Ken Phillips m0mcw 的帖子

81) 留言板 : Number crunching : Oops! Sorry folks, I've munged some downloads (消息 150452)
发表于:12 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Cheers for your replies, I've just checked up on the Einsteins, and LHC units that got uploaded overnight, and they validated fine, even the ones the machine was working on, as it's mainboard failed, how's that for scientific robustness?
On that basis, as much as the science is different, I'll assume until proved otherwise, that the seti@home work is in 'good hands'.

Bye all,

Ken P.
82) 留言板 : Number crunching : Oops! Sorry folks, I've munged some downloads (消息 150405)
发表于:12 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Not me guv, honest!

However, I've just experienced the dangerous occurrence of having a thought (ouch), if the validators are so backlogged, it could well be quite some time before I even know if my trusty cpu, and it's bright shiny new mobo, actually co-exist together and crunch properly, although I suppose that my returns to LHC and einstein would give me some idea.

I got the machine up and running again, in time to start crunching and returning some einsteins that had got near deadline, some pre-failure LHC's are still in progress, as is a climate prediction unit with only 1 and a bit days on the odometer

Does anyone know if seti@home work is being validated at all, or is it just that the backlog is moving, but, it's slowing down all the time, so the number of WU's pending just gets bigger? I haven't a clue myself, as I've not really had my attention on the status page.

Cheers,

Ken Phillips
83) 留言板 : Number crunching : How do I tell boinc to finish what it's got, but get no more? (消息 150273)
发表于:11 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Set to 0.0 instead and you won't receive no more WU!


Won't this 'connect to time' then propagate via updates, to the other science applications as well? Thereby causing all of Dorsai's projects to stop downloading?

I can't readily test this, as I don't have 4.19 installed on anything anymore.

@Dorsai, If you upgrade to 4.45, then you can just suspend, stop downloads, etc., from the boinc manager, however, I'll understand if you are a bit wary of doing so, purely because of 4.45's quirks.

TTFN

Ken
84) 留言板 : Number crunching : How do I tell boinc to finish what it's got, but get no more? (消息 150263)
发表于:11 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
At the moment there seems little point in requesting more work, as all this will do is generate more results to add to the ever growing pile.

But I would like to return work I have, once it's done.

I think that it is possible to create a file, in the relevant place, that will cause Boinc to stop requesting more WU's.

I see that the Berkeley house is on fire, and I don't wish to stand there, throwing fuel onto the fire.

I can wait till the Fire Brigade have arrived and put the fire out.

Once the house has been rebuilt, I will happily stand there putting fuel into the fuel tank.

This PC will run dry about 6PM Friday 12th. Once all the SETI Wu's are done, I want to return then and get no more. I will Pick another project, and wait for SETI to be rebuilt.

It's A hard think to decide to do, but all my returning & getting & returning & getting WU's is doing is making the situation worse.

I will think Einstein will do. It's space orientated. That's what I like.

How do I achieve a "graceful shutdown"?


Open Boinc manager, got to the projects tab, highlight Seti@home, on the left pane of the window, you should see a 'no new work' button, click it; job done.

Come back soon :)

Ken Phillips
85) 留言板 : Number crunching : Oops! Sorry folks, I've munged some downloads (消息 150259)
发表于:11 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
This might be a bit moot point at the moment, but, I've just replaced the mainboard on one of my hosts to resurrect it, unfortunately, I couldn't get the same model as previously installed, so I had to do a repair install of XP. Anyway less of the twaddle; when the host came back up, before all the relevant updates, etc, it munged 16no03ab.2904.785.354830.237 and 16no03ab.2904.785.354830.53 results, while attempting to download before it wasn't fully ready.

[edit]
Damn! Found another one 16oc03aa.979.10945.984656.208, I've changed the links to WU names, to save anyone having to click them :-)
[/edit]

Apologies for holding up anyones validation, not that it really makes much difference at the moment.

I'll have to try and wangle a faster cpu now, the new mobo is a lot better.

Cheers and beers!

Ken Phillips
86) 留言板 : Number crunching : Oh My! Another outage! (消息 150142)
发表于:11 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
yeah, it was Message 150048 that accused me of stealing.
I own all these computers. Some I bought from Dell, others I built.
The reason for so many is work I and my group is doing on making a replacement for ViCAP [google it] that the FBI uses is criminal profiling.

Your statement that I am 'stealing computer time' is slanderous.
Watch it!



Sorry to have to continue this folks, I, like several others am beginning to think 'troll' in connection with the doctor, I also agree as said earlier, that this thread should now be closed and allowed to sink into obscurity, but to continue:-

Doctor,

I'd like to think that no one has any problems with the number of computers you operate, apart from envy that is. The fact is, that that number is really quite small compared to some other volunteers involved with seti.

The problem as I see it, is why you saw fit to need 3 separate user accounts, again, when there are folks on here with many more boxes than you, all on one single account - was this simply because you'd evaluated what sometimes goes on on here, and decided you'd rather have three chances to vote?

Ken Phillips
87) 留言板 : Number crunching : Oh My! Another outage! (消息 149832)
发表于:11 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:



This is not a Berkeley problem.

Why not? Look at the name. It ends with cogentco.com which means that the address belongs to Cogent Communications, not Berkeley. It is not part of Berkeley's zone.

I was tired last night, I stayed up trying to figure this out. I took me a bit to realize that you were typing berley instead of berkeley and that sent us off into DNS questions instead of routing.

It's easy to take pot-shots at the SETI systems people.


I spelled it right for the trace routes but couldn't copy it so I hand typed it in the message to this forum and misspelled it.

The fact remain...boinc is broken, period!



If the infrasructure of Boinc is so broken, period!, then why is the infrastructure of Boinc, and it's hosted, but, separate science applications of which seti@home is but one, working so well, in spite of a few glitches?

I run 4 projects via Boinc, they are all working, and reporting, sometimes not brilliantly, but, they are working, and science is being carried out.

Boinc is not broken, Boinc is working reasonably well, for a work in progress.

I repeat, because obviously some folks are having problems with the english language, and understanding certain key concepts, that Seti@home (not boinc) has some issues, and there currently are some signs that the connectivity issues, apparently due to a misconfigured and/or faulty router on the cogent network border, well beyond Seti@homes control, have been addressed.

If you are going to throw your expensive toys out of your so well equipped and oh so perfectly configured playpen, then at least get it over with, just do it and go; either that or get your facts right, get it sorted, get over it, and get crunching.

There are some folks on here who have been having problems connecting to Seti@home, yes, Seti@home, not Boinc, Seti@home, for longer than you have, some of the affected folks are now able to connect unassisted by proxies, etc, for the first time in weeks, and they should be proud to have been part of the solution, not just whining, threatening and saying 'it's not at my end'.

All this misguided Boinc bashing is now seriously doing my head in, period!

Ken Phillips
88) 留言板 : Number crunching : Seti disabling my computers? (消息 148626)
发表于:8 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
My fastest computer managed to connect to seti this morning (I'm in England) but I'm having difficulty connecting any of my other computers, I know that the schedulers are online because my fast computer can connect to them, but all my other computers just show 'No schedulers responded' every time. Whats going on is it something to do with this figure '100/day'(on my fastest computer) under the 'Maximum daily WU quota per CPU' and all my other computers show stuff like '1/day' and '41/day' I don't even no what 'Maximum daily WU quota per CPU' actully means. Also are SETI or BOINC going to create somekind of system that stops peoples recent avg. credit from going down when SETI has an outage because about 3 weeks ago I had more that 500 RAC!!!

Update: My completed workunits have been 'disappearing' and I have not been able to connect to the schedulers for about 2 weeks on all of my other computers, Could it be a problem at my end?


Thomas,

First of all, it's very improbable that seti is 'disabling your computers', purely because Seti@home is just a science application hosted by Boinc, and Boinc only uses, but doesn't change whatever network (internet) setup you have got.
Unfortunately, no one can even begin to help you, unless you can provide some more information, such as; how do all your computers connect to each other and the internet? Dialup? Broadband? Internet connection sharing (ICS)? Router? Network address translation (NAT) , Proxy or 'direct'? Operating system?
What numbers (default gateway, dns server, ip address, ........) does typing IPCONFIG at a command prompt give you?
Can you browse the internet properly on the affected machines?
What other connectivity tests have you done from the affected machines, Ping? Tracert? ......
Since the first of two recent DNS changes, there have been some issues with a lot of folks being unable to connect and/or transfer work, while many more others have had absolutely no trouble at all, Ian (Tigher) has done a hell of a lot of work to try and help track the problem down, and has presented the project devs with what information he has collated.
I think it's reasonable to say that somewhere along the data path there is either one or more 'bad' routers, a badly configured firewall, an overloaded server, or even a an arguement between two ISP's (de-peering), but so far I think the jury is out, on what the exact issues are.
Several people have managed to get data flowing again by setting Boinc to use a proxy, see this list, thereby bypassing the 'bad' route, If you are going to try this, ensure, that you change (where appropriate) Boincs default of port 80, because, not all proxies use port 80, for instance, purely for the sake of experimentation, one of my hosts is temporarily set to use an http proxy which connects via port 3128, and, so far it's happily communicating with seti@home, Einstein@home, LHC, and climate prediction without any hitches.

TTFN,

Ken Phillips
89) 留言板 : Number crunching : Need clarification about Proxies (消息 148179)
发表于:7 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
With the url 128.32.18.173 in the http proxy, I get these error message from the other projects

8/6/2005 12:26:21 PM|LHC@home|Scheduler request to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi failed with a return value of 404
8/6/2005 12:26:21 PM|LHC@home|No schedulers responded
8/6/2005 12:26:22 PM|LHC@home|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds


8/6/2005 12:29:53 PM|ProteinPredictorAtHome|Scheduler request to http://predictor.scripps.edu/predictor_cgi/cgi failed with a return value of 404
8/6/2005 12:29:53 PM|ProteinPredictorAtHome|No schedulers responded
8/6/2005 12:29:54 PM|ProteinPredictorAtHome|Deferring communication with project for 6 minutes and 31 seconds


8/6/2005 12:28:56 PM|Einstein@Home|Scheduler request to http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/EinsteinAtHome_cgi/cgi failed with a return value of 404
8/6/2005 12:28:56 PM|Einstein@Home|No schedulers responded
8/6/2005 12:28:57 PM|Einstein@Home|Deferring communication with project for 1 minutes and 51 seconds


I delete the 128.32.18.173 url and all is well with the other projects but Seti will not work, anyone care to enlighten me as to what is going on....

I checked the Wiki and it did not help me.....


When you are using a proxy, you must make sure that you have also entered the appropriate port number; they don't all use port 80, for instance this computer, I'm on at the moment is using a proxy server on the our lan, 192.168.0.1 port 8080, for caching and monitoring webpages, but, boinc communicates directly.
So therefore, if you going to boinc via a proxy you also have to set the correct port address in boinc.
The correct port, check this list for examples should be published along with the IP address relevant for your chosen proxy.

Hope this helps, and that they have not turned seti off while I've been typing.

Ken Phillips
90) 留言板 : Number crunching : Upload/Download problems? Please see here (消息 146989)
发表于:4 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
A bit off topic, but hopefully not too much

A thing I've noticed about all this, is that all the testing going on, is dependant on something that on most soho routers is disabled by default.
That something, is that which the designers of the internet said should always happen within a short period of time, otherwise, the internet would be slowed down.
That something is ICMP echo, in other words 'ping'. It is actually specified somewhere (I can't remember where, sorry), that any IP host, network appliance, or router, should always respond promptly to a ping.
Sadly, that is now seen to be a major security risk, but, I do often wonder just how much time is lost, with millions of legitimate ICMP requests waiting up to 1 minute to fail, that otherwise would provide rapid yes/no type information as to whether there was actually something at the other end of the wire.

If I can ping my router, then, I know it's there and working, that the kittens haven't knocked it off the shelf it lives on (or done worse with those very sharp teeth!), and that the house probably isn't on fire. I don't really care if everyone else also knows it's there, I leave that problem for the firewall to look after.

Just my 2 pennies worth :)

Ken Phillips
91) 留言板 : Number crunching : Still cant return or pick up WUs (消息 146974)
发表于:4 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:

@Mike

Is what Ian suggests above correct? You have a number of public addresses, and if one changes for any reason, then, also as suggested, windows gets upset and assumes at the next renewal, that you want an 'auto IP allocation' address in a private range, which of course then won't communicate with your other machines?

TTFN,

Ken P


Ken, I thought I had mentioned my router in my earlier post but after a quick reread, clearly I hadn't. It's a D-Link DSL-504T. It does the DHCP, DNS, Firewall stuff. All the PC's point to 10.1.1.1 for their thing and use private address in the 10.1.1.n range.
I change the DNS Server there. I also used two wholesalers DNS's because they used a differant trans-Pacific cable (ie straight across while my normal one goes via SE Asia. I thought there may have been a problem with Reach.com. But the results still came out the same.


Mike,

I understand now, with that setup, however, you should always be able to 'ping' between any of your machines by IP number, without difficulty. Even if your external IP address did change after a power cycle, this basic connectivity should never be lost.

However, name resolution for your LAN computers, as opposed to those resulting from internet lookups, is usually done using netbios, controlled by any one computer on your LAN which wins an 'election' to become the 'browse master'; this process, also should not be influenced by a change of external IP, if network (not internet!) browsing is problematic, I've often found the cause to be machines fighting over who gets to be browse master.

In the past, one of my simpler solutions, to this browse master issue, is to disable the 'computer browser' or equivalent service on all but one computer on the network, which is the one that is normally runing all the time. Then what happens, is that a more consistant tally can be kept by one you have chosen to be browse master, of which name belongs to which mac address, this problem is especially prevalent on networks with more than one operating system.

A much more sophisticated solution would be to run DNS name resolution across your local area network, using your own dedicated DNS, DHCP, which then of course would always know, who was what, where when and how.
92) 留言板 : Number crunching : Still cant return or pick up WUs (消息 146953)
发表于:4 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Bronco sent me his ethereal trace of an update to seti servers. Basically the galileo server stop responding to Bronco's client after it had sent a duplicate ack.

Why is there a duplicate ACK?

And might this break a stateful firewall along the way?...

Let us know what you find on this one!

Regards,
Martin


Martin

This was my first thought too when I saw mention of the duplicate ACK ealier today. Obviously, it shouldn't be happening, and could well be interpreted as an attack, but, is it Bronco's client that is doing the mischief, or his router, and, if the router, is the problem more common amongst users of that particular type of router.
I know Ian is valiantly trying to get to the bottom of whether it's a TCP/IP stack, OS, or client problem, so I won't tread on any toes there, but, I dare say that if it was more of a client issue, then surely a lot more people would be affected by it?

Ken Phillips

[edit]
Duh! Of course it's his host, otherwise, etherial, wouldn't show it, because, etherial is monitoring his network card.
Now, where did I put that spare brain cell?
[/edit]
93) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : STS-114: Discovery (消息 146838)
发表于:4 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Has anyone been following the repairs? I find NASA's casual attitude about the damage to the shuttle very disturbing. Yeah, just pull out the gap filler and leave the space between the tiles. I have a bad feeling about the return flight.


I too have serious worries about the shuttles return flight, especially now I know what they have just done. In lieu of other information, I can only assume that the gap filler was not just 'any old fabric', and it's there for a reason.
Might that reason be to stop white-hot gas plasma from touching thin aluminium?
In which case, bearing in mind that they have just carried out experimental repairs to isolated tiles in the cargo bay, would the materials used be adequate, for an actual 'just in case' repair?
I've just been reading about a few other 'small issues' that the shuttles heatshield is supposed to have, but, this now gap, near the nose cone (very very hot) has me extremely concerned.

Best wishes to the crew for a safe trip home, and I hope we are just worrying over nothing.

Ken Phillips
94) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : Than - then (消息 146466)
发表于:3 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Having another native language than English (Swiss German in fact), i wonder at the usage of "than" vs. "then" in this board (and others...).

Is it correct today to say "bigger then...", is it mere analphabetism or laziness?

Help, ye English speaking!

:-)= Greybeard


Barbarossa

Some some silly examples (hopefully correct).

I've not seen that usage, then again, perhaps I was not looking properly. Your recent average credit is much bigger than mine.

If that box is so much bigger than this box, [i]then[i] why is so easy to carry?

I was never very good at the 'science' of what we in britland laughingly call english, it's such a mixture of lots of other languages, that it's just crazy. I only speak it and write it, oblivious of why or how sentences work, I definitely can't explain it.

Tally ho

Ken Phillips

[edit]
Damn you Ian! Beat me to it; brilliant examples though, I didn't think of your first one. :)
[/edit]
95) 留言板 : Number crunching : Still cant return or pick up WUs (消息 146234)
发表于:2 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
OK, I'll give you the answer tomorrow (It's 11 pm local time). I'll try to find a DNS test utility for Windows because DNS servers are on my ISP's net and they probably don't answer outside (I can't believe that 10 out of 11 servers are down)

Another test done on my laptop : I'm using a canadian anonimous proxy (131.202.8.136:80) to connect. Taking it off ans trying an update gives "no sched ...". Putting it back gives an answer on the first attemp. So the original problem seems to be still there.

Thanks for your help
Jean-Marc


Jean-Marc,

Have you approached your ISP regarding this? What is their answer to this problem? I note that your associates, who also use the same ISP, are also having the same problem, is it safe to assume, that they are also up and running via a proxy?

I am inclined to agree that the issue is looking to be something other than name resolution, purely because even with accurate lookups, your packets are still not making the trip.

I can't imagine that the wanadoo and cogent de-peering from some months ago is the problem, because, one of the purposes of the recent dns switch was to move scheduler traffic off cogent, onto another link.

I'm having problems believing that packets are being blocked; unless your ISP is very draconian, why would they block traffic to the new scheduler, it doesn't make sense, but, obviously it's happening, I can only think that a router somewhere along the line has got upset, but, if you can ping the new scheduler (can you?), then even that is a duff idea.

I know Paul (The Gas Giant) had a similar problem recently (after the de-peering kaffufle), he also fixed it by using a proxy in boinc, but, he had to keep changing proxies, because each one would 'fail' after a few days. I'm not sure if he ever got it all sorted out.

I feel for you, but in all honesty, I'm totally stumped at this point, sorry.

If you ask your ISP, can you let us know what they say?

Best wishes,
Ken Phillips
96) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : It's just not funny any more... (消息 146195)
发表于:2 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Jord,

Enjoy your vacation, I'm inclined to agree with CA, when he suggests lurking, but, would you be able to contain yourself :-)

For your information, you, along with a few other notables, are someone who's posts I would always look at and value, no matter how many negatives they are hidden under.

Be good!

Ken Phillips
97) 留言板 : Number crunching : Still cant return or pick up WUs (消息 146065)
发表于:2 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
I'm less than please with BOINC. With SETI Classic, I rarely encounter the situation where work isn't available and almost immediately provided for processing. With BOINC it seems that I encounter problems getting work or finding schedulers that will respond.

Personally, I think BOINC just isn't up to the task; it isn't ready for prime time.

Nick.


I re-iterate; what work is not available?

Server status page as of 13:09 UTC today is now reading 491187 units as ready to send. I personally (to prove a point) have just reduced that number by two, with this host, which produced the following log:-

02/08/2005 14:00:06 44 request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
02/08/2005 14:00:06 43 Throughput 103221 bytes/sec
02/08/2005 14:00:06 42 Finished download of 28ap04aa.15206.28576.1034646.30
02/08/2005 14:00:01 41 Started download of 28ap04aa.15206.28576.1034646.30
02/08/2005 14:00:00 40 Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
02/08/2005 13:59:59 39 Requesting 29018 seconds of work, returning 0 results
02/08/2005 13:59:59 38 Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
02/08/2005 13:49:54 37 Deferring communication with project for 10 minutes and 4 seconds
02/08/2005 13:49:53 36 No work from project
02/08/2005 13:49:53 35 Message from server: Not sending work - last RPC too recent: 20 sec
02/08/2005 13:49:53 34 Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
02/08/2005 13:49:52 33 Requesting 32814 seconds of work, returning 0 results
02/08/2005 13:49:52 32 Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
02/08/2005 13:49:44 31 Starting result 28ap04aa.15206.28481.661080.26_2 using setiathome version 4.18
02/08/2005 13:49:44 30 request_reschedule_cpus: files downloaded
02/08/2005 13:49:44 29 Throughput 36315 bytes/sec
02/08/2005 13:49:44 28 Finished download of 28ap04aa.15206.28481.661080.26
02/08/2005 13:49:34 27 Started download of 28ap04aa.15206.28481.661080.26
02/08/2005 13:49:33 26 Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded
02/08/2005 13:49:32 25 Requesting 43200 seconds of work, returning 0 results
02/08/2005 13:49:32 24 Sending scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi
02/08/2005 13:49:31 23 request_reschedule_cpus: project op
02/08/2005 13:36:52 22 Insufficient work; requesting more
02/08/2005 13:26:53 21 request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities


So what is not working?

The only reference to 'no work from project' in the above log, is because my host broke an important rule, it cut the tcp/ip connection, then tried to re-establish it before the mandatory and strictly enforced ten minute time-out period had elapsed.

If you think you have a problem (apart from me), then post the logs, and/or the host id, and perhaps it can be sorted out.

I'm less than pleased with some thing's, but, because I can't, I leave the rectification to those that can, hopefully learning and adapting as things happen.

Sincerely,

Ken Phillips
98) 留言板 : Number crunching : Still cant return or pick up WUs (消息 146052)
发表于:2 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
Just ran out of work. Well it's time to give the computers a break till Seti decides to make more work available.

Cheers


Losi,

According to the server status pages there were 500,958 work units waiting for distribution as of about 10 minutes ago, so the project certainly isn't short of work to hand out.
Could you please let us know what messages you are getting, indicating to you that there is no work?

If you are not getting any otherwise meaningfull messages, check that you have not inadvertantly clicked the no 'new work' button on the project tab; you will know if you have, because the button will now be 'allow new work'.

Ken P.
99) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : CLOSED (消息 145621)
发表于:1 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
>:-) (-:<



That's just showing off!
100) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : CLOSED (消息 145616)
发表于:1 Aug 2005 作者: Ken Phillips m0mcw
Post:
>test of greater than
<test of less than character
[test of open square bracket
]test of close square bracket



[edit]
Anyone know how to post a less than character?
All that I can get to happen is that all the text after the character disappears!
[/edit]

[another edit]
Got it I think:-
ampersand l t semicolon = less than
ampersand g t semicolon = greater than
It doesn't seem to care about square brackets unless a real tag follows.
Wonder if this will survive a quote?
[/another edit]

[yet another edit]
Seems to survive a quote OK, cheers scarecrow for the intuitive nudge :), I briefly saw 'lt' in your post above, then thought, Ah! that looks logical (less than = lt ), then noticed that my greater than came back as 'gt' enclosed in & and a ;, and voila! Problem solved. I'll have try it next time I have to post one one real, if I can remember; the average goldfish could probably do better than me at the moment!

Bye all, for now.
[/yet another edit]


前 20 · 后面 20


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.