Posts by Blanchjoe

1) Message boards : News : SETI@home hibernation (Message 2038590)
Posted 17 Mar 2020 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Dear Tom, Thanks for the thoughts.
2) Message boards : News : SETI@home hibernation (Message 2037452)
Posted 12 Mar 2020 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Dear Crew, With the advent of the ending of SETI Data crunching my computer ( small and meager as it is ) is now free since 2002, I have been crunching continuously for 18 years. I am seeking suggestions of which one of the many BIONIC projects needs our help the most, or which has the most significance socially or scientifically? Thanks again. Blanchjoe
3) Message boards : News : Richard Lubrich has passed away. (Message 1903392)
Posted 29 Nov 2017 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
I am sorry to hear this, and thank you for sharing his passing with the SETI group.
4) Message boards : Number crunching : Is there a way to import past activity.... (Message 883775)
Posted 9 Apr 2009 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Hi Thanks for the reply!

I have always had this account so I know that all of my data is located on SETIs server, however what I am trying to do is take the results that get saved to anyone one computers hard drive and transfer that data to another computer.

Does Bionic create some sort of Data Results History file of some kind that I can copy from my other machine onto this one so that the Bionic Total and Averaging stats section could read it?

Thanks
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Is there a way to import past activity.... (Message 883699)
Posted 9 Apr 2009 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
...I am running SETI BIONIC on different computer. Is there a way to transfer or import my past work activity onto this machines HD so that I can see ALL my Stats?

Thanks!
6) Message boards : Number crunching : 90 Hours to crunch 1 task? Help! (Message 333137)
Posted 10 Jun 2006 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
The longer times, I can pretty much see, are basically the adjustment for CPU processing power advancement over the years. So for all the older CPUs, they can still run SETI@home stuff, but slower than before relative to the kind of CPU work of the here and now compared to the past.

I do believe long, long ago, I was able to run on a 486 without too much trouble. It then became a joke to run SETI@home on it. (I think it was SETI stuff, or it could have been something else. But I'm pretty sure it was SETI.)

Time changes, CPU processing power advances, software advances accordingly (or should), and all older things become proportionally slower and then, later on, completely obsolete. It's sad to hear, relative to what we have, at some point in time, but time moves on and technology advances. :-/

But if something still works, use it when and where it is still practical.

E

Hello E,

Thanks for the insight, and yes I understand your commentary all too well. I am old enought to remember a time when a machine stayed current for the better part of its functional life, however with the advent of computers a machine is viable only for a very limited perieod of time. While my 333mhz P2 is a dinasoar compared to most, it is in real terms only about ten years old, but in computer development is ancient. I use a Gateway Destination system which is acting as my television, home computer, movie player and SETI number cruncher all at once 24-7-365 on Win98 1st Version. Needless to say it has taken some bubble gum and bailing wire to keep it going over the years on a wireless DSL network, and frustrating as you can imagine, but the cost of replacing what this system does for me for something current is prohibitive at the moment. Take care and thanks! Blanchjoe
7) Message boards : Number crunching : 90 Hours to crunch 1 task? Help! (Message 333128)
Posted 10 Jun 2006 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
The longer times, I can pretty much see, are basically the adjustment for CPU processing power advancement over the years. So for all the older CPUs, they can still run SETI@home stuff, but slower than before relative to the kind of CPU work of the here and now compared to the past.

I do believe long, long ago, I was able to run on a 486 without too much trouble. It then became a joke to run SETI@home on it. (I think it was SETI stuff, or it could have been something else. But I'm pretty sure it was SETI.)

Time changes, CPU processing power advances, software advances accordingly (or should), and all older things become proportionally slower and then, later on, completely obsolete. It's sad to hear, relative to what we have, at some point in time, but time moves on and technology advances. :-/

But if something still works, use it when and where it is still practical.

E

8) Message boards : Number crunching : 90 Hours to crunch 1 task? Help! (Message 322976)
Posted 2 Jun 2006 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Thanks Pooh, Egoicly I knew I could never keep up with the mighty crunchers, but at least I felt that I could push a WU out of my poor 333 P2 in 18 hours, but now to see that it takes 70 or 90 hours is deflating needless to say. Ah me, well thanks for your insight. Blanchjoe
9) Message boards : Number crunching : 90 Hours to crunch 1 task? Help! (Message 321327)
Posted 31 May 2006 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Hello Everyone, I just recently moved to Bionic 515 and I just noticed that my last three WU took 70 and 90 hours to run? Am I reading the Bionic Manager correctly? Have the WU gotten significantly larger? Can someone let me know if this is normal. My system ran slow in the past (I was using an optimized Bionic 411) but it took no more than 16 hours to run a WU. I have Number of CPU's is 1 at 275 float point MIPS on Win98 with a 333mhz processor. Thanks! Blanchjoe
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Win98 1st Versionf and Bionic WU speed (Message 171464)
Posted 24 Sep 2005 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Hi folks, Sorry if this is a repeated question. I am running a 333mghz processor on a Win98 1st version OS with Bionic 4.19.

Would my WU completion speed increase or decrease if I go to Bionic 4.45?

It won't make any difference on your crunching time, but 4.19 does report a higher number of Claimed Credits than 4.45. This is due to a bug in the 4.19 benchmark routine.
On that same vein, does anyone have an idea what would increase my WU speed (other than buying a completely new computer (smile))?

As Landroval said, optimized clients will cut time considerably. :)
Since you have a Pentium II PC, you should run YAOSCW-O-r8.1.zip. But to be sure, run CPU-Z first.

BTW, welcome to BOINC! :D



<font color=gold>Thanks, I did go to a site that listed an Optimizer for a Intel Pentium II or older and uploaded the .zip file and followed the instructions. I have been running my first WU on my now optimized Bionic 4.19 version and it appears to have doubled my processing time. I know that this is glacial for most of you, but a normal WU processed at 17 to 21 hours per unit on this machine, but now it is running at 8 to 11 hours. I think that is wonderful. Thanks guys! Blanchoe
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Win98 1st Versionf and Bionic WU speed (Message 171423)
Posted 24 Sep 2005 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Hi folks, Sorry if this is a repeated question. I am running a 333mghz processor on a Win98 1st version OS with Bionic 4.19.

Would my WU completion speed increase or decrease if I go to Bionic 4.45?

On that same vein, does anyone have an idea what would increase my WU speed (other than buying a completely new computer (smile))?


BOINC handles the scheduling of the workunits, not the processing itself. I wouldnt' expect switching versions of BOINC to have any appreciable effect one way or the other.

Reducing competing tasks on the computer will help; so will leaving off the graphics. The biggest step you can take is switch to an optimized client if one's available for your hardware. That seems to cut processing time by 20-50%; results vary depending on hardware details.

***Thanks my friend, I am running a Pentium II so I have already left off the graphics, but I will give the optimization a try, thanks again.

Happy crunching!

12) Message boards : Number crunching : Win98 1st Versionf and Bionic WU speed (Message 171400)
Posted 24 Sep 2005 by Profile Blanchjoe
Post:
Hi folks, Sorry if this is a repeated question. I am running a 333mghz processor on a Win98 1st version OS with Bionic 4.19.

Would my WU completion speed increase or decrease if I go to Bionic 4.45?

On that same vein, does anyone have an idea what would increase my WU speed (other than buying a completely new computer (smile))?

Thanks everyone.

Blanchjoe





 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.