Questions and Answers :
Getting started :
I think there's a bug in the Verifier: reference workunit included
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Greg Wageman Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 27 Credit: 67,872 RAC: 0 |
Please have a look at this workunit: http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=840587 Four different computers have successfully completed this workunit; one has not. Yet, credit is still pending (and has been since 30 August 2004!) The one incomplete result shouldn't be holding this up, if what's posted here is correct. |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
You are correct that there is a problem. Either some subset of the results already returned should verify, or the WU should be resent. It is entirely possible that no two of the returned results match closely enough to get the verifier to accept them as the same. BOINC WIKI |
Greg Wageman Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 27 Credit: 67,872 RAC: 0 |
> You are correct that there is a problem. Either some subset of the results > already returned should verify, or the WU should be resent. It is entirely > possible that no two of the returned results match closely enough to get the > verifier to accept them as the same. Ok, that was also my conclusion. What is the next step? Is someone with who is familiar with the verifier code going to take a look at this? I can imagine that this is not the only workunit in this situation (probably far from it). |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.