. If you want to detect massive wavelength EM radiation, you just build your detector to measure and detect a small part of the wave. Its easy to just build your antenna to match 1/60,000,000th of the wavelength. So ET would only need a 1 meter antenna and some clever software to detect our electrical grids. No, your right Michael, this is just a forum message to chat about the topic. So no quotes or references are needed, its light hearted. But the science i have discussed here is very valuable. In general, before you arived Michael, i tried to keep heavy electrical and technical detail out of the discussion cos i know the folks reading the message might not understand. So i was keeping it timid :) The fact remains, our planet stands out like a sore thumb in space because of our heavy use of electricity through distributed electrical grids. ET could spot us a 100,000 light years away because of this. Of coarse, we only have the grids for about 1 hundred years, so ET will get the signal when it arrives. I have never heard any SETI researcher even mentioning this as a possible way to detect ET. Sometimes science misses the most obvious things. Or maybe i just see things that other people don't see. John in Ireland. ____________ | |
| ID: 1094379 · | |
|
Thanks for addressing my points. I agree there is promise here, just not sure how much. | |
| ID: 1097562 · | |
|
Very low frequencies have been used for communications by our Nations submarines. These are propagated in water and basically are sound waves. | |
| ID: 1097638 · | |
Very low frequencies have been used for communications by our Nations submarines. These are propagated in water and basically are sound waves. That may well be the case now but that is communication by mechanical compression waves, more commonly known as sound. You can have electro-magnetic radiation at low frequencies that are still "radio waves". One very good transmitter is the earth itself due to ducting through the ionosphere powered by lightning strikes to give 7.8 Hz. See Schumann resonance. Some Radio Hams record ELF/VLF radio to pick up disturbances in the Earth's (EM) environment. The military have played with such low EM frequencies but I don't know if anything practical was achieved. I wonder if any other planets or stars 'transmit' a characteristic resonance at radio frequencies that can then be picked up?... Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1097674 · | |
|
Hmmmm, sirzerp made a very good point there. sirzerp i read the shorter of the two papers, the other one was 50 pages long. | |
| ID: 1098106 · | |
|
Does SETI reports any potential ETI signals? | |
| ID: 1098110 · | |
Does SETI reports any potential ETI signals? No, they tell us nothing! I've been posting messags in this forum for about 5 years now and i've never heard a peep out of the SETI scientists. If they have ET signals, i didn't hear anything about it! To be honest, i think they stopped looking about a year and a half ago. John. | |
| ID: 1098113 · | |
|
That is very disapointing, i wonder if SETI scientits ever read the comments in this forum. The SetiHome is a wonderfull experiment for us non-astronomers to participate in nevertheless. | |
| ID: 1098142 · | |
... To be honest, i think they stopped looking about a year and a half ago. Oh no...! We haven't scared them away have we?! (Or are we too primitive for them to be disturbed from their own searches?) Keep searchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3) | |
| ID: 1098146 · | |
|
C Olival, | |
| ID: 1098438 · | |
|
The cosmos is a big place, our own galaxy has over 200 billion stars, perhaps more, just a question of time until life is found outside Earth. Will that be achieved via Kepler and ground telescopes? A combination of both for certain. More likely life will be detected when telescopes are powerful enough in picking up bio marks in the atmosphere of an exoplanet; more likely that will happen first before SETI does find ETI signals. Does SETI and Paul Allen Array ever points their radio dishes to the stars that currently Kepler is observing? | |
| ID: 1098579 · | |
Does SETI and Paul Allen Array ever points their radio dishes to the stars that currently Kepler is observing? Yea, they can point the ATA at any target they choose. John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1098696 · | |
Does SETI reports any potential ETI signals? They don't tell us anything, because there is nothing to tell. I would need to do some research, but I am pretty sure a few crunchers got credit for their computers discovering a few pulsars (I recall a few news pieces about that). And from time to time rumors circulate that they did find something, and it turns out to be untrue. That may have been the case with the pulsar story I recall too. I also interviewed a scientist with this program in an article I wrote. It can be seen here: Searching for asteroids, extraterrestrial life a little more rocky: Budget cuts threaten to close Arecibo, world's largest radio telescope So they do pay attention and sometimes comment when it's necessary. But they aren't going to scream WE FOUND SOMETHING...if nothing has yet been found. Even if they did find ET or something, then it would take time and research before an announcement is made. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1098698 · | |
I also interviewed a scientist with this program in an article I wrote. It can be seen here: Searching for asteroids, extraterrestrial life a little more rocky: Budget cuts threaten to close Arecibo, world's largest radio telescope. Jason, Nice article, well written :) John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1098787 · | |
I also interviewed a scientist with this program in an article I wrote. It can be seen here: Searching for asteroids, extraterrestrial life a little more rocky: Budget cuts threaten to close Arecibo, world's largest radio telescope. Thanks! I was slightly wrong though. It was Einstein@home which discovered the pulsars: Citizen Scientists Make First Deep Space Discovery With Einstein@Home. Still cool though. It also proves that our work here will eventually yield something. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1098817 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Human electrical transmission & detecting aliens
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |