Had a P4 2.8Gig HT with optimized times...has 100K credits but dont use it anymore.

Host #316624

CPU: Intel P4 2.8GHz (Hyperthread)
RAM: 2 x PC3200
Avg time: 6360 / 2 (HT) = 3180
RAC: 760 (at one time, was machine #48 for a while)

<blockquote>Had a P4 2.8Gig HT with optimized times...has 100K credits but dont use it anymore.

Host #316624

CPU: Intel P4 2.8GHz (Hyperthread)
RAM: 2 x PC3200
Avg time: 6360 / 2 (HT) = 3180
RAC: 760 (at one time, was machine #48 for a while)

</blockquote>

Hmm, 4,022.8 for both benchmarks, eh? Interesting...

---

<blockquote>
Hmm, 4,022.8 for both benchmarks, eh? Interesting...</blockquote>

Yea, thats how I forced the client to grant credits similar to what other hosts were submitting...around 30 claimed on average.

<blockquote>Had a P4 2.8Gig HT with optimized times...has 100K credits but dont use it anymore.

Host #316624

CPU: Intel P4 2.8GHz (Hyperthread)
RAM: 2 x PC3200
Avg time: 6360 / 2 (HT) = 3180
RAC: 760 (at one time, was machine #48 for a while)

</blockquote>

not bad look at my P4 3.2 with the optimized Clients


hostid# 56765 :)

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club m7 ©

<blockquote>not bad look at my P4 3.2 with the optimized Clients


hostid# 56765 :)

</blockquote>

Could be faster.......
P4 3.2 also, but..........

hostid# 176507

---

<blockquote><blockquote>not bad look at my P4 3.2 with the optimized Clients


hostid# 56765 :)

</blockquote>

Could be faster.......
P4 3.2 also, but..........

hostid# 176507 </blockquote>

your P4 is a little bit overclocked i think, my runs at Stock Speed

P4 3.2, Mobo I875, Memory 2 Twinmos Syster at 2.5 3 3 8

only for Info

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club m7 ©

I get pretty fast times with a low power Pentium-M (Dothan) 1.8
Using Pentium-M optimized applicaton:
Host #161518

---

<blockquote>I get pretty fast times with a low power Pentium-M (Dothan) 1.8
Using Pentium-M optimized applicaton:
Host #161518</blockquote>

you forget, that we P4 HT Users do 2 WUs at the same Time

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club m7 ©

<blockquote>
you forget, that we P4 HT Users do 2 WUs at the same Time
</blockquote>

I haven't forgotten, but for twice the power consumption and almost twice the clock frequency, you'd better be getting something! :)

---

<blockquote>
your P4 is a little bit overclocked i think, my runs at Stock Speed

P4 3.2, Mobo I875, Memory 2 Twinmos Syster at 2.5 3 3 8

only for Info

</blockquote>

A little bit would be a huge understatement.

P4 640 3.2GHz @ 4208MHz OCZ DDR2 667 @ 700MHz DDR 4-2-2-8

---

Recent average credit 565.40
CPU type GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz
Number of CPUs 4
http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=638685

That&#180;s mine running Tetsuji&#180;s P4-SSE2 Client and Boinc 4.52 (i really don&#180;t like Boinc manager & Cli version they suck :-).

---

Join BOINC United now!

<blockquote>
your P4 is a little bit overclocked i think, my runs at Stock Speed

P4 3.2, Mobo I875, Memory 2 Twinmos Syster at 2.5 3 3 8

only for Info

</blockquote>

A little bit would be a huge understatement.

P4 640 3.2GHz @ 4208MHz OCZ DDR2 667 @ 700MHz DDR 4-2-2-8

How do ypu P4 folks get such fast wu crunching times?
I'm running a p4 540 3.2GHz @3.52GHz with 1GB corsair ddr2 533MHz on an Asus P5GDC-Deluxe mobo w/I915 chipset, dual channel with HT enabled and am doing 2 WUs in an averge time of 2hrs 41mins or 1 wu in ~1hr 25mins.??

---

Hey, I thought I'd throw my little Celeron in here just for kicks. :)

With the optimized client, I'm getting an average of 6956 seconds, or 1.93 hours per work unit. Not bad for a cheap low-end Intel processor!

CPU: Intel Celeron D 2.93 GHz.
FSB: 533 MHz.
L2 Cache: 256Kb
RAM: 512MB (PC3200 DDR)
Avg time: 6956 sec.

Dig

How do ypu P4 folks get such fast wu crunching times?

Try reading the 3 or so threads related to an "optimized windows client" posted by TMR.

Start with this [url=http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14378]one<a>

then on to this [url=http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14557]one<a> and finally this [url=http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14594]one<a>

Be careful as this represent a transition from one to the next and you should read all of it to make sure you get the right one.


tony