Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Radio or some other form of communication?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Michael Send message Joined: 21 Aug 99 Posts: 4608 Credit: 7,427,891 RAC: 18 |
Folks, "they" are out there...but by now probably aren't even using RF for comms....although those old old signals might just started arriving any day now from their long interstellar voyage.. This discussion is general in nature.....do you think ET has dropped RF for communication and now user another way? If so, what form? Light? Something sub atomic? We're so primitive probably in our own way, not sure it's good practice to focus just on RF energy. Our technology just got here and we're just babies... |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30651 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Folks, "they" are out there...but by now probably aren't even using RF for comms....although those old old signals might just started arriving any day now from their long interstellar voyage.. At present we humans know of two methods of communications. One uses electro-magnetic energy, the photon. The other uses gravity waves. We, in common usage make a distinction between RF and light, but only the frequency is different, they are both carried by photons. As for gravity waves, the power levels needed to transmit are so far off the chart, I can't actually see any civilization doing so. Remember at present we have only been able to observe multi solar mass black holes. To grab such a mass and shake it in a way to transmit is rather a wasteful use of energy which could produce a much stronger stream of photons. I'm rather sure searching for photons is the way to go. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Quantum entanglement sounds interesting. |
moomin Send message Joined: 21 Oct 17 Posts: 6204 Credit: 38,420 RAC: 0 |
Quantum entanglement sounds interesting.Yes. But it doesn't work as a better or faster way of communication then using radio waves. Just to set up such a line takes much more times than to transmit some kind of message. One could think that some aliens have for some billion years ago somehow transported entangled particles to Earth and already "communicating" with us. Sorry, that doesn't work either because you cannot eavesdrop on entangled particles... |
William Rothamel Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 3756 Credit: 1,999,735 RAC: 4 |
Don't see this as a way of communicating. Equivalent to flipping a coin. How do we change the spin of an electron and how do we keep track of it's entangled partner to even identify it. How do we send it to where we want to go. Looks to me flipping a coin makes more sense. more quantum mumbo jumbo |
Jim1348 Send message Joined: 13 Dec 01 Posts: 212 Credit: 520,150 RAC: 0 |
More to the point I think is that the power levels required to communicate over the likely distances are very great. If as I strongly suspect intelligent life evolves very rarely (and may last only a short time after it evolves), then the mean distances to the nearest sources will be large, probably on the order of a thousand light-years. (The Milky Way is about 100,000 light-years in diameter). If you have any background in RF engineering, you realize that the power levels required at that distance to produce a usable signal at a telescope the size of Green Bank is huge. That is why such telescopes are intended to study exploding stars, gas clouds, etc. that produce enormous energy outputs that dwarf anything we can do. When you scratch just a little below the surface, the SETI folks also realize that, they just don't bother to mention it very much. What they are really assuming (or hoping) is that said intelligent life will be so considerate as to set up large beacons that will radiate out huge amounts of RF energy, conveniently in our direction, over time periods of at least thousands of years to have any hope of our detecting it. Right. In fact, any intelligent civilization that lasted that long probably did so by figuring out how to hide their presence from possible invaders. They are probably the universe's experts in cloaking technology. The chances that they would jeopardize their existence just to say hello to us is not that great. I think I will use my crunching energy elsewhere. We need to keep our own civilization going. |
Rayalot72 Send message Joined: 16 Oct 19 Posts: 10 Credit: 1,294,130 RAC: 3 |
Hyperwave relay anyone? Most likely, it would be too expensive for advanced civilizations to hide themselves. There is a very real possibility that civilizations don't hang around very long, though. Earth's history involves several mass extinctions, so if SETI finds the universe to be unusually empty in the next 20-30 years, we should anticipate that we will have a limited ability to survive any significant portion of the universe's history. Philosophies:
|
John D Anthony Send message Joined: 4 Sep 15 Posts: 177 Credit: 1,303,001 RAC: 1 |
Here's a thought. We don't know what the impact of receiving a signal would have on our species. The possible reactions range from enlightenment to self-immolation and we have no reason to assume we're anything but average. If life is as abundant as we hope that means our galaxy is full of other species at varying stages of their own evolution. So let's say that we had the capability of broadcasting a signal thousands of light-years. Maybe some bit of technology we think everyone should have or simply a "we are here" announcement. Knowing there is a chance that that signal might be an extinction-level event for whoever receives it, would it not be an insanely irresponsible act to send it? Maybe the reason we hear nothing is simply because it's a really, really bad idea. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22202 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
The best "first contact" signals started to leave Earth about 100 years ago. It is not possible to decipher any message in these signals without knowing a lot about the sender, their "natural time cycle", the sort of language they use and so on. However, given a good enough receiver system it should be possible to detect those signals. Now consider the reverse.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Mr. Kevvy Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3776 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 |
Maybe the reason we hear nothing is simply because it's a really, really bad idea. It may also be that, if there is something out there that is very far advanced from us, they've decided that their "beacon" should be in the most advanced form of communication that they have, something we have yet to develop or even theorize about, so that any civilization that can detect them is similarly advanced technologically, and thus hopefully past the risk of self-immolation. But of course, we'll never know unless we listen. All the speculation we can do is never a substitute, as we really have no idea if or what we will find. |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30651 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
The universe has a speed limit for matter. We are matter. Potential invaders are matter. Even if we find a way to transform us - regular matter - into some "thing" that goes faster than the speed limit, there will need to be the inverse machine on the other end to transform the "thing" back into ordinary matter. Having to move that machine to the other place kills any scheme to go faster than the speed limit. I don't think we or they have much to worry about from an invasion standpoint. If we got a signal tomorrow, perhaps it would spur us to finally do something about our trashing of our spaceship. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.