Kavanaugh

Message boards : Politics : Kavanaugh
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 12094
Credit: 6,317,865
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1958750 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 3:56:45 UTC

If Kavanaugh gets the job as the next U.S. Supreme Court Judge, does that mean the people who voted for him think Christine Blasey Ford was lying about her claim that he sexually assaulted her?

I'm not saying every allegation against someone should kill a career, but the Supreme Court judges should be held to a very high standard, and this Kavanaugh controversy would make me vote against him. There's no acceptable excuse for his actions if the sexual assault allegations against him are true, and any lingering doubt about his character would always hang over me if I voted him into such a high position of authority, which should be as squeaky clean as possible.
The mind is a weird and mysterious place
ID: 1958750 · Report as offensive
Profile SUPER NATIONALIST&SUPER PRIVILEGED I'm **in' RACIST; I'm **in' BIGOTED; I'm **in' PREJUDICED; I'm **in' JUDGEMENTAL; I **In' Have ALL dA CONSCIOUS & UNCONSCIOUS BIAS & ALL Other NASTIEs a HuWoMan Can **in' Have. ALL AGENDAs ALL dA **in' Kind of Gender
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 02
Posts: 4304
Credit: 6,353,911
RAC: 181
Russia
Message 1958757 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 5:08:23 UTC

LEFTistsHATERs DREAM of PEOPLE who Have 'DOUBLT'.

It Is Their, WEAPON of CHOICE.

Listen to the WHOLE SPEECH of dA Senator from Maine, and MOST PEOPLE will be 'LEFT' with 'NO DOUBT' 'bout da GREAT B. KAV

APEWorld is BEERsWorld

ORANG orange YAPe



ID: 1958757 · Report as offensive
Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 12094
Credit: 6,317,865
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1958758 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 5:13:57 UTC - in response to Message 1958757.  

To me, this really isn't a partisan thing. If there is doubt about a person's character, I don't think he or she should be appointed as a Supreme Court Judge.
The mind is a weird and mysterious place
ID: 1958758 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo "Democratic Socialist"
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 16553
Credit: 220,591,646
RAC: 168,606
Australia
Message 1958782 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 8:15:51 UTC - in response to Message 1958758.  

To me, this really isn't a partisan thing. If there is doubt about a person's character, I don't think he or she should be appointed as a Supreme Court Judge.
+1
ID: 1958782 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 20858
Credit: 2,886,128
RAC: 1,370
Ireland
Message 1958803 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 10:47:14 UTC

ID: 1958803 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1958831 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 14:20:00 UTC - in response to Message 1958750.  
Last modified: 6 Oct 2018, 14:20:33 UTC

If Kavanaugh gets the job as the next U.S. Supreme Court Judge, does that mean the people who voted for him think Christine Blasey Ford was lying about her claim that he sexually assaulted her?

I'm not saying every allegation against someone should kill a career, but the Supreme Court judges should be held to a very high standard, and this Kavanaugh controversy would make me vote against him. There's no acceptable excuse for his actions if the sexual assault allegations against him are true, and any lingering doubt about his character would always hang over me if I voted him into such a high position of authority, which should be as squeaky clean as possible.

I agree, but there are another issues.

#1 - Presumption of innocence.

#2 - Should any allegation(s), refuted by those who the victim named as witnesses, be considered reasonable and presumptive?

#3 - Does the emotional testimony of any accused responding to threats of violence against his wife and children and what he claims to be false allegations. Automatically disqualify him from an important office?

#4 - I personally do not share some of Kavanaugh's beliefs, especially Roe vs. Wade. But we cannot allow an attempt to destroy any nominee and his family for political reasons to be successful.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1958831 · Report as offensive
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 13436
Credit: 60,387,349
RAC: 74,592
United States
Message 1958903 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 20:49:15 UTC - in response to Message 1958831.  

ID: 1958903 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1958910 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 21:13:31 UTC - in response to Message 1958903.  
Last modified: 6 Oct 2018, 21:20:05 UTC

https://www.apnews.com/8234f0b8a6194d8b89ff79f9b0c94f35/Kavanaugh-is-confirmed:-Senate-Oks-Supreme-Court-nominee

He's IN

The vote was 50 - 48.

And now we have to live with the consequences of the despicable game the Democrats forced us to endure over the past couple of weeks.

As Harvard Law Professor Alan M. Dershowitz who likened the allegations against Kavanaugh without corroboration to that of “sexual McCarthyism".

Would Republican Senator Susan Collins and perhaps a couple of other Republican Senators have voted Yea if not for the Democrats?
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1958910 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 4776
Credit: 29,831
RAC: 37
Sweden
Message 1958924 - Posted: 6 Oct 2018, 22:29:06 UTC
Last modified: 6 Oct 2018, 22:36:57 UTC

Brett Kavanaugh is described as a very conservative official. He is a traditionalist, that is, for a literary interpretation of the United States Constitution from 1789.
So nothing has changed in 229 years in the US when it comes to laws?
No needs for amendments?
For all I know languages and their meanings change over time.
229 years is a long time.
ID: 1958924 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1958958 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 0:29:17 UTC - in response to Message 1958924.  

Brett Kavanaugh is described as a very conservative official. He is a traditionalist, that is, for a literary interpretation of the United States Constitution from 1789.
So nothing has changed in 229 years in the US when it comes to laws?
No needs for amendments?
For all I know languages and their meanings change over time.
229 years is a long time.

Belief in Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association and other Individual Freedoms predate the US Constitution.

Yes, Kavanaugh believes these are 'Literal Interpretations'. Not to be 'Interpreted', nor changed, by the Passions of the Day.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1958958 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 4776
Credit: 29,831
RAC: 37
Sweden
Message 1958963 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 0:44:36 UTC - in response to Message 1958958.  

Conservatives think that the text should be interpreted strictly, the Liberal believes that current circumstances should also be included, which is of great importance when deciding on issues such as LGBT rights or religious freedom.
In 1789 there where no LGBT rights or religious freedom in the USA.
ID: 1958963 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1958969 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 0:57:50 UTC - in response to Message 1958963.  
Last modified: 7 Oct 2018, 0:59:00 UTC

Conservatives think that the text should be interpreted strictly, the Liberal believes that current circumstances should also be included, which is of great importance when deciding on issues such as LGBT rights or religious freedom.
In 1789 there where no LGBT rights or religious freedom in the USA.

Correct. We have included more and more regarding Individual Rights.

We have never, excepting Alcohol Probation, reduced any Individual Rights because of the Passions of the Day.

These Rights, enumerated in 1789, are fundamental to our liberty. They are neither 'old' nor obsolete.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1958969 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 9336
Credit: 24,599,576
RAC: 20,778
United States
Message 1958974 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 1:12:22 UTC - in response to Message 1958969.  

We have never, excepting Alcohol Probation, reduced any Individual Rights because of the Passions of the Day.

Tobacco, helmets for cyclists, seat belts in cars, drugs, I disagree.
Frankly I do agree with these restrictions.
ID: 1958974 · Report as offensive
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2339
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1958975 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 1:12:52 UTC
Last modified: 7 Oct 2018, 1:43:17 UTC

Freedom as such could perhaps be defined by the Constitution, but except for still both hawks and doves, who are supposed to be making the Laws?

I think we sometimes could make it Rights as well, because your country has not seen any oppression since the Civil War, which should not be discussed further.

But rather watching a documentary here, for that of a lull in the session, and it became color videos showing Adolf Hitler emerging from poverty,
ending up a Dictator in central Europe, after expelling a couple of internal anniversaries first.

But rather a weird thought, for that of making it "Sitting Bull", for only a couple of Indians instead, and yet another story for only that of past or bygone time.

Perhaps the final outcome of any decision making could still be that of war and conflicts, because I was asking who are supposed to be making the Laws.

We could perhaps benefit for just make it a stable and free world, but supposedly such a world could be still based on such a thing as Rights, for also judiciary Laws.

If perhaps the other thing, or even more to it, perhaps rather a bit of science instead, for where such a thing supposedly belongs.
ID: 1958975 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 4776
Credit: 29,831
RAC: 37
Sweden
Message 1958980 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 1:31:47 UTC - in response to Message 1958969.  

Not even modernized and simplified the text in general?
We have. Last time in 2009.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Laws_of_Sweden#Amendment_of_2009
In 2009, the Riksdag approved Proposition 2009/10:80, "A Reformed Constitution" (Swedish: En reformerad grundlag), making substantial amendments to the Instrument of Government, and related acts.[2][3]
The amendment modernized and simplified the text in general, and strengthened several fundamental rights and freedoms
Well our first constitution is from about 1341. There are actually some of those laws still ruling but of course updated over time so people can understand them and also adapted to the current values of the time:)
https://mdvlnld.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/magnus-erikssons-landslag-in-holm-kb-b-6/
ID: 1958980 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1959068 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 14:53:50 UTC - in response to Message 1958974.  
Last modified: 7 Oct 2018, 15:20:58 UTC

We have never, excepting Alcohol Probation, reduced any Individual Rights because of the Passions of the Day.

Tobacco, helmets for cyclists, seat belts in cars, drugs, I disagree.
Frankly I do agree with these restrictions.

When have we reduced the Individual's Fundamental Right to Political and Social Speech, Freedom of Association, Freedom of the Press, et al.

Believing that the ability of Government to enforce Traffic and other Laws. Means the Government can also reduce or stop Individual Freedoms as enumerated in the Constitution by simply enacting a Law. Is... Well...

Another example of why those individual and other Rights enumerated in the US Constitution are neither old nor obsolete.

Edit: Yes, we had to endure Right Wing McCarthyism. As we now have to endure Left Wing McCarthyism, as exposed during the recent SCOTUS Hearings.

Our Rule of Law and our Constitution is why we have defeated and will defeat the above.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1959068 · Report as offensive
Profile Robert Waite
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 07
Posts: 2396
Credit: 15,795,324
RAC: 10,848
Canada
Message 1959128 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 20:57:38 UTC - in response to Message 1958969.  


Correct. We have included more and more regarding Individual Rights.

We have never, excepting Alcohol Probation, reduced any Individual Rights because of the Passions of the Day.

These Rights, enumerated in 1789, are fundamental to our liberty. They are neither 'old' nor obsolete.



Tell this nonsense to the untold numbers of federal prisoners doing time for possession of weed.
I do not fight fascists because I think I can win.
I fight them because they are fascists.
Chris Hedges

A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr.
ID: 1959128 · Report as offensive
Profile Clyde "Liberal" Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 15240
Credit: 45,292,474
RAC: 736
United States
Message 1959132 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 21:16:05 UTC - in response to Message 1959128.  
Last modified: 7 Oct 2018, 21:25:42 UTC


Correct. We have included more and more regarding Individual Rights.

We have never, excepting Alcohol Probation, reduced any Individual Rights because of the Passions of the Day.

These Rights, enumerated in 1789, are fundamental to our liberty. They are neither 'old' nor obsolete.



Tell this nonsense to the untold numbers of federal prisoners doing time for possession of weed.

Hi Robert,

When have we reduced the Individual's Fundamental Right to Political and Social Speech, Freedom of Association, Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of the Press, et al?

Believing that the ability of Government to enact and enforce Traffic and other Laws. Means the Government can also reduce or stop Individual Freedoms as enumerated in the Constitution by simply enacting a Law. Is... Well...

Another example of why those individual and other Rights enumerated in the US Constitution are neither old nor obsolete.

BTW: Yes, we had to endure Right Wing McCarthyism. As we now have to endure Left Wing McCarthyism, as exposed during the recent SCOTUS Hearings.

Our Rule of Law and our Constitution is why we have defeated and will defeat the above.

Sincerely, Clyde
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton
ID: 1959132 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 20858
Credit: 2,886,128
RAC: 1,370
Ireland
Message 1959137 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 21:53:15 UTC - in response to Message 1959132.  

Your monotonous tirade failed to answer the question asked of you.
ID: 1959137 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 9336
Credit: 24,599,576
RAC: 20,778
United States
Message 1959140 - Posted: 7 Oct 2018, 22:04:58 UTC - in response to Message 1959137.  

Of course.
ID: 1959140 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Kavanaugh


 
©2019 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.