Sorry for the long gap between reports. Since last April, my colleagues (Dan Werthimer, Eric Korpela, Jeff Cobb, Wei Liu) have done two re-observation sessions at FAST, looking at a few dozen of the top-scoring multiplets found by Nebula. So far it's been all barycentric spike/gaussian multiplets. With our remaining observing time we'll look at some pulse/triplet and autocorr multiplets, and some non-barycentric, as well.

We haven't examined the re-observation data yet, and it's unclear how we're going to do this. For barycentric multiplets I think the plan is to manually look at waterfall plots, possibly of the raw FFT data, possibly after processing by the SETI@home client (running on our own computers). For non-barycentric this isn't feasible - the frequency range is big and there's lots of RFI. I don't know; I'm out of the loop at this point.

Whether or not we find ET, there's still the matter of writing papers describing what we did, and (in the case of Nebula) giving sensitivity bounds. We had planned to write two papers, one about the front end and one about the back end (Nebula). These papers are about 80% done, but there has been no progress on them in over a year. I can't go into details. I've done everything I can to complete these papers, but I can't do it by myself.

My involvement in SETI@home has ended. I'd like to thank everyone who has participated, especially those who have read and commented on these Nebula reports. Since then, I worked for a while on PanoSETI, an optical SETI project. I've also worked on two music-related projects: Music Match and Numula. I'm also working as a contractor for IMSLP, the online classical music score library. And I continue to run the BOINC project.