Posts by Instytut Dziennikarstwa

1) Message boards : Number crunching : CLOSED SETI/BOINC Milestones [ v2.0 ] - XX CLOSED (Message 977079)
Posted 10 Mar 2010 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
10th million!
2) Message boards : Number crunching : **CLOSED SETI/BOINC Milestones [ v2.0 ] - XIX CLOSED** (Message 959584)
Posted 30 Dec 2009 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Ladies and Gentlemen: I've just climbed to top 500 participants for S@H based on total credit, YAY!
3) Message boards : Number crunching : CLOSED** SETI/BOINC Milestones (tm) XVII **CLOSED (Message 903289)
Posted 3 Jun 2009 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
5th Million in SAH! Yay!
4) Message boards : Number crunching : **CLOSED SETI/BOINC Milestones (tm) XVI CLOSED** (Message 882217)
Posted 4 Apr 2009 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Overlooked my 4th million.
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Panic Mode On (12) Server problems (Message 848142)
Posted 2 Jan 2009 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Server was working from 6:04 to 7:40 CET, after that it got silent again, about 4 machines reported tasks and got new ones. Looks like network trouble to me.
6) Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA victim #1 (Message 841563)
Posted 18 Dec 2008 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
well, I don't mind the speed, I mind the completely different result for CUDA vs. non-CUDA crunch
7) Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA victim #1 (Message 841556)
Posted 18 Dec 2008 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=381019093
What the hell?
8) Message boards : Number crunching : **CLOSED SETI/BOINC Milestones (tm) XVI CLOSED** (Message 837718)
Posted 7 Dec 2008 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Finally, my 3rd million for SETI
Also, finally my own workhorse beethoven reached 800 RAC yesterday night, of which I'm very happy.
9) Message boards : Number crunching : A little joke (Message 770435)
Posted 19 Jun 2008 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Task ID = 874261455
Result ID = 278923005
Sent = 10 Jun 2008 0:47:42 UTC
Reported = 10 Jun 2008 23:30:34 UTC
State = Over
Outcome = Success
Status = Done
CPU time = 36.77
Claimed Credit = 0.08
Granted Credit = pending

Man I'm fast :D

---awwww, more coffee please, noticed MY mistake- would be funny if it was reportedon 9th though :)
10) Message boards : Number crunching : Oldest Pending Date (Message 684315)
Posted 25 Nov 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=154621326
Got and sent at September 5th
11) Message boards : Number crunching : Now I've seen everything :) (Message 684232)
Posted 25 Nov 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Well, so I have new stallions in my SETI stable: two Intel SR1530CL with two dual-core Xeons 5110 each, crunching 24/7 before they get into "production" as new Institute of Journalism server and Online Journalism major server...

But what I just saw on one's BOINC made me laugh:

Sun Nov 25 18:32:52 2007|SETI@home|Requesting 0 seconds of new work, and reporting 3 completed tasks
Sun Nov 25 18:32:57 2007|SETI@home|Scheduler RPC succeeded, got 0 tasks

Well.... had it coming :D
12) Questions and Answers : Getting started : Un-merging wrongly merged machine (Message 649848)
Posted 27 Sep 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
It seems I mistakenly merged two working and crunching machines into one. What will happen to the retired ID? Will the merged but crunching machine get a new one automatically assigned?

13) Message boards : Number crunching : Crunched uncrunchable :) (Message 634229)
Posted 5 Sep 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Verrrry interesting! Wonder what will happen on a more 'normal' WU. Keep us advised of your progress. Maybe we have another Chicken cook stewing here!

Actually it's not ChickenApp- these are unsuitable for the system I'm using (A heavily optimized system, with just a shred of Debian inside). FFTW of mine is optimized for my CPU. SAH client is "mildly" optimized ("-O4")- and that's it, usual crunch time is between 3.5 and 8 hours (for BOINC-estimated 10 hour crunch time), results here:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=2352316
Check this nice result: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=153914570
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Crunched uncrunchable :) (Message 634144)
Posted 5 Sep 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=147848688
2352316 is mine, machine-optimized app.

A joke about finishing infinite loops in one day comes to mind :D
15) Message boards : Number crunching : So, where is your RAC now (Message 634141)
Posted 5 Sep 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
My RAC yesterday climbed again to 245.00 on most powerful machine (1450 for all machines), and today starts falling down as more work arrived.
16) Message boards : Number crunching : How is THIS possible? (Optimization or cheat?) (Message 632397)
Posted 2 Sep 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Update to this: as it turns out, with machine-optimized client (DIY) the "real" crunch time of my client is comparable with Conroe now(!)- BELOW 4k secs-1.5h for 56 cobblestones unit), however... somehow the time for completion is not CPU time, but time from sending workunit to receiving result(!).

Needless to say, I'm now a little lost- or how can decrease intervals of reporting results (connecting every 0.05 day is pretty much often)?
17) Message boards : Number crunching : How is THIS possible? (Optimization or cheat?) (Message 618030)
Posted 11 Aug 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
ChickenApp 2.4 unfortunately dies painfully on my machine while 2.2-SSE2 kills the machine (unusually heavy load), so building my own and see what it will bring :)
18) Message boards : Number crunching : How is THIS possible? (Optimization or cheat?) (Message 618004)
Posted 11 Aug 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
Ah-HA! So time to switch :), Would love to squeeze some more juice from the old D :D
19) Message boards : Number crunching : How is THIS possible? (Optimization or cheat?) (Message 617987)
Posted 11 Aug 2007 by Profile Instytut Dziennikarstwa
Post:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=144812504
I understand that a Conroe is far better CPU than Presler- and that ChickenApp will give you major computational boost- but that is just incredible!
Unfortunately the result that surpassed even that has been deleted already, but I once had 88.70 cobblestones result with difference of 33k vs. 3.7k seconds CPU time- is that actually possible?

Rambo





 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.