Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Just watched Contact again, and it brought me here :(
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ch3W Send message Joined: 21 Nov 04 Posts: 1 Credit: 2,559,681 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I miss seti@home. It's a shame it's not running anymore, I have access to a lot of computing power these days. Wherever you are, whenever you read this, I wish you well <3 |
![]() Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 19499 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for looking in on the forums. The s@h data collection and number crunching may well have come to an end, however the analysis continues... Dr Anderson is working on his Nebula project to analyze our years of processing. That leads into a reobservation campaign to direct telescopes to check for new signals. Meanwhile, see: This hurts me as much as it hurts you Patience needed for the next update! Meanwhile meanwhile: Boinc continues with many other projects! Keep searchin'! Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 6774 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
And the same opinion, except money for nothing, perhaps. Just 20 years of crunching, and we never looked up into the sky for not any aliens we could make it either. So which answer for only making when only nature for the same when it should be the Universe? Does it tell for only lying or could it be a Fallacy for still not any results returned when it could be the JWST? Only the moderator screaming for not me on the job, it became only scrutinizing numbers in vain for nothing to validate. Only that the Universe could be open for still not any empty, and therefore relative for such a thing. So here one thing is making it a measure for only some 200-500 billion galaxies (not stars), and therefore measurability for such a thing. Becomes that of validness for still only the comparison we could make when everything is still relative. Any inception should not be a guess, but rather a wish for only expecting instead. Any Proof or provability should next be valid for the same, except that valid could only end up becoming Logic. We tried here proving the Universe for Existence next also to ourselves, except still not any Fallacy here just either. When I tried telling or perhaps explaining that both Logic and Religion could be for a given Cause, they did not take my words. Only that I was perhaps wrong for making it a scientifical God or Creator instead. You see, but the stumbling block could be any witness for only observing, except also Credibility for such a thing. Therefore that any faint heart should not be any valid result we could deliver or produce. Notice here that I do not give any mention of the biblical or Religion when still only Instantiation instead. Only that unique or uniqueness is relative to any poor for only the comparison we could make it. Those things which could be obvious could also be assumed, but here still only military pilots for their observations. So here one thing is making it a leveled Universe for each thing, where I could still take a part. Only because of still me for only existing, also an alien or E.T. for such a thing, except still having to validate. Sorry, I meant it should be the credible witness still, for not any moderator able to validate. |
![]() Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 19499 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 ![]() ![]() |
The search in itself is all an important part of the Science... Whether we find something or nothing, that in itself is an important find. And meanwhile, we have found a lot of other Science along the way... Keep searchin'! Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.