Message boards :
Number crunching :
Heavy Metal! - high cpu count
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640 |
More "Heavy Metal" :) This is the same system you posted back in Message ID 1960507 This system is on the 2nd page of the LeaderBoard and moving up. It has "only" 80 'cpus' and [4] NVIDIA Quadro P4000 (4095MB) driver: 382.59 OpenCL: 1.2's Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
More "Heavy Metal" :) Now its on the 3rd page. That must be why I didn't recognize it :) Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=8703499 If I am reading it right, this system is nearly brand new. Just started here on April 15, 2019 88 cores. A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
TimeLord04 Send message Joined: 9 Mar 06 Posts: 21140 Credit: 33,933,039 RAC: 23 |
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=8703499 Probably 44 Physical Cores/88 Threads. Most likely Dual Xeon CPUs on the MOBO to do this. If you look at my 4 Core i7 7700K @ 4.2GHz, "iMac 18,3" Hackintosh, System ID: 7952666 you'll see that BOINC is reporting 8 Cores. It's really 4 Cores/8 Threads. In fact, my curiosity made me search the Processor. E5-2699 v4 Xeon. 22 Cores/44Threads. (e-Bay: $976.89 - USED) From Dell, this thing, new, goes for $8K+ NEW, and $10.5K+ NEW Non-Dell. So, NOT for the faint-hearted! I wonder what the MOBO goes for to support two of these MONSTROSITIES!!!??? TL [EDIT:] Just looked at one of his Completed and Validated Units: Task 7700486492 Name blc25_2bit_guppi_58340_51498_HIP25486_0067.16842.409.20.29.76.vlar_1 Workunit 3485197161 Created 22 May 2019, 10:29:32 UTC Sent 22 May 2019, 16:43:41 UTC Report deadline 14 Jul 2019, 21:43:23 UTC Received 22 May 2019, 19:59:07 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x00000000) Computer ID 8703499 Run time 2 hours 50 min 2 sec CPU time 2 hours 41 min 33 sec Validate state Valid Credit 83.47 Device peak FLOPS 3.44 GFLOPS Application version SETI@home v8 v8.08 (alt) windows_x86_64 Peak working set size 87.77 MB Peak swap size 88.95 MB Peak disk usage 0.06 MB Stderr output <core_client_version>7.14.2</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> setiathome_v8 8.00 Visual Studio/Microsoft Visual C++ libboinc: 7.6.33 Work Unit Info: ............... WU true angle range is : 0.011972 Optimal function choices: -------------------------------------------------------- name timing error -------------------------------------------------------- v_BaseLineSmooth (no other) v_avxGetPowerSpectrum 0.000080 0.00000 avx_ChirpData_b 0.003074 0.00000 v_avxTranspose4x16ntw 0.001128 0.00000 AK SSE folding 0.001396 0.00000 Triplet: peak=11.38574, time=52.55, period=37.48, d_freq=7893452242.13, chirp=2.2707, fft_len=256 Pulse: peak=7.691181, time=45.99, period=19.57, d_freq=7893445943.49, score=1.041, chirp=-4.2927, fft_len=4k Pulse: peak=8.018477, time=45.99, period=19.57, d_freq=7893445942.68, score=1.085, chirp=-4.3105, fft_len=4k Spike: peak=26.73931, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.83, chirp=-15.121, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=29.0706, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.126, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=24.87879, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.81, chirp=-15.127, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=30.1932, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.131, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=26.23547, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.81, chirp=-15.132, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=29.95384, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.136, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=26.31975, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.81, chirp=-15.137, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=28.32604, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.141, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=25.10128, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.81, chirp=-15.142, fft_len=128k Spike: peak=25.45118, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.146, fft_len=128k Pulse: peak=2.195631, time=45.82, period=3.255, d_freq=7893442342.54, score=1.029, chirp=-19.301, fft_len=64 Pulse: peak=7.642792, time=45.9, period=22.31, d_freq=7893442649.67, score=1.003, chirp=-33.633, fft_len=2k Pulse: peak=9.708794, time=45.99, period=24.7, d_freq=7893450401.9, score=1.032, chirp=-33.651, fft_len=4k Pulse: peak=1.306258, time=45.84, period=1.556, d_freq=7893443961.74, score=1.043, chirp=35.052, fft_len=512 Pulse: peak=1.615052, time=45.82, period=2.116, d_freq=7893445940.08, score=1.115, chirp=37.748, fft_len=256 Pulse: peak=3.266259, time=45.86, period=6.957, d_freq=7893452347.65, score=1.003, chirp=-39.452, fft_len=1024 Pulse: peak=2.717923, time=45.86, period=5.54, d_freq=7893452672.16, score=1.031, chirp=-44.561, fft_len=1024 Pulse: peak=4.509082, time=45.86, period=9.992, d_freq=7893450871.11, score=1.016, chirp=52.153, fft_len=1024 Pulse: peak=2.715545, time=45.84, period=5.029, d_freq=7893451338.67, score=1.01, chirp=62.867, fft_len=512 Pulse: peak=4.210422, time=45.82, period=8.495, d_freq=7893451288.07, score=1.054, chirp=64.713, fft_len=128 Pulse: peak=6.498947, time=45.9, period=17.67, d_freq=7893452112.4, score=1.026, chirp=-66.451, fft_len=2k Pulse: peak=1.090146, time=45.84, period=1.325, d_freq=7893447170.98, score=1.045, chirp=81.174, fft_len=512 Triplet: peak=10.70693, time=45.54, period=16.64, d_freq=7893447424.23, chirp=-82.061, fft_len=2k Pulse: peak=6.728341, time=45.9, period=17.45, d_freq=7893452912.7, score=1.063, chirp=-94.301, fft_len=2k Pulse: peak=7.646245, time=45.9, period=18.67, d_freq=7893451475.28, score=1.01, chirp=98.133, fft_len=2k Best spike: peak=30.1932, time=85.9, d_freq=7893450051.84, chirp=-15.131, fft_len=128k Best autocorr: peak=17.12929, time=85.9, delay=1.683, d_freq=7893445500.97, chirp=-27.649, fft_len=128k Best gaussian: peak=0, mean=0, ChiSq=0, time=-2.124e+11, d_freq=0, score=-12, null_hyp=0, chirp=0, fft_len=0 Best pulse: peak=1.615052, time=45.82, period=2.116, d_freq=7893445940.08, score=1.115, chirp=37.748, fft_len=256 Best triplet: peak=11.38574, time=52.55, period=37.48, d_freq=7893452242.13, chirp=2.2707, fft_len=256 Flopcounter: 38654324279242.281250 Spike count: 10 Autocorr count: 0 Pulse count: 16 Triplet count: 2 Gaussian count: 0 12:58:30 (65224): called boinc_finish(0) </stderr_txt> ]]> TimeLord04 Have TARDIS, will travel... Come along K-9! Join Calm Chaos |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19062 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
MONSTROSITIES would be the Intel-Xeon E5-4669 v4 @ $7000 ea |
TimeLord04 Send message Joined: 9 Mar 06 Posts: 21140 Credit: 33,933,039 RAC: 23 |
MONSTROSITIES would be the Intel-Xeon E5-4669 v4 @ $7000 ea NEW FROM DELL: E5-4669 v4 $28,123.94 INSANE!!!!! TL TimeLord04 Have TARDIS, will travel... Come along K-9! Join Calm Chaos |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
Here is the first AMD (server) EYPC seti cruncher I have noticed on the LeaderBoard. Looks like he is running a Dual MB with SMT (96 cores). And a stock Linux version of Boinc. https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7186677 He is running along with a RAC of 58k+ on shear "muscle" :) Located here: https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/top_hosts.php?sort_by=expavg_credit&offset=80 Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
Thank you Moderator. Just ran across a new to me "Heavy Metal" system: https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=8819281 According to Intel https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/192437/intel-xeon-gold-6230-processor-27-5m-cache-2-10-ghz.html this is a 20c/40t cpu chip which makes it likely they are running a dual cpu motherboard (its reporting 80 cpus). Since the operator is also running [4] NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (4095MB)gpus, with Tbar's gpu app under linux, the system is cranking out a lot of RAC's. After looking at some of the processing times on the gpu tasks I have to wonder if the "-nobs" command line is being used? The wall clock time is significantly slower than the cpu time. According to "details" the system is crunching cpu tasks. I am not sure how many cpu threads are being used though. I finally fell over some CPU tasks and while one was probably a noise bomb the other two ran in less than a hour & 45 minutes with is more than brisk for a "2.10Ghz" server CPU. So welcome, welcome :) Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
He's also leaving performance on the table by not switching over to the CUDA101 app. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
He hasn't connected since Oct 10th.... so he has either re-deployed the system, something broke or he is experiencing the California wind driven power outage first hand. Ummm.... his profile is in German. I don't think he is in California :) Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Matthias said he got real busy at work and crunching had to take a backseat for a while. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
Matthias said he got real busy at work and crunching had to take a backseat for a while. Seem like he started a new host today. A single 2080Ti one. |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
I have a new build using Rome 7702P with 64 cores up and running, Nexon . With no GPU, it is producing about 120K per day. Averages more than 1 WU per minute. I plan to add a Vega20 card over the weekend. This will not be a dedicated cruncher, as I have built it for an analytics project I am working on, but I will turn it over to SETI whenever it is not being used. It runs out of work very easily. I hope that we will soon see more flexibility in max CPU work to download as core counts increase. |
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640 |
I have a new build using Rome 7702P with 64 cores up and running, Nexon . With no GPU, it is producing about 120K per day. Averages more than 1 WU per minute. I plan to add a Vega20 card over the weekend. This will not be a dedicated cruncher, as I have built it for an analytics project I am working on, but I will turn it over to SETI whenever it is not being used. I guess you have disabled SMT? Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
I have a new build using Rome 7702P with 64 cores up and running, Nexon . With no GPU, it is producing about 120K per day. Averages more than 1 WU per minute. I plan to add a Vega20 card over the weekend. This will not be a dedicated cruncher, as I have built it for an analytics project I am working on, but I will turn it over to SETI whenever it is not being used. Yes, I prefer it off for the development work I’m doing. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
That's a good question. Does BOINC simply ignore the HT cores since the count moves the host beyond 100 cores. Or do you have to disable SMT for BOINC to even work? Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
That's a good question. Does BOINC simply ignore the HT cores since the count moves the host beyond 100 cores. Or do you have to disable SMT for BOINC to even work? I ran it for a while with SMT enabled. It just ran all 100 WUs across the 128 available threads, leaving 28 unused. Doesn’t make sense to use SMT since even 36 extra WUs isn’t enough buffer. If I get a bunch of shorties, cores will be idle until work download catches up. |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
That's a good question. Does BOINC simply ignore the HT cores since the count moves the host beyond 100 cores. Or do you have to disable SMT for BOINC to even work? Does upping the number of downloads/uploads you run in parallel help that at all? I am assuming the 100 cpu tasks / system is a Boinc limit which means running other projects won't really help. I suppose you could also run non-Boinc projects... Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
Maybe I should ask to rename this thread "Heavy Mettle" and see if it generates more conversation..... :) Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22200 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
The one hundred tasks per CPU is a SETI limit, other projects will almost certainly have other limits, or no limit at all. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.