Bob DeWoody 的帖子

141) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1975476)
发表于:16 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I'd say that the SpaceX venture has eaten up quite a bit of Elon Musk's fortune. This latest rocket though seems a bit on the fantasy side.
142) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets (消息 1974597)
发表于:10 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I'm not in favor of the wall, but fyi it is being built between Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California and Mexico. All in north america. And I think somebody is reading more into the situation than exists. I see no indication that NASA is being permanently shut down.
143) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Can a planet tilt more than 90 degrees? (消息 1974101)
发表于:8 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
On Spaces Deepest Mysteries it was stated that Pluto is tilted 120 degrees. I always thought that 90 degrees was the maximum.
144) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1973975)
发表于:7 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
To me, commercializing the ISS is just what the doctor ordered. It would take some of the strain from the cost of operation off the various agencies that are paying the bills. If we can't keep this small station operating how in the world can it be expected to build something much larger such as the big spoked wheel in the 2001 movie.
145) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1973748)
发表于:6 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I did a lot of reading today and although I found an article claiming the Russians are making plans to convert or add to their modules at the ISS in the form of a space hotel. I also read about a plan that Obama was pushing to have the USA stop funding the ISS but that was in 2016. The new plan from the USA would have us close up shop by 2025. Also I have read that the NASA and ESA portions of the space station are for sale. The funds to maintain the ISS are supposedly draining capital from other NASA projects and, as is, the ISS is a dead end.
146) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : The wacky world of computers (消息 1972931)
发表于:1 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I bought this computer about three years ago and at that time its components were about a year out of date. I bought it with Win7 pro installed as I was advised to steer away from Win 10. I use a registry repair tool which I run about once a month. Recently the computer began behaving oddly, mainly loading programs slowly or not at all. Then I remembered that I hadn't run disc cleanup in a long time. Well I started running the program and it took a while for it to compile how much disc space needed cleaning, over 700 gigabytes. After running the disc cleaner twice and my registry cleaner again my computer seems healthy again.

What I don't understand is (a) how did my hard disc get so full and (b) why does my registry checker alway find between 50 and 100 problems to fix after waiting only a week between checks. Why does the Windows OS generate so many errors and create so many junk files.
147) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : Happy New Year (消息 1972929)
发表于:1 Jan 2019 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I'm adding my wishes to everyone for a Happy New Year.
148) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Theories on why we haven't found alien life yet (消息 1972655)
发表于:30 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
My favorite theory is that ET is actively avoiding sending any signal toward our solar system. Why? you ask. Just take a good look at what we have done to our planet.
149) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1972103)
发表于:27 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Wasn't there one time when Mission Control noticed a heat tile damaged and they did a space walk to either check or try to patch it? Maybe I'm just dreaming.

Different mission.
150) 留言板 : Cafe SETI : Having A Quiet Christmas? (消息 1971946)
发表于:25 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Merry Christmas to everyone here at Boinc.
151) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1971759)
发表于:24 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
In all cases the cause was technical limitations not human error.

Technical limitations is human error!

The prime error in both cases was external payload.

In case 1, because of external payload there was no escape system.
In case 2, because of external payload the payload was hit on ascent.

You should really read the accident investigation for the second disaster. Concludes than external payloads are inherently too dangerous. That is why after the disaster they would not launch until until a second shuttle was on the pad ready for a rescue mission, exception being to the ISS because the ISS could be used as the rescue holding place. You have forgotten all those hours of self inspection before they dared to return.

Hey, have you ever been to a winery? Have you seen the fermentation tanks? Have you seen one where they are chilling it to control the rate of fermentation? Do you remember the ice coating the tank? That tank is boiling hot compared to liquid oxygen sitting in a rocket tank. You have to insulate the tank or that same ice forms. If there is ice on a rocket tank guess what happens when you go up? Ice falls off and hits the external payload. Insulation does the same. That is why the payload has to be at the top!

If your country wants to build shuttles and kill people, go ahead, the rest of us learned the lesson.

Finally while Hubble was big, you should look up the sizes of some of the NRO birds, and the other space telescopes which launch from Atlas and Delta rockets.

As far as I recall there were no external payloads on any of the shuttle missions. There was an external fuel tank as part of the shuttle design but the fuel tank was never, as far as I recall, regarded as "payload". Payload is what a vehicle carries as cargo to pay the bills. Having the external tank and the two external boosters was never considered the ideal configuration but they were considered as acceptable risks to get the job done with the technology and funds available at that time. All shuttle payloads were carried internally in the spacious cargo hold behind the crew compartment,
152) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1971522)
发表于:22 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
If we wait until all the major problems here on earth are solved before going beyond LEO then we will still be sitting here when the big asteroid/comet hits. It is important to work on all the problems we face here on earth but that shouldn't preclude advancing into space and going beyond earth orbit. I personally think that the moon should become our orbital space station where much of the material needed to venture farther out into the solar system exists.
153) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1971280)
发表于:21 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
If China actually builds a base on the moon NASA will most likely drop everything and build a base for the western powers.
154) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Would you go? (消息 1970618)
发表于:16 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I know a scenario where I wouldn't go. If they told me I would have to teach a bunch of unruly snot nosed 7th graders math.
155) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Things left behind on the moon (消息 1970349)
发表于:14 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
That was funny.
156) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Planet Hunters Report Record-Breaking Discovery, Search for other habitable planets (消息 1970348)
发表于:14 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
Everything that is theorized about our early solar system is no more than an educated guess. Yes they are based on what is observed today out in the galaxy and some pieces of evidence found here and there, but no proof of most of what is speculated has been found. And a lot of what is currently being guessed is based on earlier guesses.
157) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Would you go? (消息 1970013)
发表于:12 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
My comment was merely a wonderment at how far off topic some threads get. Apparently I too had forgotten that the OP was about going away with ET to some other unknown (to us) world.
158) 留言板 : SETI@home Science : Would you go? (消息 1969951)
发表于:12 Dec 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
And a very good morning to you Mr Wiggo!

Americans seem to work on the basis of Jewish Tailors as in "Never mind the quality, feel the width". But in terms of size yes, the UK could fit into Texas 3 times, not that it would want to of course. But we have Garden Cities over here

United Kingdom

Garden City, Flintshire, Wales
Garden Suburb, Oldham, Greater Manchester, England
Hampstead Garden Suburb, London, England
Humberstone Garden Suburb, Leicester, England
Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire, England, designed by Ebenezer Howard, originator of the Garden City movement
Welwyn Garden City, England, designed by Ebenezer Howard

It is noted that the USA doesn't have any.

------------> Garden City

Then of course we have the world famous Kew Gardens, and The Royal Horticultural Society's garden at Wisley, Surrey. Then we have the Annual RHS Chelsea Flower show with award winning gardens.

Point made young man? :-))

And we are seriously off topic here as well!

There are numerous communities in the USA with the name Garden City. What that has to do with whether I would volunteer to go to Mars I have no idea.
159) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Space Exploration News (消息 1967344)
发表于:27 Nov 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
I watched the TV coverage live. Another great job by the team at JPL.
160) 留言板 : Science (non-SETI) : Don't know where it should go? Stick it here. (消息 1967333)
发表于:27 Nov 2018 作者: Profile Bob DeWoody
Post:
While watching programming on Mars I hear a statement about the variable tilt of Mar's axis claiming that "some models" show that Mars has tilted close to 90 degrees. Then they go on to make more claims based on that assumption. I truly wonder how much is really known about Mar's deep past and how much is assumptions based on other assumptions?


前 20 · 后面 20


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.