1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Network going Down?
(Message 119015)
Posted 5 Jun 2005 by abject Post: Seems to have started uploading again (don't need more work just yet...) about an hour ago. Of course, there'll be a traffic jam for a while... Ah, and from the front page: June 4, 2005 Update: the scheduling and data servers are back on line. Service may be a bit slow for a while. |
2)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Technical News in Time Warp
(Message 112068)
Posted 17 May 2005 by abject Post: Erm... Is this a bug, or is this (and the long eerie silence on XML stats) a new (or, perhaps, the bad old) un-communications policy? |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster BOINC and SETI clients for AMD now available [for Linux]
(Message 111971)
Posted 17 May 2005 by abject Post: ... I would suggest everybody running 64bit Linux to switch over to this new seti client, it certainly rocks! Will do! My A64 3200+ is getting a serious inferiority complex! |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New faster BOINC and SETI clients for AMD now available [for Linux]
(Message 111391)
Posted 15 May 2005 by abject Post: Not to look a gift horse in the mouth or anything... but these XP clients are *so* fast, my XP2200 and XP2400 are theatening my Athlon64 3200+ !! An equally souped-up AMD64 client would be way cool! :) |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
XML Data feed snag?
(Message 111390)
Posted 15 May 2005 by abject Post: No update to S@H stats on boincstats.com for 24 hours. Is this problem back again? (Please! I'm not sucking around for the "Why we do this" lecture; I just really like to watch those stats :) |
6)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
3rd Party stats behind. Has Replica db fallen behind again?
(Message 110591)
Posted 12 May 2005 by abject Post: Solved. XML has been updated, 3rd party stats sites sucking it up. |
7)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
3rd Party stats behind. Has Replica db fallen behind again?
(Message 110477)
Posted 12 May 2005 by abject Post: See also: http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14596 http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14606 ... for additional grumbling about this in the 'Crunching forum. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
XML Data feed snag?
(Message 110344)
Posted 12 May 2005 by abject Post: Also mentioned in the Q&A Web site forum (by me :) - http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=14604 |
9)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
3rd Party stats behind. Has Replica db fallen behind again?
(Message 110341)
Posted 12 May 2005 by abject Post: "Website" looks like the best fit for this Q, sorry if I've misunderestimated... Anyway, Boincstats.com's S@H stats haven't updated for over 2 days. Is the problem on their end, or has the replica db they use (see time-warped Tech News page ;) ) fallen behind again? |
10)
Questions and Answers :
Web site :
Technical News in Time Warp
(Message 110126)
Posted 11 May 2005 by abject Post: Sometime in the past week or so, the Technical News section had a flashback to April, and now seems to be stuck there. THought you might like to know. :) |
11)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
On AMD64 - Unrecoverable error - process exited with code 127 (0x7f)
(Message 85595)
Posted 13 Mar 2005 by abject Post: > amd64-libs was wrong > > > rpm -q -l zlib > > /usr/lib/libz.so.1 > /usr/lib/libz.so.1.2.1.2 > /usr/share/doc/zlib-1.2.1.2 > /usr/share/doc/zlib-1.2.1.2/README > > > the file libz.so.1 is included in the package zlib > You were close the first time, Aki! For Debian, the "native" library is in the package zlib1g-dev. The AMD64-from-i386 version is in the AMD64-libs-dev package. But I had the native version installed at the time. Thanks, though, Aki |
12)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
On AMD64 - Unrecoverable error - process exited with code 127 (0x7f)
(Message 85489)
Posted 12 Mar 2005 by abject Post: > "setiathome_4.02_i686-pc-linux-gnu: error while loading shared libraries: > libz.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" > > i think the package you need is called amd64-libs > > > http://rpmseek.com/rpm/amd64-libs_1.1_i386.html?hl=com&cs=libz.so.1:FN:0:0:0:0:1790826 Hi again, Aki :) This is a Pure64 system (64-bit kernel and packages), so it doesn't have a amd64-libs - the libs (libstdc++, etc.) are all 64-bit. There is an IA32-libs package, which is installed. There are no nightly tarballs and the CVS sources don't come with a pre-built configure or Makefile script. The seem to need autoconf and automake, and I'm without a clue about that stuff... - Larry. |
13)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
where are the nightly tarballs?
(Message 85439)
Posted 12 Mar 2005 by abject Post: I don't know where they are either, so I just pulled from CVS. The handy command line is right there on the page - http://boinc.berkeley.edu/source_code.php As of now, it says: <p> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@alien.ssl.berkeley.edu:/home/cvs/cvsroot checkout boinc <p> for the latest version, or <p> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@alien.ssl.berkeley.edu:/home/cvs/cvsroot checkout boinc_public <p> for the latest "released" version. I can't get either to build under Debian AMD64, though :( |
14)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
On AMD64 - Unrecoverable error - process exited with code 127 (0x7f)
(Message 85428)
Posted 12 Mar 2005 by abject Post: Running Debian Unstable Pure AMD64 on an Althon64 3200. I suspect that I need to complile a seti client for AMD64, which I've flailed at for a couple of days. If so, a cry for help with that will be my next post : But, just to confirm - I've downloaded several different BOINC clients - the "standard" x86, optimized XP, optimized AMD64, etc. All start up OK, download a seti client (if necessary) and WUs. Then, the fun begins: [...] 2005-03-12 17:15:59 [SETI@home] Starting result 07ja05aa.26430.23249.348568.155_1 using setiathome version 4.02 2005-03-12 17:15:59 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 07ja05aa.26430.23249.348568.155_1 (process exited with code 127 (0x7f)) 2005-03-12 17:15:59 [SETI@home] Unrecoverable error for result 07ja05aa.26430.23249.348568.155_1 (process exited with code 127 (0x7f)) 2005-03-12 17:15:59 [SETI@home] Computation for result 07ja05aa.26430.23249.348568.155 finished [...] This is because the seti client can't work on AMD64, right? Thanks for any help. |
15)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Pentium M vs. G5
(Message 81806)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by abject Post: [...] > Ok, my question is, is this normal? The Pentium M has a higher "measured > floating point speed" while the G5 has a higher "measured integer speed" and > which is more important to SETI@Home? [...] It may have to do with the optimizations of each client's respective compiler. This will affect the credit you get for completing WUs. You'll get different results for the *same* processor (not just the same model, the same actual chip) on Windoze and Linux Boinc clients because of the differences between the compilers used on each OS. |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized BOINC clients (Version 4.19) for **Linux**
(Message 76900)
Posted 5 Feb 2005 by abject Post: Wow! Thanks! $ cat /proc/cpuinfo [...] model : 8 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+ stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1991.342 cache size : 256 KB [...] bogomips : 3964.92 Before (boinc_4.13_athlon-xp-pc-linux-gnu): [---] Benchmark results: [---] Number of CPUs: 1 [---] 1892 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU [---] 2632 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU After (boinc_4.19_athlon-xp-pc-linux-gnu): [---] Benchmark results: [---] Number of CPUs: 1 [---] 2076 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU [---] 4115 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
3 success result pending?
(Message 51407)
Posted 4 Dec 2004 by abject Post: Same here, or maybe worse. I have 57 pending WUs out there, from every month since July. As John MacLeod #7 says, it looks like the ones that didn't get 2 other matching results haven't been resent until this week. Patience. Again. |
18)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Upgraded to 4.13 client - now always
(Message 36996)
Posted 15 Oct 2004 by abject Post: I'm running 2.6.7 and a mixed Sarge/Sid. 4.09 won't upload for me, but 4.12 works fine. If I were you, I'd stick with 4.09 and wait for > 4.13 to see if they fix its problems. |
19)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Result exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
(Message 36995)
Posted 15 Oct 2004 by abject Post: What version of BOINC are you using? If it's not 4.12, upgrade or downgrade (4.13 has issues) to 4.12, is my recommendation |
20)
Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Upgraded to 4.13 client - now always
(Message 36702)
Posted 15 Oct 2004 by abject Post: 4.12 gave Winderz users problems. 4.13 for Winderz fixed thos problems. For Winderz 4.12 (linux) is working fine for me. Are you trying to solve some problem with 4.13? If not, I recommend you go back to 4.12. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.