EVGA 2070 Super and Evga 660ti - what sort of performance should I get and recommended configuration?

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : EVGA 2070 Super and Evga 660ti - what sort of performance should I get and recommended configuration?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2008970 - Posted: 23 Aug 2019, 18:49:30 UTC - in response to Message 2008892.  

Hey Keith,

What are these tasks of this type: 21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218_1? My 2070 Super just seems to be bogged down by these and making zero progress on them. Not sure if this is due to the fact that for some reason I can only seem to give my GPU 0.04 of a processor no matter what I do but have a gut feeling that this has something to do with no real processing on them.

The blc* task types run at about 3 1/2 mins.
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2008970 · Report as offensive
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2008971 - Posted: 23 Aug 2019, 18:58:41 UTC - in response to Message 2008970.  

I finally figured out my bone-headed mistake on the app_config.xml setup. I forgot to show file extensions and it was saved as a .txt file. Removed that and all is good now. Showing 1 CPU and 1 GPU in use for GPU tasks now. Will monitor those 21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218_1 type tasks and see if that helps them move at all.
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2008971 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2008983 - Posted: 23 Aug 2019, 20:28:59 UTC - in response to Message 2008970.  

Hey Keith,

What are these tasks of this type: 21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218_1? My 2070 Super just seems to be bogged down by these and making zero progress on them. Not sure if this is due to the fact that for some reason I can only seem to give my GPU 0.04 of a processor no matter what I do but have a gut feeling that this has something to do with no real processing on them.

The blc* task types run at about 3 1/2 mins.

Those are standard AR Arecibo tasks. Or possibly VHAR Arecibo tasks. Notice they end with just a issue number and not .vlar
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2008983 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2008984 - Posted: 23 Aug 2019, 20:32:05 UTC - in response to Message 2008971.  

I finally figured out my bone-headed mistake on the app_config.xml setup. I forgot to show file extensions and it was saved as a .txt file. Removed that and all is good now. Showing 1 CPU and 1 GPU in use for GPU tasks now. Will monitor those 21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218_1 type tasks and see if that helps them move at all.

Common mistake when editing to save as .TXT instead of the native file extension. All tasks that you downloaded with the cpu settings being read from the app_info and before you fixed the app_config will show as the .04 cpu use. Doesn't mean they aren't being crunched that way with the fixed app_config. As long as you reread config file to pick up the new settings from app_config.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2008984 · Report as offensive
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2008990 - Posted: 23 Aug 2019, 21:58:48 UTC - in response to Message 2008984.  

Yeah, especially tweaking my fresh install of Win10. Always hate when I forget the little things.

Anyways, still have not noticed any difference in this particular task type with naming structures like: 21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218

They literally get on the 2070 and just die on the vine...making no progress. I just forced processing of when of them again through suspending/resuming various tasks to see if there was any improvement. nothing. The last time I looked at a previous task run it was like this for near 45 mins. Just not sure what is going on with these task types. The CPU version of these naming conventions run just fine.


Application
Local: setiathome_v8 8.20 (opencl_nvidia_SoG)
Name
21au19aa.32315.38600.14.41.218
State
Running
Received
8/23/2019 8:18:08 AM
Report deadline
9/12/2019 7:27:50 PM
Resources
1 CPU + 1 NVIDIA GPU
Estimated computation size
70,727 GFLOPs
CPU time
00:00:07
CPU time since checkpoint
00:00:07
Elapsed time
00:04:56
Estimated time remaining
00:21:00
Fraction done
0.005%
Virtual memory size
142.26 MB
Working set size
105.76 MB
Directory
slots/1
Process ID
15840
Executable
MB8_win_x86_SSE3_OpenCL_NV_SoG_r3557.exe
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2008990 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2009395 - Posted: 26 Aug 2019, 19:22:37 UTC

Which points the problem to be located with the gpus and likely the graphics drivers.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2009395 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2009457 - Posted: 27 Aug 2019, 1:13:25 UTC - in response to Message 2008990.  

Robert Miles is having the same problem with another VHAR species. Same Windows10 and same 436 drivers. All erroring out on time exceeded.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2009457 · Report as offensive
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2009465 - Posted: 27 Aug 2019, 2:46:11 UTC - in response to Message 2009457.  

Interesting. Well, I re-installed Boinc and the Lunatics app but still running 436.02 driver. Picked up a bunch of Cuda32 and Cuda42 GPU tasks. I am going to let this run for a few days and get to the Open_CL SOG tasks again. If I still have issues I am going to back down to the 431.60 driver and see what happens. Mucked around way too much with this today and have my tasks all jacked up. Working slowly through recovery of many of them.
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2009465 · Report as offensive
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2009502 - Posted: 27 Aug 2019, 14:20:04 UTC - in response to Message 2009465.  

I had a stuck task this morning when I woke up and checked (however running on cuda42 and not OpenCL). I downgraded to 431.60 driver and rebooted. Upon restart the tasks are again processing! Looks like it is drivers.
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2009502 · Report as offensive
timminator2

Send message
Joined: 12 Sep 99
Posts: 17
Credit: 24,031,980
RAC: 123
United States
Message 2009503 - Posted: 27 Aug 2019, 14:25:37 UTC - in response to Message 2009502.  

strange part is that these task type are running just fine with the 436.02 driver on my 660ti to it APPEARS that it may be 20 series drivers.

I also see that NVIDIA just relesae 436.15 TODAY. I am going to give that a few days before I try it on the newer rig.
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/2360850/sig.png
ID: 2009503 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 2009546 - Posted: 28 Aug 2019, 1:45:14 UTC - in response to Message 2009503.  

Huge difference in architecture between that Kepler 660 Ti and your Turing 2070. The crunching code path through each architecture is massively different.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 2009546 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : EVGA 2070 Super and Evga 660ti - what sort of performance should I get and recommended configuration?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.