Anyone using 4.1 on Linux yet?

Message boards : Number crunching : Anyone using 4.1 on Linux yet?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Darren
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 99
Posts: 259
Credit: 280,503
RAC: 0
United States
Message 9200 - Posted: 18 Jul 2004, 1:17:59 UTC

I've compiled the boinc 4.1 linux client today for 2 of my hosts and was wondering if anyone else is using it yet - and if so if they know of any surprises I'm in store for!!!

I found out it will do a project reset on upgrade since it's a change in major version number, so I'm running down my cache now so I won't dump any work units. The cache should run out tomorrow, and I'll upgrade it then - unless someone already has some experiences with it that they want to share so I'll change my mind.


ID: 9200 · Report as offensive
Profile Rom Walton (BOINC)
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 00
Posts: 579
Credit: 130,733
RAC: 0
United States
Message 9201 - Posted: 18 Jul 2004, 1:41:24 UTC

I would recommend people hold off on this release until we have had a chance to let the Alpha group and the Dev group look over it.

Already I've found a few problems that'll cause the SETI_BOINC application to terminate. Also, that client should fail to get any work from the public project since the public project is still flagged as 3.19/3.20 and not 4.0.

At this point we cannot say if their are any other adverse side-effects with the development branch at this point.

----- Rom
BOINC Development Team, U.C. Berkeley
ID: 9201 · Report as offensive
Darren
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Jul 99
Posts: 259
Credit: 280,503
RAC: 0
United States
Message 9205 - Posted: 18 Jul 2004, 1:50:31 UTC - in response to Message 9201.  
Last modified: 18 Jul 2004, 1:53:21 UTC

> I would recommend people hold off on this release until we have had a chance
> to let the Alpha group and the Dev group look over it.
>
> Already I've found a few problems that'll cause the SETI_BOINC application to
> terminate. Also, that client should fail to get any work from the public
> project since the public project is still flagged as 3.19/3.20 and not 4.0.
>
> At this point we cannot say if their are any other adverse side-effects with
> the development branch at this point.
>
> ----- Rom
> BOINC Development Team, U.C. Berkeley


Well, that'll do it.

Thanks Rom.


ID: 9205 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Anyone using 4.1 on Linux yet?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.