Message boards :
Technical News :
Tell Me Why (Sep 08 2008)
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Matt Lebofsky Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1444 Credit: 957,058 RAC: 0 |
The triplet table in the science database has been a headache for over a week now. We've been trying to add some indexes to it, but this has been mysteriously filling up some kind of logical space (not physical space) such that new triplets couldn't be inserted. This has also been adversely affecting the science database replica. For now we're giving up on the indexes and letting triplet insertions continue, and allowing the replica to recover. Internal discussions continued today regarding what to do next as far as general storage. As mentioned often recently, we're low on workunit storage - the crux of most of our recent public server problems. We just got some disks in the mail today which were slated for our new home-made NAS box, but we might instead aim these at workunit storage somehow. Testing will commence tomorrow during the outage, as will several other server-related tests/upgrades. To clear up some confusion: a lot of raw data files depicted on the server status page are showing errors. This is somewhat misleading as these errors all happen at the very end of the particular file/channel. So it's not like we're losing half our data. Only about one tenth of a percent. What are the errors? At the very very end of the raw data files, some channels are missing the radar blanking signal, so it's impossible to remove the RFI. These channels exit in error, though there's nothing we can do about it. We have taken steps to try to reduce the number of files that exit this way. - Matt -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30651 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
The triplet table in the science database has been a headache for over a week now. We've been trying to add some indexes to it, but this has been mysteriously filling up some kind of logical space (not physical space) such that new triplets couldn't be inserted. This has also been adversely affecting the science database replica. For now we're giving up on the indexes and letting triplet insertions continue, and allowing the replica to recover. Thanks for the update Matt. Hope those index problems work themselves out. Got a question. As there was a bunch of downtime on the dish a while back, how does the backlog of data being gathered match up with the rate at which all of us are able to crunch the data? Are we keeping up? Is the pile of disks waiting for the splitters getting bigger? |
MarkJ Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 1139 Credit: 80,854,192 RAC: 5 |
Internal discussions continued today regarding what to do next as far as general storage. As mentioned often recently, we're low on workunit storage - the crux of most of our recent public server problems. We just got some disks in the mail today which were slated for our new home-made NAS box, but we might instead aim these at workunit storage somehow. Testing will commence tomorrow during the outage, as will several other server-related tests/upgrades. Hi Matt, I Don't know if you've seen this message thread going on in number crunching, which might have a few ideas for storage. BOINC blog |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.