Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)

Message boards : Politics : Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2139464 - Posted: 14 Aug 2024, 17:38:52 UTC
Last modified: 14 Aug 2024, 17:39:08 UTC

Meanwhile in another expensively calamitous part of the World of Boeing:



Maximus Aviation - Is BOEING Destroying NASA? NASA Report: Defects, Delays, Unskilled Workers And BILLIONS Over Budget!
wrote:
A NASA Inspector General report on Boeing pulls no punches as Boeing is failing on every level but what's worse...



That is an unbelievably expensive Ouch!

How can such unabated unproductive random extravagance come to be?...

Fly safely on that?...


Only in the USA?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2139464 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2139468 - Posted: 14 Aug 2024, 18:09:54 UTC

For another Meanwhile...

... For yet another Boeing "Quality Escape"...

We have for your death defying pleasure:


Simple Flying - A "Quality Escape": FAA Suggests Boeing 787 Landing Gears Need To Be Inspected
wrote:
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed an airworthiness directive after the company had reported that certain 787 main landing gear inspections were not performed during the production process...



Very interesting to hear the comment in the transcript that ALL the 787 landing gear assemblies 'out in the wild' are proposed to be inspected...

The parts tracing procedures are not to be trusted?...


Fly safe? (... Right off the end of the runway on a runaway landing?)
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2139468 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22401
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 2139469 - Posted: 14 Aug 2024, 18:42:44 UTC - in response to Message 2139463.  

Such redesigns are often rolled out before the governmental reports come out, so nothing new in that.
BUT what is annoying is the short period of time between the event and the completion of the design - I thin I smell something that may have escaped from the local fish-market going on here. Did Boeing have this design sitting in the filing cabinet, but decided it was "not appropriate" (for whatever reason) to implement?
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 2139469 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30889
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2139481 - Posted: 15 Aug 2024, 0:58:39 UTC - in response to Message 2139469.  

Ah, you mean like FORD Pinto gas tank crash barrier?
ID: 2139481 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 1022
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2139493 - Posted: 15 Aug 2024, 12:21:18 UTC - in response to Message 2139463.  

Boeing is to redesign the Plug Door... AND retrofit them on all planes using them...
My recent understanding of this incident was: the plug door was decently designed and safe.

Instead it was the chaotic processes at Boeing and Spirit Aerosystems, especially when Spirit workers followed unfinished 737 hulls from Kansas into Boeing factories to fix some remaining quality issues. Somewhere in between the responsibility for safety was lost. Why to redesign a simple plug door, which was already used in hundreds of previous generation 737 NG?

Okay, Boeing suggests:

[...] design changes that would allow the doorplug to not be closed if there was any issue before being firmly secured.
Hopefully they don't talk about a "Door Characteristics Augmentation System (DCAS)", a high-tech computerized 'door locked' supervision control function that depends on a couple of expensive (and faulty) sensors, and interpolation by means of fuzzy logic and machine learning algorithms... I think Boeing should refrain from introducing more software to achieve safety.
ID: 2139493 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 1022
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2139494 - Posted: 15 Aug 2024, 12:32:04 UTC - in response to Message 2139481.  

Ah, you mean like FORD Pinto gas tank crash barrier?
You can't deny that adding the crash barrier was way more expensive than to pay for all the victims. That's why you need MBA's for decision making to prevent the engineers from burning all your money.
ID: 2139494 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2139609 - Posted: 18 Aug 2024, 22:41:14 UTC
Last modified: 18 Aug 2024, 22:41:45 UTC

The latest according to the world of Boeing:


Boeing discovered a new set of problems in its 737s, further slowing deliveries
wrote:
At Boeing, the hits just keep coming. A new electrical issue on Boeing’s 737s will take time to correct...

... uncertainty surrounding the number of aircraft affected...

... an issue with junction boxes, which are used to rout electrical cables through planes...

... identified a “nonconforming component” on three already delivered airplanes, leading to their grounding...

... production issues are starting to impact the bottom line...


NASA acknowledges it cannot quantify risk of Starliner propulsion issues
wrote:
With no consensus on the safety of the Starliner crew capsule, NASA officials said Wednesday they need another week or two before deciding whether to bring two astronauts back to Earth on Boeing's spacecraft or extend their stay on the International Space Station until next year.

Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, stricken by suspect thrusters and helium leaks, is taking up a valuable parking spot at the space station. It needs to depart the orbiting research complex, with or without its two-person crew, before the launch of SpaceX's next Dragon crew mission to the station, scheduled for September 24.

"We can juggle things and make things work if we need to extend, but it’s getting a lot harder,"...

... If NASA decides to bring Wilmore and Williams home on Starliner, Bowersox said the agency will have to accept more risk than officials originally expected. NASA officials were unable to quantify how much additional risk the thruster problem might pose to the astronauts if they rode back to Earth inside the spacecraft...


NASA watchdog warns Boeing is overbudget, behind schedule on Artemis upper rocket stage
wrote:
NASA's chief watchdog warned that the planned upgrade to NASA's Artemis Program moon rocket upper stage, being developed by Boeing, is now likely to cost $700 million more...

... In addition to the cost and time overrun, NASA's Inspector General also expressed concerns about quality control issues and a lack of responsiveness from Boeing to address problems...

... The Exploration Upper Stage was scheduled to be delivered to NASA back in early 2021. It is now projected that the development of SLS Block 1B will not be complete until 2027 (for a 2028 launch, which may still be delayed), and rise to the cost of approximately $5.7 billion - $700 million more than NASA anticipated...





How much real Science has been killed by that Boeing budget overrun?...

How much unnecessary risk has been added against life and progress?


Fly safe?...
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2139609 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2139641 - Posted: 19 Aug 2024, 22:27:44 UTC

Is Boeing going in the right direction?...


Boeing grounds 777X test fleet on failure of engine mounting structure...
wrote:
... an inspection showed the failure of a key engine mounting structure...


US FAA Adopts Safety Directive for Boeing 787 Planes Following Mid-Air Dive
wrote:
... plane went into a sudden mid-air dive that injured more than 50 passengers...

... a total of five reports of similar problems with the captain and first officer's seats on 787s, the most recent in June...



Fly safe?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2139641 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 1022
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2139651 - Posted: 20 Aug 2024, 9:07:50 UTC

The affected part is called a “thrust link,” a heavy titanium component. The thrust of the engine is transferred to the airframe through this link between the engine and where it is mounted on a pylon beneath the wings.

The thrust link is not part of the GE-9X engine that powers the airplane, but a Boeing-designed connector to the engine. This specific design is unique to the 777X.

The GE-9X is an enormous engine, weighing about 11 tons and featuring a front fan that’s more than 11 feet in diameter.

Each engine has two of these thrust links for redundancy, in case one were to fail.
Source: Boeing discovers engine part defect and grounds its 777X test airplanes
ID: 2139651 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2139822 - Posted: 24 Aug 2024, 21:29:07 UTC

There is rather a curious quote in this article:

NASA Says SpaceX Will Bring Boeing's Starliner Astronauts Back to Earth - in February wrote:
... NASA said there was a "technical disagreement" between the agency and the aerospace company, and said it evaluated risk differently than Boeing for returning its crew...



Fly safe folks?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2139822 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140114 - Posted: 1 Sep 2024, 21:00:30 UTC
Last modified: 1 Sep 2024, 21:01:16 UTC

'Just' one of those minor 'glitches' to ignore?...

The Speaker on Boeing's Starliner Spacecraft Has Started Making Strange Noises


... Just like the 'glitches' on the thrusters that were ignored to ignore a far more serious death defining problem...?

Fly safe the Boeing way?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140114 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140115 - Posted: 1 Sep 2024, 21:08:30 UTC - in response to Message 2140114.  

Note:

More seriously... Such silly niggles like that can indicate bad electrical earthing that then leads to seriously confusing failures...

As suffered in Boeing passenger airliner cockpits for the flight instruments...


Fly safe??
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140115 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140117 - Posted: 1 Sep 2024, 21:37:34 UTC

The story continues:



Inside Boeing's Factory Lapses That Led To the Alaska Air Blowout
wrote:
... Filling in for the veteran mechanic on vacation, the Trainee was perhaps the least equipped to do this atypical job. He'd been at Boeing for about 17 months, his only previous jobs being at KFC and Taco Bell. "He's just a young kid," the Door Master Lead said...



Really?

Fly safe??
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140117 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scrooge McDuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Nov 99
Posts: 1022
Credit: 1,674,173
RAC: 54
Germany
Message 2140123 - Posted: 2 Sep 2024, 9:05:26 UTC - in response to Message 2140115.  

More seriously... Such silly niggles like that can indicate bad electrical earthing that then leads to seriously confusing failures...
They still use a pure oxygen atmosphere in these spacecrafts as soon as reaching space, isn't it? I would guess solid wiring and perfect grounding would have to be the highest priority.
ID: 2140123 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140125 - Posted: 2 Sep 2024, 9:54:59 UTC - in response to Message 2140123.  

More seriously... Such silly niggles like that can indicate bad electrical earthing that then leads to seriously confusing failures...
They still use a pure oxygen atmosphere in these spacecrafts as soon as reaching space, isn't it? I would guess solid wiring and perfect grounding would have to be the highest priority.

That is a good sensible expectation...

And yet Starliner still has flammable tape wrapping some of the cable bundles together... And what else?...


The long list of calamities, and the long long overdue attempts at completion, all suggest a lack of competent thoroughness...

Management enforced haste and shortcomings coming home to suffer the bite of reality?

Human life is secondary to the Management attempts of chasing profit?...


Fly safe with that??
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140125 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30889
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2140135 - Posted: 2 Sep 2024, 15:20:13 UTC - in response to Message 2140123.  

Spacelab, MIR, Shuttle, ISS, Soyuz, Dragon - all use earth standard atmosphere. Apollo 1 changed a lot. However the Polaris mission profile is a bit different with the spacewalk and no airlock available.
ID: 2140135 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30889
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2140374 - Posted: 8 Sep 2024, 0:05:11 UTC

Starliner is down, it didn't burn up. Any data released from its trip back?
ID: 2140374 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140387 - Posted: 8 Sep 2024, 12:44:12 UTC

The recipe for disaster:


Boeing 737 Door Mechanic Was On Vacation During Assembly Of Alaska Blowout Aircraft


Really?

Life critical working? Or comedy sketch??


Fly safe?
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140387 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30889
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 2140392 - Posted: 8 Sep 2024, 13:55:22 UTC - in response to Message 2140387.  

To be fair it sounds like your place of employment, or SOP corporatized management.
ID: 2140392 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20844
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2140400 - Posted: 8 Sep 2024, 19:45:51 UTC - in response to Message 2140392.  

To be fair it sounds like your place of employment, or SOP corporatized management.

The big difference here in my example outpost, is that the only thing that gets put at risk are jobs/livelihood and production output.

... No actual LIVES, or the well being of others, are put at risk in the 'game' of being gambled for profit...



Fly safe??
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2140400 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Boeing: Profits 1st, Safety 2nd? (Part 3)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.