Message boards :
Number crunching :
Test thread
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 7 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Do you have automatic image re-sizing enabled for your browser?I use Firefox here with auto resizing off Grant. So i'm not sure why you don't have an issue with those oversized images then. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I think oversized images without scaling are always going to be a problem - I would argue against cropping. The question is, do you have to scroll the whole thread (which would mean that wrapped test in other posts is partially off-screen), or do you have to scroll the post containing the image only? The original massive non-wrapping url is still a problem. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Couldn't find a ruler, but found a tape measure- the different sized images do require different amounts of scrolling (just that on a large monitor the difference between 1917 & 2133 isn't that great...)The humble Windows Paint application is useful here. It will always show any image at native size unless another 'view' level is chosen manually. It also shows the pixel count in the status bar, and can be used to rescale images. It doesn't handle many formats, but the commonest photographic (.jpg) and screengrab (.png) formats are supported. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I think oversized images without scaling are always going to be a problem - I would argue against cropping. The whole thread. That's how I noticed something had changed- when posts I could read before were no longer wrapping to my browser window, and then when moving my mouse I noticed the scroll bar on the bottom of the page (I'm not a fan of auto hiding scroll bars). The large images were both posted so long ago, I can't remember if they were re-sized by the forum or cropped. I'm thinking re-sized as I don't remember the images posted by Zalster (https://i.imgur.com/hJHbHUh.png) being so large vertically (but it was 5 months ago so they may have been & it just didn't register at the time). Grant Darwin NT |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
At least one thread still has the side scroll bar at the bottom. I think it is "my computer builds and other projects". A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Anyone think of anything else we ought to test?When can we get rid of that annoying extra CR when using a quote box, so we don't have to start our answer directly at the closing tag of the previous quote? Anyone think of anything else we ought to test? Same quote but now with one CR at the end of the end-quote tag. Edit: also happens as far as I know at [code] and [list] |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
At least one thread still has the side scroll bar at the bottom. I think it is "my computer builds and other projects". If your browser isn't set to automatically re-size images it will still occur in several threads. Grant Darwin NT |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11358 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
If your browser isn't set to automatically re-size images it will still occur in several threads. I am unable to find that option on Chrome. I still suffer. |
anniet Send message Joined: 2 Feb 14 Posts: 7105 Credit: 1,577,368 RAC: 75 |
If your browser isn't set to automatically re-size images it will still occur in several threads.I do have IE11 set to automatically resize images, yet it doesn't. It used to, just not anymore. Setting my community preferences to display only a very limited number of posts is the only way I've found to limit the tedium of crawling-off 10 inches to the right, and then crawling-back... 10 inches to the left, just to continue reading a sentence because a picture, 3 posts ago or more, isn't doing what it's supposed to. And that soon stops feeling like a solution when the forums are slow. Firefox and I don't get on, but images are at least resizing in it, and they also do in a browser Avast dumped on my desktop a few weeks ago. Not sure if any of that was helpful, but I feel loads better for having my moan, so, you know... thank you for listening ;) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
If your browser isn't set to automatically re-size images it will still occur in several threads. Apparently Chrome requires the use of an addon for auto image resizing (plenty of freebies from the Chrome store). With IE, it's an option in it's settings & I prefer it off, it's just that recently on this site that setting has become an issue. The non-wrapping text issue with the pre /pre code has been sorted. To be sure it's the over sized images causing the problem & not something else, you can go to your Account, Message boards and private messages Community preferences settings, and in the Message display section select "Show images as links", Update & then Refresh the thread. If the need to scroll sideways is cleared up, then that confirms it's the large image causing the issue. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
If your browser isn't set to automatically re-size images it will still occur in several threads.I do have IE11 set to automatically resize images, yet it doesn't. It used to, just not anymore. Just tried it with my IE11 browser and it's not resizing these images either. I did try to give it a go on other sites with oversized images, but my internet has just started playing up- download speeds are less than 1/10th of my upload speeds, which are also now pretty crappy as well. Will try again later if things improve. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I did try to give it a go on other sites with oversized images, but my internet has just started playing up- download speeds are less than 1/10th of my upload speeds, which are also now pretty crappy as well. Things have improved- automatic image resizing in IE is definitely no longer functional. Tried it on other sites with oversized images, and they stayed over sized. In Edge, they're re-sized. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Apparently Chrome requires the use of an addon for auto image resizingI'm using Chrome on Windows 7: no addon, no manual setting, and last time I checked (early in this thread) images were resizing automatically. David says "I'm happy with this now. It's been on S@h for a couple of days." Are y'all happy with it too? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
David says "I'm happy with this now. It's been on S@h for a couple of days." Are y'all happy with it too? I'd be happier if thigs were as they were before- if oversized images didn't cause the need to scroll. But people shouldn't be posting post images that size anyway. My biggest concern was the need to scroll for pre /pre items, and that's been fixed. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Doesn't work with IE11 in at least the below included thread. The entire thread is killed by this post (second picture), which is extremely big (5184 X 3888):It's OK in Chrome, but 'save image as...' gives the dimensions you state - so it's being scaled. I checked the page source: This a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Line" rel="nofollow"> HighLine </a> pigeon<br /> <br /> <img hspace="8" class="img-responsive" src="https://i.imgur.com/sdHcE1V.jpg?1"> <br /> <br /> Now I'll go and repeat that test in IE. What the heck has David done this time with the board??The purpose of the change was to support users with ultra-high res screens (4K and above) who want to use high pixel counts (dpi) for text. I'm running 'full HD' (1920 x 1080 or 1920 x 1200), and 'smaller' fonts (96 dpi) - fortunately my eyes plus glasses can still cope with that. I'll have to leave it to the home cinema fans to test above that. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13720 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
The purpose of the change was to support users with ultra-high res screens (4K and above) who want to use high pixel counts (dpi) for text. I've been running a 4k monitor at 3840 * 2160 with the default text & scaling settings for months now, and hadn't noticed any issues prior to the recent changes. Grant Darwin NT |
Bernie Vine Send message Joined: 26 May 99 Posts: 9954 Credit: 103,452,613 RAC: 328 |
Doesn't work with IE11 in at least the below included thread. The entire thread is killed by this post (second picture), which is extremely big (5184 X 3888): The pictures was a mistake on my part, which had now been corrected by resizing. My apologies |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
The pictures was a mistake on my part, which had now been corrected by resizing.Arghhhhhhh... :-))) I was searching Google, and had just got as far as https://drive.google.com/open?id=1dmqMNC3FLHjKTPKiMES727jSx9Id_RbO and the image resized as I clicked off 'height: auto'. For a moment, I thought I'd cracked it - but then I couldn't get the stretch back anyhow I tried! |
Bernie Vine Send message Joined: 26 May 99 Posts: 9954 Credit: 103,452,613 RAC: 328 |
Thanks Bernie, that restored the thread to usable format. Even though some pictures posted there, does not take into consideration that so many people I still use ADSL and am not 100meg, just 65 meg download and have never had any problems with pictures here. I was away recently and was using "hotel Wi-FI" that just about managed 2meg and I have to say I didn't notice the picture threads being any slower to load. However, if it is a problem I will no long post pictures as I feel they do need at least 1100x800 (which all my usually are) to get a good picture. And yes I could post links but many may not bother to click them. Sorry to have caused a problem. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14649 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Much of the problem is the need to cater for everybody, at a time when:
|
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.