Posts by KWSN - MajorKong

21) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1933130)
Posted 2 May 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Knowledge Quiz

Which American President made this speech?


"We need patience and good will, but we really need to realize that there is a limit to the role and the function of government. Government cannot solve our problems, it can’t set our goals, it cannot define our vision.”


Wasn't it peanuts, (brother of Billy 'he who peed on a wall in an alley')? Never in the history of the USA has a more moral person been elected President... And peanuts, because of that, was EXTREMELY unsuited to the position.




Truly the standard by which all other presidential sibling's antics are judged, Billy burst onto the national scene as the boisterous, hard-drinking counterpoint to his pious, reserved brother

22) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1933116)
Posted 2 May 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
With 325 million people in the USA, you don't have anyone worthwhile to lead the "greatest country in the world


We have plenty... The problem is that those that are worthwhile do NOT want the job... They know better than to go swimming in that hellswamp that is D.C.
23) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1932889)
Posted 30 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Why would Pence need S.S. protection if, as the NRA would have us believe, the VP would be in the safest place possible.


Simple:

Federal law: 18 U.S. Code § 3056 - Powers, authorities, and duties of United States Secret Service
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3056

(a) Under the direction of the Secretary of Homeland Security, the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect the following persons:

(1) The President, the Vice President (or other officer next in the order of succession to the Office of President), the President-elect, and the Vice President-elect.

(2) The immediate families of those individuals listed in paragraph (1).

(3) Former Presidents and their spouses for their lifetimes, except that protection of a spouse shall terminate in the event of remarriage.

(4) Children of a former President who are under 16 years of age.

(5) Visiting heads of foreign states or foreign governments.

(6) Other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad when the President directs that such protection be provided.

(7) Major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates and, within 120 days of the general Presidential election, the spouses of such candidates. As used in this paragraph, the term “major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates” means those individuals identified as such by the Secretary of Homeland Security after consultation with an advisory committee consisting of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and one additional member selected by the other members of the committee. The Committee shall not be subject to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2).

(8) Former Vice Presidents, their spouses, and their children who are under 16 years of age, for a period of not more than six months after the date the former Vice President leaves office. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall have the authority to direct the Secret Service to provide temporary protection for any of these individuals at any time thereafter if the Secretary of Homeland Security or designee determines that information or conditions warrant such protection.

The protection authorized in paragraphs (2) through (8) may be declined.


Note: protection in (1) may NOT be declined. Pence does not, therefore, have a choice. Federal law.
24) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1932872)
Posted 30 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Read the post & report again. It refers to the NRA :-)

The NRA say's the safest places are those where all the good guy's (read NRA supporters) are armed.
So why are guns banned where and when Pence speaks?

Make a guess why private guns are banned from President and Vice President appearances.


Heh... The article says why...

The S.S. (U.S. Secret Service) doesn't allow them. Protection of the President/Vice President. And it is not just firearms...


ATTENTION: The Arena is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Secret Service during the Leadership Forum.

By entering this area, you are consenting to a search of your person and belongings. The following items are prohibited inside the Arena:

• Aerosols
• Ammunition
• Backpacks
• Bags larger than 18”x13”x7”
• Drones and other unmanned aircraft systems
• Firearms
• Glass, Thermal, or Metal Containers
• Gun Parts, Holsters, Magazines, etc
• Knives
• Laser Pointers
• Mace/Pepper Spray
• Selfie Sticks
• Signs
• Toy guns
• Weapons of any kind
• Any other item determine to be potential safety hazards

https://www.nraam.org/media/2612/am2018-secret-service-notice.pdf (This was linked in the article).
25) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1932499)
Posted 28 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
You might try to say the same about the best ball game Rugby, but there any player is free to kick the ball at any during normal play.

True, and it is more fun also.


betreger,

I would tend to agree with you on this one.

Back many years ago in college I had a friend (from Bristol, England) that lived in the same dorm as I did... He used to play every year in the intramural rugby league. It looked fun, and he used to say it was a game one needed to play while drunk (for the pain relief), but then it really wasn't my cup of tea. I much preferred to play the sport most of the rest of the world knew as football, and I thought (and still do) that 'American football' kinda sucks.
26) Message boards : Politics : I hope that this cop gets to feel the full force of the law. #4 (Message 1932026)
Posted 26 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
How about some here learn to read English?
Thank God that over 99.9999% of Law Enforcement aren't mass murdering rapists.
That doesn't mean that 99.9999% of Law Enforcement is criminal!
They who are mass murdering rapists are very criminal though.
Perhaps 0.0001% of them are.
Anyone having an idea how many they are?

.14% of 765,000 = 107,100. Not the 1100 referenced.

Appears that more than one poster has a problem with decimals :)


Clyde,

I agree with a substantial amount of what you say.

But, please... Stop arguing this arithmetic. You are... not correct.

Given the quantity 765,000:

0.14 of it is 107,100

14% of it is 107,100

0.14% of it is 1071.
27) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1931838)
Posted 25 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Without an 'unfair' advantage over the other parties under the law, the Republicans and the Democrats couldn't maintain their domination of the political party landscape. That advantage is that those two parties do not have to qualify to be on the ballots every election year... the other parties do.
In simple terms: A corrupt practice.


Yes, it is corrupt practice. I've been saying that for decades, since I left the Republican party in the mid 1980s over a combination of the above mentioned corruption and the fact that the Ds and Rs don't really stand for anything other than 'we are not them'....

An example of what I am talking about:
https://www.lp.org/libertarians-challenge-ga-ballot-access-law-federal-court/

The lawsuit, filed on Nov. 21, challenges a state requirement that any political party receiving less than 20 percent of the votes for governor or 20 percent for president in the entire country must obtain notarized signatures from 5 percent of eligible voters in the district in order to place a congressional candidate on the ballot. This requirement has never been met, by any party.




The Libertarian party is more successful in getting ballot access than any other 'minor' party. Currently 39 of the 50 States (plus D.C.) ('choice' in the above graphic means Libertarian party ballot access).

You want elections in the U.S.A. to be better? Allow ALL political parties ballot access. End the dominance of both the Ds and the Rs... Give us a meaningful choice.
28) Message boards : Politics : Russia in the 21st Century #2 (Message 1931627)
Posted 23 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Hmm and Blin...
Russian Businessman Releases 'Novichok' Line of Cooking Oil
The Novichok oil will be marketed under the motto “products for a long life,” together with a logo bearing KGB insignia.
https://themoscowtimes.com/news/russian-businessman-releases-novichok-line-cooking-oil-61227

KGB insignia.

Semechki https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsPFdxMAG6o


Ewww... sunflower oil... yuck...
29) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1931626)
Posted 23 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Lots of hot air expelled in the last year over the 'unfair' Electoral College..............but not one word regarding Dim-o-crats 'Super'Delegates and the Repugnants closed caucuses...

False equivalency, The electorial college is matter of law, the political parties are not, and are subject to the governance of their respective power structures.


Man, betreger, you can't even get your objection correct.

The electoral college is a matter of the U.S. Federal Constitution. The political parties are partly a matter of some Federal and mostly State law, and partly a matter of their own power structure.

Without an 'unfair' advantage over the other parties under the law, the Republicans and the Democrats couldn't maintain their domination of the political party landscape. That advantage is that those two parties do not have to qualify to be on the ballots every election year... the other parties do.
30) Message boards : Politics : Trade War (Message 1930909)
Posted 19 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:

Unless one wishes to live under the economic yoke of the expanding Chinese empire.

How do we stop (edit: or at least slowdown) their economic expansion and control?


Quit importing all their stuff...

Is the temporary but unavoidable economic 'hit' we would have to endure to protect our workers and our industries in the future politically possible?


Politically possible? Not the way politics is these days... And that is sad.

Everyone is too focused on the short-term, and ignoring the medium and long-term.
31) Message boards : Politics : Trade War (Message 1930898)
Posted 19 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:

Unless one wishes to live under the economic yoke of the expanding Chinese empire.

How do we stop (edit: or at least slowdown) their economic expansion and control?


Quit importing all their stuff...
32) Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)? (Message 1929686)
Posted 13 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
In states such as Texas, an undocumented migrant is not allowed to get a driver’s license. But anyone — even a member of the MS-13 gang without papers — can potentially walk into a gun show and buy a semiautomatic rifle. Organized crime groups are taking advantage of this every day.


NYT - The Other Border Problem: American Guns Going to Mexico


Nice story...
But I think it's just that.
Is this widespread (maybe 2% of the sales)? It does make a good story to sell papers to those that never have been to a "Gun Show" and don't know any better.

Do you have any explanation how 75,000 firearms initially bought in the US find there way south of the border.


Smuggling, of course.

Lots of firearms are stolen. Wind up in Mexico, and I believe Canada.

Straw purchasers buying from Federally licensed firearms dealers (especially in Arizona). Including with the help of the US Federal Government (Operation Fast & Furious back during the O'bummer Presidency).

Oh, and that opinion piece in the NYT is quite ignorant in what it says.
33) Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)? (Message 1929600)
Posted 12 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
In states such as Texas, an undocumented migrant is not allowed to get a driver’s license. But anyone — even a member of the MS-13 gang without papers — can potentially walk into a gun show and buy a semiautomatic rifle. Organized crime groups are taking advantage of this every day.


NYT - The Other Border Problem: American Guns Going to Mexico

Interesting, must be a Texas only loophole.

http://res.cloudinary.com/simpleview/image/upload/v1505838454/clients/lasvegas/LVCC_and_CC_2017_BUM_46366050-3e74-47dd-b0d3-8e4b74245826.pdf
Page 42 wrote:
Firearms (handguns, rifles, shotguns, etc.) may be legally bought and sold at gun shows in Clark County. In order to complete the sale, the Lessee must make arrangements to have a local licensed firearms dealer on property to handle transfers and conduct background checks. All firearm sales will go through this dealer.


Bat guano. It is not just Texas. Most states do not require background checks on private sales of firearms (including gun shows). Sure, some do, but most of those require it only on handguns.

As to Nevada, what you linked is rules of Las Vegas Convention Center, not Nevada law. Yes, Nevada voters passed a law to require the checks, but it is not enforceable due to a spat between the FBI and Nevada State authorities.

In December, the FBI said in a letter to state officials that Nevada could better assess applicants’ fitness themselves because records such as arrest warrants and drivers’ records are kept by the state. State legislation can’t dictate how federal resources are applied, according to the letter.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-10-02/nevada-s-background-check-for-gun-buyers-stalls-despite-voter-ok

But, even if you DO manage to close the 'gun-show' loophole nationwide, it will not stop the guns going south. Ioan Grillo's op-ed in the NYT made it very clear why it won't... in the 1st paragraph.

He never bothered paying American citizen straw buyers to purchase the weapons for him, he said.


A person buys one or more firearms from a licensed gun dealer. Background checks done. All is well.....
THEN, that person sells said firearm(s) to someone else. Legal so far....
The someone else then runs them to Mexico... <--- the illegal part.

Sorry, but there is no quick, easy, and inexpensive 'fix' to solve this problem. Stuff gets smuggled into the USA with enough frequency to supply the 'needs' of various groups (drugs for the drug addicts, etc., etc.). If stuff can be smuggled in, stuff can be smuggled out... And don't even think about any sort of prohibition. That didn't work on booze (also fueling a large expansion of organized crime), it hasn't worked on various drugs (again, fueling a large expansion of organized crime)... And so on, and so forth.
34) Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)? (Message 1929430)
Posted 11 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Add Little Britain :)


Hey! We abandoned caning in schools many years ago.

Baseball bats are more the sort of nuklear option that are only shown as a laugh on cartoons or as where not to go in dystopian films... :-(


What next?...

Where's the good sense?...

Only in the Kafkaesque Amerika?
Martin


What is wrong with baseball bats at school?


They are athletic equipment.

http://activerain.com/blogsview/80091/tahoma-high-school-baseball

Now then, if one was discussing a variation on a cricket bat, you might have a point... maybe...

35) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1929319)
Posted 11 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:

If another Dimocrat ever gets elected President again, he/she will be hamstrung, drawn and quartered and spend 24/7/365 defending BS investigations and allegations. The Dims have opened Pandora's box and the raid on Cohen's office, home, and hotel room, confiscating privileged attorney client communications is nothing less than an open declaration of war against Trump and everyone that supports his policies.

This will not go unanswered. I would suggest that appointment of another 'special prosecutor' is not out of the question. Given the same open ended mandate and budget that Mueller has but focused on the DOJ, FBI, Dim National Organization, the Clintons and where ever else it may lead. Squeeze some Dims and see how many 'lie' to investigators and charge them with same BS charges as Flynn and the other targets of Mueller.

IMHO the concept of 'blind justice' in America is dead. It's now every man/woman for themselves. We are about to become(if not already are) totally paralyzed by fear of the 'deep police state' and the gestapo that invaded Cohen's life.

The IG report on FBI mismanagement and the bias of the DOJ could be the Rubicon that spurs a house cleaning in both agencies. I can only hope, but I'm not counting on anything changing much as the sheep have been thoroughly brain laundered.


Yes,

I read a very interesting op-ed by Alan M. Dershowitz earlier today...

Now, to preface this in case you don't know, Dershowitz is a Democrat, and a H. Clinton supporter... AND a Professor Emeritus at Harvard Law School.


Dershowitz: Targeting Trump's lawyer should worry us all

...

Civil libertarians should be concerned whenever the government interferes with the lawyer-client relationship. Clients should be able to rely on confidentiality when they disclose their most intimate secrets in an effort to secure their legal rights. A highly publicized raid on the president’s lawyer will surely shake the confidence of many clients in promises of confidentiality by their lawyers. They will not necessarily understand the nuances of the confidentiality rules and their exceptions. They will see a lawyer’s office being raided and all his files seized.

I believe we would have been hearing more from civil libertarians — the American Civil Liberties Union, attorney groups and privacy advocates — if the raid had been on Hillary Clinton’s lawyer. Many civil libertarians have remained silent about potential violations of President Trump’s rights because they strongly disapprove of him and his policies. That is a serious mistake, because these violations establish precedents that lie around like loaded guns capable of being aimed at other targets.

I have been widely attacked for defending the constitutional rights of a president I voted against. In our hyperpartisan age, everyone is expected to choose a side, either for or against Trump. But the essence of civil liberties is that they must be equally applicable to all. The silence among most civil libertarians regarding the recent raid shows that we are losing that valuable neutrality.

What else does the raid tell us? It seems likely that special counsel Robert Mueller is bifurcating the investigation: He will keep control over matters relating to Russia, the campaign and any possible obstruction. But he has handed over to the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York any matters relating to Trump’s personal and business affairs. Mueller will work hand in hand with the New York prosecutors, but they will be in charge of the other matters. If they manage to find prosecutable evidence against Trump’s lawyer, they may try to squeeze him into cooperating against his client.

It is doubtful that Cohen would cooperate, even if he has anything on his client. But prosecutors often try to get lawyers to “sing” against their clients — to become “canaries” — in order to save their own feathers. Some flipped witnesses will tell prosecutors anything they want to hear in order to earn a “get out of jail free card.” They know that the “better” their story, the more leniency they will earn. So, in addition to singing, they “compose” by making up incriminating details.

I have seen this on many occasions. Mueller has already apparently flipped several witnesses, but Cohen would be his biggest catch in the unlikely event he could be induced to turn against his client. So, stay tuned to this unfolding drama, but remember that prosecutorial tactics used today against President Trump may tomorrow be used against Democrats — and even against you.
http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/382459-dershowitz-targeting-trumps-lawyer-should-worry-us-all

I agree with Dershowitz. I am by no means a Trump supporter, but the actions spurred on by the Never-Trumpers (of both parties, and then some) and others are a danger to our civil liberties.

Constitutionally, the power to investigate, impeach (indict), and try/convict/remove from office/bar from future Government service any elected or appointed Federal Government official belongs to Congress. How can someone working for the DOJ (Mueller) investigate his bosses BOSS? Let Congress do it and actually earn some of the pay we taxpayers pay them for doing their phony-baloney jobs.
36) Message boards : Politics : Another example of USA Gun Laws (or lack of...)? (Message 1929084)
Posted 9 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Known here as an accomplice which faces the same charge as the perpetrator.

But the perpetrator was the police officer...

Yes. Same as if the shop owner shoots a robber dead. Or misses and hits a bystander. If you didn't start the crime there wouldn't be a dead person.


Yep.

"felony murder rule"

Sec. 19.02. MURDER.

(a) In this section:

(1) "Adequate cause" means cause that would commonly produce a degree of anger, rage, resentment, or terror in a person of ordinary temper, sufficient to render the mind incapable of cool reflection.

(2) "Sudden passion" means passion directly caused by and arising out of provocation by the individual killed or another acting with the person killed which passion arises at the time of the offense and is not solely the result of former provocation.

(b) A person commits an offense if he:

(1) intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual;

(2) intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual; or

(3) commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.

(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a felony of the first degree.

(d) At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause. If the defendant proves the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence, the offense is a felony of the second degree.

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/PE/htm/PE.19.htm#19.02
37) Message boards : Politics : Trade War (Message 1928366)
Posted 6 Apr 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
How is China "Lawless?"



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czNcMGkOCkU
38) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1927147)
Posted 29 Mar 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
Oh my Rumpers goin to court And it isn't going to be a friendly chat like one with Mueller
https://apnews.com/a54c439f8af046cf9da54ec1ce33d8c8/Attorney-for-porn-star-seeks-to-depose-Trump-on-payment
Attorney Michael Avenatti is seeking sworn testimony from Trump and Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, about a $130,000 payment made to Daniels days before the 2016 presidential election as part of a nondisclosure agreement she is seeking to invalidate.


He is seeking... but not gonna get it yet.....


https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics/michael-avenatti-stormy-daniels-donald-trump/index.html

The case isn't far enough along for her to compel depositions yet.
39) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1927146)
Posted 29 Mar 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:
But I disagree with your use of the word 'denigrates' in the next sentence. Denigrates => 'unfairly criticize'.

Major, so you think Trump is fair?


I think it is fair for ANYONE to criticize the news media. Trump included. Other than that... He is fair on some things, and unfair on others. Just like everyone else (you and me both included).
40) Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap (Message 1927135)
Posted 29 Mar 2018 by Profile KWSN - MajorKong
Post:

A free press used to do that important function, now the alt right and Trump denigrates that function.



betreger,

Yes, I agree that the press USED to do that important function. But I disagree with your use of the word 'denigrates' in the next sentence. Denigrates => 'unfairly criticize'.

The problem is that the 'press' is highly biased nowadays.

Fox is highly biased in favor of the Republicans.

Most of the rest are biased in favor of the Democrats (some such as MSNBC highly so).

It is not that 'Trump' or some members of the 'right' have ruined the press... The press has ruined itself with its very obvious biases.

What the press needs to do is stop making excuses for Government officials (elected and appointed), and start going after ALL of them.


Previous 20 · Next 20


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.