1) Message boards : Number crunching : Top Participants (Message 43789) Posted 7 Nov 2004 by James Doutsis Post: > James, > > Most of the stats sites sort by total credit. The berkeley pages sort by > recent average credit (RAC). If you click on the 'total credit' column on the > seti@home website, you are currently listed as #847. The BOINC projects all > base their leaderboards on RAC by default. I think the theory is to keep > people on their toes. If you accumulate massive amounts of credit but then > slow down, you will fall quickly in the ranks if they are sorted by RAC. I > think all of the stats sites sort by total credit by default since this is the > way it has always been done I guess - and it does kind of make more sense... > :) > > Thanks for the vote of confidence, Everette :) > Thanks, that has cleared it all up.

2) Message boards : Number crunching : Top Participants (Message 42417) Posted 3 Nov 2004 by James Doutsis Post: Hi all, According to 'BOINK Statistics for the WORLD', I am ranked around 870th. When going to SETI@home's Top Patricipants I can not see myself there, or anywhere in the listing for that matter. Am I missing something? If not, what stats are accurate? Regards, James

 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.