And I will startup my GT 240 in few hours :)
MSI with GDDR5, and I also need to see how this new generation is fast ( or not)

Mine is apparently (haven't seen it yet) a Galaxy 512mb GDDR3. The specs are in many aspects the same as the 8800GS I am currently running. I will be happy if I get performance similar to a 9800GT! We can compare notes on Monday...

No problem
I will send you message :)

---

I am cruncher :)
I LOVE SETI BOINC :)

Don't be shy..

You can do this also here in the forum..

It would be interesting for all.

---

mimo, PhysX enabled for multi GPUs?
Hmm.. to now I disabled PhysX on my both PCs.

if i wanna use both (different) cards: i must have : attached two monitors or had enabled psychx on the second ...

---

And I will startup my GT 240 in few hours :)
MSI with GDDR5, and I also need to see how this new generation is fast ( or not)

I started BOINC just prior to frying my BIOS. The results were not encouraging - CUDA 2.3, PhysX disabled:

NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GT240 (driver version 19562, CUDA version 3000, compute capability 1.2, 512MB, 279 GFLOPS peak)

The GFLOPS are 15% less than my 8800GS on 19170. I didn't get to see how it would crunch though.

It have same performance then my 9800 green. So in fact it is faster card compared to characteristics.
If GT240 has 96 cuda cores, and 9800 green 112, then it is faster compared to 9800. And also it cannot get over 47 °C (24/7 seti crunch) :)

---

I am cruncher :)
I LOVE SETI BOINC :)

In short, last nVidia driver (195.62) has worse performance then prev ones for my low-end GPU too.
But the difference in performance is pretty small.
Data provided:

Thanks for your 'officially' test!

Big table..
In short, which driver you would use now with current CUDA_V2.3 ?

190.38 , 190.62 , 191.07 ?


BTW.
195.x and CUDA_V3.0_final wouldn't change this table with the current available equipment, or?

---