Message boards :
Number crunching :
CPU
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Daniel S. Gandolfo Send message Joined: 17 Nov 02 Posts: 56 Credit: 2,430,947 RAC: 0 |
Hello, I have recently installed the new Ubuntu Distribution on a: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz which runs: Linux Ubuntu 2.6.24-19-generic (64bit). On running the BOINC benchmark now I find: Sat 02 Aug 2008 21:27:06 BST||Benchmark results: Sat 02 Aug 2008 21:27:06 BST|| Number of CPUs: 4 Sat 02 Aug 2008 21:27:06 BST|| 1135 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU Sat 02 Aug 2008 21:27:06 BST|| 4874 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU Previously on a Debian Linux distribution I was seeing Whetstone = 1800 per CPU Dhrystone = 9400 per CPU Any ideas about what could have happened or has the CPU burnt out or something equivalent. Any reason for the loss in performance. Whether the change in distribution is responsible I think it is unlikely. Nevica |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
You might like to review this old thread. Modern Linux distros are - very comendably - concerned about not wasting energy when nothing important is going on. Unfortunately, the science applications controlled by BOINC (such as SETI) run at the 'nothing important' level. So linux tries to save energy, and invokes the Intel 'Speedstep' or AMD 'CoolNquiet' technology as appropriate. Result: lower CPU speed and reduced crunching. There are posts with appropriate commands to overcome this in the thread I linked. |
Westsail and *Pyxey* Send message Joined: 26 Jul 99 Posts: 338 Credit: 20,544,999 RAC: 0 |
Ubuntu is set to *on demand* power setting by default. This equates to it doesn't think you need to run a low priority task like boinc at more than 50%. This link shows how to set the scaling to 100%. Link Good luck! This would be my best guess. "The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!) but rather, 'hmm... that's funny...'" -- Isaac Asimov |
JDWhale Send message Joined: 6 Apr 99 Posts: 921 Credit: 21,935,817 RAC: 3 |
Any ideas about what could have happened or has the CPU burnt out or something equivalent. Any reason for the loss in performance. Whether the change in distribution is responsible I think it is unlikely. Looks like you're running 50% speed... the app reports... Processor Information: Model: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600, 1.20 GHz Package: 4 Cores Good luck, JDWhale |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.