Posts by Tim Norton

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (45) Server problems (Message 1087128)
Posted 14 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
well its dropping like a stone now as the cupboard is empty

also server status page appears to be stuck at the moment
22) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Contest III (Message 1086968)
Posted 14 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
113
23) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1084733)
Posted 7 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
Ok folks no more additions so judging time!

in third place

VW with : "The very nearly extinct Smilodon, Why is It smiling? You would be too If You'd just had brunch."

in second place

Kadaitcha_man with : "Please. Do not concern yourself...unless, of course, you can actually hear me talking to you."

and the winner is.....

James Sotherden with : "When ever my ex wife looked like that, I got scared, really really scared."

Pm being sent
24) Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA times increased to 3 hours on 570? (Message 1084725)
Posted 7 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
now you have a stable situation 3 wu at once will be fine on a 570
25) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1084580)
Posted 7 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
Hi

Just a quick note to say i will judge tonight (UK time) when back from work

some good ones already :)
26) Message boards : Number crunching : GTX295 water cooling (Message 1084130)
Posted 5 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
as they are only single spaced whats the distance between the ports on the cards

i imagine its quite short - guess sort of 20mm - 25mm - can you get a straight connector that short? (assuming they are heat sinks from the same manufacturer)

{edit} just read the other thread where you have been discussing this

as you have a few connectors have you tried a dry fit to see which if any is the correct length?
27) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Contest III (Message 1084085)
Posted 5 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
i'll have a go with 17
28) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1084060)
Posted 5 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
morning thanks for the win!

right get your chops round this one

29) Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA times increased to 3 hours on 570? (Message 1083650)
Posted 4 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
Claggy

yes it was reported as a -177 error because it ran for 2 hours or so - thats the consequence

but the cause was the driver crash making the task run long and exceed the estimate - i did not copy all the error in as its a lot of info just the indication that it was a driver exception error

the shader clock rate you highlight is read at the start of the wu run and does not change if the drivers fail part way through - possible does if you get a restart as well but it would list two sets of start up info in the stdout
30) Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA times increased to 3 hours on 570? (Message 1083572)
Posted 4 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
Couple of things

do you have your screen saver disabled? will eat cycles and generally slow you machine down

have you rebooted recently? If a nvidia card crashes or the drivers do and then they tend to de clock the card it will not return to full speed unless you reboot
not all seti wu errors cause or are a symptom of this

do you use a utility like afterburner - if so is it showing the correct speeds for the gpu/shaders/memory?

EDIT:

just looked at your error'd tasks

and basically you have had numerous driver crashes that have de clocked your card and you are seeing this as a long running task

reboot the machine and if you have recently done some oc wind it back

e.g. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1799600883

stdout
...

Multibeam x32f Preview, Cuda 3.0

Work Unit Info:
...............
WU true angle range is : 0.416002


Unhandled Exception Detected...

- Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x7C90120E

Engaging BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger...



********************


BOINC Windows Runtime Debugger Version 6.3.22


Dump Timestamp : 02/19/11 19:32:24
Install Directory : C:\Program Files\BOINC\
Data Directory : C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC
Project Symstore :
Loaded Library : C:\Program Files\BOINC\\dbghelp.dll
Loaded Library : C:\Program Files\BOINC\\symsrv.dll
Loaded Library : C:\Program Files\BOINC\\srcsrv.dll
LoadLibraryA( C:\Program Files\BOINC\\version.dll ): GetLastError = 126
Loaded Library : version.dll
Debugger Engine : 4.0.5.0
Symbol Search Path: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC\slots\10;C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\BOINC\projects\setiathome.berkeley.edu;srv*C:\DOCUME~1\Rock\LOCALS~1\Temp\symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;srv*C:\DOCUME~1\Rock\LOCALS~1\Temp\symbols*http://boinc.berkeley.edu/symstore

....

its not necessarily terminal as it could be heat, over clock or bad driver install related

i get these very occasionally on all types of card reboot usually fixes it
31) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1083441)
Posted 4 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
do you want fries with that?

or

come on! where's the wine waiter gone...
32) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1082853)
Posted 2 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
To b(ar)e or not to be(ar) that is...

Why we run so fast!
33) Message boards : Number crunching : Can a HD2900XT crunch? (Message 1082730)
Posted 1 Mar 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
3850 works with hybrid lunatics AP app fine - if slow

but quicker than the P4 its installed in!

have it on Collatz at the moment

soon to be ebay'd
34) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Contest III (Message 1082230)
Posted 28 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
1960
35) Message boards : Cafe SETI : Contest III (Message 1082215)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
1964
36) Message boards : Number crunching : Running multiple WUs on FERMI's, an avantage or too heavily dependent of AR? (Message 1082211)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
collatz does purely integer math and seti is i believe mostly/fully floating point math so essential using different parts of the gpu

but as the Fermi app for your 460 has a lot of potential optimisation to go and lunatics are working on this yes there will be improvement to come and it will be interesting to see what extra performance they can get
37) Message boards : Number crunching : Running multiple WUs on FERMI's, an avantage or too heavily dependent of AR? (Message 1082149)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:


His example while ok, Is not what I meant by mixed, I have a GTX460 on the way and I have 5 GTX295 cards, All will be water cooled of course. Here's what I should have said: I want to run 2 WU's on the 460 and 1 WU on each gpu of the older 295 hardware, I asked how to do this, But somehow It didn't take. Vypers example is of 3 cards. 2 GTX295 cards and a GTX285 card, No real difference there and He just wanted the 285 for a different project I think which is not My aim, I just want to do Seti@Home.


all you would have to do to modify Vyper's approach is join seti on both instances of boinc and have one with the 460 and the other instance with your 295 and you would have what you need
38) Message boards : Cafe SETI : BEET'S Give us a Caption #29 (Message 1082035)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:


Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer regret signing up for Top Gun II
39) Message boards : Number crunching : Running multiple WUs on FERMI's, an avantage or too heavily dependent of AR? (Message 1081959)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
LOL

it must be the translation back and forth

how about

this give an equivalent crunching run time of 6 to 6:40 minutes

just make sure everything you say is "correct" from now on as i will be watching :)
40) Message boards : Number crunching : Running multiple WUs on FERMI's, an avantage or too heavily dependent of AR? (Message 1081951)
Posted 27 Feb 2011 by Profile Tim Norton
Post:
sorry you are missing the point

its more than a 50% increase in through put

i.e. 9+ wu per hour vs. 5-6


Previous 20 · Next 20


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.