Message boards :
Number crunching :
NVIDIA QUADDRO 5000
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
Author | Message |
---|---|
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
If you don't actively select the SoG app on the chooser page in the Lunatics application, it will default to a CUDA app which is much slower. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
TimeLord04 Send message Joined: 9 Mar 06 Posts: 21140 Credit: 33,933,039 RAC: 23 |
With Lunatics 0.45 Beta 6 on my dad's Win 10 Pro System, (i7 7700, 16GB DDR4 CL14 Corsair Vengeance RAM, using the Integrated HD-630 GPU), with SOG - Crunching Times ARE DOWN to 37 Min or LESS... DOWN from something around 2 Hours a Unit on Lunatics 44. ymmv As the others stated, SELECT SoG from the Lunatics Installer. ;-) TL [EDIT:] AND, on a Discrete GPU 0.45 Beta 6 on SoG does MUCH better than my dad's Integrated HD-630 GPU. :-) TimeLord04 Have TARDIS, will travel... Come along K-9! Join Calm Chaos |
George 254 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 155 Credit: 16,507,264 RAC: 19 |
Dear Keith My processing times have dropped so I went back to the setup where for some reason it defaulted to the cuda 20 setting. Just to be sure let me ask about each of the setup pages: 1) AstroPulse v7...select ss3? 2) multibeam v8 SSE4.2...? 3) Astropluse v7 (CPU) SSE3 ?? 4) multibeam v8 (CPU)....?? 5) Astropulse v7 NVIDIA AP7_win_x86...?? 6) Multibeam v8 (NV - cuda) selected .....S0G_r3557 7) Astropulse v7 (Intel iGPU)...... 8) Multibeam v8 (Intel iGPU).. Bit confused as which ones to select apart from the option with .....S0G TIA George |
George 254 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 99 Posts: 155 Credit: 16,507,264 RAC: 19 |
Dear Juan/Keith Finally cracked the settings with processing times around 700 seconds. Previously made the mistake of selecting TOO many options. Just have the one now with SoG and it runs well. BTW does one need to select any Astropulse options to crunch those WUs quickly? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.