1) Message boards : Number crunching : Waiting for validation 1 (Message 37126) Posted 16 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: Very nice to see that everything has caught up :) The Waiting for validation queue now = one

2) Message boards : Number crunching : Why wont it send me work? (Message 35910) Posted 13 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: Hello NovaPaul I get this everytime I set-up a new box, it's just a matter of waiting, normally not more that 10-20 mins :)

3) Message boards : Number crunching : Anyway to rescue failed uploads? (Message 35795) Posted 13 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: Now I have installed 4.12 (without problems)is there anyway to try and rescue the failed uploads that we were having with 4.09? Thanks

4) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading fixed????....NOT! (Message 35037) Posted 11 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: October 9, 2004 A problem with file uploads has existed for the last few days. This problem causes file uploads to fail. We now understand the problem and are working on a fix - it will probably require upgrading your BOINC client. Please stay tuned.

5) Message boards : Number crunching : Good News on Results Upload issue - I've had a success! (Message 34403) Posted 9 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: Hello Ned :) This morning I seem to be doing better as well, I only have one failed upload on one box, the rest on that box have gone through ok, so I will leave it alone. Happy Crunching. [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

6) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading fixed????....NOT! (Message 34157) Posted 8 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: > Maybe they're still doing the rounds because you people have itchy trigger > fingers and reset Boinc everytime someone sneezes. > > And your solution is.................... :D If you cruch them and the server rejects them, they will still get sent out again. If you have any ideas please share them :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

7) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading fixed????....NOT! (Message 34151) Posted 8 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: Just for your Info. Reset Project this morning, downloaded new work units and still had the same problem this afternoon, so if it is buggy work units they are still doing the rounds :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

8) Message boards : Number crunching : Uploading fixed????....NOT! (Message 34012) Posted 8 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: I'm now getting this on a couple of boxes, I will try reseting the project then, of course I will need to do the workaround for the P4 HT bug as well *laugh* [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

9) Message boards : Number crunching : Using HT, Boinc hangs if last WU is processing (Message 33293) Posted 6 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: You will only get this problem if you either do a new install or get down to One Work unit, in my testing it will not make any differance if you are using XP SP1 or SP2 :) On a new install, as soon as you have one WU downloaded, the bonic client will hang, I have never waited to see if in time it sorts itself or not. I'm not moaning but I hope the Dev team are aware of this bug :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

10) Message boards : Number crunching : Using HT, Boinc hangs if last WU is processing (Message 32931) Posted 5 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: This a nasty bug, it's affecting every P4 HT I am trying to set-up now, work around = setting to one CPU, downloading work, then setting back to two cpu's. I have not run out of work yet, I am not looking forward to it either. [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

11) Questions and Answers : Windows : BOINC v4.09 problem (Message 32550) Posted 4 Oct 2004 by M@tt Post: I also had this problem with a P4 HT Change your Preferences - General - On multiprocessors, "use at most 2" processors to "use at most 1", install boinc, then download work, then change it back to use "at most 2" Worked for me :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

12) Message boards : Number crunching : Lost Preference's...??? (Message 22552) Posted 5 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: I think your right :) I love the phrase "about" every **** Days *Giggle* [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

13) Message boards : Number crunching : Lost Preference's...??? (Message 22548) Posted 5 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: Yes Gone here too. Is this new though "Connect to network about every 10 days" what does that mean? Cheers [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

14) Message boards : Number crunching : CPU BENCHMARKS RESULTS BANK (Message 22540) Posted 5 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: Dual Bartons @ 2400Mhz Measured floating point speed 2940.81 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 5205.96 million ops/sec -------------------------------------------------------- M processor 1700MHz Pentium Measured floating point speed 2062.94 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 4148.72 million ops/sec -------------------------------------------------------- M processor 1600MHz Pentium Measured floating point speed 1815.57 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 3911.56 million ops/sec -------------------------------------------------------- AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ Pentium Measured floating point speed 2676.99 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 4757.65 million ops/sec -------------------------------------------------------- Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.26GHz Pentium Measured floating point speed 1421.13 million ops/sec Measured integer speed 2850.31 million ops/sec [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

15) Message boards : Number crunching : What's a good CPU to get? (Message 22526) Posted 5 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: I'm thinking about trying a P4 so Prescott Vs Northwood I know Prescott run hot and are power hungry, but does the 1 MB of L2 cache on the Prescott help much with Seti? Does the Prescott overclock much better? Cheers Ps. My Best Cruncher is a Dual with Mobile Bartons @ 2400 Mhz, 2 Normal Work Units in 2:50 It keeps up with the Dual Xeons for a lot less money. [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

16) Message boards : Number crunching : boinc.mundayweb.com news (Message 21466) Posted 2 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: Thanks Neil, I really appreciate your stat signatures [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

17) Message boards : Number crunching : Preferences not honoring number of days (Message 21448) Posted 2 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: Agreed Ten Days is the maximum I would set. Maybe that's why you are having problems download? [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

18) Message boards : Number crunching : Top computers (Message 21000) Posted 1 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: > If boxes are identical it is possible to merge them and create what appears to > be a 'uber cruncher'. > > I have 3 dual xeons (all identical) each with about 18000 credits. If I > merged all 3 it would appear that I had one dual xeon with 54000 credits ;-) > The option does exist! > > They may be legit crunchers, however...... > > Just a thought > > Dunc Sorry cross posting, That maybe the answer then, cheers

19) Message boards : Number crunching : Top computers (Message 20999) Posted 1 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: Yes, I do know some are multiple CPU Boxes, but I'm still not convinced that any Dual even Quad Xeon could produce 146,134.02 since the beginning of the project, if they could I would get one ;) The Four Way AMD Opteron looks about correct at 30,449.04 Apologies if I'm Wrong :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

20) Message boards : Number crunching : Top computers (Message 20964) Posted 1 Sep 2004 by M@tt Post: If you look at Top computers by Total Credit http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/top_hosts.php?sort_by=total_credit I cannot understand how some of the top runners could have so much credit in the time the project has been running? I'm I missing something? :) [url=http://acidtrax.net/forum/index.php] <a>

Next 20

 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.