Message boards :
Number crunching :
Hope not to see anymore of these!
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
gomeyer Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 488 Credit: 50,370,425 RAC: 0 |
I just ran this on all of my machines and found 3 more of these WU's Richard, FYI, no new negative threshold WU's downloaded since this afternoon. I guess that's good news. Perhaps some of these are beginning to hit their retry limits and are no longer being reissued. I'll post any that show up in the future. Regards |
Matthias Lehmkuhl Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 28 Credit: 10,832,348 RAC: 53 |
i got one too WU 147604048 Results are from 17,183.47 to 284,332.57 CPU time (sec) mine was 593286220 time 26,030.03 credit 0.44 Matthias |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Thanks for the offerings folks - those WU links make it really easy. Urs - you're right, the number I'm getting makes it important to check for overlaps. Did so: none found. So the running total is 54 WUs, 179.82 days Transferring to a database for duplicate checking makes it easy to get other metrics. Server states 56 In Progress 229 Over 5 Unsent Outcomes 156 Client error 26 No reply 47 Success 61 Unknown Clent states 32 Aborted by user 96 Compute error 2 Computing 61 Done 12 Downloading 87 New I think I'm going to close this exercise when the maintenance outage starts this evening, and - if there hasn't been any sort of announcement on the boards - send it off to Eric: I don't want the early ones to get too stale. So, you've got about 7 hours to help me get the 'time wasted' up to 200 days (NB we're already over half a year of CPU time reported). Edit - can't do mental arithmetic any more. Almost half a year. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19085 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Do you have this one wuid=147632149 |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Do you have this one wuid=147632149 Yes, I've got that one - has your name alongside it, must have picked it up from one of your earlier posts. Got to go out now - will process any other replies when I get back. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Last call for contributions - closing in ~1 hour. Thanks to RottenMutt in another thread, I've now got 57 WUs, 185.90 days - officially more than half of even a leap year. PS One of RottenMutt's beats the previous record for the latest time of 'initial release' - by 23 seconds. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51469 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Last call for contributions - closing in ~1 hour. Ooohhhh.....more than half a year to crunch just 57 WUs. Not good for the ol' RAC, eh? "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Do you have this one wuid=147632149 wuid 148074042 wuid 148074050 wuid 148074055 wuid 148074058 wuid 148074066 wuid 148074070 wuid 148074075 wuid 148074082 wuid 148074101 wuid 148074139 wuid 148074151 wuid 148074158 wuid 148074176 wuid 148074184 wuid 148074291 wuid 148074297 wuid 148074323 These are all siblings of URS' 50 and 51, members of the 05mr07ab.14780.368229 group. I was trying to estimate how many of the original group had been retired, how many remain. The very rough figure I came up with was about 60% gone, 40% still being worked. Many are close to having enough errors, of course. Joe |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Do you have this one wuid=147632149 I'm not sure that was entirely sporting, Joe - bit like fishing with a blunderbuss! - but it's brought us up to 246 days. Haven't even counted them yet - need to grab the data before the servers go off line. The one I've left in the quote is interesting - first observation (I think) of a 'Redundant result Cancelled by server', yet it's only got one "Success". Might be a sign of progress? No more bulk uploads, please, but a couple more might take us up to 250 days? |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I didn't expect the boards to go down quite as early as that. 148074151 was indeed the only 'Redundant result Cancelled by server' in the collection - which had reached 74 after Joe's buckshot blast. Server states 74 In Progress 315 Over 8 Unsent Outcomes 214 Client error 36 No reply 1 Redundant result 64 Success 82 Unknown Clent states 37 Aborted by user 1 Cancelled by server 141 Compute error 3 Computing 81 Done 16 Downloading 118 New |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I've got one, Which i've aborted. Already got it - it was one of Joe's mass haul. But your abort has added another 97 seconds, and another pending resend, to the totals. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Odysseus has found one more, so I'm at 75 WUs, 251.28 days. Nice round figures. This collection is now officially CLOSED - thanks to all contributors. I'll send them off to Eric today. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Glad Tidings! From Technical News: As far as those overflow workunits taking forever... Jeff and Eric wrote some code (and checked it twice) to scour the database for such workunits and "cancel" them. Immediately we saw our pipelines flood with requests for new work.. so expect some delays for a while. We hope to eventually give credit to those who got stuck with these troubled workunits. I can confirm that all the "Splitsville Evercrunch Specials" I've tested from my logs now say 'cancelled' (if they haven't become extinct through natural wastage already). Clearly there were a lot of them out there, from Matt's comment about the requests for new work. But I, for one, am happy to put up with a brief delay for that reason. And to be offered credit as well.... icing on the cake. Thanks, fellas. |
Clyde C. Phillips, III Send message Joined: 2 Aug 00 Posts: 1851 Credit: 5,955,047 RAC: 0 |
Thanks, Richard. I saw that, too. I didn't hurt me that much. I suppose something like that could be put on the back burner, unless some others were hurt more by these. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.