Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)

Message boards : Politics : Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 46 · 47 · 48 · 49 · 50 · 51 · 52 . . . 53 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151488 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 4:10:24 UTC - in response to Message 2151484.  

Nope... Worse than that...
A known maintenance procedure is allowed to continue unchecked...
That's on the individual A&P. If you don't know how to grind hardened steel without overheating it so it loses temper that isn't on Boeing or the FAA. And if you are an airline executive hiring A&P's who don't know basic materials science that is on you; you better spring for new parts then. Or does everything in life have to be idiot proof?
ID: 2151488 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151495 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 11:33:35 UTC - in response to Message 2151488.  

Or does everything in life have to be idiot proof?

Very much yes.

... At least so for anything life critical.

That is why we have evolved the tangle of Regulation and regulations that we have. Sweep all that away and back to the deadly old Wild West we go...


Special note: For the people doing the job of adding a new hardened coating, their focus is upon only what they are being paid for to repair the coating. They will have no cares for anything else, let alone going to any extra expense to protect the underlying structure. ... Unless protecting that structure is part of the pricing and is REQUIRED tested for...

Otherwise, not tested for: Who is to know...?


Fly safe?...
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151495 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 2117
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2151496 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 12:26:58 UTC

Positive news:

High five: Fifth 777-9 takes flight

A fifth 777-9 took off from Paine Field in Everett, Wash., on August 5 at 11:03 a.m. PDT, a sign of progress in the journey of Boeing’s new widebody airplane to certification and eventual entry into commercial service.

This marked the first time in nearly five years the team built, prepared and flew a 777-9 airplane
Boeing 777-9 Advances to Next FAA Certification Phase

The Boeing 777-9 [...] has achieved a significant milestone in its long-delayed journey toward certification. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has approved Boeing to advance to the next phase of the 777-9 certification process, marking a critical step forward for the largest twin-engine jetliner currently in production.

The FAA’s clearance allows Boeing to commence the fourth phase of the certification program, which began in July 2024. This phase, known as Type Inspection Authorization (TIA) 2C, focuses on system demonstrations to validate the aircraft’s safety, reliability, and performance under regulatory scrutiny. [...] Boeing’s test fleet, comprising four aircraft, has already logged over 1,400 flights and nearly 4,000 flight hours, including tests for crosswind handling, braking performance, and engine reliability
ID: 2151496 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151497 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 12:46:27 UTC - in response to Message 2151495.  

Special note: For the people doing the job of adding a new hardened coating, their focus is upon only what they are being paid for to repair the coating. They will have no cares for anything else, let alone going to any extra expense to protect the underlying structure. ... Unless protecting that structure is part of the pricing and is REQUIRED tested for...
It was the people tasked with removing the corrosion, the ones who need to know basic materials science, as should anyone who is an A&P. Just like the guy who makes subs to see the Titanic.

Idiots hold themselves out to be experts. How to protect from liars? (think about politics)
ID: 2151497 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151499 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 13:48:36 UTC - in response to Message 2151497.  

... It was the people tasked with removing the corrosion, the ones who need to know basic materials science...

Yes.

Their task is regarding the corrosion. As far as their pay grade is concerned, that is a world away from considering material or structural properties like "hardening" treatments... Or (inadvertently) undoing such treatments...

Which is where the Regulations come into play to head off such 'inadvertent' 'mistakes'...


Note that this problem is an identified problem covered by a voluntarily followed unenforced Air Directive...


Fly safe?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151499 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22958
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 2151501 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 15:43:21 UTC - in response to Message 2151497.  

When new these Pins have a heat treated core to give then the required structural properties, they are then "chrome" plated to give a very hard wearing skin. In service the plating is designed to wear very slowly, and after years of operation, with regular correct lubrication they can be re-worked by machining off the plating and "re-profiling" the pin to the correct shape, albeit slightly undersize and finally building up the pin to the correct dimensions by applying a slightly thicker plating.
There are two ways of removing the plating and re-profiling the pin, both involve turning in a lathe, one using a very hard tool, the other by grinding. Both have advantages and disadvantages - using the very hard tool works well, but the tooling and operation are more expensive, but there is less heat generated, grinding can be faster but it is harder to control the localised heat generation. From other incidents with pins of this type it would appear that the normal process is to grind off the plating and do the re-profiling at the same time. The final plating being done using the same process.

Now, there's a third way of doing this - metal spraying. remove the worn out chrome by the process of your choice, but to a smaller diameter. Heat it up and spray it with a machinable metal sinter, then machine it down to the correct size. This technique is used when recovering very large parts, but great care has to be taken during the heating prior to the spraying stage, you have to get the surface hot enough for the spray to stay in place, but not hot enough to destroy the heat treatment....
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 2151501 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 2117
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2151503 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 16:09:39 UTC
Last modified: 11 Sep 2025, 16:12:29 UTC

In the age of industrial mass production, how is the complex machining, that is lathing, grinding, hardening, and surface coating of individual worn parts cheaper than ordering a spare part via FedEx from a (Boeing-certified) mass manufacturer?
ID: 2151503 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22958
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 2151505 - Posted: 11 Sep 2025, 17:46:23 UTC - in response to Message 2151503.  

Buying new only works if the spare is readily available at a reasonable cost.
Otherwise there can be some quite considerable savings in re-manufacturing parts like these pins - you don't have to buy the material, do the initial machining, heat treatment, plus of course all the aerospace QC on the new material, tooling etc.
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 2151505 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151513 - Posted: 12 Sep 2025, 1:00:21 UTC - in response to Message 2151499.  

... It was the people tasked with removing the corrosion, the ones who need to know basic materials science...

Yes.
Their task is regarding the corrosion. As far as their pay grade is concerned, that is a world away from considering material or structural properties like "hardening" treatments... Or (inadvertently) undoing such treatments...

Apparently you are not aware of their pay grade. "It takes 21 to 24 months of full-time study at most aircraft mechanic schools to obtain your A&P license"

What, did you think an A&P was on par with a grease monkey at the local petrol station?

Not to say there aren't places that just teach the test and produce certified incompetence, but that is on the airline for hiring them.
ID: 2151513 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 2117
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2151574 - Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 10:43:33 UTC
Last modified: 16 Sep 2025, 10:45:36 UTC

How to remove a stranded Boeing from the only runway of a small island: (time-lapse video)

--> Westjet B737-800, Sint Maarten, Sep 7th 2025, main gear collapse on landing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rjm7TqJCN8c
ID: 2151574 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151575 - Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 12:41:45 UTC - in response to Message 2151513.  
Last modified: 16 Sep 2025, 12:42:48 UTC

... It was the people tasked with removing the corrosion, the ones who need to know basic materials science...

Yes.
Their task is regarding the corrosion. As far as their pay grade is concerned, that is a world away from considering material or structural properties like "hardening" treatments... Or (inadvertently) undoing such treatments...

... your A&P license"...

Does that training/schooling include the details of materials hardening, the pitfalls with hardening, and also the techniques to overcome management 'costs economies'?...

This particular failure has happened at least FOUR times now.

All completely potentiality deadly. So far, no one has died... So far...


As with the multiple prior failures with MCAS on the Boeing 737, do we need people to die before very obvious fixes are enforced?

Note that the Air Directive alone isn't working...


Fly safe?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151575 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151577 - Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 13:00:29 UTC - in response to Message 2151575.  

the techniques to overcome management 'costs economies'?...
who pays the rent when the order comes down?
ID: 2151577 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151578 - Posted: 16 Sep 2025, 13:12:55 UTC - in response to Message 2151577.  

the techniques to overcome management 'costs economies'?...
who pays the rent when the order comes down?

... And that is 'ok' to gamble people's lives for profit?...


Fly safe with that?!
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151578 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151587 - Posted: 17 Sep 2025, 1:01:42 UTC - in response to Message 2151578.  

the techniques to overcome management 'costs economies'?...
who pays the rent when the order comes down?

... And that is 'ok' to gamble people's lives for profit?...
There are laws against blackmail, but it doesn't stop it from being profitable.
ID: 2151587 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151605 - Posted: 17 Sep 2025, 23:36:49 UTC - in response to Message 2151587.  
Last modified: 17 Sep 2025, 23:39:41 UTC

... And that is 'ok' to gamble people's lives for profit?...
There are laws against blackmail, but it doesn't stop it from being profitable.

Well... To my mind and values, I consider this to be very much not "ok"...

However...

How can the accountants and Management not consider this latest result to be highly profitable?

See:

Boeing faces $3.1M fine for door plug blowout, hundreds of safety violations
wrote:
... fines of $3.1 million against Boeing for various safety violations related to the January 2024 door plug blowout and what the FAA called "interference with safety officials' independence."...

... "The FAA identified hundreds of quality system violations at Boeing's 737 factory in Renton, Washington, and Boeing subcontractor Spirit AeroSystems' 737 factory in Wichita, Kansas. Additionally, Boeing presented two unairworthy aircraft to the FAA for airworthiness certificates and failed to follow its quality system,"...

... a Boeing safety official faced pressure to sign off on an aircraft that did not meet standards...

... due to Boeing's failure to provide adequate training, guidance, and oversight...

... The NTSB also said the FAA's compliance and enforcement systems "were inadequate to identify repetitive and systemic discrepancies and nonconformance issues" at Boeing...

... The NTSB last year said that four bolts were missing from the Boeing 737 Max 9 when it left the factory. The plane used by Alaska Airlines was forced to make an emergency landing when the door ... blew off the aircraft in mid-flight...

... was spurred by 737 Max crashes in 2018 and 2019 in Indonesia and Ethiopia that killed a combined 346 people...



To me, that fine looks to be an insignificance.

Fly safe with that?...
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151605 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 31626
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2151607 - Posted: 18 Sep 2025, 0:44:19 UTC - in response to Message 2151605.  

To me, that fine looks to be an insignificance.
The fiduciary duty to the shareholder to maximize profit [period the end].
ID: 2151607 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 2117
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2151647 - Posted: 19 Sep 2025, 9:05:26 UTC - in response to Message 2151607.  
Last modified: 19 Sep 2025, 9:10:57 UTC

The fiduciary duty to the shareholder to maximize profit [period the end].
Of course, shareholders can still exploit this veteran, prize-winning racehorse for maximum profit. But at some point, it will simply collapse from old age.

The strategic planners and engineering teams at Airbus now have both: the time and an overwhelming amount of money at their disposal to secretly develop a new series of aircraft.

The Chinese aren't capable to at least develop (and also achieve FAA and EASA certification for) a single aisle aircraft which is competitive to A320 and B737? Are bets accepted on this?

I believe that influential shareholders like e.g. BlackRock fully understand the situation of Boeing. Large profits can be expected in the future if they enable Boeing to regain its innovative strength and production efficiency. No one, not even Airbus, could assemble aircraft as quickly as Boeing did in the past with the B737 NG, before the Max disaster.
ID: 2151647 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151731 - Posted: 23 Sep 2025, 14:35:58 UTC
Last modified: 23 Sep 2025, 14:36:23 UTC

Ok... So a faulty oxygen supply and...

First reported in 2023.

And finally, much time later through to just recently...


Airlines have argued for, and been allowed, 36 to 48 MONTHS to replace the faulty systems...

Faulty 787 Oxygen Masks! Causes The FAA To Issue Airworthiness Directive For Over 100 {Boeing} Dreamliners!


... Lots of turgid detail, but in short...

A low cost item is kicked down the aisle...


Just hope you don't suffer a depressurization, or a door blow-out?

Fly safe?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151731 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 21976
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2151732 - Posted: 23 Sep 2025, 14:38:50 UTC
Last modified: 23 Sep 2025, 14:39:01 UTC

Meanwhile...

What an expensive saga?...


The {Boeing} KC-46 Pegasus


(Includes Boeing's MCAS...)


... And still ongoing...

Fly safe with that?...
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2151732 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 2117
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2151745 - Posted: 24 Sep 2025, 7:07:11 UTC - in response to Message 2151731.  

... Lots of turgid detail, but in short...

A low cost item is kicked down the aisle...
...or rather a manufacturing or just packing issue?

...because some of the oxygen masks could be faulty and might not work.... the oxygen supply tubing for the masks could be kinked.


That doesn't sounds like a Boeing problem but just negligence of the supplier of these cheap, mass produced masks.
ID: 2151745 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 46 · 47 · 48 · 49 · 50 · 51 · 52 . . . 53 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)


 
©2026 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.