Questions and Answers :
Wish list :
Wishes
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
VanHalen Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 29 Credit: 476,175 RAC: 0 |
figure credit from S@H classic and credit it to our account. Some of us did ALOT of work back then. |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
figure credit from S@H classic and credit it to our account. Some of us did ALOT of work back then. Sorry, this is extremely unlikely to happen for many reasons. The top reasons that I can remember off of the top of my head are: 1) More than half of the top 100 cheated to get there on S@H Classic. 2) There were different amounts of work done by the client based on: a) What version of the executable the task was run under (and there was no auto update so people ran old versions for a long time after the new version was up) b) The angle range (still true today - but the credit grant based on run time). c) WHether it was noisy. I also did a fair amount of work for Classic before moving to BOINC. BOINC WIKI |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.