|
1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (38) Server problems
(Message 1035937)
Posted 25 Sep 2010 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: I got this message 25/09/2010 7.48.40|SETI@home|[error] Error reported by file upload server: Server is out of disk space I think this is a real problem :( |
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
losing ground
(Message 933367)
Posted 14 Sep 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: I permit to say this because is not the first time i hear it. I now the problems of the project (bandwith, data from arecibo, databases etc) but when hear after years of crunching I'm sure you can find some other hobby/project that will give you just as worthless a validation my blood temperature rise. I believe in this project and crunch for this reason. |
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
losing ground
(Message 933351)
Posted 14 Sep 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: With new WU assignments I have gone from over 3000 WU credits a month to less than 2500 & falling. Is true the goal of the project isn't pure credit collection but when i start the project was encouraged to crunch the major number of WU (rank and RAC statistics, teams, competitions etc). Today the project have enough crunchers and prestige to say "we don't need your WU is better if you go away". If this is the new spirit of the project I was very sad. |
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (19) Server problems
(Message 914364)
Posted 5 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: Thanks. |
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (19) Server problems
(Message 914341)
Posted 5 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: I get 200 of very fast (15 min) MB wu this wu have the same size of a normal and was returned fast too increasing the network traffic. why the splitter produce it? |
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (19) Server problems
(Message 914062)
Posted 4 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: Did they have A major meltdown in servers? Only a question why from 13:30 of Friday to the 8:30 of the Saturday the system work fine with a network traffic normal? Just for 20 Hours for me is very strange? |
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Where go AP wu?
(Message 913918)
Posted 4 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: Thanks |
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Where go AP wu?
(Message 913708)
Posted 3 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: Today I received 1000 MB wu (4 PC) but I receive only six 5.05 AP wu. I Set to get only AP wu but get nothing in all the day. The server status say more than 60000 AP wu was sended out in the field in the last 48 Hours
|
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (18) Server problems
(Message 913420)
Posted 2 Jul 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: The problem isn't AP is the big number of WU out to the field. The number of WU processed with the new systems like CUDA and faster multi core CPU create a very big amount of data to process. The bandwith is non enought for this kind of traffic. The number of crunchers (active users) is very high |
|
10)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Astropulse finished... I can retire now.
(Message 904394)
Posted 6 Jun 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: Is enough for me too with no AP WU's to crunch I think is time to shutdown my farm. The average RAC with MB WU's is to low (1:2,6 in my farm) my actual RAC is 21000 this mean my RAC will drop to 7-8000 credits. I'm unhappy after more than 6 years of crunching, but the electric energy used for this maybe can find a better way to be used. |
|
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
AP completed - no credit... possible Bug?
(Message 893987)
Posted 12 May 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: I got the same error with this WU 431057699 Task ID click for details Computer Sent Time reported explain Status CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit 1200444080 4805004 8 Apr 2009 21:27:07 UTC 6 May 2009 9:08:44 UTC Client detached 0.00 --- --- 1200444081 4363657 8 Apr 2009 21:26:46 UTC 9 May 2009 23:35:44 UTC Completed and validated 674,239.60 1,265.49 1,244.37 1220962853 4905408 6 May 2009 19:29:04 UTC 10 May 2009 13:23:55 UTC Completed and validated 218,477.10 1,244.37 1,244.37 1223088461 4854737 9 May 2009 8:34:51 UTC 12 May 2009 13:11:01 UTC Completed, marked as invalid 60,787.53 1,241.92 0.00 I think is a bug :( |
|
12)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Olga (Apr 02 2009)
(Message 882204)
Posted 4 Apr 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: the sah_assimilators are running, Workunits waiting for assimilation 2,331,964 at time of post... see it the queue decreases... Slowly but decreases :)
|
|
13)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (14) Server problems
(Message 881654)
Posted 2 Apr 2009 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: I get some WU but can't upload? I see the cricket graph and see abnormal traffic :( . What happend? |
|
14)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
What happen?
(Message 78028)
Posted 10 Feb 2005 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: > The validator is still falling farther and farther behind. The databse seems > to have copied okay, but they are checking EVERY little detail, an example > would be Paul A. Buck is a valid user name, but so is Paul A. Duck. The > original database has Paul A. Buck, if the copy does not then there is a > problem. When the check finishes AND it is successful, then the database will > be copied one more time and then we will be using the new machine. There is > about 40 gig of data to check and they cannot afford ANYTHING to be messed up! > It must be copied one more time because the database is constantly changing > and the current one is now newer than the one they are checking. > go to the main Boinc page and click on "server status", you will see "Waiting > for validation". When that numbers starts going down consistently then the > system will be working as it should. > Thanks |
|
15)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
What happen?
(Message 77782)
Posted 9 Feb 2005 by DPRGI - Luivul
Post: The new system is working? I have a lot of pending WU. The last news about the sytem is 6 days old. Can someone say anythin. |
©2026 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.