Pending Credit.

Author	Message
Wandering Willie Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 136 Credit: 2,127,073 RAC: 0	Message 633038 - Posted: 3 Sep 2007, 21:14:31 UTC Any request to suspend one WU for another would be in my case ignored. The manager seems to be doing quite well by itself both 5.10.13 and 5.8.16. Keep up the banter and good work after all it is in it's eighth year. most of my WUs are deadline OCTOBER I might even go on holiday myself when I retire in 10 days time. What are the chances of two users getting 100% the same units. ID: 633038 ·

perryjay Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0	Message 633116 - Posted: 3 Sep 2007, 23:44:23 UTC - in response to Message 633038. Any request to suspend one WU for another would be in my case ignored. The manager seems to be doing quite well by itself both 5.10.13 and 5.8.16. Keep up the banter and good work after all it is in it's eighth year. most of my WUs are deadline OCTOBER I might even go on holiday myself when I retire in 10 days time. What are the chances of two users getting 100% the same units. Just in case no one else has noticed, 5.10.20 is now the official release. PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC ID: 633116 ·

n7rfa Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0	Message 633160 - Posted: 4 Sep 2007, 1:15:07 UTC - in response to Message 633116. Any request to suspend one WU for another would be in my case ignored. The manager seems to be doing quite well by itself both 5.10.13 and 5.8.16. Keep up the banter and good work after all it is in it's eighth year. most of my WUs are deadline OCTOBER I might even go on holiday myself when I retire in 10 days time. What are the chances of two users getting 100% the same units. Just in case no one else has noticed, 5.10.20 is now the official release. I noticed after the upgrade to 5.10.20 that it didn't return the results using the exising Connection Interval of 0.001. I've increased it to 0.010 to see if that fixes it. ID: 633160 ·

Alinator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0	Message 633166 - Posted: 4 Sep 2007, 1:26:13 UTC Last modified: 4 Sep 2007, 1:28:53 UTC That's one of the little 'features' which got added after 13. I don't remember what the threshold is for sitting on reports after you go below a certain CI, but I'm sure it was measured in hours (maybe a day) rather than minutes. Alinator ID: 633166 ·

n7rfa Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 13 Apr 04 Posts: 370 Credit: 9,058,599 RAC: 0	Message 633235 - Posted: 4 Sep 2007, 4:24:52 UTC - in response to Message 633166. That's one of the little 'features' which got added after 13. I don't remember what the threshold is for sitting on reports after you go below a certain CI, but I'm sure it was measured in hours (maybe a day) rather than minutes. Alinator Interesting, the General Preferences page still lists "0" as valid and this is the first I've heard of the change. Oh, well. It will work out in the end. ID: 633235 ·

Alinator Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Apr 05 Posts: 4178 Credit: 4,647,982 RAC: 0	Message 633240 - Posted: 4 Sep 2007, 4:40:41 UTC Last modified: 4 Sep 2007, 4:42:41 UTC I'm pretty sure I saw it mentioned in the BOINC fora somewhere, but not in the stickies IIRC. If your feeling adventurous, you could play around some and maybe find out empirically what that threshold is. ;-) Personally, I wasn't too keen on the idea since I don't like having the fate of a completed result hanging around in an active work file like client_state for hours to days on end, depending on which mode you run in, automatic backup file not withstanding. If a project doesn't want you calling right back after a scheduler session for load management reasons, then they should tell your host to 'clam up' for X after a scheduler session. Alinator ID: 633240 ·

Ingleside Volunteer developer Send message Joined: 4 Feb 03 Posts: 1546 Credit: 15,832,022 RAC: 13	Message 633461 - Posted: 4 Sep 2007, 16:20:48 UTC - in response to Message 633166. That's one of the little 'features' which got added after 13. I don't remember what the threshold is for sitting on reports after you go below a certain CI, but I'm sure it was measured in hours (maybe a day) rather than minutes. The BOINC-Wiki is your friend. ;) Well, atleast in instances has taken the time to update the info, often the info is old... :oops: The delay in reporting, if there's no other reason for connecting (like asking for more work), is 24 hours. Since most users will ask for more work, it shouldn't really be a problem. Oh, and #6, the "have sporadic connection", it seems that if you hits "Advanced/Retry Communications", you'll report any results immediately after upload. Now, if this is a permanent mode until BOINC-client is re-started or not, I don't know... "I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might." ID: 633461 ·

Fred G Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 185 Credit: 24,109,481 RAC: 0	Message 634618 - Posted: 6 Sep 2007, 6:41:54 UTC All I know is mine has been climbing constantly for a few weeks. I'm up to now...Pending credit: 19,089.07 http://www.teamstarfire.org/ ID: 634618 ·

Helli_retiered Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Dec 99 Posts: 707 Credit: 108,785,585 RAC: 0	Message 634628 - Posted: 6 Sep 2007, 7:21:26 UTC - in response to Message 634618. Last modified: 6 Sep 2007, 7:23:51 UTC All I know is mine has been climbing constantly for a few weeks. I'm up to now...Pending credit: 19,089.07 Same here since weeks. Climbing and climbing and climbing and... Actually 741 WUs with 41000 Cobblestones waiting. Thats not funny. :-( A loooong time ago: First Credits after SETI@home Restart ID: 634628 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.