Intel steps up with 28 core Xeon Processor for High-End Workstations

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel steps up with 28 core Xeon Processor for High-End Workstations
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Dr Who Fan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 01
Posts: 3208
Credit: 715,342
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1977961 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 6:39:12 UTC

https://insidehpc.com/2019/01/intel-steps-up-with-28-core-xeon-processor-for-high-end-workstations/
Today Intel announced that their new Intel Xeon W-3175X processor is now available. This unlocked 28-core workstation powerhouse is built for select, highly-threaded and computing-intensive applications such as architectural and industrial design and professional content creation.

The Intel Xeon W-3175X processor is available from system integrators that develop purpose-built desktop workstations.
Intel Xeon W-3175X Specifications:

  • Base Clock Speed (GHz): 3.1
  • Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 Maximum Single Core Turbo Frequency (GHz): 4.3
  • Cores/Threads: 28/56
  • TDP: 255W
  • Intel Smart Cache: 38.5 MB
  • Unlocked: Yes
  • Platform PCIE Lanes: Up to 68
  • Memory Support: Six Channels, DDR4-2666
  • Standard RAS Support: Yes
  • ECC Support: Yes
  • RCP Pricing (USD 1K): $2,999


ID: 1977961 · Report as offensive
J. Mileski
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 02
Posts: 632
Credit: 172,116,532
RAC: 572
United States
Message 1977973 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 9:25:35 UTC - in response to Message 1977971.  

But I bet it means yet another new socket and another new upmarket mother board. You won't upgrade an existing machine.

every time Intel brings out a new range of processors they make sure that it means a new socket, and therefore a new mother board. I think that is reprehensible and profiteering.


I believe it is an existing server socket " Socket P (LGA 3647)"
ID: 1977973 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1977974 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 9:28:02 UTC

I thought that too, but it appears to use an existing socket - the Socket 3647.....
But I bet to get full benefit of all those PICe lanes you have to go a long way up the price tree
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1977974 · Report as offensive
Profile Tom M
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Nov 02
Posts: 5124
Credit: 276,046,078
RAC: 462
Message 1977999 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 16:36:01 UTC - in response to Message 1977982.  

They are saying $3000 as the cost, I haven't seen a UK price.

But there is a UK price of £9500 for a Skylake Xeon Platinum that fits in the 3647 socket.

Xeon Platinum


Sounds like you could fund the fastest EYPC cpu and a newly announced workstation/server MB (4 full sized/full speed/doublewide slots) for that kind of money Maybe even a dual cpu version.

Tom
A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association).
ID: 1977999 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1978010 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 17:13:55 UTC - in response to Message 1977971.  

But I bet it means yet another new socket and another new upmarket mother board. You won't upgrade an existing machine.

every time Intel brings out a new range of processors they make sure that it means a new socket, and therefore a new mother board. I think that is reprehensible and profiteering.

Yes it is a new socket and only one motherboard so far that uses it. The ASUS Dominus Extreme. No price yet on the board and not released yet.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1978010 · Report as offensive
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1978017 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 19:08:18 UTC

However there are differences in Intel's own documentation for this processor - in a number of places they declare 68 PCIe lanes, but in others 48; in some places they say it uses a 771 socket, and yet in others it uses the 3647 socket.

Quite some beast, but Intel do need to sort out this sort of detail quickly.


(Just sorted out the PCIe lane issue - a number of lanes are shared between memory other devices, so it's 48 "real" that are shared all over the place a maximum of 68 "virtual".)
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1978017 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1978021 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 20:00:40 UTC - in response to Message 1978017.  
Last modified: 31 Jan 2019, 20:01:52 UTC

I just watched a couple of der8uer's YT videos on the cpu. One comment is that he really dislikes the socket with its 3647 pins. He said it is worst than a Threadripper or Epyc because the cpu has no mounting carrier like AMD. He said he never could get all 6 memory channels working. He would get 2, 3, 5, 4, 3, 2 etc. etc. every time he tried mounting the cpu in the socket. He finally just gave up with only 4 channels working to do his testing and benchmarking. It will overclock well with adequate cooling. He preceded onto delidding the cpu and overclocked on liquid nitrogen. Got close but didn't break the benchmarking record.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1978021 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 13164
Credit: 1,160,866,277
RAC: 1,873
United States
Message 1978022 - Posted: 31 Jan 2019, 20:10:08 UTC - in response to Message 1978017.  

(Just sorted out the PCIe lane issue - a number of lanes are shared between memory other devices, so it's 48 "real" that are shared all over the place a maximum of 68 "virtual".)


Yes, rather limited in PCIe lanes, at least compared to Threadripper which has 64 lanes with 4 going to the chipset so effectively only 60 to the slots.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)
ID: 1978022 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Intel steps up with 28 core Xeon Processor for High-End Workstations


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.