Message boards :
SETI@home Enhanced :
Error on file upload: Socket Read incomplete:
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 15 Credit: 11,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
1/26/2007 1:14:59 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 15980, got 12912: Socket operation on non-socket 1/26/2007 1:14:59 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0: transient upload error 1/26/2007 1:14:59 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Backing off 2 hr 45 min 53 sec on upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 1:32:18 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 1/26/2007 1:32:18 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Requesting 78 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 1/26/2007 1:32:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 1/26/2007 1:32:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Deferring communication for 7 sec 1/26/2007 1:32:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Reason: requested by project 1/26/2007 1:32:25 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started download of file 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204 1/26/2007 1:32:27 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Finished download of file 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204 1/26/2007 1:32:27 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Throughput 286885 bytes/sec 1/26/2007 2:51:58 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Computation for task 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.106_1 finished 1/26/2007 2:51:58 PM||Starting 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.202_1 1/26/2007 2:51:58 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Starting task 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.202_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 1/26/2007 2:52:00 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.106_1_0 1/26/2007 2:52:04 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.106_1_0 1/26/2007 2:52:04 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Throughput 26365 bytes/sec 1/26/2007 4:00:53 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 4:00:58 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 15980, got 12912: Socket operation on non-socket 1/26/2007 4:00:58 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0: transient upload error 1/26/2007 4:00:58 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Backing off 2 hr 58 min 18 sec on upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 4:50:05 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 1/26/2007 4:50:05 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Requesting 102 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 1/26/2007 4:50:10 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 1/26/2007 4:50:10 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Deferring communication for 7 sec 1/26/2007 4:50:10 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Reason: requested by project 1/26/2007 4:50:12 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started download of file 06no06aa.19371.92944.10.4.62 1/26/2007 4:50:14 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Finished download of file 06no06aa.19371.92944.10.4.62 1/26/2007 4:50:14 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Throughput 287001 bytes/sec 1/26/2007 6:09:40 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Computation for task 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.202_1 finished 1/26/2007 6:09:40 PM||Starting 06no06aa.19371.91308.10.4.78_0 1/26/2007 6:09:40 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Starting task 06no06aa.19371.91308.10.4.78_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 1/26/2007 6:09:43 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.202_1_0 1/26/2007 6:09:47 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file 06no06aa.19371.90899.10.4.202_1_0 1/26/2007 6:09:47 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Throughput 30720 bytes/sec 1/26/2007 6:59:17 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 6:59:19 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 15980, got 12912: Socket operation on non-socket 1/26/2007 6:59:19 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0: transient upload error 1/26/2007 6:59:19 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Backing off 1 hr 25 min 59 sec on upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 8:25:19 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 8:25:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 15980, got 12912: Socket operation on non-socket 1/26/2007 8:25:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0: transient upload error 1/26/2007 8:25:23 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Backing off 3 hr 46 min 0 sec on upload of file 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 1/26/2007 10:26:49 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user 1/26/2007 10:26:49 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Reporting 1 tasks 1/26/2007 10:26:54 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 1/26/2007 10:26:54 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Deferring communication for 7 sec 1/26/2007 10:26:54 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|Reason: requested by project This one has actually been done for a few days now, but just can't make the upload. Only one i have seen like this, have done other units since then without a problem. any ideas? |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
This is a rare problem, but it seems to be becoming more common: maybe someone should feed it into the BOINC bug-reporting system. I've seen it twice, and written it up here (this Beta board, but describing an Einstein event) and here (BOINC dev board, describing a SETI main event). Byron has reported it in SETI Beta here. There are a couple of recent reports in SETI Main, here and here. In my own case, I'm convinced that the problem started when two WUs from the same project finished within 1 second of each other on a multi-core machine: BOINC seems to have got confused about which file to upload (the numbers in the error message relate to the file sizes of the upload files). In some cases, it seems to correlate with an error in the state file found the next time BOINC restarts - David, if you haven't restarted BOINC since you saw the error, perhaps you could test this out? Whatever it is, it seems to be an error on the local computer, and the only way I could find to solve it was to abort the failing transfer. But unfortunately the reports have been rather submerged by the spate of server-related upload problems at both SETI and Einstein (and mis-diagnosed as a server problem by at least one moderator on the SETI main board). |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
And another one on SETI main. |
Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 15 Credit: 11,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Restarted, and tried to reload, and still have the same error. I have only experienced the error with that specific work unit so far. result id 1267041 work unit id 302792. system states (asked for 15980, got 12912) transfer area lists SETI@homeBetaTest 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 86.63% 13.52/15.61KB This is a single core AMD64 3200+ 2 gigs of system ram, 2 gigs of readyboost running 64bit Vista Really wish these boards were keyword searchable |
Send message Joined: 14 Oct 05 Posts: 1137 Credit: 1,848,733 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Restarted, and tried to reload, and still have the same error. I have only experienced the error with that specific work unit so far. result id 1267041 work unit id 302792. system states (asked for 15980, got 12912) transfer area lists SETI@homeBetaTest 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 86.63% 13.52/15.61KB If you haven't already aborted the upload, open the 06no06aa.19371.89263.10.4.28_0_0 file in a text editor and look at the end. I suspect you'll see one <spike> report but no <best_spike>, <best_gaussian>, or <best_pulse>. Without those "best of" signals, the result wouldn't validate even if the upload were forced. There's been an active discussion of this problem on the boinc_alpha mailing list for a few days, that seems to be the route to report problems with the Alpha versions of BOINC. The BOINCzilla bug report system had fewer than 600 total reports the last time I looked, it's very inactive. The only link to the keyword search for these boards is on the Questions and answers page. Dunno why, but it's the same in the main project. Joe |
Send message Joined: 7 Sep 05 Posts: 15 Credit: 11,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
something else i just noticed while watching the system.. 1/28/2007 9:59:25 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|Computation for task 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204_0 finished 1/28/2007 9:59:27 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started upload of file 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204_0_0 1/28/2007 9:59:29 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Finished upload of file 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204_0_0 1/28/2007 9:59:29 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Throughput 30914 bytes/sec 1/28/2007 10:00:11 AM||Starting 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204_0 1/28/2007 10:00:11 AM|SETI@home Beta Test|Starting task 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 currently my system appears to be re hashing the same wu that it just completed, there is no time to finish listed, and at the end it says ready to report.Currently it is at 8:06 cpu time with a progress of 3.9% posibly what is making the other units larger then what the server is expecting? |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Note that this is the same WU that you downloaded during the upload errors in your first post: 1/26/2007 1:32:25 PM|SETI@home Beta Test|[file_xfer] Started download of file 06no06aa.19371.92535.10.4.204 I saw something similar in the Einstein error I linked to earlier: not only did an upload go wrong, but the next WU to crunch [in the same slot directory ???] is also damaged. If you can hang on until the next subscriber to the dev mailing list can chip in, they might ask for logs or other system info to help the debug effort: otherwise, I suspect you're going to have to abort it. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Feb 06 Posts: 30 Credit: 3,136 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I have been seeing this same error on the main Seti project. I have been getting at least one or two of these errors per week for a couple of months now. The error is most commonly seen on my multicore or HT machines. In each occurance on my machines, the workunit is listed in the Task List as being less than 100% complete, but it's status is listed as "uploading". On 32-bit systems, this error usually terminates all BOINC related processes, in some instances locking up the O/S. On 64-bit Windows, only the Seti app and BOINC client are terminated, but the BOINC Manager is left running, and the O/S does not lock up. On my Linux systems, when this occurs, the whole system locks up. I have also had this error occur on a single core, single CPU system running SuSE Linux 10.0 x86_64. In all cases when this error occurs, upon restarting BOINC, the Message Tab refers to an error in the state file. The only way to recover from this has been for me to abort the file transfer. Regards, Daniel. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
There's been an active discussion of this problem on the boinc_alpha mailing list for a few days, that seems to be the route to report problems with the Alpha versions of BOINC.Joe Can anyone pass on any conclusions from the alpha discussion about this problem? I've had a couple more instances recently, under BOINC 5.8.9, and I've posted full logs in this thread. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 Jun 05 Posts: 970 Credit: 1,495,169 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Richard: more info: There's been an active discussion of this problem on the boinc_alpha mailing list for a few days, that seems to be the route to report problems with the Alpha versions of BOINC.Joe Message: 5 Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:48:34 -0500 From: "Josef W. Segur" Subject: Re: [boinc_alpha] Probably a SETI issue, but.... To: "BOINC Alpha list" Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On 26 Jan 2007 at 21:52, Alex wrote: > Yes, same failures after upgrading to 5.8.5 [stdoutdae.txt attached]. > After looking at this and failures on other hosts, maybe these uploads were > fubared by 5.8.4. > In any case, on to 5.86a. In the Seti Beta case[1] I looked at for a host using BOINC 5.8.0, the upload was certainly fubared. The setiathome_enhanced app copies the WU header to the result file at startup, adds any "interesting" signals as they occur, and finally writes the "best of" signals. That WU didn't have any "interesting" signals, the size BOINC measured (16324 bytes) when the app exited was about right for the WU header plus the "best of" signals, but the actual file on disk (13063 bytes) contained only the WU header. The "asked for 16324, got 13063" in the error report reflected the actual situation, and since the Validator needs signals to check, uploading the short file would be no use. The question is how the file could be complete when BOINC checks it at app exit, but be the older version without the final writes when upload is attempted. Joe [1] - http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/forum_thread.php?id=731&nowrap=true#13067 |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
The question is how the file could be complete when BOINC checks it at I think the logs I've just posted in main Q & A (link in my previous post) might explain 'how': both WUs finished normally, but then started processing again before the upload happened. That would explain why the concluding 'best of' lines were missing. And the question becomes "why" BOINC chose the recently-finished WU as the next one to start processing. Edit: I preserved the output files from the two recent examples before aborting the uploads. One ends after the </workunit_header> line: the other goes on to list two triplets and a spike. For that WU (114524447), successful crunchers report 4 triplets and 1 spike, so the 'partial re-crunch' theory is reinforced. |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yet another lifecycle log: again, the WU finished one second after another WU from the same project, and then started again before uploading. 2007-02-21 20:12:11 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 2007-02-21 20:12:11 [SETI@home] Requesting 13201 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks 2007-02-21 20:12:17 [SETI@home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 507] 2007-02-21 20:12:17 [SETI@home] Deferring communication for 11 sec 2007-02-21 20:12:17 [SETI@home] Reason: requested by project 2007-02-21 20:12:19 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38 2007-02-21 20:12:19 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 68354 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 68756 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44 2007-02-21 20:12:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.45 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38_3 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting 01no03aa.5768.1328.765888.3.102_0 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting task 01no03aa.5768.1328.765888.3.102_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting 01no03aa.5768.1233.373588.3.77_0 2007-02-21 20:12:27 [SETI@home] Starting task 01no03aa.5768.1233.373588.3.77_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44 2007-02-21 20:12:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 44306 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:12:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.45 2007-02-21 20:12:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 44219 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:12:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 15au03aa.20522.7056.765914.3.4 2007-02-21 20:12:38 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44_3 2007-02-21 20:12:38 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:38 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.45_0 2007-02-21 20:12:38 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.45_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:46 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished download of file 15au03aa.20522.7056.765914.3.4 2007-02-21 20:12:46 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 47095 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:12:53 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38_3 finished 2007-02-21 20:12:54 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3 finished 2007-02-21 20:12:55 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38_3_0 2007-02-21 20:12:55 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3 2007-02-21 20:12:55 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:56 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3_0 2007-02-21 20:12:58 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44_3 finished 2007-02-21 20:12:58 [SETI@home] Resuming task 19au03aa.16709.19889.648582.3.172_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:58 [SETI@home] Resuming task 19au03aa.16709.20530.392322.3.171_3 using setiathome_enhanced version 517 2007-02-21 20:12:59 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.45_0 finished 2007-02-21 20:13:03 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished upload of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.38_3_0 2007-02-21 20:13:03 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 4505 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 20:13:03 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.44_3_0 2007-02-21 20:13:09 [SETI@home] [error] Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 16382, got 7421: No such file or directory 2007-02-21 20:13:09 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 11no03aa.4732.12274.92334.3.43_3_0: transient upload error |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 05 Posts: 172 Credit: 251,583 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Richard, I've just read your post on the Boinc boards, this was my reply: Is anyone making any progress on this (increasingly common) error? I think there might be the chance it was corrected by the fix. Peter |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
The read problem could also be that Boinc could not read the same that was previously written - either the slot changed or the output file was overwritten by the new run. Someone else on the BOINC boards has asked for a re-check with the latest build: I've upgraded to 5.8.15, but it's difficult to arrange these events to order. Now if Eric can just keep the Beta splitters off a little longer, and send through a nice batch of VHAR on main, we might just hit one.... I think that the current best bet is that the output file is overwritten by the re-run: see my comments to Joe in my earlier posts. This recent event, again, had a clean copy of the WU header but no data or 'Best of' following the header. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 05 Posts: 172 Credit: 251,583 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Someone else on the BOINC boards Nicolas a.k.a. PovAddict, RenderFarm@Home's admin. has asked for a re-check with the latest build Actually I've meant the same, but forgot to tell explicitly ;-) ... it's difficult to arrange these events to order. Now if Eric can just keep the Beta splitters off a little longer, and send through a nice batch of VHAR on main, we might just hit one.... That's the "beauty" of debugging :-( Peter |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Nicolas has come back with a claim attributed to DA that this was fixed in v5.8.11, released 09 Feb. I refuse to run that version, because of the "harmless", "bogus", 'exit with zero status' message which has caused at least one cruncher on CPDN to lose over 600 hours of work. While we're waiting for mine to hit the spot with 5.8.15, anybody got any other evidence, pro or anti? |
Send message Joined: 21 Aug 05 Posts: 56 Credit: 183,653 RAC: 0 ![]() |
5.8.11 is running here... i had one unit with this problem... so. no.. .not fixed. WU upload aborted |
Send message Joined: 3 Jan 07 Posts: 1451 Credit: 3,272,268 RAC: 0 ![]() |
5.8.11 is running here... i had one unit with this problem... so. no.. .not fixed. Do you still have the message log (or could you recover it from 'stdoutdae.txt', in the BOINC directory)? I would be interested in the lines around the time the WU finished crunching: a few lines before, and the lines after 'finished' up to the first attempt at uploading. |
![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 05 Posts: 172 Credit: 251,583 RAC: 0 ![]() |
OK let's repeat it here too: If someone will notice any "Error on file upload" problem, it would be helpful to take a look into the log, if that particular result was possibly restarted once more after being finished, prior to being uploaded. Especially if it happened with at least Boinc 5.8.12 (because WinterKnight already observed it on 5.8.11). Peter |
Send message Joined: 21 Aug 05 Posts: 56 Credit: 183,653 RAC: 0 ![]() |
5.8.11 is running here... i had one unit with this problem... so. no.. .not fixed. well here you go... (relevent info is tabbed 2007-02-21 06:03:59 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.18_0_0 2007-02-21 06:03:59 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.22_0 finished . 2007-02-21 06:03:59 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0 . 2007-02-21 06:03:59 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 519 2007-02-21 06:04:01 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.18_0_0 2007-02-21 06:04:01 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 67350 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 06:04:01 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.22_0_0 2007-02-21 06:04:04 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.22_0_0 2007-02-21 06:04:04 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 214138 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 06:13:28 [SETI@home Beta Test] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 2007-02-21 06:13:28 [SETI@home Beta Test] Requesting 107916 seconds of new work 2007-02-21 06:13:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 509] 2007-02-21 06:13:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Deferring communication for 7 sec 2007-02-21 06:13:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Reason: requested by project 2007-02-21 06:13:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Deferring communication for 42 min 44 sec 2007-02-21 06:13:33 [SETI@home Beta Test] Reason: no work from project 2007-02-21 06:23:23 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.29_0 finished 2007-02-21 06:23:23 [SETI@home] Resuming task 19au03aa.16709.20786.704834.3.98_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 519 . 2007-02-21 06:23:24 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0 finished 2007-02-21 06:23:25 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.29_0_0 . 2007-02-21 06:23:25 [SETI@home] Starting 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0 . 2007-02-21 06:23:25 [SETI@home] Starting task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 519 . 2007-02-21 06:23:26 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 2007-02-21 06:23:27 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Finished upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.29_0_0 2007-02-21 06:23:27 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Throughput 51216 bytes/sec 2007-02-21 06:23:28 [SETI@home] [error] Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 12226, got 7426: No such file or directory . 2007-02-21 06:23:28 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0: transient upload error . 2007-02-21 06:23:28 [SETI@home] Backing off 1 min 0 sec on upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 . 2007-02-21 06:24:28 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 2007-02-21 06:24:30 [SETI@home] [error] Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 12226, got 8963: No such file or directory . 2007-02-21 06:24:30 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0: transient upload error . 2007-02-21 06:24:30 [SETI@home] Backing off 1 min 0 sec on upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 2007-02-21 06:25:24 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 2007-02-21 06:25:24 [SETI@home] Requesting 13653 seconds of new work, and reporting 7 completed tasks 2007-02-21 06:25:29 [SETI@home] Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 507] 2007-02-21 06:25:29 [SETI@home] Deferring communication for 11 sec 2007-02-21 06:25:29 [SETI@home] Reason: requested by project 2007-02-21 06:25:30 [SETI@home] [error] garbage_collect(); still have active task for acked result 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.19_3; state 9 . 2007-02-21 06:25:30 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 2007-02-21 06:25:30 [SETI@home] Computation for task 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.19_3 finished 2007-02-21 06:25:36 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Started download of file 15au03aa.20522.4642.779818.3.216 2007-02-21 06:25:38 [SETI@home] [error] Error on file upload: socket read incomplete: asked for 12226, got 8963: No such file or directory . 2007-02-21 06:25:38 [SETI@home] [file_xfer] Temporarily failed upload of 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0: transient upload error . 2007-02-21 06:25:38 [SETI@home] Backing off 1 min 0 sec on upload of file 11no03aa.4732.8626.304816.3.23_0_0 |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.