Message boards :
Number crunching :
Flakey AMD/ATI GPUs, including RX 5700 XT, Cross Validating, polluting the Database
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 . . . 20 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Wow fast. I'm still used to running APs on a CPU in 4 hours. If that. ;-) |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
This RX 5700 seems to be producing Incorrect results with the New Driver and App, https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/results.php?hostid=89080 ???? |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22540 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Eh???? The majority of the errors are "user aborts" on both CPU & GPU, there are a couple of invalids, but they are with version 8.22, not 8.24. Meanwhile his 8.24 results all appear to be "pending". Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
TBar Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 5204 Credit: 840,779,836 RAC: 2,768 |
Look again, most of them are "Completed, validation inconclusive". Then compare the 5700 results against what his Wingman reported, https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/results.php?hostid=89080 |
StrayCat Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3 Credit: 11,701,496 RAC: 151 |
My GPU load was pretty low, below 50%. Then reading down I saw TBar's comments on CPU usage and realized I forgot to lower my CPU usage from100 when I started running tasks in Beta. I now have one core reserved for the GPU and my GPU load is much higher, between 75-99%. |
Rob Send message Joined: 7 Apr 12 Posts: 9 Credit: 951,019 RAC: 0 |
Hi, computer 89080 is me. Indeed the errors were from me being a little stupid. As I set up the BETA project after reading the need for 8.24 testers, I forgot to turn off CPU workunits and only saw 8.22 GPU ones coming in, so I thought I had misconfigured and think I hit reset I think before realizing I'd abort a whole lot of work. Sorry for the confusion this has brought up! I had received some 8.22 workunits before the 8.24 deployment was fixed so they're both in there as well. All invalids (so far at least) are restricted to 8.22. |
Mr. Kevvy Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3807 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 |
Just returned from a week of completely offline vacation, so I have a lot of catching up to do in this thread... of course I miss the most significant developments, namely new drivers and an app. to go with them. Once both are tested I can re-contact all the people who replied earlier (and perhaps even the ones who didn't) and let them know there's a solution. It's also excellent to see that some of the people I reached out to are now helping with the testing... thank you. :^) |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
I was looking at StrayCat’s results over at beta, to get an idea of relative performance. . . Is that a 1060 running SoG or on the sauce ... Stephen ?? |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
“Wow†fast? Or “Wow†Slow? . . My 1060s take about 20 mins running as singles. So definitely faster than a 1060 :) Stephen :) |
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640 |
I was comparing to cards running the SoG apps. But it looks like his issue was CPU use. So he should be crunching faster now. Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
An AP in 6m29s. I'm happy with this card. Now if only I could ever get some AP at the main project, where it counts. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Finally some non-APs, the 8.24 MBs. https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/workunit.php?wuid=12328994 35297160 89104 13 Jan 2020, 0:48:13 UTC 13 Jan 2020, 13:13:00 UTC Completed and validated 425.73 115.11 103.72 SETI@home v8 v8.24 (opencl_ati5_SoG_nocal) windows_intelx86 35297161 78473 13 Jan 2020, 1:44:00 UTC 13 Jan 2020, 5:17:11 UTC Completed and validated 997.71 979.11 103.72 SETI@home v8 v8.16 (opencl_nvidia_sah) windows_intelx86 35297162 89062 13 Jan 2020, 1:36:53 UTC 13 Jan 2020, 8:44:08 UTC Completed and validated 886.92 849.48 103.72 SETI@home v8 v8.22 (opencl_nvidia_SoG) windows_intelx86 |
Bluerazor Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 15 Credit: 3,889,427 RAC: 12 |
I went ahead and activated my RX 5700 on Beta and am letting it crunch away. AMD released another new driver revision pn 1/13, updated to the current. Initial AP workunits came up validation inconclusive, but at least it's not overflowing on MB. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22540 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Just a quick sanity check - what's the version number for the driver AMD released on Jan 13th? Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
8.24 made it to main for AMD GPUs: https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/apps.php |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Just a quick sanity check - what's the version number for the driver AMD released on Jan 13th? The original one for the Adrenaline 20.1.1 drivers that fixed the Seti overflow problem had an internal driver number of: Name: gfx1010 Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Driver version: 3004.8 (PAL,LC) when the gpu detect module reports in the Event Log startup. But I don't know what the internal driver number is for the drivers from the 13th. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Rob Send message Joined: 7 Apr 12 Posts: 9 Credit: 951,019 RAC: 0 |
Got two invalids on RX 5700 with 8.24 beta, in case it is relevant https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=35288672 https://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/result.php?resultid=35301492 Just checked, the 20.1.2 drivers do seem to still report the same OpenCL version for me. clinfo says Platform Version: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3004.8) |
Bluerazor Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 15 Credit: 3,889,427 RAC: 12 |
Just a quick sanity check - what's the version number for the driver AMD released on Jan 13th? I'm not sure which version number you're looking for. The Radeon Software version is 20.1.2. For my Windows 10 system, the software reports the following related numbers: Software Version 2020.0113.1626.29577 Driver Version 19.50.11.10-200113a-350865E-RadeonSoftwareAdrenalin2020 However I don't know where to see that "internal" version mentioned by another poster. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
The number that is reported in the Event Log at startup when the gpu detect module probes for gpu hardware. Or in the stderr.txt output of a completed task run by the 5700XT gpu and the latest AMD Adrenaline drivers 20.1.1 or greater. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Bluerazor Send message Joined: 22 May 99 Posts: 15 Credit: 3,889,427 RAC: 12 |
The number that is reported in the Event Log at startup when the gpu detect module probes for gpu hardware. Or in the stderr.txt output of a completed task run by the 5700XT gpu and the latest AMD Adrenaline drivers 20.1.1 or greater. I see it now. Same as poster "Rob", it is reporting 3004.8 with this version 20.1.2. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.